Painful procedures and pain management in newborns admitted to an intensive care unit

Identification of Inflammatory Mediators in Saliva Samples From Hospitalized Newborns: Potential Biomarkers?

Saliva measurements serve as a noninvasive tool for clinically monitoring newborns (NB) and children, a vulnerable population with promising potential for both research and clinical practice. Saliva acts as a repository for various inflammatory biomarkers involved in diverse biological functions. Particularly for children, it offers numerous advantages when compared to plasma and urine sampling. Nevertheless, there is a significant knowledge gap regarding detectable levels of cytokines in the saliva of newborns and children, as well as studies aiming to assess the relationship of this content with physiological and pathological processes.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the levels of 11 inflammatory mediators (IFNg, IL1b, IL2, IL4, IL6, IL8, IL10, IL12, IL17, TNF, and VEGF) in saliva samples from NB on the first and second day of hospitalization in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).

METHOD

Exploratory study, descriptive, nested within a primary clinical, observational, and prospective study, conducted in the NICU of a public hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. Demographic data and vital signs were recorded in the clinical records of 90 NB, and five saliva samples from 5 NB were collected between the first and second day of life (D1-D2) at approximately 8-hr intervals (8-9 am, 4-5 pm, and 11-12 pm). Saliva samples were used for the measurement of 11 cytokines (IFNg, IL1b, IL2, IL4, IL6, IL8, IL10, IL12, IL17, TNF, and VEGF).

RESULTS

Five NBs participated in this exploratory study, and the vital signs showed variability from the first (D1) to the second day (D2) of hospitalization, variability similar to that of the total population of the primary study. The presence and levels of the 11 cytokines were detected in the saliva samples, as well as a statistical correlation between 10 cytokines (IFNg, IL1b, IL2, IL4, IL6, IL10, IL12, IL17, TNF, and VEGF) and vital signs.

CONCLUSIONS

The novelty of measuring inflammatory mediators in saliva samples from hospitalized NBs in the NICU is highlighted, providing support and new perspectives for the development of clinical and experimental research and an opportunity for developing and implementing new salivary biomarkers in different population segments.

Practice of immersion in hot water to relieve pain in neonatology: an integrative review

OBJECTIVES

to identify immersion use in hot water to relieve pain in newborns.

METHODS

an integrative literature review, carried out in the PubMed, VHL, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane and SciELO databases, with investigations in English, Spanish, French or Portuguese, published between 2002 and 2022. The Health Sciences Descriptors (DeCS) and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) were used to answer the following question: what are the uses of hot water immersion in relieving pain in newborns?

RESULTS

nine studies were included, mainly Brazilian, experimental, with a predominance of strong and moderate levels of evidence. Hydrotherapy and bath use (immersion and bandaging) was observed, promising interventions in reducing pain scores, assessed using scales, physiological and endocrine parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

hot water proved to be a promising non-pharmacological intervention in relieving pain in infants in different contexts.

From theory to practice: the inclusion of hospitalized children's families in painful procedures

OBJECTIVE

To understand nursing team professionals' strategies to include the family in painful procedures performed on hospitalized children.

METHOD

An exploratory-descriptive, qualitative study, carried out with nursing professionals. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, guided by a script of topics, transcribed and submitted to thematic content analysis, in the light of Symbolic Interactionism, discussed considering the Family-Centered Care philosophy assumptions.

RESULTS

Two central categories emerged, "Theoretical perspective: the family as a care agent in painful procedures" and "Practical perspective: experiences, challenges and strategies in painful procedures for family inclusion", with their respective subcategories.

CONCLUSION

Nursing professionals have theoretical knowledge about family inclusion in painful procedures based on the assumptions: Family-Centered Care: dignity and respect; information sharing; joint participation; and family collaboration. However, knowledge is not applied in clinical practice; consequence of the interaction between beliefs and attitudes unfavorable to family presence.

Pain management in hospitalized children: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To characterize pain management in hospitalized children.

METHOD

This is an observational, cross-sectional, retrospective and descriptive study of quantitative approach, carried out in a secondary hospital in the city of São Paulo, through analysis of 1,251 medical records of children admitted to the pediatric department. Data were tabulated and analyzed through descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 88.8% of children were assessed for pain with standardized instruments and 86% had analgesia prescribed. Among the assessments, 37.8% of the children had pain; of these, 26% had severe pain, greater in orthopedic conditions; 18.3% were not medicated, even with the presence of pain and prescribed analgesia; 4.3% had no analgesics prescribed; only 0.4% received non-pharmacological measures, and 40.3% had a report of reassessment. Professionals provided greater analgesia to children with surgical and orthopedic conditions compared to clinical conditions (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Pain management in hospitalized children is ineffective, from initial assessments to reassessments after interventions, with prioritization of medication actions guided by professional judgment in the face of pain complaints.

Manejo da dor em crianças hospitalizadas: Estudo transversal

RESUMO Objetivo: Caracterizar o manejo da dor em crianças hospitalizadas. Método: Estudo observacional do tipo transversal, com abordagem quantitativa, de caráter retrospectivo e descritivo, realizado em um Hospital secundário do Município de São Paulo, por meio de análise de 1.251 prontuários de crianças internadas na divisão pediátrica. Os dados foram tabulados e analisados por meio de estatística descritiva. Resultados: Um total de 88,8% das crianças foi avaliado para dor com instrumentos padronizados e 86% tinham analgesia prescrita. Dentre as avaliações, 37,8% das crianças apresentaram dor; dessas, 26% apresentaram dor intensa, maior nas afecções ortopédicas; 18,3% não foram medicadas, mesmo com presença de dor e analgesia prescrita; 4,3% não tinham analgésicos prescritos; apenas 0,4% receberam medidas não farmacológicas e 40,3% tinham registro de reavaliação. Os profissionais propiciaram maior analgesia a crianças com afecções cirúrgicas e ortopédicas em comparação às afecções clínicas (p < 0,05). Conclusão: O manejo da dor em crianças hospitalizadas mostra-se ineficaz, desde as avaliações iniciais até as reavaliações após intervenções, com priorização de ações medicamentosas guiadas pelo julgamento profissional frente a queixa álgica.