Celiac disease in first degree relatives of celiac children

Global Prevalence and Clinical Manifestations of Celiac Disease Among First-Degree Relatives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

First-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with celiac disease (CeD) are at high risk for developing CeD. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate CeD prevalence and clinical manifestations by analyzing studies that used the anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody test for screening.

METHODS

In this systematic review with meta-analysis, studies published in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus were searched up to January 11, 2024, using keywords related to CeD and FDRs. Random-effects models were used, with heterogeneity assessed using the Cochran Q test and the I2 statistic performed in STATA 18.

RESULTS

Of 8,764 studies screened, 34 studies involving 10,016 FDRs of patients with CeD were included. The pooled estimates for seroprevalence and the biopsy-confirmed CeD prevalence in FDRs were 11% (95% CI: 9%-13%) and 7% (95% CI: 6%-9%), respectively. Daughters and sisters had the highest prevalence rates at 23% and 14%, compared with sons and brothers at 6% and 9%, respectively. Regional analysis revealed the highest seroprevalence estimates in Hungary (24%) and Cuba (19%), while the highest prevalence of biopsy-confirmed CeD was reported in Serbia (16%) and the United States (15%). Abdominal pain (42%), bloating (39%), and flatulence (38%) were the most common gastrointestinal symptoms, while 34% of FDRs with CeD were asymptomatic. In addition, pallor was the most frequent nongastrointestinal symptom (54%).

DISCUSSION

Approximately 1 in 14 FDRs of patients with CeD is estimated to have CeD, with 1 in 4 daughters, 1 in 7 sisters, 1 in 11 brothers, 1 in 16 sons, and 1 in 20 fathers and mothers could be affected. Routine screening for FDRs could support early detection and management of CeD.

Prediction Models for Celiac Disease Development in Children From High-Risk Families: Data From the PreventCD Cohort

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Screening for celiac disease (CD) is recommended in children with affected first-degree relatives (FDR). However, the frequency of screening and at what age remain unknown. The aims of this study were to detect variables influencing the risk of CD development and develop and validate clinical prediction models to provide individualized screening advice.

METHODS

We analyzed prospective data from the 10 years of follow-up of the PreventCD-birth cohort involving 944 genetically predisposed children with CD-FDR. Variables significantly influencing the CD risk were combined to determine a risk score. Landmark analyses were performed at different ages. Prediction models were created using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, backward elimination, and Harrell's c-index for discrimination. Validation was done using data from the independent NeoCel cohort.

RESULTS

In March 2019, the median follow-up was 8.3 years (22 days-12.0 years); 135/944 children developed CD (mean age, 4.3 years [range, 1.1-11.4]). CD developed significantly more often in girls (P = .005) and in Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-DQ2 homozygous individuals (8-year cumulative incidence rate of 35.4% vs maximum of the other HLA-risk groups 18.2% [P < .001]). The effect of homozygosity DR3-DQ2/DR7-DQ2 on CD development was only present in girls (interaction P = .04). The prediction models showed good fit in the validation cohort (Cox regression 0.81 [0.54]). To calculate a personalized risk of CD development and provide screening advice, we designed the Prediction application https://hputter.shinyapps.io/preventcd/.

CONCLUSION

Children with CD-FDR develop CD early in life, and their risk depends on gender, age and HLA-DQ, which are all factors that are important for sound screening advice. These children should be screened early in life, including HLA-DQ2/8-typing, and if genetically predisposed to CD, they should get further personalized screening advice using our Prediction application.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN74582487 (https://www.isrctn.com/search?q=ISRCTN74582487).

Differences Between Familial and Sporadic Celiac Disease

BACKGROUND

It is not known if genetic background, characteristics at diagnosis, physical and psychological well-being, and adherence to a gluten-free diet are comparable between patients with familial or sporadic celiac disease. These issues were investigated in a follow-up study.

METHODS

Altogether 1064 patients were analyzed for celiac disease-associated serology, predisposing HLA-DQ, and non-HLA genotypes. Medical data were collected from patient records and supplementary interviews. Current symptoms and quality of life were further evaluated with the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), the Psychological General Well-Being questionnaire (PGWB), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires.

RESULTS

Familial and sporadic groups differed (P < 0.001) in the reason for diagnosis and clinical presentation at diagnosis, familial patients being more often screen-detected (26% vs. 2%, P < 0.001) and having less often gastrointestinal (49% vs. 69%) and severe symptoms (47% vs. 65%). The groups were comparable in terms of histological damage, frequency of malabsorption, comorbidities, childhood diagnoses, and short-term treatment response. At the time of the study, familial cases reported fewer symptoms (21% vs. 30%, P = 0.004) and lower prevalence of all (78% vs. 86%, P = 0.007), neurological (10% vs. 15%, P = 0.013), and dermatological (9% vs. 17%, P = 0.001) comorbidities. Dietary adherence and GSRS scores were comparable, but familial cases had better quality of life according to PGWB and SF-36. High-risk genotype HLA-DQ2.5/DQ2.5 was more frequent among familial cases, and four non-HLA SNPs were associated with familial celiac disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the greater proportion of high-risk genotypes, familial cases had milder symptoms at presentation than did sporadic cases. Worse experience of symptoms and poorer quality of life in sporadic disease indicate a need for intensified support.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Point of Care Tests for Diagnosing Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

GOALS

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the overall diagnostic accuracy of point of care tests (POCTs) for diagnosing celiac disease (CD).

BACKGROUND

Recently, POCTs for CD have been developed and are commercially available. Studies have reported significant variability in their sensitivity (70% to 100%) and specificity (85% to 100%).

STUDY

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE databases, and the Cochrane library through June 2017. Positive reference test was defined as villous atrophy along with positive celiac-specific serology and/or clinical improvement after gluten-free diet. Normal duodenal biopsy was defined as negative reference test. Bivariate random-effect model was used to present the summary estimates of sensitivities and specificities along with 95% confidence regions We assessed methodologic quality using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2 tool.

RESULTS

The pooled sensitivity and specificity of all POCTs (based on tTG or DGP or tTG+Anti-gliadin antibodies) for diagnosing CD were 94.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 89.9-96.5] and 94.4% (95% CI, 90.9-96.5), respectively. The pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios for POCTs were 16.7 and 0.06, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for IgA-tTG-based POCTs were 90.5% (95% CI, 82.3-95.1) and 94.8% (95% CI, 92.5-96.4), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The pooled sensitivity and specificity of POCTs in diagnosing CD are high. POCTs may be used to screen for CD, especially in areas with limited access to laboratory-based testing. Further research assessing the diagnostic accuracy of individual POCTs and comparing it with other available POCTs is needed.

Towards an individual screening strategy for first-degree relatives of celiac patients

Celiac disease (CD) is known to be more prevalent in first-degree relatives of patients. In this retrospective cohort study of 609 relatives between 1994 and 2016, we investigated the effect of sex, HLA type, and age at time of index celiac diagnosis. Pearson's chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used as statistical analyses. CD screening was carried out for 427 relatives (70%), resulting in a prevalence of 15%. HLA typing in 335 relatives showed HLA-DQ2/DQ8 positivity in 87.5%. In 63% of children and all parents, celiac disease was diagnosed at first screening. It was diagnosed significantly more often in females, HLA-DQ2 homozygosity, and children (all p < 0.05). In children aged 0-1 year at time of index diagnosis, celiac disease was diagnosed after consecutive screening in 58%, after 3.9 ± 2.5 (max 10) years (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Future screening policies for relatives of celiac patients should include retesting, especially in HLA-positive relatives younger than 10 years of age. In addition, one-time celiac-specific antibody testing alone could be sufficient to rule out the disease in adolescent siblings and parents of newly diagnosed celiac patients. What is Known: • Celiac disease is more prevalent in first-degree relatives of celiac patients (risk 3-12%). • HLA-DQ2 homozygous sisters/daughters are at highest risk (25%). What is New: • If younger than 10 years of age, repeated testing is necessary in HLA-DQ2/DQ8-positive first-degree relatives when celiac disease is diagnosed in a family. • One-time celiac-specific antibody testing alone could be sufficient to rule out the disease in adolescent siblings and parents of newly diagnosed celiac patients.

Current Paediatric Coeliac Disease Screening Strategies and Relevance of Questionnaire Survey

Coeliac disease (CD) is an autoimmune enteropathy triggered by the ingestion of gluten-containing grains in genetically predisposed individuals. Identification of CD in clinical practice is often difficult due to the manifestation of non-specific symptoms and signs, so a relatively significant proportion of CD cases remain undiagnosed. Timely detection of the disease is necessary to provide an appropriate approach to control of the disease treatment, in order to avoid potential complications. This is even more important in the case of children and adolescents, to ensure their proper growth and development. In this review, we discuss the data on the current strategies for CD detection among paediatric populations and the role of questionnaire-based discovery of CD cases in the area of interest. We assume that mass screening is a preferable strategy for finding CD cases within the paediatric population because this could uncover symptomatic, oligosymptomatic, and asymptomatic CD cases. However, under conditions of limited financial resources, screening for CD in risk groups, members of which can be identified using questionnaires, is essential. The pros and cons of CD screening in paediatric populations are presented. These depend on a number of situational criteria (cost-effectiveness, lack of awareness), but screening is designed to improve the detection of the disease and therefore improve the quality of life of patients.

Development of a Risk Score for Extraintestinal Manifestations of Coeliac Disease

The aim of this study was to identify indicators of coeliac disease (CD) in an Australian cohort, beyond the known gastrointestinal symptoms. Individuals were recruited from the general population and at the 2014 Gluten Free Expo in Sydney and in Melbourne, Australia. Data on their current health status including medical history, diagnosis for CD, and family history were collected. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of CD. A weighted risk score system was then generated for the independent predictors, and a risk score was calculated for each individual. A total of 301 individuals were included in the study. We found an association between CD and having a family history of CD (odds ratio [OR] 7.6, 95%confidence interval [CI] 3.7-15.6), an autoimmune disorder (OR 2.1, 95%CI 1.1-4.1), anemia (OR 5.8, 95%CI 2.8-11.9), lactose intolerance (OR 4.5, 95%CI 1.2-17.7), and depression (OR 4.8, 95%CI 1.9-11.6). Risk score analysis found individuals in the medium (OR 4.8, 95%CI 2.5 to 9.3) and high-risk (OR 36.6, 95%CI 16.4 to 81.6) groups were significantly more likely to report having CD compared with those in the low-risk group. This study identifies a set of factors more commonly observed in individuals with CD, beyond the traditional gastrointestinal complaints. These include a family history of CD, the presence of another autoimmune disorder, anemia, lactose intolerance, and depression. A risk score was developed (Coeliac Risk COMPARE) which scores individuals based on the presence or absence of these additional symptoms and provides an additional screening tool when assessing whether the patient requires follow-up testing for CD.

Risk of Celiac Disease in the First- and Second-Degree Relatives of Patients With Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

First-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with celiac disease (CD) are at high risk for CD and prevalence among them varies from 1.6 to 38%. The risk of having CD among FDRs if the FDR is sister, brother, mother, father, son, or daughter of index patient with CD is not known. We conducted a meta-analysis and calculated pooled prevalence of CD among FDRs, second-degree relatives (SDRs), and specific relations with index patient.

METHODS

On search of literature, 2,259 articles appeared of which 54 articles were included in this meta-analysis. Diagnosis of CD was based on standard criteria.

RESULTS

Pooled prevalence of CD was 7.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 6.3%, 8.8%) in 10,252 FDRs and 2.3% (95% CI 1.3%, 3.8%) in 642 SDRs. Pooled prevalence of CD was highest in siblings (8.9%), followed by offsprings (7.9%) and parents (3.0%). Female FDRs had higher prevalence than male FDRs (8.4% vs. 5.2%, P=0.047). While sisters and daughters of index patient had the highest risk of having CD (1 in 7 and 1 in 8, respectively), the risk was 1 in 13 in sons, 1 in 16 in brothers, 1 in 32 in mothers, and 1 in 33 in fathers. There were also differences in the pooled prevalence of CD in FDRs according to their geographic location.

CONCLUSIONS

Pooled prevalence of CD among FDRs is 7.5% and varies considerably with their relationship with the index patient. The risk of CD in FDRs also varies according to gender and geographical location.

Celiac disease in children from Madeira island and its prevalence in first degree relatives

CONTEXT

It is well recognized that celiac disease is an immune-mediated systemic disorder highly prevalent among relatives of celiac patients.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of celiac disease in a group of first degree relatives of celiac children, and to access the frequency of human leukocyte antigen HLA-DQ2 and DQ8 in celiac disease patients and their affected relatives.

METHODS

A survey was conducted of 39 children with celiac disease with follow-up in the Pediatric outpatient's clinic of Dr. Nélio Mendonça Hospital, in Madeira Island, Portugal. Were invited 110 first degree relatives to undergo serological screen for celiac disease with IgA antibody to human recombinant tissue transglutaminase (IgA-TGG) quantification. In all seropositive relatives, small intestinal biopsy and HLA typing was recommended.

RESULTS

HLA- typing was performed in 38 celiac patients, 28/74% DQ2 positive, 1/2% DQ8 positive and 9/24% incomplete DQ2. Positive IgA-TGG was found in five out of the 95 relatives, and CD was diagnosed in three of them. Three relatives had the presence of HLA-DQ2, two were DQ2 incomplete (DQB1*02).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of celiac disease among first degree celiac patients´ relatives was 3.1%, 4.5 times higher than the general Portuguese population (0,7%) witch reinforces the need of extensive diagnostic screening in this specific group. HLA-DQ2 typing may be a tool in the diagnostic approach.

A point-of-care test for facing the burden of undiagnosed celiac disease in the Mediterranean area: a pragmatic design study

BACKGROUND

We aimed at assessing the factors that can influence results of the dissemination of an already validated, new generation commercial Point-of-Care Test (POCT) for detecting celiac disease (CD), in the Mediterranean area, when used in settings where it was designed to be administered, especially in countries with poor resources.

METHODS

Pragmatic study design. Family pediatricians at their offices in Italy, nurses and pediatricians in Slovenia and Turkey at pediatricians', schools and university primary care centers looked for CD in 3,559 (1-14 yrs), 1,480 (14-23 yrs) and 771 (1-18 yrs) asymptomatic subjects, respectively. A new generation POCT detecting IgA-tissue antitransglutaminase antibodies and IgA deficiency in a finger-tip blood drop was used. Subjects who tested positive and those suspected of having CD were referred to a Celiac Centre to undergo further investigations in order to confirm CD diagnosis. POCT Positive Predictive Value (PPV) at tertiary care (with Negative Predictive Value) and in primary care settings, and POCT and CD rates per thousand in primary care were estimated.

RESULTS

At tertiary care setting, PPV of the POCT and 95% CI were 89.5 (81.3-94.3) and 90 (56-98.5) with Negative Predictive Value 98.5 (94.2-99.6) and 98.7% (92-99.8) in children and adults, respectively. In primary care settings of different countries where POCT was performed by a different number of personnel, PPV ranged from 16 to 33% and the CD and POCT rates per thousand ranged from 4.77 to 1.3 and from 31.18 to 2.59, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Interpretation of POCT results by different personnel may influence the performance of POC but dissemination of POCT is an urgent priority to be implemented among people of countries with limited resources, such as rural populations and school children.