Quantitative sensory testing in trigeminal traumatic neuropathic pain and persistent idiopathic facial pain

Psychological profiles and sleep quality differences between patients with persistent idiopathic facial pain and trigeminal neuralgia: a 7-year retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to identify differences in psychosocial profiles and sleep quality between patients diagnosed with classical trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP).

STUDY DESIGN

Archival data of 84 patients diagnosed with TN and 46 patients diagnosed with PIFP were used to compare pain interference, affective distress, anxiety and depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, and sleep quality measures using Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Significant differences between the 2 groups were determined using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), and chi-square analyses.

RESULTS

Anxiety symptoms were higher for patients with TN compared to PIFP. Both groups presented with clinically significant sleep disturbances (PSQI > 5). For patients who indicated past trauma exposure (n = 44), the TN group reported significantly higher post-traumatic stress symptoms compared with the PIFP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Anxiety symptoms were significantly elevated in the TN group compared to PIFP. For patients who indicated past trauma exposure, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms were greater for the TN group compared with the PIFP group. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol YEAR;VOL:page range).

Multimodal pain therapy for persistent idiopathic facial pain - a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain (PIFP) is a pain syndrome with missing evidence-based therapy recommendations. According to the biopsychosocial pain model, multidisciplinary pain treatment (MPT) offers a promising therapeutic option for chronic pain syndromes. MPT is an interprofessional treatment procedure, consisting of medical, physiotherapeutic and psychotherapeutic treatment units, which has not yet been studied in PIFP.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 25 patients with PIFP, who had been treated with MPT. Pain intensity on the numerical rating scale (NRS), perceived disability, habitual well-being, as well as anxiety/depression and stress scales were recorded. Moreover, the patients evaluated the efficacy of each type of the single therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

There was a highly significant decrease in the characteristic pain intensity. Also habitual well-being improved significantly, as did anxiety and depression. The perceived disability and stress also improved, but without statistical significance. Physiotherapy was rated as the most effective therapeutic unit. Among the medical measures, consultations took first place (40% of the participants). Nearly three-fourths of the patients (72%) would recommend MPT.

CONCLUSION

The present study shows beneficial outcomes in patients with PIFP following MPT. Patients evaluate physiotherapeutic treatment as particularly efficacious. Therefore, MPT can be considered as a therapeutic option in patients with PIFP.

Pathophysiology of Post-Traumatic Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain

Trigeminal nerve injury is one of the causes of chronic orofacial pain. Patients suffering from this condition have a significantly reduced quality of life. The currently available management modalities are associated with limited success. This article reviews some of the common causes and clinical features associated with post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain (PTNP). A cascade of events in the peripheral and central nervous system function is involved in the pathophysiology of pain following nerve injuries. Central and peripheral processes occur in tandem and may often be co-dependent. Due to the complexity of central mechanisms, only peripheral events contributing to the pathophysiology have been reviewed in this article. Future investigations will hopefully help gain insight into trigeminal-specific events in the pathophysiology of the development and maintenance of neuropathic pain secondary to nerve injury and enable the development of new therapeutic modalities.

Effect of neuropathic pain on sphenopalatine ganglion block responses in persistent idiopathic facial pain

OBJECTIVES

Management of persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP) can be challenging. Sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) has been the target for the interventional treatment of many facial pain syndromes. However, possible factors that may affect SPG block success are unknown. It was aimed to investigate the effect of neuropathic pain on SPG block outcomes in PIFP, which includes a heterogeneous patient group.

METHODS

All of the patients underwent fluoroscopy-guided SPG block with an injection of 40 mg of 2% lidocaine and 8 mg of dexamethasone. The patients were assigned to 2 groups according to existence of neuropathic pain determined with the DN4 questionnaire score: 19 patients with neuropathic pain (Group 1) and 15 patients without neuropathic pain (Group 2). Preprocedural and postprocedural Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 47.65 ± 6.50 years. The average pain duration was 52.95 ± 34.81 weeks. A significantly greater decrease was detected in the VAS scores at 1 week (p = 0.036) and 1 month (p < 0.001) in Group 1 when compared to Group 2. Moreover, the proportion of patients with >50% improvement in the VAS scores at 1 week (p = 0.012) and 1 month (P = 0.017) was significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2.

DISCUSSION

SPG block appears as a safe, effective, and rapid method to treat PIFP, especially in cases with neuropathic pain. Neuropathic pain may be a predictor for pain relief in interventional procedures targeting SPG in the treatment of PIFP.

Sensory characteristics and chronic facial pain conditions: Cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated patients with neuropathic, myofascial and other orofacial pain conditions according to the differences and similarities of the sensory profile, and the association between sensory findings and neuropathic or non-neuropathic conditions.

DESIGN

132 healthy controls were compared with 174 orofacial pain patients that were classified into three groups (neuropathic, masticatory myofascial and other orofacial pain condition) and evaluated with a systematized protocol of sensory testing. Data were analyzed with chi-quare and Bonferroni correction (categorical data), Student´s t test, oneway ANOVA, Tukey (quantitative features), Pearson´s coefficient for correlations and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Cold, olfactory and superficial pain thresholds were higher in the group of neuropathic facial pain compared with the other groups, and the highest vibratory thresholds were observed in the group of other orofacial pain conditions. Deep pain thresholds were statistically lower in the group with masticatory myofascial pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive sensory findings (eg. hyperalgesia) were more common in the group of patients with masticatory myofascial pain, supporting inflammatory systemic mechanisms, and negative sensory findings not restricted to the trigeminal nerve (eg. hypoesthesia, hyposmia) were more frequent in patients with neuropathic conditions. Non-classical neuropathic orofacial pains also showed sensory impairment from pain chronification and from the overlap with functional disorders.

Neuropathic orofacial pain: Characterization of different patient groups using the ICOP first edition, in a tertiary level Orofacial Pain Clinic

OBJECTIVE

To characterize patients with chronic neuropathic orofacial pain in accordance with the International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP first edition) criteria.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review of 108 patients was conducted. The most common categories observed were trigeminal neuralgia (TN) (25.9%), burning mouth syndrome (BMS) (11.1%), persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP) (26.9%), and posttraumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain (PTTNP) (26.9%); 9.3% of patients could not be categorized.

RESULTS

TN and BMS was more prevalent in the sixth decade, and PIFP and PTTN were more prevalent in the fifth decade. All categories showed female predilection. The pain in TN was predominantly episodic, described as "sharp shooting" and like an "electric shock," unilateral and affecting the V2 division, and with trigger zones in 50% of patients. Pain in BMS was predominantly constant and described as "burning," with the tongue being the most common site. Pain in PIFP and PTTNP was as follows: varied from constant to episodic; described as "burning," "sharp shooting," "throbbing," or "dull aching"; intraoral or extraoral; and mostly involving the V2 or V3 division.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to characterize patients with neuropathic orofacial pain using the new ICOP criteria. PIFP and PTTNP were most commonly misdiagnosed categories. Using diagnostic criteria will increase the understanding of this patient group.

Psychophysical evaluation of somatosensory function in oro-facial pain: achievements and challenges

AIM

This critical review describes key methodological aspects for a successful oro-facial psychophysical evaluation of the somatosensory system and highlights the diagnostic value of somatosensory assessment and management perspectives based on somatosensory profiling.

METHODS

This topical review was based on a non-systematic search for studies about somatosensory evaluation in oro-facial pain in PubMed and Embase.

RESULTS

The recent progress regarding the psychophysical evaluation of somatosensory function was largely possible due to the development and application of valid, reliable and standardised psychophysical methods. Qualitative sensory testing may be useful as a screening tool to rule out relevant somatosensory abnormalities. Nevertheless, the patient should preferably be referred to a more comprehensive assessment with the quantitative sensory testing battery if confirmation of somatosensory abnormalities is necessary. Moreover, the identification of relevant somatosensory alterations in chronic pain disorders that do not fulfil the current criteria to be regarded as neuropathic has also increased the usefulness of somatosensory evaluation as a feasible method to better characterise the patients and perhaps elucidate some underpinnings of the so-called 'nociplastic' pain disorders. Finally, an additional benefit of oro-facial pain treatment based on somatosensory profiling still needs to be demonstrated and convincing evidence of somatosensory findings as predictors of treatment efficacy in chronic oro-facial pain awaits further studies.

CONCLUSION

Psychophysical evaluation of somatosensory function in oro-facial pain is still in its infancy but with a clear potential to continue to improve the assessment, diagnosis and management of oro-facial pain patients.

Facial pain beyond trigeminal neuralgia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Trigeminal neuralgia is a well-known facial pain syndrome with several treatment options. In contrast, non-neuralgiform idiopathic facial pain syndromes are relatively rare, reflected by the fact that, until 2020, no internationally accepted diagnostic classification existed. Like trigeminal neuralgia, these non-dental facial pain syndromes need to be managed by neurologists and pain specialists, but the lack of pathophysiological understanding has resulted in an underrepresented and undertreated patient group.

RECENT FINDINGS

This work provides a brief overview of the most common primary facial pain syndromes, namely, the facial attack-like facial pain, which corresponds to attack-like headache, the persistent idiopathic facial pain (formerly 'atypical facial pain'), and trigeminal neuropathy. What these disorders have in common is that they should all be treated conservatively.

SUMMARY

On the basis of pragmatic classifications, permanent and attack-like primary facial pain can be relatively easily differentiated from one another. The introduction of the new International Classification of Orofacial Pain offers the opportunity to better coordinate and concentrate scientific efforts, so that in the future the therapy strategies that are still inadequate, can be optimized.

Challenges of Misdiagnosis and Suboptimal Treatment of Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain and Atypical Odontalgia: A Retrospective Multi-Centric Cross-Sectional Investigation

Purpose

To explore the challenges faced in the diagnosis and treatment of atypical odontalgia (AO) and other persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP).

Patients and Methods

This retrospective multi-centric cross-sectional study utilized clinical information (eg, clinical manifestations, history of consultations and treatments prior to correct diagnoses) from patients’ medical records. Their economic parameters were also extracted from medical insurance databases. Each variable collected was statistically analyzed. Differences of variables between AO and other PIFP were statistically tested.

Results

A total of 394 patients were included in this study. On average, the diagnostic delay was 34.8±14.2 months, a median of 7 consultations were performed prior to a correct diagnosis, and 5 ineffective prescriptions were issued. Patients with AO suffered from longer diagnostic delays than patients with other PIFP (38.4±14.3 months vs 31.6±13.4 months) and were more likely to receive invasive dental treatments (73.3% vs 4.3%). The median total cost of treatment for a single patient before correct diagnosis was 8506.3 yuan. Patients with AO spent more than patients with other PIFP (10,146.5 Yuan vs 3864.0 Yuan).

Conclusion

Patients with PIFP were frequently misdiagnosed and the length of diagnostic delay was observed to be long. Ineffective medications, unwarranted procedures, and unnecessary economic burden were imposed on the patients. Patients with AO are in a worse situation than patients with other PIFP. As significantly urgent and unsatisfactory results of misdiagnosis of PIFP have been reported in our study, more attention should be paid on the research and education in this field.

Chronic Facial Pain: Trigeminal Neuralgia, Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain, and Myofascial Pain Syndrome-An Evidence-Based Narrative Review and Etiological Hypothesis

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN), the most common form of severe facial pain, may be confused with an ill-defined persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP). Facial pain is reviewed and a detailed discussion of TN and PIFP is presented. A possible cause for PIFP is proposed. (1) Methods: Databases were searched for articles related to facial pain, TN, and PIFP. Relevant articles were selected, and all systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. (2) Discussion: The lifetime prevalence for TN is approximately 0.3% and for PIFP approximately 0.03%. TN is 15-20 times more common in persons with multiple sclerosis. Most cases of TN are caused by neurovascular compression, but a significant number are secondary to inflammation, tumor or trauma. The cause of PIFP remains unknown. Well-established TN treatment protocols include pharmacotherapy, neurotoxin denervation, peripheral nerve ablation, focused radiation, and microvascular decompression, with high rates of relief and varying degrees of adverse outcomes. No such protocols exist for PIFP. (3) Conclusion: PIFP may be confused with TN, but treatment possibilities differ greatly. Head and neck muscle myofascial pain syndrome is suggested as a possible cause of PIFP, a consideration that could open new approaches to treatment.

Aberrant pain modulation in trigeminal neuralgia patients

Objectives The present study attempts to understand the role of supraspinal nociceptive pain modulation in typical trigeminal neuralgia (TN) patients by using a conditioned pain modulation paradigm and estimation of plasma levels of two important neuromodulators; Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide and β-endorphin. Methods Twenty TN patients and 20 healthy, age and gender-matched subjects participated in the study. The participants' hot pain thresholds (HPT) were measured over their affected side on the face. Testing sites were matched for healthy controls. For the conditioned pain modulation their contralateral foot was immersed in noxious cold (5 °C) water bath (conditioning stimuli) for 30 s and HPT (testing stimuli) was determined before, during and till 5 min after the immersion. Plasma Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide and β-endorphin levels were estimated to understand their role in disease pathogenesis and pain modulation. Results Change in HPT during foot immersion was significantly higher in healthy controls compared to TN patients (p<0.0001). The changes recorded in HPT in patients, were significant only in 2nd and 3rd minute post immersion. While in healthy controls, the effect lasted till the 4th minute. The concentration of beta-endorphin was significantly lower in TN patients (p=0.003) when compared to healthy controls. Conclusions The results suggest that there is an impairment in supraspinal pain modulation also known as Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls in typical TN and that the reduced levels of β-endorphin may contribute to the chronic pain state experienced by patients.

Molecular mechanisms of painful traumatic trigeminal neuropathy-Evidence from animal research and clinical correlates

Painful traumatic trigeminal neuropathy (PTTN) may occur following major craniofacial or oral trauma, or may be subsequent to relatively minor dental interventions. Following injury, pain may originate from a peripheral nerve, a ganglion, or from the central nervous system. In this review, we focus on molecular mechanisms of pain resulting from injury to the peripheral branch of the trigeminal nerve. This syndrome has been termed painful traumatic trigeminal neuropathy (PTTN) by the International Headache Society and replaces previous terms including atypical odontalgia, deafferentation pain, traumatic neuropathy and phantom toothache. We emphasize the scientific evidence supporting the events purported to lead to PTTN by reviewing the pathophysiology of PTTN based on relevant animal models. Additionally, we briefly overview clinical correlates and pathophysiological manifestations of PTTN.

Quantitative Sensory Changes Following Gasserian Ganglion Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation in Patients with Medical Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Prospective Consecutive Case Series

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

 Microsurgical vascular nerve decompression and percutaneous ablative interventions aiming at the Gasserian ganglion are promising treatment modalities for patients with medical refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Apart from clinical reports on a variable manifestation of facial hypoesthesia, the long-term impact of trigeminal ganglion radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) on sensory characteristics has not yet been determined using quantitative methods.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 We performed standardized quantitative sensory testing according to the established protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain in a cohort of patients with classical (n = 5) and secondary (n = 11) TN before and after percutaneous Gasserian ganglion RFT (mean follow-up: 6 months). The test battery included thermal detection and thermal pain thresholds as well as mechanical detection and mechanical pain sensitivity measures. Clinical improvement was also assessed by means of renowned pain intensity and impairment questionnaires (Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, Pain Disability Index, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale), pain numeric rating scale, and anti-neuropathic medication reduction at follow-up.

RESULTS

 All clinical parameters developed favorably following percutaneous thermocoagulation. Only mechanical and vibration detection thresholds of the affected side of the face were located below the reference frame of the norm population before and after the procedure. Statistically significant persistent changes in quantitative sensory variables caused by the intervention could not be detected in our patient sample.

CONCLUSION

 Our data suggest that TN patients improving considerably after RFT do not undergo substantial long-term alterations regarding quantitative sensory perception.

Neuropathic Characteristics In Patients With Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain

Background

Persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP) is a subtype of painful cranial neuropathies and other facial pains. The involvement of neuropathic mechanisms in PIFP, however, remains controversial. Using the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire, the present study examined neuropathic characteristics in patients with PIFP.

Methods

The multi-institutional retrospective study collected the following clinical data from 205 consecutive patients with adult chronic pain: gender, age, BMI, diseases causing chronic pain, disease duration, visual analogue scale score of pain strength, and DN4 score. To compare neuropathic characteristics between PIFP and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), we selected patients with PIFP (n=19) and patients with PHN (n=33), and performing a case-control study in which each patient with PHN or PIFP was matched by age and gender (n=16 in each group).

Results

DN4 score was significantly lower in the PIFP group than in the PHN group before and after matching. The incidence when DN4 was ≥4 was 10.5% before matching and 12.5% after matching in the PIFP group, both of which were significantly lower than those in the PHN group before and after matching (66.7% and 75.0%).

Conclusion

Ten percent of the PIFP patients likely show neuropathic pain characteristics.

Identifying criteria for diagnosis of post-traumatic pain and altered sensation of the maxillary and mandibular branches of the trigeminal nerve: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to systematically identify criteria used to diagnose patients with trigeminal nerve injury.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review of the literature registered in the PROSPERO database. Inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with nerve injury of the sensory divisions of the maxillary or mandibular branches of the trigeminal nerve, with reported tests and criteria used for diagnosis and persistent pain or unpleasant sensation associated with nerve injury.

RESULTS

In total, 28 articles were included. Diagnostic tests included clinical neurosensory tests (89%), thermal quantitative sensory testing (QST; 25%), electromyography (7%), and patient interview (14%). Neuropathic pain was assessed by using the visual analogue scale (39%); patient use of neuropathic medication (7%); questionnaires, including McGill and PainDETECT (21%). Functional impact was assessed in 14% and psychological impact in 7% of articles. Methodology in performing clinical neurosensory tests, application of diagnostic terms and diagnostic grading of nerve injury was found to be inconsistent among the included articles, making direct comparison of results difficult.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations for assessment and diagnosis of trigeminal nerve injury have been made based on the best available evidence from the review. There is an urgent requirement for a consensus in diagnostic criteria, criteria for assessment, and outcome reporting among stakeholder organizations to improve knowledge in this field.

Oculofacial Pain: Corneal Nerve Damage Leading to Pain Beyond the Eye

The cornea is supplied principally by the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve and is the most densely innervated organ in the human body. Under normal conditions, the corneal nerve terminals incorporate sensors that monitor the thickness and integrity of the tear film, which are essential for meaningful vision. A disrupted tear film or direct noxious stimulation of these corneal nerves can produce discomfort or pain limited to the affected surface. Damage to these nerves can sometimes lead to a chronic neuropathic condition, where pain persists months following the initial insult, long after the nerves appear to have healed in the cornea itself following treatment. Neuropathic pain appears to persist indefinitely in a few patients.

Persistent idiopathic facial pain

Background

Persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP) is a chronic disorder recurring daily for more than two hours per day over more than three months, in the absence of clinical neurological deficit. PIFP is the current terminology for Atypical Facial Pain and is characterized by daily or near daily pain that is initially confined but may subsequently spread. Pain cannot be attributed to any pathological process, although traumatic neuropathic mechanisms are suspected. When present intraorally, PIFP has been termed ‘Atypical Odontalgia’, and this entity is discussed in a separate article in this special issue. PIFP is often a difficult but important differential diagnosis among chronic facial pain syndromes.

Aim

To summarize current knowledge on diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, pathophysiology and management of PIFP.

Methods

We present a narrative review reporting current literature and personal experience. Additionally, we discuss and differentiate the common differential diagnoses associated with PIFP including traumatic trigeminal neuropathies, regional myofascial pain, atypical neurovascular pains and atypical trigeminal neuropathic pains.

Results and conclusion

The underlying pathophysiology in PIFP is still enigmatic, however neuropathic mechanisms may be relevant. PIFP needs interdisciplinary collaboration to rule out and manage secondary causes, psychiatric comorbidities and other facial pain syndromes, particularly trigeminal neuralgia. Burden of disease and psychiatric comorbidity screening is recommended at an early stage of disease, and should be addressed in the management plan. Future research is needed to establish clear diagnostic criteria and treatment strategies based on clinical findings and individual pathophysiology.

Neuropathic orofacial pain: Facts and fiction

Definition and taxonomy This review deals with neuropathic pain of traumatic origin affecting the trigeminal nerve, i.e. painful post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy (PTTN). Symptomatology The clinical characteristics of PTTN vary considerably, partly due to the type and extent of injury. Symptoms involve combinations of spontaneous and evoked pain and of positive and negative somatosensory signs. These patients are at risk of going through unnecessary dental/surgical procedures in the attempt to eradicate the cause of the pain, due to the fact that most dentists only rarely encounter PTTN. Epidemiology Overall, approximately 3% of patients with trigeminal nerve injuries develop PTTN. Patients are most often female above the age of 45 years, and both physical and psychological comorbidities are common. Pathophysiology PTTN shares many pathophysiological mechanisms with other peripheral neuropathic pain conditions. Diagnostic considerations PTTN may be confused with one of the regional neuralgias or other orofacial pain conditions. For intraoral PTTN, early stages are often misdiagnosed as odontogenic pain. Pain management Management of PTTN generally follows recommendations for peripheral neuropathic pain. Expert opinion International consensus on classification and taxonomy is urgently needed in order to advance the field related to this condition.

Altered pain modulation in patients with persistent postendodontic pain

Persistent pain may follow nerve injuries associated with invasive therapeutic interventions. About 3% to 7% of the patients remain with chronic pain after endodontic treatment, and these are described as suffering from painful posttraumatic trigeminal neuropathy (PTTN). Unfortunately, we are unable to identify which patients undergoing such procedures are at increased risk of developing PTTN. Recent findings suggest that impaired endogenous analgesia may be associated with the development of postsurgical chronic pain. We hypothesized that patients with PTTN display pronociceptive pain modulation, in line with other chronic pain disorders. Dynamic (conditioned pain modulation, temporal summation) and static (response to mechanical and cold stimulation) psychophysical tests were performed intraorally and in the forearm of 27 patients with PTTN and 27 sex- and age-matched controls. The dynamic sensory testing demonstrated less efficient conditioned pain modulation, suggesting reduced function of the inhibitory endogenous pain-modulatory system, in patients with PTTN, mainly in those suffering from the condition for more than a year. The static sensory testing of patients with PTTN demonstrated forearm hyperalgesia to mechanical stimulation mainly in patients suffering from the condition for less than a year and prolonged painful sensation after intraoral cold stimulus mainly in patients suffering from the condition for more than a year. These findings suggest that PTTN is associated more with the inhibitory rather than the facilitatory arm of pain modulation and that the central nervous system has a role in PTTN pathophysiology, possibly in a time-dependent fashion.