HLA and malaria in four Colombian ethnic groups

Plasmodium falciparum malaria and the immunogenetics of ABO, HLA, and CD36 (platelet glycoprotein IV)

Plasmodium falciparum malaria has long been a killer of the young, and has selected for polymorphisms affecting not only erythrocytes, but the immunogenetics of three histocompatibility systems: ABO, human leukocyte antigen (HLA), and CD36. The ABO system is important because the original allele, encoding glycosylation with the A sugar, acts as an adhesion ligand with infected red blood cells (iRBC), thereby promoting vasoocclusion. The prevalence of blood group O, which reduces this cytoadhesion, has increased in endemic areas. Other adaptations which could mitigate A-mediated rosetting include weaker A expression and increased soluble A secretion. The role of the HLA system in malaria has been harder to verify. Although HLA-B53 and DRB1*04 may be associated with clinical outcome, HLA studies are challenged by numerous comparisons in this most polymorphic of systems, and confounded by increasingly heterogeneous populations. Certain HLA markers may also reflect linkage artefact with other malaria-relevant polymorphisms. HLA may be less important because the parasite predominantly invades a compartment which does not express HLA. Adhesion of iRBCs is also mediated by CD36, expressed on platelets, monocytes, and microvascular endothelium. CD36 on monocytes is involved in clearing iRBC, while CD36 on platelets and the endothelium may play a role in tissue sequestration. The genetics of CD36 expression are complex, and recent research is fraught with inconsistent results. The solution may lie in examining genotype-phenotype correlations, zygosity effects on differential tissue expression, or other mechanisms altering CD36 tissue expression. Carefully designed prospective studies should bridge the gap between in-vitro observations and clinical outcomes.

The role of MHC- and non-MHC-associated genes in determining the human immune response to malaria antigens

Individual susceptibility to malaria infection, disease and death is influenced by host genotype, parasite virulence and a number of environmental factors including malaria-specific immunity. Immune responses are themselves determined by a combination of host genes and environmental effects. The extent to which host genotype limits the spectrum of possible immune responses may influence the outcome of infection and has consequences for vaccine design. Associations have been observed between human major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genotype and susceptibility to severe malaria, but no similar associations have been observed for mild malarial disease or for specific antibody responses to defined malaria antigens. Epidemiological studies have shown that, in practice, neither T helper cell nor antibody responses to malaria parasites are limited by host MHC genotype, but have revealed that genes lying outside the MHC may influence T cell proliferative responses. These genes have yet to be identified, but possible candidates include T cell receptor (TcR) genes, and genes involved in TcR gene rearrangements. More importantly, perhaps, longitudinal epidemiological studies have shown that the anti-malarial antibody repertoire is selective and becomes fixed in malaria-immune individuals, but is independent of host genotype. These findings suggest that the antibody repertoire may be determined, at least in part, by stochastic events. The first of these is the generation of the T and B cell repertoire, which results from random gene recombinations and somatic mutation and is thus partially independent of germline genes. Secondly, of the profusion of immunogenic peptides which are processed and presented by antigen presenting cells, a few will, by chance, interact with T and B cell surface antigen receptors of particularly high affinity. These T and B cell clones will be selected, will expand and may come to dominate the immune response, preventing the recognition of variant epitopes presented by subsequent infections - a process known as original antigenic sin or clonal imprinting. The immune response of an individual thus reflects the balance between genetic and stochastic effects. This may have important consequences for subunit vaccine development.

Why do some African children develop severe malaria?

Malaria is still a major cause of death and severe illness among children in many parts of tropical Africa, but only a small proportion of children, perhaps 1-2%, who become ill with malaria develop severe disease. Why only, some children experience a severe or fatal attack is not understood clearly. In this article, Brian Greenwood, Kevin Marsh and Robert Snow review some of those characteristics of the parasite and the host that may influence the outcome of a malaria infection. Identification of the relative importance of the many factors likely to be involved is needed in order to develop rational strategies for the prevention of deaths from malaria among children in malaria-endemic areas.

Gradients of HLA diversity in South American Indians

Information concerning the HLA-A and -B loci was considered in relation to 3796 Amerindians living in 39 places in South America, data related to HLA-C being based on a smaller subset of 2989 persons distributed among 33 localities. Synthetic gene frequency maps were then constructed using principal-components analysis. Clearly significant longitudinal (principal component 1) and latitudinal (principal components 1, 2, and 3) clines were observed, most probably indicating ancient migration routes.

Common west African HLA antigens are associated with protection from severe malaria

A large case-control study of malaria in West African children shows that a human leucocyte class I antigen (HLA-Bw53) and an HLA class II haplotype (DRB1*1302-DQB1*0501), common in West Africans but rare in other racial groups, are independently associated with protection from severe malaria. In this population they account for as great a reduction in disease incidence as the sickle-cell haemoglobin variant. These data support the hypothesis that the extraordinary polymorphism of major histocompatibility complex genes has evolved primarily through natural selection by infectious pathogens.