[Clinical and comparative study of the image quality of 3 digital radiographic systems, E-speed film and digitalized film]]

The influence of number of line pairs in digital intra-oral radiography on the detection accuracy of horizontal root fractures

AIM

Line pairs are the unit for measurement of resolution and are related to the spatial quality of the system. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of number of line pairs in digital intra-oral radiography on the detection accuracy of horizontal root fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-four extracted single-root human teeth were used. Thirty-two had horizontal root fractures created and were mounted in dry human mandibles. The teeth were radiographed with two digital receptors: the Digora Optime (14.3 lp mm-1) and the Digora Toto (26.3 lp mm-1). Images were viewed under standardized conditions by 3 calibrated examiners using the respective dedicated software (Digora for Windows 2.6(®) and Scanora(®) ). Digora Toto(®) images were also evaluated through the Digora for Windows 2.6(®) software. The results were statistically analyzed based on the area under the ROC curve for each examiner.

RESULTS

Pairing Digora Toto(®) with Scanora(®) allowed for greater accuracy in horizontal root fractures diagnosis, while images acquired with that same system seem to lose accuracy when visualized with Digora for Windows 2.6(®) . Pairing Digora Optime(®) with Digora for Windows 2.6(®) resulted in the lowest accuracy for horizontal root fractures diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The higher number of line pairs and the consequent higher image resolution provided by the Digora Toto(®) system and its dedicated software seem to enhance the accuracy of horizontal root fractures diagnostic imaging.

Comparative analysis of the visualization of small files using digital and conventional radiography

The present work was designed to carry out a comparative analysis of the visualization of small files using digital and conventional radiographs. Forty maxillary molars inserted in human skulls were used; Maillefer K-files #06, #08, #10 and #15 were inserted in the mesiobuccal canals and measured at 0.5mm beyond and 1.5mm before the tip with 0.5-mm intervals, in order to allow five professionals to observe whether the files were at the limit, before or beyond the foramen when visualized on conventional radiographs taken on Insight Kodak film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA) and with the RVG digital system (Trophy). Based on the results obtained, the conclusions were: with the two systems it was possible to visualize #06 K-files in nearly 60% of the evaluated cases; for the others, #08, #10 and #15 K-files, visualization was higher with both radiographic systems, achieving 82% of correct visualization for #15 K-files with the conventional system. The differences between the results of the two systems studied - conventional (Insight film, Kodak F-speed) and last generation digital (RVG - Trophy) radiographs - were not statistically significant according to the Student's t test.