Early removal of nasogastric tube is beneficial for patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion

Complications After Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Meta-regression Analysis

CONTEXT

Radical cystectomy is considered a procedure of high complexity with a relative high complication rate.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically summarize the literature regarding the complications of radical cystectomy and the factors that contribute to them.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on complications related to radical cystectomy.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 3766 studies were screened, and 44 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Complications following radical cystectomy are quite common. The most common complications were gastrointestinal complications (20%), infectious complications (17%), and ileus (14%). The majority of complications occurring were Clavien I-II (45%). Specific measurable patient factors are related to certain complications and can be used to stratify risk and assist in preoperative counseling, while proper design of high-quality RCTs may better reflect real-life complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, RCTs with a low risk of bias had higher complication rates than studies with a high risk of bias, underlining the need for further improvement on complication reporting in order to refine surgical outcomes.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Radical cystectomy is usually followed by high complication rates, which affect patients and are, in turn, strongly associated with patients' preoperative health status.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to optimize patient recovery after major surgery. Our study was to examine the evidence of the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve patient outcomes after radical cystectomy.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data Sources

PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane from January 2005 to January 2021 without language restrictions.

Eligibility Criteria

Randomized and non-randomized controlled studies implementing ERAS measuring its interventions on rates of postoperative complications, 30-day readmission, length of stay (LOS) and bowel function after radical cystectomy.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two members of the investigating team independently selected studies and evaluated bias using the Cochrane collaboration tool. Meta-analysis of all comparative studies used inversed-weighted, fixed- effects models and random effects models to pool results. Publication bias was graphically assessed using contour-enhanced funnel plots and the Egger’s test of funnel plot symmetry.

Results

Fifteen studies were included in our meta-analysis; we observed that ERAS decreased the time for the first bowel movement (standardized mean difference [SMD]: –1.30, 95% CI −1.90 to −0.70, P<0.00001) and shortened the length of stay (LOS) ([SMD]: –0.49, 95% CI −0.77 to −0.20, (P < 0.00001)); however, 30-day readmission (risk ratio [RR]: 0.97,95% [CI] 0.73 to 1.28, P=0.52) and the overall postoperative complication rate (risk ratio [RR]: 0.98,95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 1.09, P= 0.41) showed no significant difference.

Impact of an oral nutrition protocol in patients treated with elective radical cystectomy: a long term follow-up

Background After radical cystectomy, delayed return of bowel function is relatively common. Although studies investigating on the best modality for delivering nutritional support to this patient group are limited, parenteral nutrition was standard of care in those patients at the urological ward of the University Hospitals Leuven. In 2015, we published the findings from our study conducted in patients undergoing elective regular radical cystectomy at the urological ward of the University Hospitals Leuven comparing the length of hospital stay in patients with early postoperative parenteral nutrition (n = 48) versus an immediate oral nutrition protocol (n = 46). It was demonstrated that the implementation of an oral nutrition protocol was associated with a significant reduced length of hospital stay (median [IQR] of 18 [15-22] to 14 [13-18] days (p < 0.001)). The sample size was however too small to investigate the impact of the oral nutrition protocol on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection, a common parenteral nutrition related complication. Objective To investigate the long term impact of an oral nutrition protocol on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection, duration of catheterization and the length of hospital stay. Method Retrospectively, before (parenteral nutrition group) and after the implementation of the oral nutrition protocol (since March 10th 2010), two cohorts of 549 patients who underwent an elective regular radical cystectomy were included. The incidence of a catheter-related bloodstream infection and the length of stay were compared. A central venous catheter was present in every patient, which is standard of care. Results Catheter-related bloodstream infection was reduced from 22 (4%) to 10 (1.8%) (p = 0.031). The median duration of catheterization was 10 [7-13] days for the parenteral nutrition versus 7 [7-7] days for the oral nutrition group (p < 0.001). The median length of stay between both groups, 20 [17-25] before versus 17 [14-21] days after the implementation of the oral nutrition protocol, also differed significantly (p < 0.001). Implementing the oral nutrition protocol resulted in a parenteral nutrition associated cost saving of €470 per patient. Conclusion This large follow-up study showed that the oral nutrition protocol is associated with a reduction in catheter-related bloodstream infection. Besides, postponing parenteral nutrition in favour of oral nutrition enhances recovery.

Does Postoperative Rehabilitation for Radical Cystectomy Call for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The aim of this review was to systematically compare the outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) with standard care (SC) after radical cystectomy. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies published until September 2017 which involved a comparison of ERAS and SC. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the outcomes of ERAS versus SC. Sixteen studies including 8 prospective and 8 retrospective trials met the eligibility criteria. A total of 2100 participants were assigned to ERAS (1258 cases) or SC (842 cases). The time to first flatus passage {WMD=-0.95 days, 95% CI (-1.50,-0.41), P=0.0006}, time until return to a regular diet {WMD=-2.15 days, 95% CI (-2.86,-1.45), P<0.00001} and the length of hospital stay {WMD=-3.75 days, 95% CI (-5.13,-2.36), P<0.00001} were significantly shorter, and the incidence of postoperative complications {OR=0.60, 95% CI (0.44, 0.83), P=0.002}, especially postoperative paralytic ileus {OR=0.43, 95% CI (0.30, 0.62), P<0.00001} and cardiovascular complications {OR=0.28, 95% CI (0.09, 0.90), P=0.03} was significantly lower in the ERAS group than those in the SC group. This meta-analysis demonstrated that ERAS was associated with a shorter time to first flatus passage, return of bowel function, and the length of hospital stay than SC in patients undergoing radical cystectomy, as well as a lower rate of postoperative complications, especially paralytic ileus and cardiovascular complications.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathways: Role and Outcomes in the Management of Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Radical cystectomy remains the gold standard therapy for the treatment of muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma, yet is accompanied by significant rates of perioperative complications and readmission. Enhanced recovery protocols aim to apply evidence-based principles of care to ameliorate the morbidity of this procedure by enabling better tolerance of and recovery from radical cystectomy. Multiple patient series have demonstrated the capacity for enhanced-recovery-after-surgery (ERAS) principles to improve outcomes among patients undergoing radical cystectomy through decreased incidence of gastrointestinal complications and decreased length of hospitalization without increased readmissions or overall morbidity. Opportunities remain for adoption of established ERAS principles.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Radical Cystectomy

Even with advances in perioperative medical care, anesthetic management, and surgical techniques, radical cystectomy (RC) continues to be associated with a high morbidity rate as well as a prolonged length of hospital stay. In recent years, there has been great interest in identifying multimodal and interdisciplinary strategies that help accelerate postoperative convalescence by reducing variation in perioperative care of patients undergoing complex surgeries. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) attempts to evaluate and incorporate scientific evidence for modifying as many of the factors contributing to the morbidity of RC as possible, and optimize how patients are cared for before and after surgery. In this chapter, we review the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative elements of using an ERAS protocol for RC.

Bladder Cancer Recovery Pathways: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery pathways, also known as fast-track protocols, have been adopted since the early 2000s by various surgical specialties with the goal of improving patient outcomes and reducing the cost burden of major surgery on the health care system.

OBJECTIVE

To review the scientific literature on the origin of enhanced recovery pathways, track the contemporary utilization of such practices for patients undergoing radical cystectomy, and analyze the available data regarding their effect on morbidity, mortality, and treatment cost.

METHODS

A literature search of multiple electronic databases was undertaken. Manuscripts including patients undergoing radical cystectomy were chosen based on predefined criteria with an emphasis on randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Strength of evidence for each study that met inclusion criteria was assessed based on the risk of bias, consistency, directness, and precision.

RESULTS

Database searches resulted in 1,236 potentially relevant articles. A total of 485 articles were selected for full-text dual review and 106 studies in 52 publications met the inclusion criteria.

CONCLUSION

The utilization of enhanced recovery pathways with the goal of improving overall patient morbidity and mortality is well supported in the literature, however standardization of implementation and adherence across institutions is lacking, and their direct efficacy on reducing preventable treatment related expenditures is unconfirmed.

Enhanced Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group Consensus View

CONTEXT

Radical cystectomy (RC) is associated with frequent morbidity and prolonged length of stay (LOS) irrespective of surgical approach. Increasing evidence from colorectal surgery indicates that minimally invasive surgery and enhanced recovery programmes (ERPs) can reduce surgical morbidity and LOS. ERPs are now recognised as an important component of surgical management for RC. However, there is comparatively little evidence for ERPs after robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). Due to the multimodal nature of ERPs, they are not easily validated through randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a European Association of Urology (EAU) Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) policy on ERPs to guide standardised perioperative management of RARC patients.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The guidance was formulated in four phases: (1) systematic literature review of evidence for ERPs in robotic, laparoscopic, and open RC; (2) an online questionnaire survey formulated and sent to ERUS Scientific Working Group members; (3) achievement of consensus from an expert panel using the Delphi process; and (4) a standardised reporting template to audit compliance and outcome designed and approved by the committee.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Consensus was reached in multiple areas of an ERP for RARC. The key principles include patient education, optimisation of nutrition, RARC approach, standardised anaesthetic, analgesic, and antiemetic regimens, and early mobilisation.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus represents the views of an expert panel established to advise ERUS on ERPs for RARC. The ERUS Scientific Working Group recognises the role of ERPs and endorses them as standardised perioperative care for patients undergoing RARC. ERPs in robotic surgery will continue to evolve with technological and pharmaceutical advances and increasing understanding of the role of surgery-specific ERPs.

PATIENT SUMMARY

There is currently a lack of high-level evidence exploring the benefits of enhanced recovery programmes (ERPs) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). We reported a consensus view on a standardised ERP specific to patients undergoing RARC. It was formulated by experts from high-volume RARC hospitals in Europe, combining current evidence for ERPs with experts' knowledge of perioperative care for robotic surgery.

Recommendations for the improvement of bladder cancer quality of care in Canada: A consensus document reviewed and endorsed by Bladder Cancer Canada (BCC), Canadian Urologic Oncology Group (CUOG), and Canadian Urological Association (CUA), December 2015

This initiative was undertaken in response to concerns regarding the variation in management and in outcomes of patients with bladder cancer throughout centres and geographical areas in Canada. Population-based data have also revealed that real-life survival is lower than expected based on data from clinical trials and/or academic centres. To address these perceived shortcomings and attempt to streamline and unify treatment approaches to bladder cancer in Canada, a multidisciplinary panel of expert clinicians was convened last fall for a two-day working group consensus meeting. The panelists included urologic oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, patient representatives, a genitourinary pathologist, and an enterostomal therapy nurse. The following recommendations and summaries of supporting evidence represent the results of the presentations, debates, and discussions. Methodology

Enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) in robotic cystectomy surgery. Review of current status and trends

Open radical cystectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy and urinary diversion is associated with a high complication rate. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy is increasingly performed in many urologic surgical departments in an effort to reduce surgical stress and decrease perioperative morbidity. Robotic cystectomy survival studies demonstrate similar oncologic outcomes compared to the open procedure. Enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) after major surgery are multimodal perioperative interventions to reduce surgical stress, complications, and patient convalescence. Evidence for different ERP interventions are currently mainly from colorectal surgery and recently adapted to major urologic operations including cystectomy. Guidelines for perioperative care after open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer were recently published, but these recommendations may differ when considering a robotic approach. Therefore, we look at the current evidence for ERP in both open and robotic radical cystectomy and the potential for improving ERPs in robotic cystectomy by utilizing a totally intracorporeal robotic cystectomy approach. We also present the Karolinska ERP currently utilized in totally intracorporeal robotic cystectomy.

Reduced length of stay in radical cystectomy patients with oral versus parenteral post-operative nutrition protocol

BACKGROUND

In Europe, parenteral nutrition is often used after radical cystectomy to avoid postoperative malnourishment. To the best of our knowledge, however, there is a paucity of data to conclude on the best modality for delivering nutritional support to this patient group.

OBJECTIVE

The parenteral nutrition policy was reconsidered and an oral nutrition protocol was implemented by the clinical pharmacist and evaluated in terms of length of stay, number and type of postoperative complications and parenteral nutrition avoided costs.

SETTING

A prospective interventional non-randomized before-after study was conducted. Regular radical cystectomy patients presenting without preoperative contra-indications for enteral nutrition were eligible.

METHODS

Postoperatively, in the control group, the parenteral nutrition policy from the ward was applied. Parenteral nutrition was initiated systematically and continued until the patient was able to tolerate solid food. In the interventional group, an oral nutrition protocol was implemented. Parenteral nutrition could be initiated if oral intake remained insufficient after 5 days. Main outcome measure The primary end point was postoperative length of stay. Secondary endpoints included the number of patients in whom the oral nutrition protocol was implemented successfully, as well as the number and type of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 94 eligible patients was assigned consecutively to the control (n = 48) and to the interventional group (n = 46). Baseline demographics were comparable. A significant reduction in median length of stay was associated with the oral nutrition protocol [18 days (IQR 15-22) in the control group vs. 14 days (IQR 13-18) in the interventional group (p < 0.001)]. In 40 out of 46 patients from the interventional group, the oral nutrition protocol was implemented successfully. The number and type of postoperative complications did not differ significantly. Implementing the oral nutrition protocol resulted in a direct parenteral nutrition infusion bag cost saving of approximately €512 and a reduction in hospitalization cost of €2,608 per patient.

CONCLUSION

The findings of our study showed that an oral nutrition protocol, when compared to the systematic postoperative use of parenteral nutrition, was associated with a decreased length of stay and costs in a regular radical cystectomy patient population.

Defining postoperative ileus: results of a systematic review and global survey

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of an internationally accepted standardised clinical definition for postoperative ileus (POI). This has made it difficult to estimate incidence and identify risk factors and has compromised external validity of clinical trials.

AIM

To clarify terminology of POI and propose concise, clinically quantifiable definitions.

METHODS

A systematic review extracted definitions from randomised trials published between 1996 and 2011 investigating POI after abdominal surgery. This was followed by a global survey seeking opinions of those who have published in the field.

RESULTS

Definitions were extracted from 52 identified trials. Responses were received in the survey from 45 of 118 corresponding authors. Data were amalgamated to synthesise the following definitions: postoperative ileus (POI) "interval from surgery until passage of flatus/stool AND tolerance of an oral diet"; prolonged POI "two or more of nausea/vomiting, inability to tolerate oral diet over 24 h, absence of flatus over 24 h, distension, radiologic confirmation occurring on or after day 4 postoperatively without prior resolution of POI"; recurrent POI "two or more of nausea/vomiting, inability to tolerate oral diet over 24 h, absence of flatus over 24 h, distension, radiologic confirmation, occurring after apparent resolution of POI". Concordance of the latter two definitions with survey responses were ≥75 %.

CONCLUSION

We have proposed standardised endpoints for use in future studies to facilitate objective comparison of competing interventions.