Nogourani MK, Janghorbani M, Khadem P, Jadidi Z, Jalali S. A 12-month clinical evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with and without etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in newly-erupted teeth.
J Appl Oral Sci 2013;
20:352-6. [PMID:
22858703 PMCID:
PMC3881784 DOI:
10.1590/s1678-77572012000300010]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2010] [Accepted: 07/08/2011] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives
The objective of this one-year clinical study was to investigate the effect of two
adhesive systems (Adper Single Bond, a two-step etch-and-rinse and Clearfil SE
Bond, a two-step self-etch system) on pit-and-fissure sealant retention in
newly-erupted teeth. This study compared the success of the sealants in mesial and
distopalatal grooves with and without these two adhesive systems.
Material and Methods
In a clinical trial, 35 children aged 6-8 years undergoing sealant placement were
recruited. This one-year clinical study scored 70 mesial and 70 distopalatal
sealants of newly-erupted permanent maxillary first molar, with a split-mouth
design. All children received sealant alone in one permanent maxillary molar
tooth. Children were randomized into two groups. One group received Self-Etch (SE)
bond plus sealant and the other group received Single Bond plus sealant in another
permanent maxillary molar tooth. Clinical evaluation at 3, 6 and 12 months was
performed and the retention was studied in terms of the success and failure.
Results
The success rate of sealant in the distopalatal groove, using SEB at 3, 6 and 12
months was 93.3% (95% CI: 68.0, 99.8), 73.3% (95% CI: 44.9, 92.2) and 66.7% (95%
CI: 38.4, 88.2), respectively. It was greater than that of the distopalatal groove
in SB group with a success rate of 62.5% (95% CI: 35.4, 84.8), 31.3% (95% CI:
11.8, 58.7) and 31.3% (95% CI: 11.8, 58.7), at the three evaluation periods. The
success rate of sealant in the mesial groove using SEB was 86.6% (95% CI: 59.5,
98.3), 53.3% (95% CI: 26.6, 78.7) and 53.3% (95% CI: 26.6, 78.7), while this was
100% (95% CI: 79.4, 100.0), 81.3% (95% CI: 54.4, 96.0) and 81.3% (95% CI: 54.4,
96.0) using SB, at 3, 6 and 12-month evaluation periods.
Conclusions
These results support the use of these two bonding agents in pit-and-fissure
sealants under both isolated and contaminated conditions. Further, SE bond seemed
to be less sensitive to moisture contamination.
Collapse