Overview of cancer-related anemia: focus on the potential role of darbepoetin alfa

Drug utilisation and cost considerations of erythropoiesis stimulating agents in oncology patients receiving chemotherapy: observations from a large managed-care database

OBJECTIVE

Erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) resource utilisation in cancer chemotherapy patients is of importance to managed-care organisations. To understand current real-world utilisation of ESAs, this study examined epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DARB) treatment patterns (dosing and treatment duration), dose ratio and ESA treatment costs.

METHODS

An analysis of medical claims data from January 2006 through to January 2008 was conducted using the PharMetrics Patient-Centric database of over 85 health plans. Patients included in the study were > or =18 years of age, had at least one cancer claim within 90 days prior to ESA treatment initiation, were newly initiated on EPO or DARB, received at least two doses, and were treated with concomitant chemotherapy (at least one chemotherapy claim during ESA treatment). Mean cumulative ESA dose was used to calculate drug cost (based on April 2008 wholesale acquisition cost) and dose ratio (units EPO : microg DARB).

RESULTS

A total of 4,111 EPO patients and 6,817 DARB patients met inclusion criteria and formed the study population. EPO-treated patients were slightly older (mean age: EPO 63.6, DARB 61.8, p<0.0001) with a greater proportion of women in the DARB-treated group (EPO 60.9%, DARB 64.1%, p=0.0007). The mean treatment duration was slightly longer in the EPO group (EPO 58.4 days, DARB 55.4 days, p=0.0019). The mean cumulative ESA dose administered was EPO 329,129 units and DARB 1,289 microg, resulting in a dose ratio of 255:1 (units EPO:microg DARB). Mean drug cost per treatment episode was significantly lower in the EPO group by $1,768 (EPO $4,321, DARB $6,089, p<0.0001). After controlling for covariates, the incremental cost associated with DARB treatment remained stable and statistically significant (adjusted cost difference: $1,806 per treatment episode higher for DARB patients than EPO, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study of 10,928 oncology patients receiving chemotherapy reported a dose ratio of 255:1 (units EPO:microg DARB) with 29% lower treatment cost in the EPO group. These findings are similar to those previously reported from published clinical trials and real-world utilisation studies.

Effect of darbepoetin alfa on physical function in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To study whether perioperative treatment with darbepoetin alfa (DA) improves physical performance following colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

Patients admitted for planned colorectal cancer surgery were randomized to receive either weekly placebo or DA 300 or 150 microg depending on the hemoglobin (Hb) concentration. Patients were assessed 10 days before, as well as 7 and 30 days after surgery for work capacity, postural sway, muscle strength, fatigue and quality of life (QoL). The primary outcome measure were the changes in patients' physical performance from preoperative to postoperative day 7.

RESULTS

Of 221 included patients, 151 were evaluable. Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. Patients receiving DA had a significantly better working capacity on day 7 (p = 0.03) and day 30 (p = 0.03) compared with the placebo group. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups on days 7 or 30 for fatigue, postural sway and QoL. DA treatment significantly (p < 0.01) reduced the decrease in Hb concentrations on day 7 and resulted in an earlier return (p < 0.01) to the preoperative Hb concentration compared to placebo treatment.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative DA treatment improved postoperative work capacity and Hb concentrations, but had no effect on postoperative fatigue, postural sway, QoL and muscle strength.

Dosing patterns, treatment costs, and frequency of physician visits in adults with cancer receiving erythropoietic agents in managed care organizations

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the dosing patterns and treatment costs of erythropoietic agents in adult (>or= 18 years of age) cancer patients newly initiated on epoetin alfa (EPO) or darbepoetin alfa (DARB) in managed care organizations.

METHODS

An analysis of US medical claims (30 million lives in over 35 health plans) in the period July 1, 2002-February 28, 2005 was conducted. Patients with >or= 1 cancer claim within 90 days prior to initiating EPO or DARB, and who received at least two doses of the same erythropoietic agent, were included in this analysis. Weighted average weekly dosing, cumulative treatment dose, associated drug cost, dosing frequency patterns, and the frequency of outpatient visits were evaluated. The EPO:DARB dose ratio, based on average cumulative treatment doses, was assessed.

RESULTS

5639 EPO and 2166 DARB patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The EPO group was older (EPO 59.1 years; DARB 57.6 years; p < 0.001) with a higher proportion of men (EPO 38.1%; DARB 33.1%; p < 0.001). Variable dosing frequency was observed with similar treatment durations for the two groups (days: EPO 55.6; DARB 57.7; p = 0.122). A dose ratio of 236:1 was observed (average cumulative dose: EPO 252 856 U; DARB 1072 mcg). Average drug cost was significantly higher in the DARB group (drug cost: EPO 3077 dollars; DARB 4674 dollars; p < 0.001). The average number of hematology/oncology outpatient visits per patient (visits: EPO 7.4; DARB 7.3; p = 0.676) and outpatient visits for hemoglobin determination (visits: EPO 6.7; DARB 6.4; p = 0.093) during treatment was similar between the two groups.

LIMITATIONS

The results were based on medical claims only. The absence of information on actual injection dates in pharmacy claims prevented their incorporation in the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the average cumulative doses, the EPO:DARB dose ratio was 236:1 (Units EPO: mcg DARB) with 52% greater drug cost in the DARB group. Despite the variable administration frequency observed between the two agents, the number of hematology/oncology outpatient visits was not different.

Cost-minimization analysis of darbepoetin alfa versus epoetin alfa in the hospital setting

PURPOSE

The cost of darbepoetin alfa versus that of epoetin alfa in a hospital setting was studied.

METHODS

The study was an observational, retrospective review of the hospitalwide use of darbepoetin and epoetin during hospital admissions beginning in the period from January 2003 through April 2003. After the identification from daily charge reports of patients who used at least one of the study drugs during an admission, charts were requested for review. Drug product costs were determined from hospital purchasing information. Material and labor costs were combined to estimate drug administration costs. Total costs were calculated as the sum of drug product costs and administration costs.

RESULTS

A total of 429 epoetin records and 80 darbepoetin records were included. The two cohorts were similar with respect to demographic characteristics. With respect to costs, the only significant difference between cohorts was in daily administration costs, which were lower for patients receiving darbepoetin. Sensitivity analysis found lower costs for darbepoetin only after the dose-conversion ratio (DCR) was increased to above 256.74 units:1 microg. The overall DCR based on the median daily dose of each drug was 244.90 units:1 microg.

CONCLUSION

A cost-minimization study in a hospital showed no cost difference between treatment with epoetin and darbepoetin.

Darbepoetin ?? as treatment for anemia in patients receiving chemotherapy: a single-center experience

We evaluated Darbepoetin alpha (Aranesp; Amgen), a novel erythropoietic protein, in patients who developed anemia while receiving chemotherapy. Seventy-five patients (median age 62 years, range 40-81 years) undergoing different cancer chemotherapy regimens were treated with darbepoetin alpha. Therapy was started if hemoglobin (Hb) levels fell below 10 g/dl or if symptomatic anemia developed. Treatment effect was evaluated after 4 weeks, 8 weeks and at the end of therapy (up to 12 weeks). If no increase in Hb was seen after 4 weeks, the dose of darbepoetin alpha was increased to 300 microg. Patients were questioned about fatigue and any change during treatment, with evaluation according to a four-point scale, where 0 = no fatigue and 3 = severe fatigue. We observed a treatment response in 54 of 75 patients (72%). Dose escalation was necessary in 30 of 75 patients (40%) and blood transfusions were required in 13 of 75 patients (17.3%). Response was observed in 32 of 43 patients (74.4%) who had a baseline Hb < 10 g/dl and in 22 of 32 (68.8%) patients who had a baseline Hb > or =10 g/dl. At baseline, 60 of 75 patients (93.3%) reported fatigue of grade 2 or 3, but at the end of the 12-week follow-up period, only 26 of 68 patients (38.3%) reported fatigue at these levels. We conclude that darbepoetin alpha is a highly effective and well-tolerated drug in the treatment of chemotherapy-associated anemia. Patients benefited both in terms of Hb levels and control of chemotherapy-related symptoms.

Considerations in Darbepoetin alfa Cost and Reimbursement: A Model for Pharmacy Managers

With health care administrators focusing on the financial aspects of patient care, pharmacy budget managers must be able to evaluate all financial implications of drugs under formulary review. Clinical considerations, dosing equivalency, direct and indirect costs, payer mix, and reimbursement level are issues that should be considered by a multidisciplinary team. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of darbepoetin alfa compared with epoetin alfa is presented as a model to help pharmacy budget managers address these issues and develop an evaluation of two high-cost drugs to determine which would be the better agent to have on their formulary.