Telithromycin-induced digoxin toxicity and electrocardiographic changes

Nortriptyline Cardiac Toxicity Resulting from a Probable Interaction with Telithromycin

Objective

To report a case of probable nortriptyline toxicity associated with a combination of telithromycin and nortriptyline.

Case Summary

A 50-year-old white woman was admitted to the hospital with new-onset palpitations after taking 5 days of telithromycin in combination with nortriptyline. On admission her electrocardiograph showed atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia. The patient was also hypotensive, with a blood pressure of 90/45 mm Hg. She had been taking nortriptyline 150 mg daily at bedtime for 10 years without complications. The final day of telithromycin therapy was completed, and nortriptyline was discontinued on admission. The tachycardia subsided with a dose of diltiazem.

Discussion

It is suspected that the cardiovascular symptoms observed in the patient are the result of nortriptyline toxicity caused by inhibition of CYP2D6 by telithromycin. Limited evidence shows that telithromycin may be an inhibitor of CYP2D6. An assessment of causation of the adverse effects using the Drug Interaction Probability Scale suggests a probable interaction between telithromycin and nortriptyline.

Conclusion

It is recommended that clinicians remain aware of possible interactions between telithromycin and known CYP2D6 substrates such as nortriptyline. Should telithromycin therapy be required, close monitoring of the potential adverse effects and/or plasma drug levels of patients taking interacting drugs is warranted.

Role of p-glycoprotein inhibition for drug interactions: evidence from in vitro and pharmacoepidemiological studies

OBJECTIVES

We determined in vitro the potency of macrolides as P-glycoprotein inhibitors and tested in hospitalised patients whether coadministration of P-glycoprotein inhibitors leads to increased serum concentrations of the P-glycoprotein substrates digoxin and digitoxin.

METHODS

In vitro, the effect of macrolides on polarised P-glycoprotein-mediated digoxin transport was investigated in Caco-2 cells. In a pharmacoepidemiological study, we analysed the serum digoxin and digitoxin concentrations with and without coadministration of P-glycoprotein inhibitors in hospitalised patients.

RESULTS

All macrolides inhibited P-glycoprotein-mediated digoxin transport, with concentrations producing 50% inhibition (IC(50)) values of 1.8, 4.1, 15.4, 21.8 and 22.7 micromol/L for telithromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, azithromycin and erythromycin, respectively. Coadministration of P-glycoprotein inhibitors was associated with increased serum concentrations of digoxin (1.3 +/- 0.6 vs 0.9 +/- 0.5 ng/mL, p < 0.01). Moreover, patients receiving macrolides had higher serum concentrations of cardiac glycosides (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Macrolides are potent inhibitors of P-glycoprotein. Drug interactions between P-glycoprotein inhibitors and substrates are likely to occur during hospitalisation.