Important antimicrobial dosing considerations for transitions of care: Focus on thrice-weekly dosing in hemodialysis

PURPOSE

The objective of this clinical review is to evaluate current literature and propose optimal dosing strategies for thrice-weekly postdialytic administration of select antimicrobial agents in individuals receiving chronic intermittent hemodialysis (iHD).

SUMMARY

The optimization of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) for patients receiving chronic iHD presents a prime opportunity for stewardship intervention. By utilizing the existing vascular hemodialysis access instead of inserting an additional peripheral catheter for antimicrobial administration, the risk for potential clinical complications (e.g. vein thrombosis, catheter-associated infections) can be minimized. In addition to vancomycin and aminoglycosides, literature evidence also supports the use of thrice-weekly cefazolin, ceftazidime, cefepime, ertapenem, and daptomycin given after dialysis sessions.

CONCLUSION

Optimal dosing strategies of antimicrobials during transitions-of-care are imperative, especially in those receiving OPAT with iHD. While different dosing strategies may exist for each antimicrobial agent, other factors such as the modality of hemodialysis and site/severity of infection should be considered when choosing the optimal dosing regimen.

Post-Dialysis Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in Patients Receiving Intermittent High-Flux Hemodialysis

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) are at increased risk of infection, which represents a leading cause of mortality in this population. The use of additional vascular access devices such as peripherally inserted central catheters to treat such infections should be minimized in patients with ESRD requiring IHD in order to mitigate complications such as infection and thrombosis and to maintain venous patency for hemodialysis access. Intravenous antimicrobial dosing following IHD has the advantages of avoiding additional access devices and providing convenience for patients and providers. Vancomycin, cefazolin, and aminoglycosides have historically been regarded as the primary intravenous antimicrobials administered with IHD given their relatively low cost, convenient dosing, and longevity of clinical use. Despite this, a growing body of literature is evaluating the use of an expanded list of antimicrobials that may be employed using post-dialysis dosing for patients requiring IHD; however, the available data are largely limited to pharmacokinetic studies and small cohorts of infected patients or uninfected subjects. Post-dialytic dosing of intravenous antimicrobials may be considered on a patient-by-patient basis after careful consideration of clinical, microbiological, and logistical factors that may influence the probability of treatment success. This document reviews and evaluates currently available information on the post-dialytic administration of an expanded list of intravenous antimicrobials in the setting of thrice-weekly, high-flux IHD.

Retrospective study on clinical efficacy and safety for daptomycin intermittent doses with or without loading dose in renal failure patients

This retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of daptomycin (DAP) intermittent doses and the effectiveness of DAP loading dose in renal failure patients received DAP intermittent doses. One hundred and ninety-seven patients received DAP for at least 3 days from 2014 to 2017. Clinical and microbiological outcomes and the safety were assessed. A total of 183 patients (93, 60 and 30 patients received DAP daily dose, every 48 h dose and thrice per week dose) were included. DAP intermittent doses, such as every 48 h dose (28.3%) and thrice per week dose (30.0%), showed significantly higher mortality rates than that of DAP daily dose (6.5%) (p = 0.0320). Especially for bacteremia patients, significantly higher mortality was admitted, compared with patients received DAP daily doses (p = 0.0160). Moreover, patients received DAP intermittent doses were admitted slower improvements of their inflammation after DAP therapy started, compared with patients received daily dose. Additionally, DAP loading dose for renal failure patients decreased their mortality and improved patients' inflammation early. Especially for patients received DAP thrice per week dose, they showed significantly lower mortality than patients received non-loading dose (p = 0.0306). Additionally, these clinical enhancements of DAP therapy with loading dose were admitted without any enhancements of its adverse effect risks, except alkaline phosphatase elevation, compared with non-loading dose. In conclusion, DAP intermittent doses showed poor clinical outcomes, compared with daily dose. Then, DAP loading dose would be better clinical option for patients received DAP intermittent doses.

Antibiotic Dosing for Critically Ill Adult Patients Receiving Intermittent Hemodialysis, Prolonged Intermittent Renal Replacement Therapy, and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: An Update

Objective: To summarize current antibiotic dosing recommendations in critically ill patients receiving intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy (PIRRT), and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), including considerations for individualizing therapy. Data Sources: A literature search of PubMed from January 2008 to May 2019 was performed to identify English-language literature in which dosing recommendations were proposed for antibiotics commonly used in critically ill patients receiving IHD, PIRRT, or CRRT. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All pertinent reviews, selected studies, and references were evaluated to ensure appropriateness for inclusion. Data Synthesis: Updated empirical dosing considerations are proposed for antibiotics in critically ill patients receiving IHD, PIRRT, and CRRT with recommendations for individualizing therapy. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review defines principles for assessing renal function, identifies RRT system properties affecting drug clearance and drug properties affecting clearance during RRT, outlines pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic dosing considerations, reviews pertinent updates in the literature, develops updated empirical dosing recommendations, and highlights important factors for individualizing therapy in critically ill patients. Conclusions: Appropriate antimicrobial selection and dosing are vital to improve clinical outcomes. Dosing recommendations should be applied cautiously with efforts to consider local epidemiology and resistance patterns, antibiotic dosing and infusion strategies, renal replacement modalities, patient-specific considerations, severity of illness, residual renal function, comorbidities, and patient response to therapy. Recommendations provided herein are intended to serve as a guide in developing and revising therapy plans individualized to meet a patient's needs.

Safety of high-dose daptomycin in patients with severe renal impairment

Background

Treatment options are limited for infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens. Daptomycin is a lipopeptide antibiotic with concentration-dependent killing characteristic and dose-dependent post-antibiotic effect. To achieve optimized pharma-codynamic effect, some experts advocated using a high dose of daptomycin (≥9 mg/kg) for severe infections. However, the safety of high-dose therapy in patients with renal impairment remains unknown. This study was aimed to evaluate the safety of daptomycin in patients with severe renal impairment.

Methods

This was a retrospective study performed by reviewing electronic medical records. Patients with severe renal impairment who were treated with daptomycin in a tertiary teaching hospital between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2016, were included for evaluation. The incidence rates of creatine kinase (CK) elevation between high-dose (≥9 mg/kg) and standard-dose (<9 mg/kg) groups were compared.

Results

Overall, 164 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 114 (69.5%) of them were on renal replacement therapy. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci were the most common pathogens (61.3%) of the patients with documented pathogens. The treatment success rate was 51.6% in the 91 patients with bacteremia. The average dose of daptomycin was 8.0±2.3 mg/kg, and 37 (22.6%) patients received ≥9 mg/kg. CK levels were followed in 108 (65.9%) patients. Significantly higher incidence of CK elevation was found in the high-dose group compared with that in the standard-dose group (10.8% vs 1.6%, P<0.05). Moreover, patients with elevated CK received a higher dose of daptomycin than those without (9.3±1.2 vs 7.9±2.3 mg/kg, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of CK elevation between patients treated with different dosing frequency or with the concurrent use of statins, fibrate, or colchicine.

Conclusions

In patients with severe renal impairment, high-dose (≥9 mg/kg) daptomycin therapy may result in a significantly higher incidence of CK elevation. More frequent CK monitoring is warranted to avoid potential harm in this population.

Daptomycin for a complicated urinary tract infection with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a renal transplant recipient

There is an increasing prevalence of urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by multiresistant gram-negative enteric bacilli such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase as well as Gram-positive enterococci whose vancomycin-resistance can be as high as 25%. We report on a 68-year-old Caucasian female with a UTI caused by a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, only tested to be susceptible to gentamycin, linezolid and daptomycin. Within a day after administration of the bactericidal daptomycin clinical and laboratory signs of infection regressed and graft function recovered. Our case suggests that daptomycin might be an effective alternative for UTI caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Daptomycin dosing strategies in patients receiving thrice-weekly intermittent hemodialysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal dosing regimen of daptomycin in patients receiving thrice-weekly hemodialysis.

DATA SOURCES

Literature was accessed via PubMed using the terms daptomycin and hemodialysis through July 2013. Reference citations from publications identified were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

English language articles meeting the search criteria were evaluated. Studies were included if they addressed either thrice-weekly or intradialytic daptomycin administration.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Daptomycin is approved for the treatment of bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other Gram-positive organisms. Rapid bactericidal activity and limited potential for drug interactions make daptomycin an attractive agent. However, the daptomycin prescribing information recommends dosing every 48 hours in patients receiving hemodialysis, which results in dyssynchrony of dosing and dialysis sessions every other week. Studies evaluating a dosing regimen of daptomycin thrice weekly, coinciding with dialysis, indicate that pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters are appropriate for therapeutic success. However, to maintain adequate serum drug concentrations throughout the 72-hour interdialytic period, an additional 50% of the dose should be provided to account for the longer interval. Intradialytic dosing, with the administration of daptomycin infusion beginning during the final 30 minutes of dialysis, may also require a dose increase. Limited clinical outcomes data have been reported, but no significant safety concerns have been identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of daptomycin doses thrice weekly on hemodialysis days appears to be both safe and reasonable. Doses should be increased preceding the 72-hour interdialytic period or if daptomycin is infused during dialysis.

Current use of daptomycin in cardiac surgery and postoperative intensive care

Infections due to multidrug-resistant pathogens have an increasing impact on patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Preoperative infections, such as endocarditis, and postoperative infections, including wound and device infection, influence patient outcomes. Special interest needs to be taken in patients admitted to cardiac surgical intensive care units, as these patients are at high risk for infections, particularly nosocomial pneumonia, catheter-related and wound infections. The increasing numbers of infections due to Gram-positive multidrug-resistant pathogens underline the necessity for newer antibiotics with bactericidal effects and a more favorable profile of side effects. Daptomycin, a lipopeptide antimicrobial agent with bactericide activity against Gram-positive organisms, has been successfully used in the treatment of complicated infections due to Gram-positive multidrug-resistant pathogens, especially regarding endocarditis, wound infections, device and catheter-related infections in intensive care units. In this review, the authors will summarize therapeutic potential of daptomycin in cardiac surgery and postoperative intensive care.

Brazilian experience in EU-CORE: daptomycin registry and treatment of serious Gram-positive infections

Objectives

To collect data about non-controlled prescribing use of daptomycin and its impact among Brazilian patients with serious Gram positive bacterial infection, as well as the efficacy and safety outcomes.

Materials and methods

This is a multi-center, retrospective, non-interventional registry (August 01, 2009 to June 30, 2011) to collect data on 120 patients (44 patients in the first year and 76 patients in the second year) who had received at least one dose of commercial daptomycin in Brazil for the treatment of serious Gram-positive bacterial infection.

Results

Right-sided endocarditis (15.8%), complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI)-wound (15.0%) and bacteremia-catheter-related (14.2%) were the most frequent primary infections; lung (21.7%) was the most common site for infection. Daptomycin was used empirically in 76 (63.3%) patients, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the most common suspected pathogen (86.1%). 82.5% of the cultures were obtained prior to or shortly after initiation of daptomycin therapy. Staphylococcus spp. – coagulase negative, MRSA, and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus were the most frequently identified pathogens (23.8%, 23.8% and 12.5%, respectively). The most common daptomycin dose administered for bacteremia and cSSTI was 6 mg/kg (30.6%) and 4 mg/kg (51.7%), respectively. The median duration of inpatient daptomycin therapy was 14 days. Most patients (57.1%) did not receive daptomycin while in intensive care unit. Carbapenem (22.5%) was the most commonly used antibiotic concomitantly. The patients showed clinical improvement after two days (median) following the start of daptomycin therapy. The clinical success rate was 80.8% and the overall rate of treatment failure was 10.8%. The main reasons for daptomycin discontinuation were successful end of therapy (75.8%), switched therapy (11.7%), and treatment failure (4.2%). Daptomycin demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile regardless of treatment duration.

Conclusions

Daptomycin had a relevant role in the treatment of Gram-positive infections in the clinical practice setting in Brazil.

[Daptomycin in Gram-positive bacterial infections in oncohematological patients and transplant recipients]

Gram-positive infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in oncohematological patients and transplant recipients. The most frequently isolated Gram-positive organisms are the coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp., and viridans group streptococci. Antibiotic resistance in these organisms is increasing and poses a challenge to clinicians. Daptomycin is rapidly bactericidal against a broad spectrum of gram-positive bacteria, including strains resistant to other drugs. The present article reviews some aspects of Gram-positive infections in these immunocompromised patients and provides a detailed analysis of experience with daptomycin in the treatment of these infections.