Regional anesthesia for cleft lip repair: a preliminary study

Use of Local Anesthesia in Adolescent and Adults Undergoing Cleft Lip Repair or Revision: A Systematic Review

ObjectiveThis study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of solely using local anesthetics for cleft lip repair and/or revision in adolescent and adult patients.DesignSystematic review.SettingClinical studies describing the use of local anesthetics in cleft lip repair procedures.Patients, ParticipantsA literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Inclusion criteria were studies focusing exclusively on local anesthetic techniques in adolescent or adult patients undergoing cleft lip procedures. Non-English studies, studies involving patients under the age of 10, or those undergoing cleft palate or other otolaryngological procedures were excluded. Risk of bias was addressed by using a modified Downs and Black checklist.InterventionsReview of local anesthetic use alone for adult and adolescent patients undergoing cleft lip repair or revision.Main OutcomesThe main studied outcomes were any reported general perioperative complications, the necessity of switching to general anesthesia, patients' self-reported pain during the surgery, wound dehiscence, wound infection, and the need for postoperative narcotics for pain control.ResultsThe included studies demonstrated consistent evidence supporting the sole use of local anesthesia for cleft lip repair and revision, with absence of wound dehiscence or infection. Most patients reported minimal to no pain and required no general anesthesia during the procedures.ConclusionsThe current literature supports the safety and efficacy of local anesthesia alone for cleft lip repair and revision procedures. This modality offers a promising approach in resource-limited countries where access to general anesthesia is often limited.

Narcotic Utilization After Cleft Lip Repair: Does Local Anesthetic Choice Matter?

To analyze whether the choice of intraoperative local anesthetic for cleft lip repair is associated with the amount of perioperative narcotic utilization.

Retrospective cohort study.

Hospitals participating in the Pediatric Health Information System.

Primary cleft lip repairs performed in the United States from 2010 to 2020.

Local anesthesia injected-treatment with lidocaine alone, bupivacaine alone, or treatment with both agents.

Perioperative narcotic administration.

During the study interval, 8954 patients underwent primary cleft lip repair. Narcotic utilization for unilateral (P < .001) and bilateral (P = .004) cleft lip repair has decreased over the last 5 years. Overall, 21.8% (n = 1950) of infants were administered perioperative narcotics for cleft lip repair, such that 14.3% (n = 1282) required narcotics on POD 0, and 7.2% (n = 647) required narcotics on POD 1.In this study, 36.5% (n = 3269) patients received lidocaine, 22.0% (n = 1966) patients received bupivacaine, and 19.7% (n = 1762) patients received both local anesthetics. Administration of any perioperative narcotic was significantly lower in patients receiving both lidocaine and bupivacaine than those receiving only lidocaine (P = .001, 17.5% vs 21.7%) or only bupivacaine (P < .001, 17.5% vs 22.9%). Narcotic utilization on the day of surgery was significantly lower in patients receiving both lidocaine and bupivacaine than those receiving only lidocaine (P < .001, 11.5% vs 15.1%) or only bupivacaine (P = .004, 11.5% vs 14.6%). Narcotic utilization on the first postoperative day was significantly lower in patients receiving both lidocaine and bupivacaine than those receiving only bupivacaine (P = .009, 5.9% vs 8.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

In children undergoing cleft lip repair, local anesthetic combination of lidocaine and bupivacaine is associated with decreased perioperative narcotic use compared to lidocaine or bupivacaine alone.

Utility of Regional Maxillary Nerve Blocks in Improving Cleft Palate Postoperative Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Palatoplasty procedures used to repair cleft palates are commonly associated with limiting postoperative pain. Regional anesthetic blocks have been utilized to improve pain outcomes and decrease opioid intake, yet additional data is needed to fully explore its utility in this setting.

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether ultrasound-guided suprazygomatic maxillary blocks (SMB) improve postoperative pain, postoperative opioid use, time to oral feeding, and length of stay compared with a palatal field block in cleft palate repair.

METHODS

In this retrospective chart review, 47 patients aged 9 to 25 months who underwent cleft palate repair between 2013 and 2020 were allocated into 2 groups: a control group where patients received only palatal local anesthetic in a field block fashion (N=29), and Maxillary block group who received ultrasound-guided SMB (N=18). Patients were matched by age and cleft Veau type. The primary outcomes were total postoperative morphine equivalent consumption, average pain scores, length of stay, and time to first oral feed.

RESULTS

Comparing field block versus SMB groups, there was not a statistical difference in the overall dose of postoperative morphine equivalent opioid administration (11.71 vs. 13.36 mg; P =0.483), average pain scores (5.78 vs. 5.27; P =0.194), time to first oral feed [17.21 vs. 14.48 h; P =0.407, 95% CI: (-3.85, 9.32)] or length of stay ( P =0.292).

CONCLUSION

The use of SMBs did not demonstrate a difference in the postoperative outcomes evaluated by this study. Further study is needed to define its utility in cleft palate repair.

Effect of bilateral infraorbital nerve block on intraoperative anesthetic requirements, hemodynamics, glycemic levels, and extubation in infants undergoing cheiloplasty under general anesthesia

Background

Inappropriate use of intravenous and inhaled anesthetics may be dangerous in infants undergoing facial cleft surgeries. This study primarily aimed to compare the effect of infraorbital nerve block on sevoflurane requirement in infants undergoing cheiloplasty. Intraoperative opioid consumption, hemodynamics, blood glucose levels, extubation time, and delirium were also compared.

Methods

This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was conducted in 34 infants undergoing cheiloplasty under general anesthesia. After induction, group A received bilateral infraorbital nerve block with 0.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and group B 0.5 mL saline. An increase in heart rate or blood pressure > 20% was managed by increasing sevoflurane by 2-2.5%, followed by fentanyl 0.5 µg/kg bolus. The chi-square test and independent-sample t-test were used where applicable.

Results

Demographics, duration of surgery, and intravenous fluids used were comparable between the groups. Compared to group A, patients in group B had significantly higher consumption of fentanyl (14.2 ± 4.4 µg vs. 22.1 ± 6.2 µg) and sevoflurane (14.2 ± 4.8 mL vs. 26.8 ± 15.6 mL). Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters were significantly lower in group A, the number of times increases in hemodynamic parameters occurred, and fentanyl supplemental bolus was required remained significantly lower in group A than in group B. Intraoperative glycemic levels remained higher in group B, and the extubation time was significantly shorter in group A than in group B (4.40 ± 1.60 min vs. 9.2 ± 2.18 min). Group A had a lesser occurrence of postoperative delirium.

Conclusion

Supplemental infraorbital block in infants undergoing cheiloplasty under general anesthesia resulted in significantly decreased anesthetic requirements and optimal hemodynamic and glycemic levels with faster extubation and lesser delirium.

World Cleft Coalition International Treatment Program Standards

OBJECTIVE

To present preliminary efforts to establish an internationally agreed set of minimum core practice and best practice guidelines, along with overarching principles to promote safe and comprehensive cleft care globally.

DESIGN

Representatives from 6 national and international organizations collaborated to form a World Cleft Coalition. Representatives met monthly/bimonthly to compile standards for safe, comprehensive, and sustainable cleft care. Outcomes were circulated within each organization and to a small subset of external constituents for feedback.

RESULTS

A series of overarching principles were established for those involved in International Cleft Treatment Programs, based on the experience of participating organizations. The overarching principles are followed by a structured and detailed Recommended Practice for Ensuring Safe, Comprehensive and Sustainable Cleft Care, which includes minimum core and best practice for the following areas: surgical safety, quality control, patient education, patient selection, patient follow-up, comprehensive care, partnership with the host nations and professionals, training and exchanges for sustainability, and local capacity building.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes aimed to provide a working document to define core principles for safe comprehensive cleft care, while balancing various levels of resources, geographic locations, appropriately trained health care professional specialists, and training limitations. The study highlights the process and benefits to a collaborative international working group not only to establish best practice but also to solicit and engage others in discussion of their experiences with building and supporting safe, high-quality, comprehensive, sustainable, worldwide cleft care.

Anaesthesia for cleft lip surgeries in a resource poor setting: techniques, outcome and safety

Introduction

Cleft lip and palate is one of the more common congenital malformation and the most common craniofacial anomalies in children. The treatment is expensive and requires specialised care. Access to this care in middle and low income countries is compounded by socioeconomic status of patients and their relation and also the inadequacy of expertise in medical personnel and infrastructure. Objective: the study aimed to review the techniques of anaesthesia used in a low resource setting in terms of the techniques, outcome, and safety.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of 79 cases done in a resource poor setting. Information regarding the patients, surgeries and modes of anaesthesia were retrieved from the case notes.

Results

A total of 62 patients were operated with incomplete cleft accounting for 37 (59.7%), complete 23(37.1%), and 2 (3.2%) as bilateral. Forty-six (74.2%) of patients had their surgery done with ketamine anaesthesia without endotracheal intubation, 14 (22.6%) had regional anaesthesia and 2 patients (3.2%) had general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that with careful planning and expertise, cleft lip repair can be done safely in resource poor setting.

Regional anesthesia for maxillofacial surgery in developing countries

Regional anesthesia in the maxillofacial region is safer and more efficient than general anesthesia when its indications are carefully considered. In addition, the majority of medical institutions in developing countries are not well equipped for proper anesthesia and elective surgery. In this review, we describe regional anesthesia and cutaneous nerve divisions in the maxillofacial region. In addition, we summarize detailed regional anesthetic techniques adapted for representative cleft lip cases in developing countries.

20 years of cleft lip and palate missions

Volunteer missions for cleft lip and palate (CLP) care in Indonesia (1991-1992), India (1994-2003), Bhutan (2005-2010), and Kenya (2011), took place always at the same Hospital in each country. Altogether over a thousand patients were operated using a conservative protocol: Safety first - no experiments. Five months and 5 kg were the basic rules. For the native doctors, training help for self-help was priority. In the announcements, patients with CLP were primarily addressed. Burns, contractions, tumors, and trauma-cases were the second priority. Fresh trauma was done in night shifts with the local surgeons in order not to interfere. Besides facial esthetics speech was the number one issue, following priorities fell into place. Cultural aspects played a certain role in the different countries and continents.

Minimally painful local anesthetic injection for cleft lip/nasal repair in grown patients

INTRODUCTION

There has been a recent interest in injecting large body and face areas with local anesthetic in a minimally painful manner. The method includes adherence to minimal pain injection details as well feedback from the patient who counts the number of times he feels pain during the injection process. This article describes the successes and limitations of this technique as applied to primary cleft lip/nasal repair in grown patients.

METHODS

Thirty-two primary cleft lip patients were injected with local anesthesia by 3 surgeons and then underwent surgical correction of their deformity. At the beginning of the injection of the local anesthetic, patients were instructed to clearly inform the injector each and every time they felt pain during the entire injection process.

RESULTS

The average patient felt pain only 1.6 times during the injection process. This included the first sting of the first 27-gauge needle poke. The only pain that 51% of the patients felt was that first poke of the first needle; 24% of the patients only felt pain twice during the whole injection process. The worst pain score occurred in a patient who felt pain 6 times during the injection process. Ninety-one percent of the patients felt no pain at all after the injection of the local anesthetic and did not require a top-up.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to successfully and reliably inject local anesthesia in a minimally painful manner for cleft lip and nasal repair in the fully grown cleft patient.

Intra and postoperative outcome of adding clonidine to bupivacaine in infraorbital nerve block for young children undergoing cleft lip surgery

Aims and Context:

To evaluate the efficacy of adding clonidine to bupivacaine in bilateral infraorbital nerve block for hemodynamic changes, requirement of opioids, volatile agent, and muscle relaxants intraoperatively and relief of pain postoperatively

Setting and Design:

Prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

Methods:

Fifty pediatric patients aged less than 24 months undergoing elective cleft lip repair were randomly allocated to two groups of 25 each. After tracheal intubation, group A received bilateral infraorbital nerve block with 1 ml solution of clonidine (1 μg/kg) and bupivacaine 0.25%, and group B received 1 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. Hemodynamic parameters, intraoperative requirement of volatile anesthetic agent, muscle relaxant, and analgesic were recorded. Pain was assessed postoperatively using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale till the first rescue drug was given.

Statistical Analysis:

Two sample unpaired t-test and the correlation r test.

Results:

The duration of analgesia from the time of administration of block in group A was 667.72 ± 210.74 min compared to 558.48 ± 150.28 min in group B (P<0.05).

Conclusion:

Addition of clonidine as an adjunct to local anesthetic significantly decreased the requirement of other anesthetic drugs and significantly prolonged the duration of postoperative analgesia without any adverse effects.

Primary repair in adult patients with untreated cleft lip-cleft palate

BACKGROUND

The authors have volunteered their services as plastic surgeons in several countries, such as Nepal and Cambodia. In these programs, the authors saw many adults with cleft lips or palates who could not have primary repair at the proper time. The purpose of this report is to discuss the primary repair of untreated cleft lips or palates in adult patients.

METHODS

Subjects were older than 17 years. In Nepal, primary repairs were performed in 129 adults with untreated clefts over the past 11 years. Unilateral cleft lips were repaired by rotation advancement with the small triangular flap method or the straight method with a small triangular flap. Bilateral clefts were repaired using a one-stage repair method. Cleft palates were repaired by a mucoperiosteal push-back or Furlow technique.

RESULTS

Differences between primary cleft repair for infants and for adults were as follows: (1) in adults, aggressive correction was possible, as maxillary growth was not a consideration; (2) correction of the anterior part of the nasal deformity was more difficult than in infants, as adults showed less elasticity and a more severe deformity of the nasal cartilages; (3) simultaneous palatoplasty should be chosen judiciously, as it is more invasive and results in higher morbidity; and (4) cheiloplasty under local anesthesia can reduce cost, time, and manpower.

CONCLUSIONS

These observations should be useful for the local and foreign surgeons who treat clefts in developing regions.