Neutralizing antibodies are associated with a reduction of interferon-β efficacy during the treatment of Japanese multiple sclerosis patients

The role of neutralizing antibodies to interferon-β as a biomarker of persistent MRI activity in multiple sclerosis: a 7-year observational study

PURPOSE

During interferon-β (IFN-β) therapy, up to 45 % of patients may develop neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), associated with a decreased efficacy of the drug. We investigated in a real-life setting the impact of NAbs on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes in a population of 567 IFN-β-treated relapsing-remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS) patients up to 7 years. We also evaluated NAbs' role as a biomarker of the persistence of MRI disease activity.

METHODS

Patients' sera were tested for NAbs' presence by cytopathic effect (CPE) assay every 6-12 months. MRI scans were performed every 12 months. Generalized hierarchical linear models accounting for within-patient correlation were used to analyze T1 gadolinium-enhancing and new T2 lesions. Moreover, further tests were carried out to assess the overall outcome difference from year 1 to year 7 according to NAb status and the possible interaction between NAb status and time of follow-up.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients (13.2 %) became NAb positive (NAb+) during the follow-up. Considering T1 gadolinium-enhancing (GD+) lesions, we observed a significantly higher incidence in NAb+ patients (52 %, p = 0.0091). Also for new T2 lesions, we found a higher incidence in NAb+ patients (50 %, p = 0.0075). The negative impact of NAbs on the MRI outcomes considered did not change during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our 7-year results show the negative effect of NAbs on MRI measures of disease activity and confirm their role as a surrogate marker of IFN-β treatment efficacy.

Long-term efficacy and safety of intramuscular interferon beta-1a: Randomized postmarketing trial of two dosing regimens in Japanese patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 years of treatment with intramuscular interferon beta-1a (IM IFN beta-1a) in Japanese patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, with an exploratory analysis of the impact of initial dose titration on tolerability.

METHODS

Japanese patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were randomized to receive IM IFN beta-1a at dosages of either 30mcg once weekly (full-dose group, n=50) or 15mcg once weekly for 2 weeks then 30mcg once weekly thereafter (titration group, n=50). Key outcomes included annualized relapse rate (ARR) at 2 years (primary endpoint), change in disability measured using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), safety, and tolerability.

RESULTS

The ARR (95% CI) decreased from 1.540 (1.381-1.718) at baseline to 0.371 (0.240-0.571) at Year 1 and 0.351 (0.244-0.503) at Year 2. EDSS improvements were apparent from Week 24; the mean change from baseline EDSS score (2.1) at Year 2 was -0.34 (P=0.004). The most frequently reported adverse events were influenza-like illness (92%), nasopharyngitis (57%), relapse of multiple sclerosis (51%), and injection-site reaction (30%). The overall incidence and severity of influenza-like symptoms were similar in the full-dose group and titration group; only 1 participant, in the full-dose group (2%), experienced severe influenza-like symptoms. However, the incidence of influenza-like symptoms was slightly reduced at earlier timepoints in the titration group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this 2-year study demonstrate that IM IFN beta-1a can be used effectively and safely in Japanese patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis for an extended period of time.

Evaluation of the impact of neutralizing antibodies on IFNβ response

IFNβ therapeutic action depends on a sequence of biological steps: i) the interaction between interferon beta (IFNβ) and its receptor (IFNAR) located at the cell surface of peripheral blood mononuclear cells; ii) activation of second messengers; iii) transcription of several genes containing specific ISRE regions (Interferon Stimulated Response Elements); and iv) synthesis of specific proteins. Although IFNβ therapy has improved treatment options of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), the long-term efficacy of IFNβs can be compromised due to the development of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). High titer NAbs develop in about 15% of patients; they abolish IFNβ biological activity and consequently the therapeutic action of IFNβ. Different IFNβ preparations carry different risks of developing NAbs, ranging from 3 to 28%. The risk of inducing NAbs must be considered in the selection of treatment. Guidelines for NAbs testing and the therapeutic decision in case of NAbs positivity have been established. NAbs positivity predicts MRI and clinical activity. Precocious identification of Nabs-positive patients and switch to alternative treatments can improve the percentage of responders and allow a better allocation of relevant economical resources.

Neutralizing antibodies and fatigue as predictors of low response to interferon-beta treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis

Background

The clinical impact of neutralizing antibodies against interferon-beta (NAb) is controversial. Their presence can lead to a decrease in interferon-beta (IFNβ) efficacy. Fatigue reported in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) may be associated with an unfavorable clinical course. We conducted a prospective multicentre study to assess the association between response to IFNβ, NAb and fatigue.

Methods

Patients with relapsing-remitting MS on IFNβ treatment were included. During the second year of treatment, the patients were analyzed for NAb status and non-response criteria to IFNβ (number of relapses ≥1 during the follow-up period, increase in the Expanded Disability Status Scale ≥0.5). The score on the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS pathological if score ≥35) was noted for each patient.

Results

Of the 176 patients included: 22.3% were NAb positive, 54.5% presented non-response criteria to IFNβ, and 57.4% had a pathological MFIS score. Fatigue was increased in NAb + patients (p = 0.0014) and they were more likely to present non-response criteria to IFNβ (p = 0.041) than NAb- patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of NAb was related to fatigue (p = 0.0032) and denoted disease activity in these patients (p = 0.026).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the impact of NAb on the non-clinical response to IFNβ. Fatigue assessment is an indicator of IFNβ responsiveness and a predictive biomarker of deterioration on patient’s neurological status.

Identifying responders and nonresponders to interferon therapy in multiple sclerosis

Interferon beta is a well established disease-modifying agent used for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Despite treatment, a relevant proportion of patients continue to experience clinical (ie, relapses, worsening of disability) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity. Early identification of responders and nonresponders to interferon beta is strongly recommended to select patients who need a prompt switch to another disease-modifying agent and to ultimately avoid accumulation of fixed disability over time. Detecting responders and nonresponders to interferon beta can be challenging, mainly because of the lack of a clear and shared clinical definition of response to treatment. Clinical features at the start of treatment should be considered as prognostic factors, but MRI parameters assessed during treatment, such as contrast-enhancing lesions or new T2-hyperintense lesions, may be sensitive markers of response to interferon beta. Quantitative scoring systems derived from a combination of relapses and MRI activity have recently been proposed as practical tools for use in the everyday clinical setting. Blood biomarkers, such as neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta and Myxovirus resistance protein A, provide further useful information for detecting responders and nonresponders to interferon beta. However, since the presence of neutralizing antibodies can only partially explain the nonresponse to interferon beta, biomarkers of interferon beta activity possibly related to the pathogenesis of the disease could represent a future step toward a tailored, long-lasting effective treatment against multiple sclerosis.

Immunological mechanism of action and clinical profile of disease-modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a life-long, potentially debilitating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). MS is considered to be an immune-mediated disease, and the presence of autoreactive peripheral lymphocytes in CNS compartments is believed to be critical in the process of demyelination and tissue damage in MS. Although MS is not currently a curable disease, several disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are now available, or are in development. These DMTs are all thought to primarily suppress autoimmune activity within the CNS. Each therapy has its own mechanism of action (MoA) and, as a consequence, each has a different efficacy and safety profile. Neurologists can now select therapies on a more individual, patient-tailored basis, with the aim of maximizing potential for long-term efficacy without interruptions in treatment. The MoA and clinical profile of MS therapies are important considerations when making that choice or when switching therapies due to suboptimal disease response. This article therefore reviews the known and putative immunological MoAs alongside a summary of the clinical profile of therapies approved for relapsing forms of MS, and those in late-stage development, based on published data from pivotal randomized, controlled trials.

Guidelines on the clinical use for the detection of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) to IFN beta in multiple sclerosis therapy: report from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Study group

Interferon beta (IFNβ) was the first specific disease-modifying treatment licensed for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, and is still one of the most commonly prescribed treatments. A strong body of evidence supports the effectiveness of IFNβ preparations in reducing the annual relapse rate, magnetic resonance (MRI) disease activity and disease progression. However, the development of binding/neutralizing antibodies (BAbs/NAbs) during treatment negatively affects clinical and MRI outcomes. Therefore, guidelines for the clinical use for the detection of NAbs in MS may result in better treatment of these patients. In October 2012, a panel of Italian neurologists from 17 MS clinics convened in Milan to review and discuss data on NAbs and their clinical relevance in the treatment of MS. In this paper, we report the panel's recommendations for the use of IFNβ Nabs detection in the early identification of IFNβ non-responsiveness and the management of patients on IFNβ treatment in Italy, according to a model of therapeutically appropriate care.