Add-on treatment with mitiglinide improves residual postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetic patients receiving the combination therapy with insulin glargine and sitagliptin

Starch digestibility modulation significantly improves glycemic variability in type 2 diabetic subjects: A pilot study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients, the reduction of glycemic variability and postprandial glucose excursions is essential to limit diabetes complications, beyond HbA1c level. This study aimed at determining whether increasing the content of Slowly Digestible Starch (SDS) in T2D patients' diet could reduce postprandial hyperglycemia and glycemic variability compared with a conventional low-SDS diet.

METHODS AND RESULTS

For this randomized cross-over pilot study, 8 subjects with T2D consumed a controlled diet for one week, containing starchy products high or low in SDS. Glycemic variability parameters were evaluated using a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System. Glycemic variability was significantly lower during High-SDS diet compared to Low-SDS diet for MAGE (Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions, p < 0.01), SD (Standard Deviation, p < 0.05), and CV (Coefficient of Variation, p < 0.01). The TIR (Time In Range) [140-180 mg/dL[ was significantly higher during High-SDS diet (p < 0.0001) whereas TIRs ≥180 mg/dL were significantly lower during High-SDS diet. Post-meals tAUC (total Area Under the Curve) were significantly lower during High-SDS diet.

CONCLUSION

One week of High-SDS Diet in T2D patients significantly improves glycemic variability and reduces postprandial glycemic excursions. Modulation of starch digestibility in the diet could be used as a simple nutritional tool in T2D patients to improve daily glycemic control. REGISTRATION NUMBER: in clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03289494.

Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin, sitagliptin, and linagliptin as add-on therapy in Chinese patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with dual combination of insulin and traditional oral hypoglycemic agent

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the three dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (vildagliptin, sitagliptin, and linagliptin) as add-on therapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)inadequately controlled on dual combination of insulin and metformin or acarbose.

METHODS

A total of 535 T2DM patients who failed to achieve glycemic control with insulin and a traditional oral hypoglycemic agent were randomized to receive vildagliptin, sitagliptin, or linagliptin. Body mass index, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting and postprandial plasma glucose (FPG and PPG), insulin dose, and adverse events were evaluated during the study.

RESULTS

The baseline HbA1c was 9.59 ± 1.84 % (vildagliptin group), 9.22 ± 1.60 % (sitagliptin group), and 9.58 ± 1.80 % (linagliptin group). At week 12 it was 8.16 ± 1.29 % (vildagliptin), 8.56 ± 1.96 % (linagliptin), and 8.26 ± 1.10 % (sitagliptin). The changes in HbA1c from baseline were -1.33 ± 0.11 % (vildagliptin), -0.84 ± 0.08 % (sitagliptin) and -0.81 ± 0.08 % (linagliptin), the vildagliptin group had the greatest reduction in HbA1c (P < 0.05). The proportions of patients that reached target HbA1c were 66.27 % (vildagliptin), 52.73 % (sitagliptin), and 55.49 % (linagliptin), the vildagliptin group had the highest one (P < 0.05). The baseline FPG and PPG values in the three groups were at the same level. At week 12, mean FPG levels in the vildagliptin (7.31 ± 1.50 mmol/L) and linagliptin (6.90 ± 1.55 mmol/L) groups were significantly lower than in the sitagliptin group (8.02 ± 4.48 mmol/L; P < 0.05); the linagliptin group had the lowest mean PPG followed by the vildagliptin group which was also significant lower (P = 0.000) than the sitagliptin group. Additionally, the required insulin dosage in the vildagliptin group was the lowest among the groups at weeks 6 and 12. Only mild AEs were reported during the study.

CONCLUSION

The three DPP-4 inhibitors appear to be effective and safe as add-on therapy for T2DM patients on dual combination of insulin and a traditional OHA. Vildagliptin was more effective in decreasing insulin requirement and achieving glycemic control when compared to the other two.