Meta-analysis Exploring the Effectiveness of S-1-Based Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

S-1 plus cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis (PRISMA) of randomized control trials

INTRODUCTION

The present study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus cisplatin as concurrent chemoradiation (experimental group [EG]) compared with standard concurrent chemoradiation regimens (control group[CG]) in patients with local advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

The Cochrane library, pubmed, and Ovid (elsevier) were retrieved. The included randomized controlled trials (RCT) were evaluated, and the statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Cochrane handbook was applied to evaluate the methodological quality. Statistical significance was considered as P <.05.

RESULTS

There were 5 randomized control trials identified eligible for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of the pooled date suggested that overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.58-1.13; P = .21, heterogeneity P = 1.00, I = 0%), progressives free survival (PFS) (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.62-1.09; P = .18, heterogeneity P = .83, I = 0%) and 1,2,3-year OS (1-year OS: RR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.92-1.15, p = 0.59), (2-year OS: RR 1.14; 95% CI: 0.98-1.34, P = .09), (3 -year OS: RR 1.14; 95% CI: 0.90-1.44, P = .29) were not significantly different. The combination of S-1 and cisplatin had lower grade 3 or 4 leukocytopenia, neutropenia, (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.38-0.75, P = .0003; RR = 0.23,95% CI: 0.14-0.36, P <.00001;, respectively). The rates of nausea, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, pneumonitis, anorexia, anemia, febrile neutropenia were much the same in the 2 groups (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.68-2.68, P = .38; RR = 1.85, 95% CI: 0.61-5.60, P = .28; RR = 1.67, 95% CI: 0.88-3.17, P = .12; RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.44-3.21, P = .73; RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.68-2.68, P = .38; RR = 0.86, 95% CI:0.55-1.34, P = .50; RR = 0.63, 95% CI:0.35-1.14, P = .13;, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis of 5 randomized control trails demonstrates that EG results similar OS, PFS, and 1,2,3-year OS, compared with CG, with lower risk of leukocytopenia, neutropenia.

Meta-analysis for the efficacy of S-1-based regimens as the first-line treatment in Asian chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

AIM

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety for S-1-based regimens as the first-line treatment in Asian chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included, of which data were extracted by inclusion criteria and exclusion one. Odds ratio and hazard ratio (HR) of outcomes including objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse effects (AEs) were explored for the final analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-one RCTs including 3263 patients were fit into the analysis. Pooled HR for PFS was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.92-1.10; p = 0.88), the pooled HR for OS was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.85-1.06; p = 0.33) and the pooled odds ratio for ORR was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.61-0.90; p = 0.003). S-1-based regimens showed milder AEs in high-grade nausea/vomit, anorexia, leukopenia, neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The present study has revealed that S-1-based regimens are accompanied by the similar efficacy and slighter AEs compared with standard regimens as the first-line treatment in Asian chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.