Cellular stress and redox activity proteins are involved in gastric carcinogenesis associated with Helicobacter pylori infection expressing high levels of thioredoxin-1

From ubiquity to specificity: The diverse functions of bacterial thioredoxin systems

The thioredoxin (Trx) system, found universally, is responsible for the regeneration of reversibly oxidized protein thiols in living cells. This system is made up of a Trx and a Trx reductase, and it plays a central role in maintaining thiol-based redox homeostasis by reducing oxidized protein thiols, such as disulfide bonds in proteins. Some Trxs also possess a chaperone function that is independent of thiol-disulfide exchange, in addition to their thiol-disulfide reductase activity. These two activities of the Trx system are involved in numerous physiological processes in bacteria. This review describes the diverse physiological roles of the Trx system that have emerged throughout bacterial evolution. The Trx system is essential for responding to oxidative and nitrosative stress. Beyond this primary function, the Trx system also participates in redox regulation and signal transduction, and in controlling metabolism, motility, biofilm formation, and virulence. This range of functions has evolved alongside the diversity of bacterial lifestyles and their specific constraints. This evolution can be characterized by the multiplication of the systems and by the specialization of cofactors or targets to adapt to the constraints of atypical lifestyles, such as photosynthesis, insect endosymbiosis, or spore-forming bacteria.

Reactive oxygen species and gastric carcinogenesis: The complex interaction between Helicobacter pylori and host

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a highly successful human pathogen that colonizes stomach in around 50% of the global population. The colonization of bacterium induces an inflammatory response and a substantial rise in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), mostly derived from host neutrophils and gastric epithelial cells, which play a crucial role in combating bacterial infections. However, H. pylori has developed various strategies to quench the deleterious effects of ROS, including the production of antioxidant enzymes, antioxidant proteins as well as blocking the generation of oxidants. The host's inability to eliminate H. pylori infection results in persistent ROS production. Notably, excessive ROS can disrupt the intracellular signal transduction and biological processes of the host, incurring chronic inflammation and cellular damage, such as DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, and protein oxidation. Markedly, the sustained inflammatory response and oxidative stress during H. pylori infection are major risk factor for gastric carcinogenesis. In this context, we summarize the literature on H. pylori infection-induced ROS production, the strategies used by H. pylori to counteract the host response, and subsequent host damage and gastric carcinogenesis.

Helicobacter pylori Thioredoxin1 May Play a Highly Pathogenic Role via the IL6/STAT3 Pathway

Background

Recent studies have shown that CagA is considered highly pathogenic to helicobacter pylori (HP) in Western populations. However, in East Asia, CagA positive HP can be up to 90%, but not all patients will lead to gastric cancer. Our research group has found that HP thioredoxin1 (Trx1) may be a marker of high pathogenicity. Here, we investigate whether HP Trx1 exerts high pathogenicity and its internal molecular mechanism.

Materials and Methods

We constructed the coculture system of high-Trx1 HP and low-Trx1 HP strains with gastric epithelial cell lines separately and detected the influence of HP strains. The cells were stained by AM/PI, and the cell's mortality was assessed by fluorescence microscope. The cell's supernatants or precipitates were collected to detect the expression of IL6. In addition, the cell's precipitates were collected, and the expression of p-STAT3 was detected by western blot. Furthermore, the cell's supernatants were collected for detecting the expression of 8-OHDG to investigate the extent of DNA damage.

Results

The high-Trx1 HP can cause higher mortality of GES-1 cells compared with the low-Trx1 HP group (high-Trx1 HP (4.53 ± 0.56) %, low-Trx1 HP (0.39 ± 0.10) %, P < 0.001). The mRNA and protein level of IL-6 in AGS and GES-1 cells were increased during HP infection, and the expression of IL-6 in the High-Trx1 HP group was much higher than the low-Trx1 HP group. Besides, the expression of p-STAT3 was higher in the HP-positive gastric mucosa. And the expression of p-STAT3 in the high-Trx1 HP group was significantly upregulated compared with the low-Trx1 HP group. Furthermore, the expression of 8-OHDG in the high-Trx1 group was much higher than the low-Trx1 group (high-Trx1 HP (5.47 ± 1.73) ng/ml, low-Trx1 HP (2.89 ± 1.72) ng/ml, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

HP Trx1 may play as a marker of high pathogenicity, and the high-Trx1 HP could mediate the pathogenic process of HP infection via the IL6/STAT3 pathway.

Malic enzyme 1 (ME1) is a potential oncogene in gastric cancer cells and is associated with poor survival of gastric cancer patients

Background and objective

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide. However, the mechanisms associated with this disease are still not clear. Malic enzyme 1 (ME1) is a metabolic enzyme that is overexpressed in various cancers. Here, we examined whether it is involved in gastric cancer.

Methods

ME1 expression was knocked down in the gastric cancer cell line SGC7901. Cell growth and migration were measured using a real-time microelectronic cell sensor system. Cell invasion was measured using a Transwell assay. Cell cycle analysis was also performed to examine cell cycle arrest. A gastric cancer tissue microarray of gastric cancer was stained using immunohistochemistry. ME1 expression levels were also statistically analysed.

Results

ME1 knockdown in gastric cancer SGC7901 cells significantly inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. Cell cycle arrest was induced in the G2 phase. Further, ME1 expression was significantly correlated with gastric cancer patient prognosis based on both univariable and multivariable survival analysis. No significant difference was found between ME1 expression in gastric cancer tissues and that in adjacent tissues.

Conclusion

Our results provide evidence that ME1 is a key factor for gastric cancer. ME1 might be pro-oncogenic during both the development and migration of gastric cancer; it also might be related to gastric cancer patient survival.