Expression of adhesion molecules on CD34(+) cells in peripheral blood of non-hodgkin's lymphoma patients mobilized with different growth factors

Bone marrow niche-mimetics modulate HSPC function via integrin signaling

The bone marrow (BM) microenvironment provides critical physical cues for hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) maintenance and fate decision mediated by cell-matrix interactions. However, the mechanisms underlying matrix communication and signal transduction are less well understood. Contrary, stem cell culture is mainly facilitated in suspension cultures. Here, we used bone marrow-mimetic decellularized extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds derived from mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) to study HSPC-ECM interaction. Seeding freshly isolated HSPCs adherent (AT) and non-adherent (SN) cells were found. We detected enhanced expansion and active migration of AT-cells mediated by ECM incorporated stromal derived factor one. Probing cell mechanics, AT-cells displayed naïve cell deformation compared to SN-cells indicating physical recognition of ECM material properties by focal adhesion. Integrin αIIb (CD41), αV (CD51) and β3 (CD61) were found to be induced. Signaling focal contacts via ITGβ3 were identified to facilitate cell adhesion, migration and mediate ECM-physical cues to modulate HSPC function.

L-selectin and skin damage in systemic sclerosis

BACKGROUND

L-selectin ligands are induced on the endothelium of inflammatory sites. L-selectin expression on neutrophils and monocytes may mediate the primary adhesion of these cells at sites of inflammation by mediating the leukocyte-leukocyte interactions that facilitate their recruitment. L-selectin retains functional activity in its soluble form. Levels of soluble L-selectin have been reported as both elevated and lowered in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). This preliminary study seeks to discern amongst these disparate results and to discover whether there is an association between L-selectin concentrations in plasma and skin damage in SSc patients.

METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Nineteen cases with limited systemic sclerosis (lSSc) and 11 cases with diffuse systemic sclerosis (dSSc) were compared on a pairwise basis to age- and sex-matched controls. Criteria of the American College of Rheumatology were used to diagnose SSc. Skin involvement was assessed using the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS). We find no association between mRSS and plasma L-selectin concentration in lSSc cases (p = 0.9944) but a statistically significant negative correlation in dSSc cases (R(2) = 73.11 per cent, p = 0.0008). The interpretation of the slope for dSSc cases is that for each increase of 100 ng/ml in soluble L-selectin concentration, the mRSS drops 4.22 (95 per cent CI: 2.29, 6.16). There was also a highly statistically significant negative correlation between sL-selectin and disease activity (p = 0.0007) and severity (p = 0.0007) in dSSc cases but not in lSSc cases (p = 0.2596, p = 0.7575, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

No effective treatments exist for skin damage in SSc patients. Nor is there a laboratory alternative to the modified Rodnan skin score as is the case for other organs within the body. Modulation of circulating L-selectin is a promising target for reducing skin damage in dSSc patients. Plasma levels of soluble L-selectin could serve as an outcome measure for dSSc patients in clinical trials.

Changes of cytokine levels during granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor stem cell mobilization in healthy donors: association with mobilization efficiency and potential predictive significance

BACKGROUND

Peripheral blood stem cells are an important source of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for allogeneic transplantations. Some allogeneic donors mobilize HSCs poorly in response to the granulocyte--colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). The estimation of the mobilization result in an individual donor is difficult due to the absence of suitable predictive factors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We analyzed the concentrations and kinetics of certain cytokines induced by G-CSF in 76 healthy donors and compared them with the mobilization efficiency.

RESULTS

The levels of the most cytokines increased after the G-CSF application: sICAM, sVCAM, MMP-9, interleukin (IL)-6, TNF-α, sE-selectin, and fibronectin. The concentrations of SDF-1α and IL-8 decreased and VEGF and fractalkine remained unchanged. The premobilization concentrations of IL-6 (p = 0.0093) and TNF-a (p = 0.0006) correlated with preapheresis CD34+ cell count. The comparison of premobilization cytokine levels between better and worse mobilizers showed a difference for TNF-α (p = 0.0006) and IL-6 (p = 0.0682). The TNF-α level below cutoff of 3.6 pg/mL implied approximately 20 times higher risk of poor mobilization (odds ratio, 19.9; p = 0.0002). The immunophenotyping of CD34+ cells suggested a negative correlation between Day +5 CD34+ count and expression of CD11a (p = 0.0319) and a positive correlation with CD44 antigen expression (p = 0.0096).

CONCLUSION

The concentrations of certain cytokines corresponded to the quality of HSC mobilization in healthy donors. Their levels measured before mobilization could probably serve as predictive factors for mobilization efficacy and prospectively detect donors who might profit from new mobilization molecules.

CD34+ cells obtained from "good mobilizers" are more activated and exhibit lower ex vivo expansion efficiency than their counterparts from "poor mobilizers"

BACKGROUND

The classification of patients into "good" or "poor" mobilizers is based on CD34+ cell count in their peripheral blood (PB) after granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) injection. We hypothesized that, apart from their mobilization from marrow to the blood, the response to G-CSF of CD34+ cells also includes activation of proliferation, metabolic activity, and proliferative capacity.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Mobilized PB CD34+ cells purified from samples obtained by cytapheresis of multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients of both good (>50 CD34+ cells/microL) and poor (< or =50 CD34+ cells/microL) mobilizers were studied. The initial cell cycle state of CD34+ cells after selection and their kinetics of activation (exit from G(0) phase) during ex vivo culture were analyzed. Their proliferative capacity was estimated on the basis of ex vivo generation of total cells, CD34+ cells, and colony-forming cells (CFCs), in a standardized expansion culture. Indirect insight in metabolic activity was obtained on the basis of their survival (viability and apoptosis follow-up) during the 7-day-long conservation in hypothermia (4 degrees C) in the air or in atmosphere containing 3% O(2)/6% CO(2).

RESULTS

CD34+ cells obtained from good mobilizers were in lower proportion in the G(0) phase, their activation in a cytokine-stimulated culture was accelerated, and they exhibited a lower ex vivo expansion efficiency than those from poor mobilizers. The resistance to hypothermia of good immobilizers' CD34+ cells is impaired.

CONCLUSION

A good response to G-CSF mobilization treatment is associated with a higher degree of proliferative and metabolic activation of mobilized CD34+ cells with a decrease in their expansion capacity.

Improved mobilization of peripheral blood CD34+ cells and dendritic cells by AMD3100 plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients

AMD3100 is a drug capable of mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) in donors and in cancer patients as a single agent or in combination with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). We initiated a phase II study of 11 refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients, receiving 16 microg/kg daily of G-CSF for 4 days followed by 240 microg/kg of AMD3100 given subcutaneously on a new schedule of 9-10 h before apheresis collection on day 5. Our aims were to assess the effect of AMD3100 on the mobilization of CD34+ cells, dendritic cells (DCs) and lymphoma cells. Administration of G-CSF and AMD3100 were continued daily until >or=2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were collected. Adequate collection of the target of CD34+ cells was achieved in all but 1 patient within 2 days, and 10/11 patients were transplanted within 2 months. All transplanted patients engrafted with a mean of 10 and 12 days for neutrophils and platelets, respectively. Addition of AMD3100 to G-CSF resulted with >2.5-fold increase in CD34+ cells/microl (p = 0.0001) and in a >2-fold increase in pDC1 and pDC2 cells/microl (p = 0.003). Adverse events related to AMD3100 were minimal. AMD3100 was generally safe and improved PBSC and DC cell mobilization with no apparent contamination of lymphoma cells.

Safety and efficacy profile of G-CSF therapy in patients with acute on chronic liver failure

BACKGROUND/AIM

We aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment in patients with acute on chronic liver failure and the effect of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on the expression level of CXCR4, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and very late activation antigen 4.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with acute on chronic liver failure were randomised to receive standard therapy, standard therapy+granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (5 microg/kg/day for 6 days) and standard therapy+granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (15 microg/kg/day s.c. for 6 days). Data on CD34+cell mobilisation were compared to age-matched peripheral blood haematopoietic stem cell donors treated with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. On day third of treatment, the expression level of CXCR4, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and very late activation antigen 4 was analysed in mobilised CD34+ cells.

RESULTS

CD34 cell count increased after the second day of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor injection in both treatment groups compared to the linear increase observed in control. After the fifth day the increase was significantly higher in healthy donors versus patients with acute on chronic liver failure. A decrease in the expression of CXCR4, very late activation antigen 4 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor compared to premobilisation values was observed. No major side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment is able to induce CD34 mobilisation in patients with acute on chronic liver failure. The expression pattern of CXCR4, very late activation antigen 4 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor suggests that these molecules are involved in the granulocyte-colony stimulating factor-induced stem cell mobilisation.

Cytokines and hematopoietic stem cell mobilization

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has become the standard of care for the treatment of many hematologic malignancies, chemotherapy sensitive relapsed acute leukemias or lymphomas, multiple myeloma; and for some non-malignant diseases such as aplastic anemia and immunodeficient states. The hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) resides in the bone marrow (BM). A number of chemokines and cytokines have been shown in vivo and in clinical trials to enhance trafficking of HSC into the peripheral blood. This process, termed stem cell mobilization, results in the collection of HSC via apheresis for both autologous and allogeneic transplantation. Enhanced understanding of HSC biology, processes involved in HSC microenvironmental interactions and the critical ligands, receptors and cellular proteases involved in HSC homing and mobilization, with an emphasis on G-CSF induced HSC mobilization, form the basis of this review. We will describe the key features and dynamic processes involved in HSC mobilization and focus on the key ligand-receptor pairs including CXCR4/SDF1, VLA4/VCAM1, CD62L/PSGL, CD44/HA, and Kit/KL. In addition we will describe food and drug administration (FDA) approved and agents currently in clinical development for enhancing HSC mobilization and transplantation outcomes.

Kinetics of CXCR-4 and adhesion molecule expression during autologous stem cell mobilisation with G-CSF plus AMD3100 in patients with multiple myeloma

AMD3100, a competitive antagonist of CXCR-4, disrupts the binding of its ligand, stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), and facilitates stem cell mobilisation in patients with haematological malignancies. This study investigated the differential kinetics of CXCR-4 and adhesion molecule expression and their impact on stem cell yield during mobilisation with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) (days 1-4) followed by AMD3100 in 10 patients with multiple myeloma. A four-colour flow cytometry-based determination of CXCR-4, VLA-4, L-selectin, PECAM, LFA-1 and CD44 expression on CD34+ cells and measurement of SDF-1 concentration were performed at different time points. After G-CSF alone, CXCR-4 expression on patients' blood and marrow CD34+ cells was significantly lower than in the healthy controls (p < 0.001), but allowed no prediction of stem cell yield. Except in the single poorly mobilising patient, AMD3100 led to a further significant decrease of CXCR4 (p = 0.001), which inversely correlated with the CD34+ counts in the blood (p = 0.005). SDF-1 level in patients' marrow was positively correlated with CXCR-4 expression on CD34+ cells (p = 0.011). It is interesting to note that the expression of adhesion molecules remained unaffected by AMD3100 administration. Further studies will define the possible prognostic role of AMD3100 mediated changes in CXCR-4 expression for the prediction of stem cell yield attainable with this new mobilisation regimen.

Good and poor mobilizing patients differ in mobilized CD34+ cell adhesion molecule profiles

BACKGROUND

Alterations in expression of adhesion molecules are important in the trafficking of hematopoietic progenitors and probably in the mobilization process. Relatively little and conflicting data are currently available on the differences in expression between good and poor mobilizing patients.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this study, the expression of eight adhesion molecules on the collected CD34+ cells from 36 patients undergoing mobilization was determined.

RESULTS

Good mobilizing patients, defined as those who collected their target in one apheresis procedure, had significantly fewer cells that expressed CD11a (LFA-1) and CD54 (ICAM-1) and borderline fewer that expressed CD11c, CD49d (VLA-4), and CD49d (VLA-5). No differences were detected in CD11b (Mac-1), CD15s (sLe(x)), or CD62L (L-selectin). Linear regression analysis identified number of prior chemotherapy courses and expression of CD11a (LFA-1) as independent predictive factors for mobilization efficiency. Good and poor mobilizing patients had approximately the same number of total CD34+ cells collected and little difference in times to engraftment.

CONCLUSIONS

CD11a (LFA-1) expression inversely correlates with mobilization efficiency. Elucidation of the mechanism(s) underlying these observations will require further study.

Elevation of Platelet Activation Markers and Chemokines during Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Harvest with G-CSF

The kinetics of peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in response to recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is well established. However, there have been few investigations of platelet activation markers during peripheral blood stem cell harvest. We measured the levels of the platelet activation markers, chemokines, and soluble factors in plasma obtained from patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell harvest. The number of leukocytes, CD34+ cells, neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes peaked on day 5 after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment, but the numbers of eosinophils and basophils showed no significant change. Regulated on activation normally T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) level increased through day 10, and the monocyte chemotactic peptide-1 (MCP-1) level peaked on day 5. Platelet counts continued to increase through day 10. The level of thrombopoietin significantly increased on day 3, peaked on day 5, and decreased slightly by day 10. The levels of soluble CD40 ligand and soluble P-selectin increased up to day 5. The platelet-derived microparticle level peaked on day 5, and then began to decline. CD34+ cell numbers significantly correlated with those of leucocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes, as well as levels of MCP-1, and the CD34+ cells exhibited changes similar to platelet-derived microparticles. The patterns of change in MCP-1, platelet-derived microparticles, and the CD34+ cell count are similar in that each peaks on day 5 and decreases thereafter. Further study is required to determine if a cause-and-effect relationship in their pattern of change exists among them.

CD34+ cells and CD34+CD38- subset from mobilized blood show different patterns of adhesion molecules compared to those from steady-state blood, bone marrow, and cord blood

As suggested previously, a down-regulation of some cellular adhesion molecules (CAMs) on CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) may contribute to their egress from bone marrow (BM) to peripheral blood (PB) by decreasing their adhesion to BM stromal cells. Besides counting the percentage of CAM-positive cells, we decided to define clearly the antigen density (AgD) of the CAM on mobilized- and steady-state CD34(+) HPC using QIFIKIT calibration beads. Five sources of cells were compared: PB and BM from normal donors (nPB, nBM) cord blood (CB), mobilized PB obtained from leukapheresis products (LKP), and mobilized BM (mBM) samples. In our study the CAM-AgD was the lowest on CD34(+) cells in LKP which, on the contrary, contained the highest percentage of CD117(+), CD54(+), CD58(+) cell subsets. As for CB, a greater proportion of CD44(+) and CD62L(+) cells was observed in LKP than in other products. The LKP-CD34(+) cell population contained a greater percentage of CD11a(+) cells when compared to mBM, but the lowest percentage of CD49d(+) and CD49e(+) cells when compared to all products. The proportion of the CD34(+)CD38(-) immature subset expressing CD11a, CD44, CD54, or CD62L was greater in LKP than in mBM; the CD62L-AgD was higher in LKP than in mBM. This quantitative analysis clearly showed a downregulation of all CAM on LKP-CD34(+). The CD44, CD62L, CD11a, and CD54 AgD decrease appears to be specifically involved in the egress of the CD34(+) subsets into PB. The control of antigen density of these adhesion molecules is likely to be clinically important for effective mobilization of HPC as well as for rapid engraftment following HPC transplant.

Homing and mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells and hematopoietic cancer cells are mirror image processes, utilizing similar signaling pathways and occurring concurrently: circulating cancer cells constitute an ideal target for concurrent treatment with chemotherapy and antilineage-specific antibodies

Adhesion molecules and stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 signaling play key role in homing and mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor (HPC) and hematopoietic cancer clonogenic cells (HCC). High expression of VLA-4 is required for homing of HPC and HCC, whereas downregulation of these molecules is required for successful mobilization of HPC and HCC. Upregulation and activation of the SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling is required for homing of HPC and HCC, whereas disruption of the SDF-1 signaling is required for mobilization of HPC and HCC. Hence, mobilizations of HPC and HCC occur concurrently. It is proposed that drug resistance evolves as a result of repeated cycles of chemotherapy. Following each cycle of chemotherapy, HCC lose adhesion molecules and SDF-1 signaling. Surviving cells, released from tumor sites, circulate until re-expression of adhesion molecules and CXCR4 occurs, then homing to stroma of distal tissues occurs. Cytokines secreted by cells in the new microenvironment induce proliferation and drug resistance of HCC. This process is amplified in each cycle of chemotherapy resulting in disease progression. A novel model for treatment is proposed in which circulating HCC are the target for clinical intervention, and concurrent treatment with chemotherapy and antilineage-specific antibodies will result in abrogation of the 'vicious cycle' of conventional anticancer therapy.

Mobilization of Myeloma Cells Involves SDF-1/CXCR4 Signaling and Downregulation of VLA-4

Adhesion molecules and stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 signaling play key roles in homing and mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC). Active signaling through SDF-1/CXCR4 and upregulation of adhesion molecules are required for homing, whereas downregulation of adhesion molecules and disruption of SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling are required for mobilization of HSC. We studied the surface expression of CXCR4 very late activation antigen (VLA)-4 and VLA-5 on myeloma cells mobilized with cyclophosphamide and GM-CSF in 12 multiple myeloma patients undergoing HSC mobilization for autologous transplantation. We also studied the plasma levels of SDF-1 in apheresis collection of these patients. We observed a statistically significant decrease in the levels of SDF-1 and surface expression of CXCR4 on myeloma cells in four consecutive apheresis collections compared with premobilization bone marrow specimens. We also observed a statistically significant decrease in surface expression of VLA-4 in myeloma cells in the apheresis collections compared with premobilization bone marrow samples. Furthermore, myeloma cells derived from apheresis collections had decreased adhesion and trans-stromal migration in response to SDF-1, which could be reversed by short incubation with interleukin-6. Hence, mobilization of myeloma cells involves SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling and downregulation of VLA-4.

The whys and hows of hematopoietic progenitor and stem cell mobilization

Intentional mobilization of hematopoietic/stem cells into the circulation has improved the efficiency of their collection. Transplantation of mobilized blood stem cells to patients with marrow aplasia results in a faster pace of hematopoietic recovery than transplantation of marrow-derived stem cells. Autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are increasingly performed with blood-derived cells. Donors of both autologous and allogeneic blood stem cells do not always respond well to therapies designed to produce mobilization. Autologous donors may respond poorly as a result of myelotoxic damage inflicted by prior antitumor therapy, but this explanation is not valid for allogeneic donors. The mechanism(s) involved in the process of mobilization are incompletely understood. Until these mechanisms are elucidated, methods to improve mobilization vigor on a rational basis will not be obvious. In the meanwhile, clinical observations may provide some hints regarding the whys and hows of mobilization and permit incremental improvements in this process.

Decreased stroma adhesion capacity of CD34+ progenitor cells from mobilized peripheral blood is not lineage- or stage-specific and is associated with low beta 1 and beta 2 integrin expression

Molecular mechanisms leading to mobilization of hematopoietic cells from bone marrow (BM) to peripheral blood (PB) involve modulation of adhesion molecule expression on these cells that probably result in changes in adhesion capacity to the microenvironment. However, it is not clear whether these changes involve different stages or lineages of progenitor cells. In this study, we compared the capacity of mature and immature clonogenic progenitor cells from granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized PB and normal BM CD34+ cells to adhere to complete marrow stroma. This functional capacity was assessed concurrently with molecular expression on CD34+ cells of integrins VLA-4 (alpha 4/beta 1), VLA-5 (alpha 5/beta 1), and LFA-1 (alpha L/beta 2) by interindividual (between mobilized PB and normal BM) and intraindividual (between mobilized PB and steady-state BM and PB in the same patient) analysis. The proportion of adherent clonogenic progenitor cells was significantly lower in PB than in BM, not only for total progenitor cells but also for mature and immature progenitor cells, and the difference was found for granulocytic and particularly for erythroid lineages. The lower adhesion capacity of PB CD34+ cells to stroma was associated with decreased expression (signal/noise MFI ratio) of integrin alpha 4, beta 1, alpha L, and beta 2 chains whereas that of alpha 5 chain did not differ from BM cells with the lowest expression level. Similar differences in integrin expression levels were also found between mobilized PB and steady-state BM CD34+ cells in the same patient except for the alpha L chain. Moreover, we demonstrated for the first time a strong positive correlation between mobilizing capacity and expression levels on mobilized CD34+ cells for the LFA-1 alpha L chain but not for VLA-4 or VLA-5. In conclusion, the decreased adhesion capacity of mobilized PB progenitor cells to stroma involves different maturation stages and different lineages. This is associated with down-regulation of integrins VLA-4 and LFA-1, but mobilizing capacity appears positively correlated with LFA-1 levels.

Comparison between granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have become the preferred source of stem cells for autologous transplantation because of the technical advantage and the shorter time to engraftment. Mobilization of CD34+ into the peripheral blood can be achieved by the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), or both, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. G-CSF and GM-CSF differ somewhat in the number and composition of PBSCs and effector cells mobilized to the peripheral blood. The purpose of this review is to give a recent update on the type and immunologic properties of CD34+ cells and CD34+ cell subsets mobilized by G-CSF or GM-CSF with emphasis on (1) relative efficacy of CD34+ cell mobilization; (2) relative toxicities of G-CSF and GM-CSF as mobilizing agents; (3) mobilization of dendritic cells and their subsets; (4) delineation of the role of adhesion molecules, CXC receptor 4, and stromal cell-derived factor-1 signaling pathway in the release of CD34+ cell to the peripheral blood after treatment with G-CSF or GM-CSF.

Antisense inhibition of macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha blocks bone destruction in a model of myeloma bone disease

We recently identified macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha (MIP-1alpha) as a factor produced by multiple myeloma (MM) cells that may be responsible for the bone destruction in MM (1). To investigate the role of MIP-1alpha in MM bone disease in vivo, the human MM-derived cell line ARH was stably transfected with an antisense construct to MIP-1alpha (AS-ARH) and tested for its capacity to induce MM bone disease in SCID mice. Human MIP-1alpha levels in marrow plasma from AS-ARH mice were markedly decreased compared with controls treated with ARH cells transfected with empty vector (EV-ARH). Mice treated with AS-ARH cells lived longer than controls and, unlike the controls, they showed no radiologically identifiable lytic lesions. Histomorphometric analysis demonstrated that osteoclasts (OCLs) per square millimeter of bone and OCLs per millimeter of bone surface of AS-ARH mice were significantly less than in EV-ARH mice, and the percentage of tumors per total bone area was also significantly decreased. AS-ARH cells demonstrated decreased adherence to marrow stromal cells, due to reduced expression of the alpha(5)beta(1) integrin and diminished homing capacity and survival. These data support an important role for MIP-1alpha in cell homing, survival, and bone destruction in MM.

Recent Developments in the Regulation of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization and Engraftment by Cytokines, Chemokines, and Adhesion Molecules

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have become the preferred source of stem cells for autologous transplantation because of the technical advantage and the shorter time to engraftment. Administration of hematopoietic growth factors such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) results in mobilization of PBSCs into the peripheral blood. G-CSF and GM-CSF differ somewhat in the number and composition of CD34(+) cells and effector cells mobilized to the peripheral blood; however, the molecular mechanism underlying the release and engraftment of CD34(+) cells by these growth factors is poorly understood. This review provides a recent update on the involvement of hematopoietic growth factors, chemokines, adhesion molecules, and chemokine receptors in the regulation of stem cell release and engraftment. The involvement of very late antigen-4 (VLA-4), VLA-5, leukocyte function associated-1 molecule (LFA-1), and L-selectin and their receptors CXCR4 and its ligand SDF-1 will be discussed, and cross talk between these factors will also be reviewed in the context of stem cell release and engraftment. Finally, PBSC mobilization by chemokines will be reviewed in relation to hematopoietic growth factors.