Assessment of solid cancer treatment feasibility in older patients: a prospective cohort study

Prevalence of pre-existing cognitive impairment in patients treated for cancer and the impact of cancer treatment on cognitive outcomes: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Pre-existing cognitive impairment (CI) is likely underreported in patients treated for cancer, and its prevalence remains unclear. Older adults with CI may have a greater risk of treatment failure and increased morbidity and mortality than patients with intact cognition. To our knowledge, there has not been a previous review summarizing data on the prevalence of pre-existing CI in patients with cancer. This review addresses: (1) What is the prevalence of pre-existing CI in patients treated for cancer and (2) What is the impact of cancer treatment on cognitive outcomes among patients exhibiting pre-existing CI before planned cancer treatment?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We defined CI as a diagnosis of dementia or mild or unspecified CI before any cancer treatment, including surgery. This scoping review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework and adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles, resolving disagreements with a third reviewer. The reviewers systematically searched MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) from inception until July 15, 2023, including original research focused on participants aged 60 or older reporting the prevalence of pre-existing CI before any cancer treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 10,490 screened citations, 23 manuscripts reporting on 21 studies met the inclusion criteria for both review questions. Pre-existing CI was prevalent at a mean rate of 6 % in administrative database studies, while clinical studies employing pre-treatment cognitive screening tools, primarily the Mini-Mental State Examination and Mini-Cog, reported a higher mean prevalence of 26 % (range 2.6 to 52 %). Only one study reported postoperative delirium in 27.9 % of patients with CI following cancer surgery, suggesting a higher risk of delirium in this population. However, none of the reviewed studies provided data on other cognitive outcomes, such as chemotherapy-related CI or treatment toxicity, in these individuals.

DISCUSSION

Pre-existing CI is common but highly variable. The variability in reported prevalence rates can largely be attributed to significant differences in study inclusion criteria of participants and sample size, with some studies relying on regionally limited datasets.

Systemic treatment among frail older patients with cancer: An observational cohort

INTRODUCTION

In the past, certain oncological therapies were not offered to frail older patients. However, the advancement of geriatric oncology, tailored chemotherapy regimens, the introduction of new treatments, and the optimization of supportive care have contributed to enhancing the therapeutic margin. We aimed to evaluate the benefit of systemic treatment among older adults by assessing the three-month survival of older frail patients with metastatic cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 70 and over with metastatic cancer who underwent pre-therapeutic geriatric assessment at Gustave Roussy Hospital between May 2020 and May 2022 and were categorized as "frail" according to the SIOG-1 classification, whether they received systemic treatment (ST group) or exclusive supportive care (SC group).

RESULTS

The ST group included 77 patients, and the SC group included 44 patients. Patients in the ST group had a median age of 80.6 years (82.7 years in SC group). The three-month overall survival rate was 81.8 % [95 % Confidence Interval (CI) 71.8; 88.9] in the ST group. The median survival rate was 10.6 months [95 % CI 6.3; 12.6] in the ST group. In multivariate analysis within the ST group, loss of autonomy assessed by activity of daily living (ADL) (HR 2.16 [1.09; 4.28]) and more frailty factors (HR 1.40 [1.01; 1.95]) were associated with lower three-month survival.

DISCUSSION

Older frail patients with metastatic cancer may benefit from systemic oncologic treatment. The introduction of such treatment for patients with loss of autonomy in ADL or cumulative frailty factors should be considered only with caution.

'ADVANCE' (a pilot trial) ADjuVANt chemotherapy in the elderly: Developing and evaluating lower-toxicity chemotherapy options for older patients with breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Older adults with breast cancer receiving neo/adjuvant chemotherapy are at high risk for poor outcomes and are underrepresented in clinical trials. The ADVANCE (ADjuVANt Chemotherapy in the Elderly) trial evaluated the feasibility of two neo/adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in parallel-enrolling cohorts of older patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer: cohort 1-triple-negative; cohort 2-hormone receptor-positive.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults age ≥ 70 years with stage I-III breast cancer warranting neo/adjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled. Cohort 1 received weekly carboplatin (area under the curve 2) and weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 for twelve weeks; cohort 2 received weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 plus every-three-weekly cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 over twelve weeks. The primary study endpoint was feasibility, defined as ≥80% of patients receiving ≥80% of intended weeks/doses of therapy. All dose modifications were applied per clinician discretion.

RESULTS

Forty women (n = 20 per cohort) were enrolled from March 25, 2019 through August 3, 2020 from three centers; 45% and 35% of patients in cohorts 1 and 2 were age > 75, respectively. Neither cohort achieved targeted thresholds for feasibility. In cohort 1, eight (40.0%) met feasibility (95% confidence interval [CI] = 19.1-63.9%), while ten (50.0%) met feasibility in cohort 2 (95% CI = 27.2-72.8). Neutropenia was the most common grade 3-4 toxicity (cohort 1-65%, cohort 2-55%). In cohort 1, 80% and 85% required ≥1 dose holds of carboplatin and/or paclitaxel, respectively. In cohort 2, 10% required dose hold(s) for cyclophosphamide and/or 65% for paclitaxel.

DISCUSSION

In this pragmatic pilot examining chemotherapy regimens in older adults with breast cancer, neither regimen met target goals for feasibility. Developing efficacious and tolerable regimens for older patients with breast cancer who need chemotherapy remains an important goal.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Identifier: NCT03858322.

[The place of support care]

Supportive care, in the context of breast cancer in the elderly, is part of standard oncogeriatric care. Nevertheless, the multidisciplinary reinforcement of the different transversal teams can support the global approach, that is essential to the quality of care and the life course. Evaluation is the basis of this management. As a result of this evaluation, the approach to sexual health is a novelty that is often insufficiently considered with elderly patients suffering from breast malignancy.

The Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Treatment Toxicity, Treatment Completion, and Survival among Older Adults Receiving Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

Although cognitive impairment is common among older adults, the relationship between cognitive impairment and its effect on cancer outcomes is unclear. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to examine how toxicity risk, treatment completion, and survival may be impacted by chemotherapy in patients exhibiting evidence of cognitive impairment. Despite an absence of clear parallels between the severity of cognitive impairment and cancer outcomes, we found statistically significant relationships with survival in several studies and with toxicity in one study. An overall lack of robust evidence indicates the need for further research on the role of cognitive impairment in predicting survival, treatment completion, and toxicity among older adults receiving chemotherapy.

Abstract

Cognitive impairment (CI) is common among older adults with cancer, but its effect on cancer outcomes is not known. This systematic review sought to identify research investigating clinical endpoints (toxicity risk, treatment completion, and survival) of chemotherapy treatment in those with baseline CI. A systematic search of five databases (inception to March 2021) was conducted. Eligible studies included randomized trials, prospective studies, and retrospective studies in which the sample or a subgroup were older adults (aged ≥ 65) screened positive for CI prior to receiving chemotherapy. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Twenty-three articles were included. Sample sizes ranged from n = 31 to 703. There was heterogeneity of cancer sites, screening tools and cut-offs used to ascertain CI, and proportion of patients with CI within study samples. Severity of CI and corresponding proportion of each level within study samples were unclear in all but one study. Among studies investigating CI in a qualified multivariable model, statistically significant findings were found in 4/6 studies on survival and in 1/1 study on nonhematological toxicity. The lack of robust evidence indicates a need for further research on the role of CI in predicting survival, treatment completion, and toxicity among older adults receiving chemotherapy, and the potential implications that could shape treatment decisions.

[Colorectal cancer and preoperative geriatric assessment]

With the ageing of the population and the increase in the incidence of cancer in the population over 75 years of age, a partnership between geriatricians and oncologists is becoming necessary to optimise the management of these patients. There is great variability in the profiles of elderly patients and age cannot be the only criterion of the decision making. Thus, it is necessary to identify patients who will benefit from an in-depth geriatric assessment (IGA) and the G8 screening tool used in oncology consultations allows to do so. The EGA offers a multidisciplinary approach to functional, psychological, nutritional, cognitive and social status of the person, and has been shown to have prognostic value for survival and relevance in guiding treatment choices.

Prevalence and prognostic impact of cachexia among older patients with cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional survey (NutriAgeCancer)

BACKGROUND

Nutritional impairment is common in cancer patients and is associated with poor outcomes. Only few studies focused on cachexia. We assessed the prevalence of cachexia in older cancer patients, identified associated risk factors, and evaluated its impact on 6 month overall mortality.

METHODS

A French nationwide cross-sectional survey (performed in 55 geriatric oncology clinics) of older cancer patients aged ≥70 referred for geriatric assessment prior to treatment choice and initiation. Demographic, clinical, and nutritional data were collected. The first outcome was cachexia, defined as loss of more than 5% of bodyweight over the previous 6 months, or a body mass index below 20 kg/m² with weight loss of more than 2%, or sarcopenia (an impaired Strength, Assistance with walking, Rise from chair, Climb stairs and Falls score) with weight loss of more than 2%. The second outcome was 6 month overall mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 1030 patients included in the analysis [median age (interquartile range): 83 (79-87); males: 48%; metastatic cancer: 42%; main cancer sites: digestive tract (29%) and breast (16%)], 534 [52% (95% confidence interval: 49-55%)] had cachexia. In the multivariate analysis, patients with breast (P < 0.001), gynaecologic (P < 0.001), urinary (P < 0.001), skin (P < 0.001), and haematological cancers (P = 0.006) were less likely to have cachexia than patients with colorectal cancer. Patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancers (including liver and pancreatic cancers; P = 0.052), with previous surgery for cancer (P = 0.001), with metastases (P = 0.047), poor performance status (≥2; P < 0.001), low food intake (P < 0.001), unfeasible timed up-and-go test (P = 0.002), cognitive disorders (P = 0.03) or risk of depression (P = 0.005), were more likely to have cachexia. At 6 months, 194 (20.5%) deaths were observed. Cachexia was associated with 6 month mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.49; 95% confidence interval: 1.05-2.11) independently of age, in/outpatient status, cancer site, metastatic status, cancer treatment, dependency, cognition, and number of daily medications.

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of older patients with cancer managed in geriatric oncology clinics had cachexia. The factors associated with cachexia were upper gastrointestinal tract cancer, metastases, poor performance status, poor mobility, previous surgery for cancer, cognitive disorders, a risk of depression, and low food intake. Cachexia was independently associated with 6 month mortality.

[Oncogeriatric assessment: The first step in personalizing cancer treatment in the elderly]

With aging worldwide population and the high incidence of cancer in the population of people over 75 years old, there is a need for oncologists and geriatricians to strengthen their collaboration to improve elderly patients care. Complexity of cancer and aging issues must be considered simultaneously to establish a personalized care plan. Thus, the G8 is a screening tool that allows to identify patients who should benefit from a geriatric assessment, which is a key step in the management process. This specific evaluation offers a multidisciplinary approach to functional, psychological, nutritional, cognitive and social status and has demonstrated its prognostic value in terms of choice of treatment but also in terms of patient survival. In nearly 20% of cases, the geriatric assessment leads to a change in the choice of treatment, and at one year the initial care plan is not carried out in a quarter of cases. The presence of malnutrition and functional impairment leading to dependence on basic activities of daily living had a significant impact on this change in therapeutic choice. Survival is not only impacted by malnutrition and functional impairment but also by the presence of severe comorbidities and thymic and neurocognitive impairment. The patient's choice must remain at the center of the elaboration of the care plan with the oncologists and geriatricians in order to propose the most appropriate treatment for his or her situation.

Functional status in older patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Functional Status (FS) is an important domain in Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) and is most often evaluated using the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scales separately.

METHOD AND OBJECTIVES

This secondary analysis of a previous prospective cohort study was conducted between September 2015 and May 2018 at Marseille University Hospital, France, on 613 cancer outpatients aged ≥70 years. The first objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of FS impairment in older outpatients with cancer using a combination of the information collected with the ADL and short IADL scales. Our second objective was to describe the potential impact of this combined FS on three-month unplanned hospitalizations and three-month mortality in this population.

RESULTS

The median age was 81 years and 61.2% were men. The most common types of tumours were lung and thoracic (22.3%). Concerning FS, 255 patients (41.6%) had unimpaired ADL-IADL, 131 patients (21.4%) had IADL impairment, 38 patients (6.2%) had ADL impairment, and 189 patients (30.8%) had impaired ADL-IADL. In the multivariate Cox analysis, metastatic stage (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) = 1.79; 95% CI [1.14-2.80]) and impaired ADL-IADL (aHR = 3.46; 95% CI [1.89-6.33]) were independently associated with three-month mortality. In the logistic regression model, impaired ADL-IADL (adjusted Odd ratio (aOR) = 3.64; 95% CI [1.84-7.20]) was the only factor independently associated with three-month unplanned hospitalizations.

INTERPRETATION

The combined use of the ADL and IADL scales to evaluate functional status in older patients with cancer is of significant prognostic value regarding the risks of three-month unplanned hospitalizations and mortality.

Patient assessment and feasibility of treatment in older patients with cancer: results from the IN-GHO® Registry

PURPOSE

Predicting feasibility of treatment in older patients with cancer is a major clinical task. The Initiative Geriatrische Hämatologie und Onkologie (IN-GHO^®) registry prospectively collected data on the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), physician's and patient's-self assessment of fitness for treatment, and the course of treatment in patients within a treatment decision aged ≥ 70 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The registry included 3169 patients from 93 centres and evaluated clinical course and treatment outcomes 2-3 and 6 months after initial assessment. Fitness for treatment was classified as fit, compromised and frail according to results of a CGA, and in addition by an experienced physician's and by patient's itself. Feasibility of treatment (termed IN-GHO^®-FIT) was defined as a composite endpoint, including willingness to undergo the same treatment again in retrospect, no modification or unplanned termination of treatment, and no early mortality (within 90 days).

RESULTS

CGA classified 30.0% as fit, 35.8% as compromised, and 34.2% as frail. Physician's and patient's-self assessment classified 61.8%/52.3% as fit, 34.2%/42.4% as compromised, and 3.9%/5.3%, as frail, respectively. Survival status at day 180 was available in 2072 patients, of which 625 (30.2%) had died. After 2-3 months, feasibility of treatment could be assessed in 1984 patients. 62.8% fulfilled IN-GHO®-FIT criteria. Multivariable analysis identified physician's assessment as the single most important item regarding feasibility of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Geriatricians were involved in 2% of patients only. Classification of fitness for treatment by CGA, and physician's or patient's-self assessment showed marked discrepancies. For the prediction of feasibility of treatment no single item was superior to physician's assessment. However CGA was not performed by trained geriatricians.

[Why and how to assess older people with cancer?]

The older population accounts for almost 60% of new cancers. Their management is a public health problem and is complex. It raises different questions: Is the patient's prognosis linked to cancer or another pathology? The heterogeneity of this population emphasises the importance of the overall condition assessment, in particular to avoid over-treatment (or under-treatment), and to be able to identify frail or vulnerable elderly patients who are at risk of having more treatment toxicities. Through this article, we will recall the importance of geriatric in-depth evaluation (EGA) by detailing the different factors that impact the therapeutic decision, tolerance to treatments… This EGA is however time-consuming and not all patients can be evaluated. In order to identify the subjects covered by this EGA, screening scales have been developed. Finally, we will develop the place of research in oncogeriatric management.

The Frailty Syndrome: A Critical Issue in Geriatric Oncology

The number of older adults with cancer is growing in the United States, and there is a relative paucity of data relating the presence of frailty with its outcomes of interest. The authors present the surgical oncology, radiation oncology, and medical oncology literature with respect to the presence of frailty in older adults with cancer. More research is needed to understand how the presence of frailty should be used by surgical, radiation, and medical oncologists to guide patient counseling and treatment planning.

Medication Reconciliation Associated with Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients with Cancer: ChimioAge Study

BACKGROUND

Polymorbidity induces polypharmacy in older patients may lead to potential drug-drug interactions (DDI) which can modify the tolerance and safety of oncological treatments and alter the intended therapeutic effect. The objective of our study was to describe the decision-making process for oncological treatment and related outcomes, in a population of older adults undergoing a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) associated to a comprehensive medication reconciliation (CMR) prior to initiating oncological treatment.

METHODS

ChimioAge is a prospective observational study conducted between 01/2017 and 07/2018 at Marseille University Hospital and approved by the French National Ethics Committee. It comprised all consecutive patients aged 70 years and over who were referred for a CGA as part of CMR, before initiating systemic treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-one cancer patients were included. Mean age was 79.2 years, over half had metastatic cancers, 75% had an ECOG performance status zero or one, and two-thirds were independent in daily activities. Two-thirds of the patients had polypharmacy and the CMR identified potential DDI with systemic treatment in 43.3% of patients. Following the CGA, the CMR and the hospital oncologists decision, 30% of the patients received adapted systemic treatment with reduced doses at initiation. They presented fewer toxicities - irrespective of grade and type - than patients who received standard treatment (p<0.001) and had comparable overall survival (Log rank p=0.21).

CONCLUSION

This is one of the first studies to highlight the value in conducting CMR and a CGA simultaneously before initiating systemic treatment in older patients with cancer. These two evaluations could give oncologists decisive information to personalize cancer treatment of older patients and optimize treatment dose to offer the best efficacy and minimize toxicity.

Functional status in a geriatric oncology setting: A review

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), is used in older patients with cancer to identify frailties, which can interfere with specialized treatment, and to help with therapeutic care. Functional Status (FS) is a domain of CGA in which Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) are evaluation tools.

OBJECTIVE

Our study reviewed the data available on the most frequently used tools to assess ADL and IADL in a geriatric oncology setting and their predictive values on overall survival (OS), toxicity, treatment feasibility or decision and postoperative complications.

DESIGN

This review was based on a systematic search of the MEDLINE® database for articles published in English and French between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017. In the final analysis, 40 out of 4061 studies were included.

RESULTS

The most common ADL and IADL scales used are the Katz ADL (KL-ADL) in 25 studies and the Lawton IADL (IADL₈) in 22 studies. FS is predictive of OS in 11 out of 24 studies, chemotoxicity in 2 out of 7 studies, treatment feasibility in 2 out of 5 studies, treatment decisions in 2 out of 3 studies, and postoperative complications in 4 out of 6 studies.

CONCLUSION

FS is of prognostic value in a geriatric oncology setting despite heterogeneous methodology and inclusion criteria, in the studies included. Additional research is needed to explore more precisely the prognostic value of FS in overall survival, toxicity, treatment feasibility or decision and postoperative complications, in older cancer patients.

How Should Palliative Thoracic Radiotherapy Be Fractionated for Octogenarians with Lung Cancer?

BACKGROUND/AIM

Geriatric oncology practice should be based on dedicated studies and real-world experience. Therefore, we evaluated survival outcomes after palliative thoracic radiotherapy in octogenarian patients with lung cancer and analyzed prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective analysis of 51 patients with a median age of 83 years. Three different fractionation regimens were compared: two fractions of 8.5 Gy, 10 fractions of 3 Gy, and higher doses than 30 Gy (maximum biologically equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) was always lower than 50 Gy). No concomitant chemotherapy was prescribed. Patients with incomplete radiotherapy (16%) were included, in line with the intention-to-treat principle, i.e. based on prescribed rather than accumulated dose.

RESULTS

Median survival was 3.4 months. We observed a relatively high proportion of patients who received radiotherapy in the last 30 days of life (24%). Nevertheless, approximately 10% of patients were alive 3-5 years after treatment. Prognosis was similar for those with stage III and IV disease. Multivariate analysis identified four significant prognostic factors for shorter survival: reduced performance status, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥30 mg/l, leukocytosis, and prescribed radiation dose ≤30 Gy (EQD2=33 Gy). The three different radiotherapy regimens resulted in median survival of 2.4, 2.6 and 11.8 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Survival outcomes were highly variable. Given that survival after 10 fractions of 3 Gy was indistinguishable from that after two fractions of 8.5 Gy, we suggest that the latter regimen should be considered for patients with poor prognosis. Patients with favorable prognostic factors should be treated with higher radiation doses, e.g. 15 fractions of 3 Gy.

Do older individuals who are diagnosed with cancer have worse physical performance prior to diagnosis compared to matched controls? A longitudinal cohort study

Background

Impaired physical performance is highly prevalent in older cancer patients and is associated with cancer-related outcomes such as mortality and chemotherapy-related toxicity. Physical performance might already decline prior to the cancer diagnosis due to undiagnosed disease. This study aimed to assess whether the physical performance of community-dwelling individuals prior to cancer diagnosis is worse compared to matched controls who are not diagnosed with cancer.

Methods

The study sample was selected from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam, a longitudinal study on a nationally representative sample of the Dutch older population. Physical performance of initially cancer-free individuals aged 55–84 years who were diagnosed with cancer during 10 or 20 years of follow-up was compared to the physical performance of controls who were not diagnosed with cancer. For controls, the physical performance measurements of the cycle with a median age closest to the cancer group were used. The time interval between physical performance measurements and the report of cancer was 2 to 4 years. Groups were compared using logistic and linear regression analysis.

Results

The study sample included 1735 individuals with a median age of 68.7 [interquartile range 63.3–76.4] years. During follow-up, 414 (23.9%) individuals were diagnosed with cancer. Handgrip strength, gait speed, chair stand ability, chair stand test time and ability to put on and take off a cardigan did not differ between groups. Individuals prior to cancer diagnosis were more likely to complete the tandem balance test.

Conclusions

Physical performance of individuals 2 to 4 years prior to report of cancer diagnosis is not lower compared to controls. This suggests that physical performance may not be influenced by cancer before diagnosis.

Prognostic Significance of Dementia in Older Adults with Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND

The public health burden of cancer and dementia in the geriatric population is well documented. There is limited data on how dementia predicts mortality among geriatric patients with solid tumors. The objective of this study is to determine the prognostic significance of dementia on survival in patients with solid tumors.

METHODS

We performed a 5-year retrospective study on elderly subjects aged ≥60 years with and without dementia that were diagnosed with solid tumors.

RESULTS

Among 3,460 patients with solid tumors, 132 (3.8%) patients were found to have dementia. The median age at diagnosis was 71 years. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that patients with dementia had an inferior median survival compared to the nondemented group (30 vs. 56 months; log-rank p < 0.001). Cox proportional hazard regression modeling identified age >80 years, female gender, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, dementia, and radiation therapy as risk factors for decreased overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that dementia is associated with shorter overall survival in elderly patients with solid tumors.

Toxicity of Cancer Therapies in Older Patients

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

In clinical practice, older patients are often undertreated due to underrepresentation in clinical trials and fear of toxicity. Our objective was therefore to review toxicities that are specific to older cancer patients, to review risk factors in order to help physicians guide their decisions, and to review interventions that can be implemented in routine clinical practice to prevent toxicity induced by cancer therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

On the whole, reviews report similar number and frequency as well as similar grade 3 or 4 adverse events between subjects older and younger than 65 years. Yet patients included in clinical trials are often not representative of real-life patients and are often fit older cancer patients. Moreover, tolerance to the additive impact of multiple adverse effects is different between older and younger patients. And specific symptoms such as stomatitis may cause a series of consequences such as dehydration, denutrition, renal insufficiency, and adverse events of renally excreted drugs. Older patients are at high risk of toxicity due to many factors but mainly due to the prevalence of frailty in this population that has been estimated to be around 40% increasing the risk of chemotherapy intolerance. As a consequence, interventions must be implemented according to altered domains of comprehensive geriatric assessment in order to improve anticancer tolerance. These interventions are reviewed here.

Chronological Age and Risk of Chemotherapy Nonfeasibility: A Real-Life Cohort Study of 153 Stage II or III Colorectal Cancer Patients Given Adjuvant-modified FOLFOX6

OBJECTIVES

To assess nonfeasibility of adjuvant-modified FOLFOX6 chemotherapy in patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Consecutive patients managed between 2009 and 2013 in 2 teaching hospitals in the Paris urban area were included in the CORSAGE (COlorectal canceR, AGe, and chemotherapy fEasability study) cohort study. Nonfeasibility was defined by the frequencies of empirical first-cycle dose reduction (>15%), early discontinuation (<12 cycles), and low relative dose intensity (RDI) (<0.85). Risk factors for chemotherapy nonfeasibility were identified using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 153 patients, 56.2% were male (median age, 65.6 y; 35.3%≥70 y; 7.3% with performance status [PS]≥2). For 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 20.9% of patients had first-cycle dose reduction and 28.1% early discontinuation; RDI was 0.91 (25th to 75th percentiles, 0.68 to 0.99). Factors independently associated with first-cycle 5-FU dose reduction were aged 65 to 69 years versus those younger than 65 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-19.9) but not age 70 years and older, PS≥2 (aOR, 6.02; 95% CI, 1.15-31.4), higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (aOR1-point increase, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.05-1.82), or larger number of medications (aOR 1-medication increase, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.00-1.42). Oxaliplatin dose reduction occurred in 52.3% of patients and early discontinuation in 62.7%; the latter was more common in the 70 years and older group (92.6% vs. 74.6% in the <65-y group; P=0.01); RDI was 0.7 (95% CI, 0.55-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

In the real-world setting, compared with their younger and older counterparts, patients aged 65 to 69 years given modified FOLFOX6 for stage II or III colorectal cancer had higher frequencies of 5-FU nonfeasibility defined based on first-cycle dose reduction, early discontinuation, and RDI; and these differences were independent from PS, comorbidities, and number of medications.

Effect of dendritic cell-cytokine-induced killer cells in patients with advanced colorectal cancer combined with first-line treatment

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection combined with adjuvant chemotherapy is considered as the gold-standard treatment for advanced colorectal cancer patients. These patients have a poor 5-year survival rate of 5% or less. Furthermore, a large dose of chemotherapy can produce adverse side effects and severe toxicity. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dendritic cell-cytokine-induced killer (DC-CIK) cell infusion as an adjuvant therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer combined with first-line treatment.

METHODS

A total of 142 patients with stage III/IV colorectal carcinoma who had been treated with first-line therapy were included in this study. Among these patients, 71 patients received first-line treatment only (non-DC-CIK group), while the other 71 patients who had similar demographic and clinical characteristics received a DC-CIK cell infusion combined with first-line treatment (DC-CIK group). These patients were followed up until August 2014. Data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression.

RESULTS

Our results showed that the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate for the DC-CIK group versus the non-DC-CIK group was 41.3 versus 19.4% (p = 0.001) and the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate for the DC-CIK group versus the non-DC-CIK group was 57.4 versus 33.6% (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that patients with advanced colorectal cancer might benefit from DC-CIK immunotherapy combined with first-line therapy by significantly prolonging 5-year OS and PFS.

Factors Predicting Adherence to a Tailored-Dose Adjuvant Treatment on the Basis of Geriatric Assessment in Elderly People With Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Selecting elderly people with colorectal cancer (CRC) for adjuvant chemotherapy is challenging. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can help by classifying them according to their frailty profile. The supposed benefit of chemotherapy is on the basis of the rate of treatment adherence. In this study we evaluated tolerance and adherence to tailored-dose adjuvant therapy on the basis of CGA in a cohort of older patients with high-risk stage II and stage III CRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study in 193 consecutive patients aged 75 years or older. On the basis of CGA results, we classified patients as fit, medium fit, or unfit, administering standard therapy, adjusted treatment, and best supportive care, respectively. We recorded planned chemotherapy, toxicity, and completion of the treatment. A logistic multivariate analysis was carried out.

RESULTS

Seventeen (15%) of the 141 candidates for chemotherapy (n = 86 fit and n = 55 medium fit) refused treatment; associated factors included polypharmacy (odds ratio [OR], 5.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-18.40) and rectal location (OR, 5.61; 94% CI, 1.45-21.49). Of the 105 (74%) patients receiving chemotherapy, 20 (27%) fit and 4 (13%) medium fit patients experienced Grade 3 to 4 toxicity (P = .11) without association to explanatory variables. Approximately 55% of patients treated with chemotherapy received at least 80% of the planned dose (55% fit and 58% medium fit patients; P = .7). Factors associated with completion of chemotherapy were the absence of toxicity (OR, 7.67; 95% CI, 2.41-24.43) and social support (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 0.08-1.04).

CONCLUSION

CGA is useful for selecting elderly patients for adjuvant chemotherapy, adapting the dose to their frailty profile, and identifying adherence-related factors amenable to modification through CGA-based interventions.

Patient-reported symptoms and performance status before palliative radiotherapy in geriatric cancer patients (octogenarians)

Purpose

To evaluate differences in baseline parameters including performance status and self-reported symptom burden between geriatric and non-geriatric cancer patients, and to assess the hypothesis that these factors might predispose older patients to incomplete radiotherapy and short survival.

Patients and methods

Retrospective comparison of geriatric and non-geriatric patients treated with palliative radiotherapy (age ⩾80 years and <80 years, respectively). Between 2013 and 2015, 26 geriatric and 76 non-geriatric patients were treated. The Edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS) was employed to document baseline symptoms.

Results

Most patients received radiotherapy for bone metastases, commonly 5-10 fractions. Geriatric patients had significantly less pain at rest and depression. No strong trends towards higher symptom burden in older patients emerged for any of the items. Overall survival was similar in the two subgroups with different age and also in a separate age-stratified analysis of patients with performance status >2. Relatively few patients were irradiated in the terminal stage of disease, defined as final 30 days of life (8% in geriatric and 12% in other patients, p = 0.73). A higher number of geriatric patients failed to complete their prescribed course of radiotherapy (14 vs. 3%, p = 0.08), despite lower rates of prescription of more than 10 fractions in this group (15 vs. 23%, p > 0.2).

Conclusions

These data support utilization of palliative radiotherapy irrespective of age. However, care should be taken in assigning the right fractionation regimen in order to avoid lengthy treatment courses when survival is limited, such as in patients with performance status >2.

Optimal management of elderly cancer patients: usefulness of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment

Background

Cancer is common in older patients, who raise specific treatment challenges due to aging-related, organ-specific physiologic changes and the presence in most cases of comorbidities capable of affecting treatment tolerance and outcomes. Identifying comorbid conditions and physiologic changes due to aging allows oncologists to better assess the risk/benefit ratio and to adjust the treatment accordingly. Conducting a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is one approach developed for this purpose. We reviewed the evidence on the usefulness of CGA for assessing health problems and predicting cancer treatment outcomes, functional decline, morbidity, and mortality in older patients with solid malignancies.

Methods

We searched Medline for articles published in English between January 1, 2000 and April 14, 2014, and reporting prospective observational or interventional studies of CGA feasibility or effectiveness in patients aged ≥65 years with solid malignancies. We identified studies with at least 100 patients, a multivariate analysis, and assessments of at least five of the following CGA domains: nutrition, cognition, mood, functional status, mobility and falls, polypharmacy, comorbidities, and social environment.

Results

All types of CGA identified a large number of unrecognized health problems capable of interfering with cancer treatment. CGA results influenced 21%–49% of treatment decisions. All CGA domains were associated with chemotoxicity or survival in at least one study. The abnormalities that most often predicted mortality and chemotoxicity were functional impairment, malnutrition, and comorbidities.

Conclusion

The CGA uncovers numerous health problems in elderly patients with cancer and can affect treatment decisions. Functional impairment, malnutrition, and comorbidities are independently associated with chemotoxicity and/or survival. Only three randomized published studies evaluated the effectiveness of CGA-linked interventions. Further research into the effectiveness of the CGA in improving patient outcomes is needed.

Immune response, safety, and survival and quality of life outcomes for advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with dendritic cell vaccine and cytokine-induced killer cell therapy

Purpose. To determine the immune response after dendritic cell (DC) vaccine and cytokine-induced killer cells (CIK) therapy and assess its associated toxicity, survival benefit, and changes in the quality of life (QOL) of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Methods. We recruited 100 patients with unresectable CRC orrelapsed CRC after surgery who received DC vaccine and CIK cells (group immunotherapy, group I), and, as a control, 251 patients who had similar characteristics and underwent similar treatments, except for this immunotherapy (group nonimmunotherapy, group NI). After a follow-up period of 489.2 ± 160.4 days, overall survival (OS) of the two groups was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results. In group I, 62% of patients developed a positive delayed type hypersensitivity response, and most patients showed an improvement in physical strength (75.2%), appetite (74.2%), sleeping (72.1%), and body weight (70.1%). Adverse events were fever (29.5%), insomnia (19.2%), anorexia (9.1%), sore joints (5.4%), and skin rash (1.0%). No toxicity was observed in patients treated with DC vaccine and CIK therapy. OS was significantly longer in group I than in group NI (P = 0.043). Conclusion. DC vaccine and CIK therapy were safe and could induce an immune response against CRC, thereby improving QOL and prolonging OS.