Activity and safety of vinorelbine combined with doxorubicin or fluorouracil as first-line therapy in advanced breast cancer: a stratified phase II study

Weekly Docetaxel and Gemcitabine following Docetaxel plus Epirubicin or Vinorelbine as First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Phase II Study

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

Sequential docetaxel and gemcitabine following initial docetaxel plus epirubicin or vinorelbine association could be worthwhile as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients entered a phase II study that included two sequential phases. In the first phase, 36 and 22 patients previously unexposed or exposed to adjuvant anthracyclines received the association of docetaxel (75 mg/m2, day 1) with epirubicin (75 mg/m2, day 1) or vinorelbine (20 mg/m2, days 1 and 5), respectively, every 21 days for 4 courses. In the second phase, patients who had a response (R) or stable disease (SD) received docetaxel (35 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (800 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days for 4 courses.

RESULTS

In the first phase, grade > or = III neutropenia occurred in 51% and 37% of patients during docetaxel-epirubicin and docetaxel-vinorelbine, respectively. In the second phase, it occurred in the 27% and 15% of patients initially treated with docetaxel-epirubicin and docetaxel-vinorelbine, respectively. On an intention to treat basis, the complete (CR) + partial response (PR) rate to the first phase was 71%, and 22% of patients had SD, without a significant difference between the docetaxel-epirubicin and docetaxel-vinorelbine arms. After the second phase, the CR + PR rate was 65%, and 14% of patients had SD. Median time to progression and survival were 12.1 and 22.0 months, respectively, without a significant difference between patients initially treated with docetaxel-epirubicin and docetaxel-vinorelbine.

CONCLUSIONS

Following an initial docetaxel-based treatment, weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine maintains high percentages of R and SD, with improved toxicity. Survival was similar in patients previously untreated and treated with adjuvant anthracyclines.

Comparison of cardiac events associated with liposomal doxorubicin, epirubicin and doxorubicin in breast cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anthracyclines play a broad and important role in the care of patients with either operable or metastatic breast cancer. However cardiotoxicity narrows the therapeutic index of this drug class leading to potentially clinically meaningful treatment delays or discontinuations. We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis, a validated statistical methodology, allowing direct and indirect comparison of cardiotoxicity of different anthracycline and non-anthracycline regimens.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of prospective randomised controlled trials through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar comparing non-anthracycline based regimens (NON), doxorubicin (DOX), epirubicin (EPI) and liposomal doxorubicin (LD). We included studies published up to 1st January 2014 in both adjuvant and metastatic contexts. Notably, HER2/neu-targeted regimens were excluded. We assessed the studies' eligibility criteria and data collection with consensus of two independent authors. Our primary outcome measure was cardiac events grade 3 or greater (CE3) in accordance with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. A Bayesian pairwise and network meta-analysis was conducted to estimate pooled Odds Ratio (OR).

FINDINGS

Nineteen randomised controlled trials met eligibility criteria and were included in this analysis. We found a trend showing that LD is less cardiotoxic than DOX with an OR of 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-1.07) There was no difference between Epi and LD with an OR of 0.95 (95%CI 0.39-2.33). DOX is more cardiotoxic than Non with an OR of 1.57 (95%CI 0.90-2.72).

INTERPRETATION

DOX has higher CE3 rates than NON does. LD statistically trended to lower cardiac event rates than DOX. Non-statistical significance among EPI, LD and DOX with regard to cardiac toxicity indicates that avoidance of CE3 should not motivate selection of a particular anthracycline in otherwise healthy women in whom total lifetime anthracycline exposure will likely be limited. Overall low incidence of CE3 with any type of anthracycline indicates that we can safely use any anthracycline if cumulative dose limits are not exceeded. While CE3 does not limit our choice of anthracycline LD appears to be the least cardiotoxic.

FUNDING

Takeo Fujii is supported by the grant named Young Investigator Award for Study Abroad in Clinical Epidemiology from St. Luke's Life Science Institution.

Results of a phase I trial of intravenous vinorelbine plus oral capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer

The management of metastatic breast cancer becomes increasingly intricate, requiring new drugs and combinations. We present here the results of a phase I study evaluating the maximal tolerated dose of vinorelbine combined with capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy. Vinorelbine was administered intravenously on days 1 and 15, and capecitabine was given orally twice daily from day 1 to 14 (three cycles every 21 days). Three out of six patients receiving vinorelbine at 25mg/m2/day and capecitabine at 2000 mg/m2/day presented with a dose-limiting toxicity, consisting of protracted grade 3 neutropenia, hand-foot syndrome and/or liver test disturbances. Despite of a dose reduction in vinorelbine (20mg/m2/day), one patient among four developed a dose-limiting febrile neutropenia. This regimen cannot be recommended as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. These findings are not in agreement with previous publications of this schedule, or with promising results using both drugs orally.

Sequential vinorelbine–capecitabine followed by docetaxel in advanced breast cancer: long-term results of a pilot phase II trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the response rate of the combination of capecitabine (C) and vinorelbine (V) followed by Docetaxel (D) in the 1st line treatment of advanced and metastatic breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable disease and no prior chemotherapy in advanced disease were eligible. Pts received V 25 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 8 in combination with C 825 mg/m(2) twice a day from day 1 to 14 every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by 12 consecutive weeks of D 25 mg/m(2)/w.

RESULTS

Between March 2002 and November 2003, 40 patients were enrolled. Median age was 57 years. Of patients, 77.5% of pts had visceral involvement and 32.5% had more than two metastatic sites. In the adjuvant setting, 62.5% received anthracycline and 10% Taxanes. In the intent-to-treat population, an overall objective response was observed in 25 patients (62.5, 95% CI, 45.8-77.27) and stable disease in 5 (12.5%). Median time till progression (TTP) was 12.3 months (range 1.5-48; 95% CI, 10.05-14.54). The median survival was 35.7 months (range 2-47). Reported grade 3-4 toxicities under Navcap were neutropenia (4 pts), anemia (1 pt), thrombopenia (1 pt) and febrile neutropenia (3 pts). Reported grade 3-4 toxicities under weekly Docetaxel were neutropenia (1 pt), thrombopenia (2 pts), leucopenia (1 pt) and anemia (1 pt).

CONCLUSION

The sequential use of Navcap followed by weekly Docetaxel demonstrated an interesting efficacy with a prolonged TTP and OS and warrants further evaluation.

Vinorelbine in the management of breast cancer: New perspectives, revived role in the era of targeted therapy

Vinorelbine is a semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid that has been shown active in many tumour types and is currently registered for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This agent has a generally favourable safety profile, and may be suitable for use in special populations such as the elderly and/or frail patient. However, with the taxanes firmly established as standard second line treatment for ABC after failure of an anthracycline, vinorelbine has been generally relegated for use as third line therapy, in competition with the oral compound capecitabine. More recently, the exciting results observed with the combination of vinorelbine and trastuzumab in patients with Her-2 overexpressing/amplified tumours, as well as the development of a reliable formulation and revised schedule of oral vinorelbine with proven activity in ABC appear to have revived the interest in this compound in the management of this disease. There are still a number of unanswered questions that will have to be addressed by properly designed, adequately powered randomised clinical trials.

Efectividad de 5-fluoruracilo y vinorelbina en pacientes multitratadas por cáncer de mama metastásico

PURPOSE

In this study we evaluated the activity and toxicity of a combination of 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion and vinorelbine as second or third line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AN METHODS: A total 24 patients who had received doxorrubicin and/or paclitaxel were included in this study. The regimen consisted in 5-fluorouracil 1 gr/m(2) BSA continuous infusion for 3 days and vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) intravenous (IV) on day 1. The cycles were repeated every 21 days for 6 cycles.

RESULTS

Objective responses were recorded in 37.5% (12.5% complete remission). The median disease-free survival was calculated 6.33 +/- 8.12 months (CI 95% of 3.43 months). Toxicity was observed in 12.5% of the patients and no treatment related deaths were recorded.

CONCLUSION

The combination of 5-fluorouracil/vinorelbine at the dose administered is an effective regime in patients with MBC, with low toxicity and cost.