1
|
Parker CD, Lister SA, Gittins J. Impact assessment of the reduction or removal of ionophores used for controlling coccidiosis in the UK broiler industry. Vet Rec 2021; 189:e513. [PMID: 34101192 DOI: 10.1002/vetr.513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Revised: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Coccidiosis is a complex parasitic disease ubiquitous in all types of poultry production. It can have both a direct effect on bird health and welfare with significant negative impacts on the production parameters and indirect effect as it predisposes to other pathogens. Ionophore coccidiostats have been used safely for over 45 years by poultry producers. Concerns have been raised that their use in livestock production could promote the development of antibiotic resistance, but their unique mode of action makes it unlikely. Conversely their removal can result in increased use of therapeutic antibiotics to treat disease posing a greater risk of antibiotic resistance development. Economic and environmental models examining the impact of the removal of ionophore coccidiostats from UK production suggest the annual cost to the broiler sector would be between £68.02-£109.95 million and result in an additional 84,000 tonnes CO2 e being produced per annum. Any cost increase would make this wholesome and affordable animal protein less affordable to poorer sectors of society. Increased greenhouse gas production, demand for water and land as a result of less efficient production will impact on climate change targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Daniel Parker
- Slate Hall Veterinary Practice, Unit 28 Moorlands Trading Estate, Metheringham, Lincs, UK
| | | | - Jason Gittins
- ADAS Agriculture and Land Management Group, Helsby, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rhouma M, Lachapelle V, Comeau G, Quessy S, Zanabria R, Provost F, Italiano C, Holley R, Smillie J, Brockhoff E, Bosch ML, Collins S, Dumas A, Chorfi Y, Costa M, Gaucher ML, Racicot M. Identification and selection of animal health and food safety-related risk factors to be included in the Canadian Food Inspection Agency's risk assessment model for livestock feed mills. Food Control 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
3
|
Karavolias J, Salois MJ, Baker KT, Watkins K. Raised without antibiotics: impact on animal welfare and implications for food policy. Transl Anim Sci 2018; 2:337-348. [PMID: 32704717 PMCID: PMC7200433 DOI: 10.1093/tas/txy016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This study assesses the impact of broilers raised without antibiotics and the information gap that exists between consumer perception and production methods. Specifically looking at risk of eye burns, footpad lesions, and airsacculitis, key indicators of animal welfare, bird-level data are collected on the occurrence and severity of each disease state by the type of antibiotic program: no antibiotics ever, nonmedically important antibiotics, or medically important antibiotics. Odds ratios and marginal effects are calculated to understand how the occurrence and severity change with access to medicine. Broilers never given antibiotics had a higher likelihood of disease states investigated, and with greater severity. In some cases, access to nonmedically important ionophores mitigated the risk of occurrence and severity of the conditions. The finding indicates that the growing trend of raising broilers without antibiotics may negatively affect animal welfare. This stands in contrast to existing consumer research showing that consumers purchase poultry raised without antibiotics because they believe that it promotes healthier animals. Therefore, a significant consumer information gap exists which needs to be addressed. JEL Codes: Q130, Q160, Q180
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kristi T Baker
- Elanco Animal Health, Elanco Knowledge Solutions, Greenfield, IN
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Birger RB, Kouyos RD, Cohen T, Griffiths EC, Huijben S, Mina MJ, Volkova V, Grenfell B, Metcalf CJE. The potential impact of coinfection on antimicrobial chemotherapy and drug resistance. Trends Microbiol 2015; 23:537-544. [PMID: 26028590 DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2015] [Revised: 04/20/2015] [Accepted: 05/05/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Across a range of pathogens, resistance to chemotherapy is a growing problem in both public health and animal health. Despite the ubiquity of coinfection, and its potential effects on within-host biology, the role played by coinfecting pathogens on the evolution of resistance and efficacy of antimicrobial chemotherapy is rarely considered. In this review, we provide an overview of the mechanisms of interaction of coinfecting pathogens, ranging from immune modulation and resource modulation, to drug interactions. We discuss their potential implications for the evolution of resistance, providing evidence in the rare cases where it is available. Overall, our review indicates that the impact of coinfection has the potential to be considerable, suggesting that this should be taken into account when designing antimicrobial drug treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruthie B Birger
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Roger D Kouyos
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.,Institute of Medical Virology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Ted Cohen
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Emily C Griffiths
- Department of Entomology, Gardner Hall, Derieux Place, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613, USA
| | - Silvie Huijben
- ISGlobal, Barcelona Ctr. Int. Health Res. (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic -Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael J Mina
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.,Medical Scientist Training Program, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Victoriya Volkova
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Institute of Computational Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
| | - Bryan Grenfell
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.,Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - C Jessica E Metcalf
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.,Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|