Cancer Incidence among Nuclear Workers in Russia Based on Data from the Institute of Physics and Power Engineering: A Preliminary Analysis

Solid cancer mortality associated with chronic external radiation exposure at the French atomic energy commission and nuclear fuel company

Studies of nuclear workers make it possible to directly quantify the risks associated with ionizing radiation exposure at low doses and low dose rates. Studies of the CEA (Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique) and AREVA Nuclear Cycle (AREVA NC) cohort, currently the most informative such group in France, describe the long-term risk to nuclear workers associated with external exposure. Our aim is to assess the risk of mortality from solid cancers among CEA and AREVA NC nuclear workers and its association with external radiation exposure. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated and internal Poisson regressions were conducted, controlling for the main confounding factors [sex, attained age, calendar period, company and socioeconomic status (SES)]. During the period 1968-2004, there were 2,035 solid cancers among the 36,769 CEA-AREVA NC workers. Cumulative external radiation exposure was assessed for the period 1950-2004, and the mean cumulative dose was 12.1 mSv. Mortality rates for all causes and all solid cancers were both significantly lower in this cohort than in the general population. A significant excess of deaths from pleural cancer, not associated with cumulative external dose, was observed, probably due to past asbestos exposure. We observed a significant excess of melanoma, also unassociated with dose. Although cumulative external dose was not associated with mortality from all solid cancers, the central estimated excess relative risk (ERR) per Sv of 0.46 for solid cancer mortality was higher than the 0.26 calculated for male Hiroshima and Nagasaki A-bomb survivors 50 years or older and exposed at the age of 30 years or older. The modification of our results after stratification for SES demonstrates the importance of this characteristic in occupational studies, because it makes it possible to take class-based lifestyle differences into account, at least partly. These results show the great potential of a further joint international study of nuclear workers, which should improve knowledge about the risks associated with chronic low doses and provide useful risk estimates for radiation protection.

[Epidemiologic data on radiation-induced breast cancer]

BACKGROUND

Female breast cancer is the most frequent cancer, both in incidence and mortality. It is well known that exposure to ionizing radiation increases the risk, but some questions remain concerning low dose and low-dose rate effects and cofactors. These potential effects have to be taken into account to carry out adequate risk assessment on medically exposed populations. A literature review is proposed on this issue.

METHODS

A Medline search was undertaken. Keywords used were ionizing radiation, breast cancer and epidemiology. More studies were added through references included in the first list of articles. The focus was placed on studies including quantitative dose-effect relationship analyses.

RESULTS

A latency of five to 10 to 13 years is observed in the appearance of risk. The risk diminishes with age at exposure. A diminution with age at risk is also suspected. The excess relative risk per gray varies between 0.3 and 1.5 for an age at first exposure of 25 years. The study of Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors shows that risk is increased even if doses are restricted to below 0.5Gy. Above high doses (20Gy), the risk no longer increases. This can be interpreted as a cell-killing effect. The excess subsists if doses are fractionated, but a diminution of the effect is suspected.

CONCLUSION

The effects of exposure to levels of doses used for medical diagnostic are very difficult to study in the general population by epidemiological methods. Only studies conducted on very young children could achieve enough power, because of their high radiosensitivity. Available information on the effects of doses above 0.5Gy allows extrapolation on maximal effects. Models deduced from existing cohorts can be used to assess risk, with their limits due to associated uncertainties. Preston et al. proposed an excess absolute-risk model, which makes estimates from the more comprehensive cohorts compatible. This model has been retained by the 2006 committee "Biological effects of ionizing radiation" (report VII).

Concept of optimisation of the radiation protection system in the nuclear sector: management of individual cancer risks and providing targeted health care

The paper discusses the provision of targeted health care to nuclear workers in Russia based on radiation-epidemiological estimates of cancer risks. Cancer incidence rates are analysed for the workers of the Institute of Physical Power Engineering (the first nuclear installation in the world) who were subjected to individual dosimetric monitoring from 1950 to 2002. The value of excess relative risk for solid cancers was found to be ERR Gy(-1) = 0.24 (95% CI: -4.22; 7.96). It has been shown that 81.8% of the persons covered by individual dosimetric monitoring have potential attributive risk up to 5%, and the risk is more than 10% for 3.7% of the workers. Among the detected cancer cases, 73.5% of the individuals show an attributive risk up to 5% and the risk is in excess of 10% for 3.9% of the workers. Principles for the provision of targeted health care, given voluntary health insurance, are outlined.