1
|
Kuang Y, Kang J, Li H, Liu B, Zhao X, Li L, Jin X, Li Q. Multiple functions of p21 in cancer radiotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2021; 147:987-1006. [PMID: 33547489 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03529-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Greater than half of cancer patients experience radiation therapy, for both radical and palliative objectives. It is well known that researches on radiation response mechanisms are conducive to improve the efficacy of cancer radiotherapy. p21 was initially identified as a widespread inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases, transcriptionally modulated by p53 and a marker of cellular senescence. It was once considered that p21 acts as a tumour suppressor mainly to restrain cell cycle progression, thereby resulting in growth suppression. With the deepening researches on p21, p21 has been found to regulate radiation responses via participating in multiple cellular processes, including cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, DNA repair, senescence and autophagy. Hence, a comprehensive summary of the p21's functions in radiation response will provide a new perspective for radiotherapy against cancer. METHODS We summarize the recent pertinent literature from various electronic databases, including PubMed and analyzed several datasets from Gene Expression Omnibus database. This review discusses how p21 influences the effect of cancer radiotherapy via involving in multiple signaling pathways and expounds the feasibility, barrier and risks of using p21 as a biomarker as well as a therapeutic target of radiotherapy. CONCLUSION p21's complicated and important functions in cancer radiotherapy make it a promising therapeutic target. Besides, more thorough insights of p21 are needed to make it a safe therapeutic target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanbei Kuang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 509 Nanchang Road, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Jian Kang
- College of Energy and Power Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, China
| | - Hongbin Li
- School of Life Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, China
| | - Bingtao Liu
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 509 Nanchang Road, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Xueshan Zhao
- The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Linying Li
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 509 Nanchang Road, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Xiaodong Jin
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 509 Nanchang Road, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
- Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
| | - Qiang Li
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 509 Nanchang Road, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
- Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bergs JWJ, Franken NAP, Haveman J, Geijsen ED, Crezee J, van Bree C. Hyperthermia, cisplatin and radiation trimodality treatment: a promising cancer treatment? A review from preclinical studies to clinical application. Int J Hyperthermia 2007; 23:329-41. [PMID: 17558732 DOI: 10.1080/02656730701378684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
This review discusses available clinical and experimental data and the underlying mechanisms involved in trimodality treatment consisting of hyperthermia, cisplatin and radiotherapy. The results of phase I/II clinical trials show that trimodality treatment is effective and feasible in various cancer types and sites with tolerable toxicity. Based on these results, phase III trials have been launched to investigate whether significant differences in treatment outcome exist between trimodality and standard treatment. In view of the clinical interest, it is surprising to find so few preclinical studies on trimodality treatment. Although little information is available on the doses of the modalities and the treatment sequence resulting in the largest degree of synergistic interaction, the results from in vivo and in vitro preclinical studies support the use of trimodality treatment for cancer patients. Animal studies show an improvement in treatment outcome after trimodality treatment compared with mono- and bimodality treatment. Studies in different human tumour cell lines show that a synergistic interaction can be obtained between hyperthermia, cisplatin and radiation and that this interaction is more likely to occur in cell lines which are more sensitive to cisplatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W J Bergs
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mirzayans R, Scott A, Cameron M, Murray D. Induction of accelerated senescence by gamma radiation in human solid tumor-derived cell lines expressing wild-type TP53. Radiat Res 2005; 163:53-62. [PMID: 15606307 DOI: 10.1667/rr3280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Recent studies have demonstrated that p21WAF1 (now known as CDKN1A)-dependent and -independent accelerated senescence responses are a major determinant of the sensitivity of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents. The objective of the present study was to determine whether human solid tumor-derived cell lines that express wild-type TP53 can exhibit levels of CDKN1A induction after exposure to ionizing radiation that are sufficient to activate the accelerated senescence program. Exposure to 60Co gamma radiation (< or =8 Gy) triggered accelerated senescence in all five TP53 wild-type tumor cell lines examined, albeit to differing degrees. Three of the TP53 wild-type tumor cell lines, HCT116, A172 and SKNSH, activated the TP53 signaling pathway similarly to normal human fibroblasts, as judged by the nuclear accumulation of TP53, magnitude and duration of induction of CDKN1A mRNA and CDKN1A protein, and propensity to undergo accelerated senescence after radiation exposure. In the clonogenic survival assay, the degree of radiosensitivity of these three tumor cell lines was also in the range displayed by normal human fibroblasts. On the other hand, two other TP53 wild-type tumor cell lines, A498 and A375, did not maintain high levels of CDKN1A mRNA and CDKN1A protein at late times postirradiation and exhibited only low levels of accelerated senescence after radiation exposure. Studies with a CDKN1A knockout cell line (HCT116CDKN1A-/-) confirmed that the radiation-triggered accelerated senescence is dependent on CDKN1A function. We conclude that (1) clinically achievable doses of ionizing radiation can trigger CDKN1A-dependent accelerated senescence in some human tumor cell lines that express wild-type TP53; and (2) as previously documented for normal human fibroblasts, some TP53 wild-type tumor cell lines (e.g. HCT116, A172 and SKNSH) may lose their clonogenic potential in response to radiation-inflicted injury primarily through undergoing accelerated senescence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Razmik Mirzayans
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1Z2, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chu K, Teele N, Dewey MW, Albright N, Dewey WC. Computerized video time lapse study of cell cycle delay and arrest, mitotic catastrophe, apoptosis and clonogenic survival in irradiated 14-3-3sigma and CDKN1A (p21) knockout cell lines. Radiat Res 2004; 162:270-86. [PMID: 15332997 DOI: 10.1667/rr3221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Computerized video time lapse (CVTL) microscopy was used to observe cellular events induced by ionizing radiation (10-12 Gy) in nonclonogenic cells of the wild-type HCT116 colorectal carcinoma cell line and its three isogenic derivative lines in which p21 (CDKN1A), 14-3-3sigma or both checkpoint genes (double-knockout) had been knocked out. Cells that fused after mitosis or failed to complete mitosis were classified together as cells that underwent mitotic catastrophe. Seventeen percent of the wild-type cells and 34-47% of the knockout cells underwent mitotic catastrophe to enter generation 1 with a 4N content of DNA, i.e., the same DNA content as irradiated cells arrested in G(2) at the end of generation 0. Radiation caused a transient division delay in generation 0 before the cells divided or underwent mitotic catastrophe. Compared with the division delay for wild-type cells that express CDKN1A and 14-3-3sigma, knocking out CDKN1A reduced the delay the most for cells irradiated in G(1) (from approximately 15 h to approximately 3- 5 h), while knocking out 14-3-3sigma reduced the delay the most for cells irradiated in late S and G(2) (from approximately 18 h to approximately 3-4 h). However, 27% of wild-type cells and 17% of 14-3-3sigma(-/-) cells were arrested at 96 h in generation 0 compared with less than 1% for CDKN1A(-/-) and double-knockout cells. Thus expression of CDKN1A is necessary for the prolonged delay or arrest in generation 0. Furthermore, CDKN1A plays a crucial role in generation 1, greatly inhibiting progression into subsequent generations of both diploid cells and polyploid cells produced by mitotic catastrophe. Thus, in CDKN1A-deficient cell lines, a series of mitotic catastrophe events occurred to produce highly polyploid progeny during generations 3 and 4. Most importantly, the polyploid progeny produced by mitotic catastrophe events did not die sooner than the progeny of dividing cells. Death was identified as loss of cell movement, i.e. metabolic activity. Thus mitotic catastrophe itself is not a direct mode of death. Instead, apoptosis during interphase of both uninucleated and polyploid cells was the primary mode of death observed in the four cell types. Knocking out either CDKN1A or 14-3-3sigma increased the amount of cell death at 96 h, from 52% to approximately 70%, with an even greater increase to 90% when both genes were knocked out. Thus, in addition to effects of CDKN1A and 14-3-3sigma expression on transient cell cycle delay, CDKN1A has both an anti-proliferative and anti-apoptosis function, while 14-3-3sigma has only an anti-apoptosis function. Finally, the large alterations in the amounts of cell death did not correlate overall with the small alterations in clonogenic survival (dose-modifying ratios of 1.05-1.13); however, knocking out CDKN1A resulted in a decrease in arrested cells and an increase in survival, while knocking out 14-3-3sigma resulted in an increase in apoptosis and a decrease in survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Chu
- Radiation Oncology Research Laboratory, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94103, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kampinga HH, Dynlacht JR, Dikomey E. Mechanism of radiosensitization by hyperthermia (> or = 43 degrees C) as derived from studies with DNA repair defective mutant cell lines. Int J Hyperthermia 2004; 20:131-9. [PMID: 15195507 DOI: 10.1080/02656730310001627713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
All biochemical and cytogenetic data on radiosensitization by heat treatment at and above 43 degrees C indicate that inhibition of DNA repair plays a central role. There are several DNA repair pathways involved in restoration of damage after ionising irradiation and the kinetics of all of them are affected by heat shock. This, however, does not imply that the inhibition of each of these pathways is relevant to the effect of heat on cellular radiosensitivity. The current review evaluates the available data on heat radiosensitization in mutant or knockout cell lines defective in various DNA repair proteins and/or pathways. The data show that thermal inhibition of the non-homologous end-joining pathway (NHEJ) plays no role in heat radiosensitization. Furthermore, limited data suggest that the homologous recombination pathway may also not be a major heat target. By deduction, it is suggested that inhibition of base damage repair (BER) could be the crucial step in radiosensitization by heat. While a lack of mutant cell lines and redundancy of the BER pathway have hampered efforts toward a conclusive study, biochemical and correlative evidence support this hypothesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H H Kampinga
- Department of Radiation and Stress Cell Biology, University of Groningen, A Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|