1
|
Blakely WF, Port M, Ostheim P, Abend M. Radiation Research Society Journal-based Historical Review of the Use of Biomarkers for Radiation Dose and Injury Assessment: Acute Health Effects Predictions. Radiat Res 2024; 202:185-204. [PMID: 38936821 DOI: 10.1667/rade-24-00121.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
A multiple-parameter based approach using radiation-induced clinical signs and symptoms, hematology changes, cytogenetic chromosomal aberrations, and molecular biomarkers changes after radiation exposure is used for biodosimetry-based dose assessment. In the current article, relevant milestones from Radiation Research are documented that forms the basis of the current consensus approach for diagnostics after radiation exposure. For example, in 1962 the use of cytogenetic chromosomal aberration using the lymphocyte metaphase spread dicentric assay for biodosimetry applications was first published in Radiation Research. This assay is now complimented using other cytogenetic chromosomal aberration assays (i.e., chromosomal translocations, cytokinesis-blocked micronuclei, premature chromosome condensation, γ-H2AX foci, etc.). Changes in blood cell counts represent an early-phase biomarker for radiation exposures. Molecular biomarker changes have evolved to include panels of organ-specific plasma proteomic and blood-based gene expression biomarkers for radiation dose assessment. Maturation of these assays are shown by efforts for automated processing and scoring, development of point-of-care diagnostics devices, service laboratories inter-comparison exercises, and applications for dose and injury assessments in radiation accidents. An alternative and complementary approach has been advocated with the focus to de-emphasize "dose" and instead focus on predicting acute or delayed health effects. The same biomarkers used for dose estimation (e.g., lymphocyte counts) can be used to directly predict the later developing severity degree of acute health effects without performing dose estimation as an additional or intermediate step. This review illustrates contributing steps toward these developments published in Radiation Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William F Blakely
- Scientific Research Department, Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Matthias Port
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Michael Abend
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Obrador E, Salvador-Palmer R, Villaescusa JI, Gallego E, Pellicer B, Estrela JM, Montoro A. Nuclear and Radiological Emergencies: Biological Effects, Countermeasures and Biodosimetry. Antioxidants (Basel) 2022; 11:1098. [PMID: 35739995 PMCID: PMC9219873 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11061098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Atomic and radiological crises can be caused by accidents, military activities, terrorist assaults involving atomic installations, the explosion of nuclear devices, or the utilization of concealed radiation exposure devices. Direct damage is caused when radiation interacts directly with cellular components. Indirect effects are mainly caused by the generation of reactive oxygen species due to radiolysis of water molecules. Acute and persistent oxidative stress associates to radiation-induced biological damages. Biological impacts of atomic radiation exposure can be deterministic (in a period range a posteriori of the event and because of destructive tissue/organ harm) or stochastic (irregular, for example cell mutation related pathologies and heritable infections). Potential countermeasures according to a specific scenario require considering basic issues, e.g., the type of radiation, people directly affected and first responders, range of doses received and whether the exposure or contamination has affected the total body or is partial. This review focuses on available medical countermeasures (radioprotectors, radiomitigators, radionuclide scavengers), biodosimetry (biological and biophysical techniques that can be quantitatively correlated with the magnitude of the radiation dose received), and strategies to implement the response to an accidental radiation exposure. In the case of large-scale atomic or radiological events, the most ideal choice for triage, dose assessment and victim classification, is the utilization of global biodosimetry networks, in combination with the automation of strategies based on modular platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Obrador
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (R.S.-P.); (B.P.); (J.M.E.)
| | - Rosario Salvador-Palmer
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (R.S.-P.); (B.P.); (J.M.E.)
| | - Juan I. Villaescusa
- Service of Radiological Protection, Clinical Area of Medical Image, La Fe University Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (J.I.V.); (A.M.)
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group GIBI230, Health Research Institute (IISLaFe), La Fe University Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - Eduardo Gallego
- Energy Engineering Department, School of Industrial Engineering, Polytechnic University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Blanca Pellicer
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (R.S.-P.); (B.P.); (J.M.E.)
| | - José M. Estrela
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (R.S.-P.); (B.P.); (J.M.E.)
| | - Alegría Montoro
- Service of Radiological Protection, Clinical Area of Medical Image, La Fe University Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (J.I.V.); (A.M.)
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group GIBI230, Health Research Institute (IISLaFe), La Fe University Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Taliaferro LP, DiCarlo AL, Satyamitra MM. NIH Policies and Regulatory Pathways for the Advancement of Radiation Medical Countermeasures and Biodosimetry Tools to U.S. FDA Licensure. Radiat Res 2021; 197:475645. [PMID: 34919721 PMCID: PMC9762489 DOI: 10.1667/rade-21-00206.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lanyn P. Taliaferro
- Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program (RNCP), Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation (DAIT), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Rockville, Maryland 20892-9828
| | - Andrea L. DiCarlo
- Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program (RNCP), Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation (DAIT), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Rockville, Maryland 20892-9828
| | - Merriline M. Satyamitra
- Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program (RNCP), Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation (DAIT), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Rockville, Maryland 20892-9828
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Penninckx S, Pariset E, Cekanaviciute E, Costes SV. Quantification of radiation-induced DNA double strand break repair foci to evaluate and predict biological responses to ionizing radiation. NAR Cancer 2021; 3:zcab046. [PMID: 35692378 PMCID: PMC8693576 DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcab046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation-induced foci (RIF) are nuclear puncta visualized by immunostaining of proteins that regulate DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair after exposure to ionizing radiation. RIF are a standard metric for measuring DSB formation and repair in clinical, environmental and space radiobiology. The time course and dose dependence of their formation has great potential to predict in vivo responses to ionizing radiation, predisposition to cancer and probability of adverse reactions to radiotherapy. However, increasing complexity of experimentally and therapeutically setups (charged particle, FLASH …) is associated with several confounding factors that must be taken into account when interpreting RIF values. In this review, we discuss the spatiotemporal characteristics of RIF development after irradiation, addressing the common confounding factors, including cell proliferation and foci merging. We also describe the relevant endpoints and mathematical models that enable accurate biological interpretation of RIF formation and resolution. Finally, we discuss the use of RIF as a biomarker for quantification and prediction of in vivo radiation responses, including important caveats relating to the choice of the biological endpoint and the detection method. This review intends to help scientific community design radiobiology experiments using RIF as a key metric and to provide suggestions for their biological interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Penninckx
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
- Medical Physics Department, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1 Rue Héger-Bordet, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Eloise Pariset
- Space Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
- Universities Space Research Association, 615 National Avenue, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
| | - Egle Cekanaviciute
- Space Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
| | - Sylvain V Costes
- To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 650 604 5343;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bensimon Etzol J, Rizzi Y, Gateau T, Guersen J, Pereira B, Gouzou E, Lanaret M, Grand O, Bettencourt C, Bouvet S, Ugolin N, Chevillard S, Boyer L. Biodosimetry in interventional radiology: cutaneous-based immunoassay for anticipating risks of dermatitis. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:7476-7483. [PMID: 33791818 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07885-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Interventional radiology procedures expose individuals to ionizing radiation. However, existing dosimetry methods do not provide the dose effectively absorbed to the skin, and do not consider the patient's individual response to irradiation. To resolve this lack of dosimetry data, we developed a new external irradiation biodosimetry device, DosiKit, based on the dose-dependent relationship between irradiation dose and radiation-induced H2AX protein phosphorylation in hair follicles. This new biological method was tested in Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital to evaluate the assay performances in the medical field and to estimate DosiKit sensitivity threshold. METHODS DosiKit was tested over 95 patients treated with neuroradiological interventions. For each intervention, lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were used to measure total dose received at each hair collection point (lateral and occipital skull areas), and conventional indirect dosimetry parameters were collected with a Dosimetry Archiving and Communication System (DACS). RESULTS Quantitative measurement of radiation-induced H2AX protein phosphorylation was performed on 174 hair samples before and after the radiation exposure and 105 samples showed a notable induction of gammaH2AX protein after the radiological procedure. According to a statistical analysis, the threshold sensitivity of the DosiKit immunoassay was estimated around 700 mGy. CONCLUSIONS With this study, we showed that DosiKit provides a useful way for mapping the actually absorbed doses, allowing to identify patients overexposed in interventional radiology procedures, and thus for anticipating risk of developing dermatitis. KEY POINTS • DosiKit is a new external irradiation biodosimetry device, based on the dose-dependent relationship between irradiation dose and radiation-induced H2AX protein phosphorylation in hair follicles. • DosiKit was tested over 95 patients treated with neuroradiological interventions. • The threshold sensitivity of the DosiKit immunoassay was estimated around 700 mGy and DosiKit provides a useful way for mapping the actually absorbed doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yassine Rizzi
- Service de Radiologie CHU Gabriel-Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Theo Gateau
- Service de Radiologie CHU Gabriel-Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Joel Guersen
- Service de Radiologie CHU Gabriel-Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Bruno Pereira
- Unité de Biostatistiques (DRCI), CHU Gabriel-Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Emmanuel Gouzou
- Service de Radiologie CHU Gabriel-Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Mathieu Lanaret
- Service de Radiologie CHU Gabriel-Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Oceane Grand
- Service de Radiologie CHU Gabriel-Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | | | - Nicolas Ugolin
- Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique (CEA), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | | | - Louis Boyer
- Service de Radiologie CHU Gabriel-Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,TGI Institut Pascal UMR 6602 CNRS UCA SIGMA, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Potential application of γ-H2AX as a biodosimetry tool for radiation triage. MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH 2020; 787:108350. [PMID: 34083048 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2020.108350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Radiation triage and biological dosimetry are two initial steps in the medical management of exposed individuals following radiological accidents. Well established biodosimetry methods such as the dicentric (DC) assay, micronucleus (MN) assay, and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) translocation assay (for residual damage) have been used for this purpose for several decades. Recent advances in scoring methodology and networking among established laboratories have increased triage capacity; however, these methods still have limitations in analysing large sample numbers, particularly because of the ∼ 48 h minimum culture time required prior to analysis. Hence, there is a need for simple, and high throughput markers to identify exposed individuals in case of radiological/nuclear emergencies. In recent years, a few markers were identified, one being phosphorylated histone 2AX (γ-H2AX), which measured a nuclear foci or nuclear staining intensity that was found to be suitable for triage. Measurement of γ-H2AX foci formed at and around the sites of DNA double-strand breaks is a rapid and sensitive biodosimetry method which does not require culturing and is thus promising for the analysis of a large number of samples. In this review, we have summarized the recent developments of γ-H2AX assay in radiation triage and biodosimetry, focusing chiefly on: i) the importance of baseline frequency and reported values among different laboratories, ii) the influence of known and unknown variables on dose estimation, iii) quality assurance such as inter-laboratory comparison between scorers and scoring methods, and iv) current limitations and potential for future development.
Collapse
|