1
|
Ariyamuthu VK, Qannus AA, Tanriover B. How do we increase deceased donor kidney utilization and reduce discard? Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2025; 30:215-221. [PMID: 39945242 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review aims to address the critical issue of expanding deceased donor kidney pool and reducing the discard rates of viable kidneys in the United States. It highlights advances in organ preservation techniques and explores strategies for expanding the donor pool by leveraging suboptimal and high-risk nonuse kidneys, including those affected by acute kidney injury (AKI), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV). RECENT FINDINGS Innovations in organ preservation, including hypothermic and normothermic machine perfusion, have demonstrated efficacy in improving outcomes for marginal and extended-criteria kidneys. The integration of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) for donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors has enhanced organ utilization and graft viability. Additionally, research confirms that kidneys from AKI and HCV-positive donors, when managed with appropriate protocols, yield comparable long-term outcomes to standard transplants. Emerging data on HBV-positive donor kidneys further underscore their potential to safely expand transplant access with targeted antiviral prophylaxis. SUMMARY Optimizing deceased donor kidney utilization requires a multi-faceted approach, including advancements in preservation technologies, evidence-based decision-making for high-risk organs, and policy innovations. Leveraging these strategies can help address the growing organ shortage, enhance transplant outcomes, and ensure broader access to life-saving kidney transplants.
Collapse
|
2
|
Mohan S, Yu M, Maclay LM, Adler JT, Huml AM, Schold JD, Husain SA. Outcomes for Patients With a Deceased Donor Kidney Offer in the New Allocation System. Kidney Int Rep 2025; 10:1111-1121. [PMID: 40303214 PMCID: PMC12034855 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2025.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2024] [Revised: 01/13/2025] [Accepted: 01/13/2025] [Indexed: 05/02/2025] Open
Abstract
Introduction In the United States (US), disparities in access to kidney transplantation exist for waitlisted candidates with end-stage kidney disease. Meanwhile, changes in kidney allocation policy have been associated with a dramatic increase in the number of organ offers declined before an organ is successfully placed. Methods We describe transplant and mortality rates for waitlisted candidates from 2015 to 2022 following these allocation changes. Results Among 249,145 incident waitlisted adults, 180,039 received at least 1 offer and were included in the study. Of these, 37.7% received a deceased donor kidney allograft, 14.7% received a living donor allograft, 7.4% died while on the waiting list, 12.7% were removed, and 27.5% were still waitlisted by the study end period. Overall, candidates' median number of days to receiving their first offer declined from 20 (7-48) in 2015 to 5 (2-13) in 2022. Candidates who died while on the waiting list received a median of 25 (9-56) offers and candidates who were removed received a median of 22 (8-53) offers during the study period. The total number of offers generated by the match-run algorithm, including those from nonutilized kidneys, increased sharply from 7,911,688 offers in 2015 to 13,682,914 in 2019, and to 29,332,516 in 2022. Conclusion These findings emphasize the inefficiencies inherent in our current allocation algorithms and the need to rethink how waitlisted patients are prioritized for a given deceased donor organ in order to maximize the probability of appropriate utilization of lifesaving organs .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Miko Yu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lindsey M. Maclay
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joel T. Adler
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Anne M. Huml
- Department of Kidney Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jesse D. Schold
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado – Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - S. Ali Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|