Cholesterol emboli presenting as acute allograft dysfunction after renal transplantation

Cholesterol Embolization Syndrome After Kidney Transplantation: A Case Series and Systematic Review

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background.

Cholesterol embolization syndrome (CES) is an uncommon but well-known cause of renal failure in native kidneys, but little is known about CES in kidney transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, clinical characteristics, histopathology, and prognosis of CES after kidney transplantation.

Methods.

CES cases in both transplanted and native kidneys (control group) were identified by searching the databases of the divisions of Nephrology and Pathology of our institution. Clinical data were retrospectively collected. Biopsies were classified according to the latest Banff 2019 Update. Second, a systematic literature search was performed (December 01, 2020) of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials, Google Scholar, and Web of Science.

Results.

CES was observed in for-cause biopsies of 11 out of 2350 (0.47%) kidney transplant recipients transplanted between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2018 (0.0009 cases per person-year). All patients had ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor, and 9 donors were expanded criteria donors. Graft loss occurred in 27.3% of the patients diagnosed with CES. Eight transplant biopsies with CES were also classified as biopsy-proven acute rejection. Transplant biopsies showed signs of inflammation (arteritis, n = 7; interstitial inflammation, n = 5; tubulitis, n = 7). One patient with CES in a native kidney was identified. The biopsy of the native kidney only showed arteritis and classified as an isolated “v” lesion. The literature search resulted in 188 unique articles of which 20 were included. A total of 47 cases of CES after kidney transplantation was reported. Cholesterol emboli were found in <1% of all kidney transplant biopsies. In 57.8% of the kidney transplant biopsies with CES described in literature, concomitant inflammation was present.

Conclusions.

CES is an uncommon cause of kidney transplant failure, although the incidence of CES may be underestimated. CES may mimic rejection as it can be accompanied by arteritis.

Iloprost in Acute Post-kidney Transplant Atheroembolism: A Case Report of Two Successful Treatments

Cholesterol embolization (CE) is a rare and alarming post-transplant complication, responsible for primary non-function (PNF) or delayed graft function (DGF). Its incidence is expected to rise due to increasingly old donors and recipients and the extended criteria for donation. Therapy with statins and steroids has not been shown to be effective, while agonism of prostaglandin I₂ has been reported to be useful in systemic CE. We report two cases of acute post-transplant CE in which intravenous iloprost (0.05 mg/kg/day) was added to standard statin and steroid therapy. In the first instance, CE was due to embolization from the kidney artery resulting in embolization of the small vessels; after a long DGF and 15 days of iloprost therapy, renal function recovered. The second instance is a case of embolization from the iliac artery of the recipient, where CE manifested as a partial renal infarction. After 5 days of iloprost administration, creatinine levels improved. Iloprost acts on vasodilation and on different inflammatory pathways, improving the anti-inflammatory profile. Post-transplant CE is difficult to diagnose and, if not treated, can lead to loss of function. Iloprost added to standard therapy could be beneficial in accelerating renal function recovery immediately after transplant.

Atheroembolic renal disease

Atheroembolic renal disease develops when atheromatous aortic plaques rupture, releasing cholesterol crystals into the small renal arteries. Embolisation often affects other organs, such as the skin, gastrointestinal system, and brain. Although the disease can develop spontaneously, it usually develops after vascular surgery, catheterisation, or anticoagulation. The systemic nature of atheroembolism makes diagnosis difficult. The classic triad of a precipitating event, acute or subacute renal failure, and skin lesions, are strongly suggestive of the disorder. Eosinophilia further supports the diagnosis, usually confirmed by biopsy of an affected organ or by the fundoscopic finding of cholesterol crystals in the retinal circulation. Renal and patient prognosis are poor. Treatment is mostly preventive, based on avoidance of further precipitating factors, and symptomatic, aimed to the optimum treatment of hypertension and cardiac and renal failure. Statins, which stabilise atherosclerotic plaques, should be offered to all patients. Steroids might have a role in acute or subacute progressive forms with systemic inflammation.

Cholesterol-crystal embolism presenting with delayed graft function and impaired long-term function in renal transplant recipients: two case reports

Introduction

Impaired renal function and/or pre-existing atherosclerosis in the deceased donor increase the risk of delayed graft function and impaired long-term renal function in kidney transplant recipients.

Case presentation

We report delayed graft function occurring simultaneously in two kidney transplant recipients, aged 57-years-old and 39-years-old, who received renal allografts from the same deceased donor. The 62-year-old donor died of cardiac arrest during an asthmatic state. Renal-allograft biopsies performed in both kidney recipients because of delayed graft function revealed cholesterol-crystal embolism. An empiric statin therapy in addition to low-dose acetylsalicylic acid was initiated. After 10 and 6 hemodialysis sessions every 48 hours, respectively, both renal allografts started to function. Glomerular filtration rates at discharge were 26 ml/min/1.73m² and 23.9 ml/min/1.73m², and remained stable in follow-up examinations. Possible donor and surgical procedure-dependent causes for cholesterol-crystal embolism are discussed.

Conclusion

Cholesterol-crystal embolism should be considered as a cause for delayed graft function and long-term impaired renal allograft function, especially in the older donor population.

Cholesterol Embolization in Renal Allografts

Cholesterol embolization (CE) in renal allografts is a rare occurrence, the natural history and prognostic significance of which is poorly characterized. We studied the clinicopathologic features and outcome of the largest known series of CE in renal allografts and combined our cases with those in the literature. We identified renal allograft biopsies with CE from 1997 to September 2004 at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC). All pathology material related to such biopsies were examined and correlated with clinical information to determine the most probable CE source. Among 5435 RAB, 19 from 12 cadaveric transplant recipients comprising 7 males and 5 females (median age=63 y) had CE. Donors consisted of 9 males and 2 females (median age=47 y). One donor's age and sex was unknown. The most probable CE source was recipient in 9 cases and donor in 3 cases. Five had acute renal failure without acute cellular rejection and 2 had CE-specific failed allografts. Of 19 RAB, the most frequent coexisting diagnosis was chronic allograft nephropathy (63%). The median follow-up time was 661 days. Combining UPMC and non-UPMC cases (n=37) revealed a statistically significant loss of grafts with donor-derived (P value=0.00459) and early CE (P value=0.00938). In renal allografts, CE most often correlated with recipient and donor atherosclerosis. It may present with acute renal failure, but usually not acute graft loss. Graft failure is significantly associated with donor-derived and early CE. Although its prognosis may be poor in the setting of primary nonfunction, prolonged graft survival may be seen.

Enfermedad por émbolos de cristales de colesterol

Cholesterol crystal embolism (CCE) is an infrequent entity that primarily appears in males over the age of 60 with generalized arteriosclerosis after angiographic procedures, vascular surgery or, more rarely, with oral anticoagulant treatment with heparin or with fibrinolytics. We present the case of a patient with several risk factors for CCE, who presented with the pathognomonic triad of leg and foot pain, livedo reticularis and palpable pedal pulses. The diagnosis was based on the fact that cholesterol crystals were seen in the arterioles in the skin biopsy. Due to the frequency with which the skin manifestations appear and the importance of early diagnosis and treatment, an awareness of these crystals is fundamental in diagnosing these processes.

Renal transplantation in a patient with end stage renal disease due to cholesterol embolism

BACKGROUND

Renal failure due to cholesterol emboli is mostly irreversible. Therefore chronic renal replacement therapy is necessary. However, to the best of our knowledge no published experience exists with renal transplantation in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to cholesterol embolization (CE).

METHODS

Renal transplantation was performed in a 64-year-old man who suffered from ESRD due to CE after coronary angiography. Because our patient presented with a typical profile of cardiovascular risk factors effective long-term control of these risk factors before and after transplantation was a mandatory prerequisite before considering transplantation.

RESULTS

After one rejection episode serum creatinine values have been stable and no major complications have occurred during a follow-up of 18 months. No signs of recurrent cholesterol emboli into the donated kidney were seen in renal biopsies performed due to graft rejection.

CONCLUSION

Cholesterol embolization is an uncommon reason for ESRD and mainly occurs after invasive vascular procedures in patients with hyperlipidemia, arterial hypertension, and smoking. Because ESRD due to CE often is irreversible, chronic renal replacement therapy may be necessary. As demonstrated in our report, renal transplantation should be considered. However, in this setting effective long-term control of the underlying risk factors before and after renal transplantation has to be ensured.

Cholesterol crystal embolism: A recognizable cause of renal disease

Cholesterol crystal embolism, sometimes separately designated atheroembolism, is an increasing and still underdiagnosed cause of renal dysfunction antemortem in elderly patients. Renal cholesterol crystal embolization, also known as atheroembolic renal disease, is caused by showers of cholesterol crystals from an atherosclerotic aorta that occlude small renal arteries. Although cholesterol crystal embolization can occur spontaneously, it is increasingly recognized as an iatrogenic complication from an invasive vascular procedure, such as manipulation of the aorta during angiography or vascular surgery, and after anticoagulant and fibrinolytic therapy. Cholesterol crystal embolism may give rise to different degrees of renal impairment. Some patients show only a moderate loss of renal function; in others, severe renal failure requiring dialysis ensues. An acute scenario with abrupt and sudden onset of renal failure may be observed. More frequently, a progressive loss of renal function occurs over weeks. A third clinical form of renal atheroemboli has been described, presenting as chronic, stable, and asymptomatic renal insufficiency. The renal outcome may be variable; some patients deteriorate or remain on dialysis, some improve, and some remain with chronic renal impairment. In addition to the kidneys, atheroembolization may involve the skin, gastrointestinal system, and central nervous system. Renal atheroembolic disease is a difficult and controversial diagnosis for the protean extrarenal manifestations of the disease. In the past, the diagnosis was often made postmortem. However, in the last decade, awareness of atheroembolic renal disease has improved, enabling us to make a correct premortem diagnosis in a number of patients. Correct diagnosis requires the clinician to be alert to the possibility. The typical patient is a white man aged older than 60 years with a baseline history of hypertension, smoking, and arterial disease. The presence of a classic triad characterized by a precipitating event, acute or subacute renal failure, and peripheral cholesterol crystal embolization strongly suggests the diagnosis. The confirmatory diagnosis can be made by means of biopsy of the target organs, including kidneys, skin, and the gastrointestinal system. Thus, Cinderella and her shoe now can be well matched during life. Patients with renal atheroemboli have a dismal outlook. A specific treatment is lacking. However, it is an important diagnosis to make because it may save the patient from inappropriate treatment. Finally, recent data suggest that an aggressive therapeutic approach with patient-tailored supportive measures may be associated with a favorable clinical outcome.

Cholesterol embolization in renal allografts

Renal cholesterol embolization (RCE) in native kidneys has a dismal outcome and frequently leads to irreversible renal failure. RCE may rarely occur in renal allografts as well, particularly if the recipient or the donor has prominent atherosclerosis. The natural history of RCE in renal transplants is unknown. We have reviewed the surgical pathology files of The Johns Hopkins Hospital in the 14-year period between 1984 and early 1999 and found 7 RCE cases among 1500 renal transplant biopsies (0.47%). One of the seven cases had three biopsies showing cholesterol emboli, the first of which was a postreperfusion (immediate posttransplant) biopsy. The probable source of the cholesterol emboli was the recipient in six cases and the donor in one case. Five donors were cadaveric and two were living donors. Six biopsies were taken within the first 4 months posttransplant (four were postreperfusion biopsies). One recent patient had the inciting event of arteriography and stent placement 2 years posttransplant and is currently doing well. One kidney failed due to posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), another kidney failed with complicating opportunistic infections, and the other five were functioning 2 to 6 years posttransplant. A literature review revealed additional 14 RCE cases in renal transplants. Combining our cases with those in the literature (21 cases), reveals that the origin of the RCE was probably the recipient in 11 cases (seven cadaveric, two living-related, and two unknown), and the donor in 10 cases (eight cadaveric and two unknown). Graft failure occurred in two of the 11 cases, where RCE was of probable recipient origin. Seven of the 10 kidneys, where the RCE was probably of donor origin, failed due to allograft dysfunction; one of them also developed superimposed rejection and cytomegalovirus infection. We conclude that if RCE is originating in the recipient, graft survival is usually good. In contrast, if RCE is of donor origin, graft dysfunction and subsequent graft loss are common. The reason for this difference may be the more extensive RCE developing in an atherosclerotic cadaveric donor during organ procurement or severe trauma leading to death.