Lehmann JF, Price R, Okumura R, Questad K, de Lateur BJ, Négretot A. Mass and mass distribution of below-knee prostheses: effect on gait efficacy and self-selected walking speed.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;
79:162-8. [PMID:
9473997 DOI:
10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90293-3]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To study mass and mass distribution effect on function of below-knee prostheses.
DESIGN
Design modifications were done to produce proximal center of mass location versus distal center of mass location variations, and prosthesis weight was modified from 42% to 70% of normal limb weight. Work across joints of affected and unaffected extremities was compared to assess the ability of the prosthesis to substitute for function loss.
SETTING
University biomechanics laboratory.
PARTICIPANTS
Fifteen volunteers with below-knee amputations, residual limb length greater than 8.3 cm, but excluding Syme amputations.
INTERVENTIONS
Patients walked with all configurations at self-selected walking speeds and 120 m/min.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Self-selected walking speed and metabolic efficiency. Work across the joints of affected and unaffected sides was compared.
RESULTS
Proximal center of mass location produced a more efficient gait. Weight change from 42% to 70% of normal had no significant effect. Mechanical studies show that the prosthesis is a relatively poor substitute for the normal limb; most work is done by the nonamputated side. Particularly, the prosthesis failed to produce effective forward impulses on the body, resulting from push-off and deceleration of the swing leg.
CONCLUSIONS
For a proximal center of mass, lightweight distal components (e.g., feet) should be used; it is questionable whether further expenditure to develop ultralightweight prostheses would be cost effective for level walking.
Collapse