[Endometrial carcinoma. Application of the guidelines of 2010: multicentre trial]

Concordance between preoperative ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification and final histology in early-stage endometrial cancer

Objective

To evaluate the concordance between preoperative European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)-European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO)-European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) risk classification in early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) assessed by biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with this classification based on histology of surgical specimen.

Methods

This bicentric retrospective study included women diagnosed with early-stage EC (≤stage II) who had a complete preoperative assessment and underwent a surgical management from January 2011 to December 2018. Patients were preoperatively classified into 3 degrees of risk of lymph node (LN) involvement based on biopsy and MRI. Based on final histological report, patients were re-classified using the preoperative classification. Concordance between the preoperative assessment and definitive histology was calculated with weighted Cohen's kappa coefficient.

Results

A total of 333 women were included and kappa coefficient of preoperative risk classification was 0.49. The risk was underestimated and overestimated in 37% and 10% of cases, respectively. Twenty-nine percent of patients had an incomplete LN staging according to the degree of risk of re-classification. The observed discordance in the risk classification was attributed to MRI in 75% of cases, to biopsy in 18% and in 7% to both (p<0.001). Kappa coefficient for concordance was 0.25 for MRI and 0.73 for biopsy.

Conclusion

Concordance between preoperative ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification and final histology is weak. Given that the risk was underestimated in the majority of patients wrongly classified, sentinel LN procedure instead of no LN dissection could be an option offered to preoperative low-risk patients to decrease the indication of second surgery for re-staging and/or to avoid toxicity of adjuvant radiotherapy.

[Non endometroid endometrial cancer guidelines evaluation: A multicentric retrospective study]

Introduction

Les carcinomes de l’endomètre de type 2 sont des cancers peu fréquents et de mauvais pronostique. Il existe très peu d’étude analysant leur prise en charge. L’objectif de l’étude était d’étudier la prise en charge des carcinomes de type 2 dans nos centres en évaluant l’application des recommandations.

Matériel et méthode

Il s’agit d’une étude multicentrique rétrospective enregistrant les cancers de l’endomètre de type 2 pris en charge de janvier 2009 à décembre 2019. Les analyses ont été adaptées aux dernières recommandations françaises appliquées par rapport à l’année de prise en charge.

Résultats

Soixante-quatorze carcinomes de type 2 ont été analysés dans dix centres: 34 carcinosarcomes (45,9 %), 29 carcinomes séreux (39,2 %), neuf carcinomes à cellules claires (12,2 %) et deux carcinomes indifférenciés (2,7 %). Lors de la prise en charge initiale, les recommandations étaient appliquées dans 45,9 % des cas. Le principal motif de non-application des recommandations était la non-réalisation d’une stadification ganglionnaire chirurgicale pour 20 patientes (57,1 %). Lors de la prise en charge adjuvante, les recommandations étaient appliquées dans 37,8 % des cas. Le principal motif de non-application des recommandations était la non-réalisation d’une restadification ganglionnaire chirurgicale ou radiologique pour 25 patientes (67,6 %).

Discussion

L’applicabilité des recommandations pour la prise en charge des carcinomes de type 2 reste difficile en raison de l’âge élevé et des comorbidités des patientes notamment pour la réalisation d’une stadification chirurgicale ganglionnaire pelvienne et lombo-aortique. L’utilisation de nouvelles techniques de stadification permettrait de mieux sélectionner les indications de curages ganglionnaires.

[Clinical practice for morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients: A french multicentric study]

INTRODUCTION

Morbid obesity may lead to difficulties for management of endometrial cancer. The aim of this study was the assessment of management of endometrial cancer for morbidly obese women and the implementation of recommendations.

METHODS

this is retrospective study including women with BMI =40kg/m² treated for endometrial cancer between November 2010 and April 2017 in the university hospital in Nantes and the Cancer Center René Gauducheau in Nantes. Patients' demographics, pre-operative intra operative, post-operative data and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty patients met the inclusion criteria with a median age of 65.5 (28-86) and a median BMI of 47kg/m² (40-60). Type I histologic was identified in 90% and of a stage I FIGO I in 75% of the cases. All the patients have benefited from a biopsy of endometrium before surgery. 70% of the patients have benefited from a MRI before surgery (14/20). The surgery was realized by laparotomy in 40%, by mini invasive surgery in 50% and by vaginal procedure in 10% of. Mini invasive surgery was converted in laparotomy in 40% (4/10). A discrepancy of the ESMO's recommandation was observed in 40% of the cases (8/20). Two patients did not benefit from the adjuvant radiotherapy recommended because of delay of healing.

DISCUSSION

Although good prognosis, the endometrial cancer of morbidly obese women seem to be under treat. These patients do not seem benefited an optimal pre-operative assessment. The surgery is mainly realized by laparotomy with a not complete surgical stadification for one more than a third of the patients.

Are preoperative histology and MRI useful for classification of endometrial cancer risk?

Background

The 2010 guidelines of the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) classify patients with endometrial cancer into three risk groups for lymph node invasion and recurrence on the basis of MRI and histological analysis of an endometrial specimen obtained preoperatively. The classification guides therapeutic choices, which may include pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of preoperative assessment to help identify intermediate- or high-risk patients requiring lymphadenectomy.

Methods

The study included all patients who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer between January 2010 and December 2013 at either Rennes University Hospital or Vannes Regional Hospital. The criteria for eligibility included a preoperative assessment with MRI and histological examination of an endometrial sample. A histological comparison was made between the preoperative and surgical specimens.

Results

Among the 91 patients who underwent a full preoperative assessment, the diagnosis of intermediate- or high-risk endometrial cancer was established by MRI and histology with a sensitivity of 70 %, specificity of 82 %, positive predictive value (PPV) of 87 %, negative predictive value (NPV) of 61 %, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 3.8 and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.3. The risk group was underestimated in 32 % of patients and overestimated in 7 % of patients. MRI underestimated endometrial cancer stage in 20 % of cases, while endometrial sampling underestimated the histological type in 4 % of cases and the grade in 9 % of cases.

Conclusion

The preoperative assessment overestimated or underestimated the risk of recurrence in nearly 40 % of cases, with errors in lesion type, grade or stage. Erroneous preoperative risk assessment leads to suboptimal initial surgical management of patients with endometrial cancer.

[How were used recommendations for endometrial carcinoma? Britain retrospective study]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the use of French Cancer Institute recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study involving 137 patients with endometrial cancer between 2011 and 2013.

RESULTS

Both MRI and pathological assessment with correct report as recommended were used for 66.4% of patients with endometrial cancer. For patients with correct preoperative assessment, 44.9% of patients were uncorrectly classified and upgraded on final pathological analysis of hysterectomy concerning lymph node involvement risk. These patients did not have confident surgical assessment, according this risk.

CONCLUSION

To improve relevance of preoperative assessment in endometrial cancer, radiological and pathological expertise is required. However, even performed optimally, preoperative assessment does not allow correct risk stratification of lymph node involvement in endometrial cancer. This ineffective stratification leads to propose sentinel lymph node biopsy with hysterectomy in case of preoperative low risk endometrial cancer assessment.