An epilepsy curriculum for primary health care providers: a report from the Education Council of the International League Against Epilepsy

Improving epilepsy diagnosis across the lifespan: approaches and innovations

Epilepsy diagnosis is often delayed or inaccurate, exposing people to ongoing seizures and their substantial consequences until effective treatment is initiated. Important factors contributing to this problem include delayed recognition of seizure symptoms by patients and eyewitnesses; cultural, geographical, and financial barriers to seeking health care; and missed or delayed diagnosis by health-care providers. Epilepsy diagnosis involves several steps. The first step is recognition of epileptic seizures; next is classification of epilepsy type and whether an epilepsy syndrome is present; finally, the underlying epilepsy-associated comorbidities and potential causes must be identified, which differ across the lifespan. Clinical history, elicited from patients and eyewitnesses, is a fundamental component of the diagnostic pathway. Recent technological advances, including smartphone videography and genetic testing, are increasingly used in routine practice. Innovations in technology, such as artificial intelligence, could provide new possibilities for directly and indirectly detecting epilepsy and might make valuable contributions to diagnostic algorithms in the future.

Fostering Education in Epilepsy: A Canadian League Against Epilepsy Teaching Initiative

The Canadian League Against Epilepsy initiated a virtual epilepsy education program, conducting 29 webinars from March 2021 to September 2023. We report our experience, with the goal to inspire other groups to develop inclusive, equitable, and free educational spaces with a worldwide reach. Monthly sessions drew a median attendance of 118 participants, predominantly Canadian but also international, including physicians (58.9%) and trainees (22.8%). Post-webinar surveys (average 40% response rate) noted high satisfaction, a strong inclination to recommend the sessions, and an interest in clinical case-based topics. We plan to consider integrating a self-assessment section evaluating knowledge gained after each seminar.

Reducing epilepsy diagnostic and treatment gaps: Standardized paediatric epilepsy training courses for health care professionals

AIM

To evaluate improvement in knowledge and clinical behaviour among healthcare professionals after attendance at paediatric epilepsy training (PET) courses.

METHOD

Since 2005, 1-day PET courses have taught evidence-based paediatric epilepsy management to doctors and nurses in low-, middle-, and high-income countries. A cohort study was performed of 7528 participants attending 252 1-day PET courses between 2005 and 2020 in 17 low-, middle-, and high-income countries, and which gathered data from participants immediately after the course and then 6 months later. Training outcomes were measured prospectively in three domains (reaction, learning, and behaviour) using a mixed-methods approach involving a feedback questionnaire, a knowledge quiz before and after the course, and a 6-month survey.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight per cent (7217 of 7395) of participants rated the course as excellent or good. Participants demonstrated knowledge gain, answering a significantly higher proportion of questions correctly after the course compared to before the course (88% [47 883 of 54 196], correct answers/all quiz answers, vs 75% [40 424 of 54 196]; p < 0.001). Most survey responders reported that the course had improved their epilepsy diagnosis and management (73% [311 of 425]), clinical service (68% [290 of 427]), and local epilepsy training (68% [290 of 427]).

INTERPRETATION

This was the largest evaluation of a global epilepsy training course. Participants reported high course satisfaction, showed knowledge gain, and described improvements in clinical behaviour 6 months later. PET supports the global reduction in the epilepsy 'treatment gap' as promoted by the World Health Organization.

Challenges and needs of epilepsy management in primary care (from the perspective of family physicians/general practitioners): A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Family physicians are expected to have sufficient knowledge and skills in epilepsy management due to frequent encountering with epileptic patients for prescribing antiepileptics, providing preventive services such as vaccination, pre-conceptional counseling, or managing acute health problems of the patients. This study aimed to determine family physicians' challenges and needs regarding managing epilepsy in primary care.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was carried out with the family physicians working in Family Health Centers representing the four districts of Istanbul in 2020. After enrolling sociodemographic characteristics, epilepsy knowledge, and self-efficacy questionnaire were filled out by the physicians themselves, and the difficulties and needs in the follow-up of the patients with epilepsy were evaluated with open-ended questions.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-eight physicians participated in the study (48.7% F; mean age: 43.06 ± 8.82). Most of the physicians reported that they feel incompetent and hesitated while providing health reports (driving [83.3%], sport [95.5%] or work [70.2%]), and prescribing antiepileptics, especially during pregnancy (38.2%) and breastfeeding (31.2%). Despite their high awareness of psychosocial problems in epileptic patients, only 25% of physicians stated that they could make psychosocial assessments. There was no correlation between Epilepsy Knowledge and Self-efficacy scores and physicians' age, graduation period, and family medicine experience (p > .05). Most frequently encountered difficulties were reported as epilepsy-specific (follow-up of pregnant or pediatric patients, lack of information about epilepsy and antiepileptics). Most physicians (82.6%) wanted training in epilepsy management.

SIGNIFICANCE

The findings of our study suggest that family physicians need knowledge and training in epilepsy management. The main limitation of the present study is its cross-sectional design, which does not allow for causal or directional inferences.

Implementing WHO's Intersectoral Global Action Plan for epilepsy and other neurological disorders in Southeast Asia: a proposal

The World Health Assembly approved the Intersectoral Global Action Plan for epilepsy and neurological disorders. Member states, including those in Southeast Asia, must now prepare to achieve IGAP's strategic targets by embracing novel approaches and strengthening existing policies and practices. We propose and present evidence to support four such processes. The opening course should engage all stakeholders to develop people-centric instead of outcome-centric approaches. Rather than caring for convulsive epilepsy alone, as currently done, primary care providers should also be skilled in diagnosing and treating focal and non-motor seizures. This could reduce the diagnostic gap as over half of epilepsies present with focal seizures. Currently, primary care providers lack knowledge and skills to manage focal seizures. Technology-enabled aids can help overcome this limitation. Lastly, there is need to add newer "easy to use" epilepsy medicines to Essential Medicines lists in light of emerging evidence for better tolerability, safety and user-friendliness.

Psychiatric comorbidities among people with epilepsy: A population-based assessment in disadvantaged communities

Psychiatric disorders are frequent among people with epilepsy but often under-recognized. The diagnosis and treatment of these disorders in low- and low-middle-income countries (LMICs) are challenging.

METHODS

This cross-sectional survey included people recruited during a community epilepsy screening program involving 59,509 individuals from poor communities in Ludhiana in Northwest India. Adults (age ≥18 years) with confirmed epilepsy on antiseizure medications were screened for depression and anxiety using the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) twice over two years of follow-up. They were later interviewed for symptoms using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, which was then confirmed by assessments by an experienced psychiatrist.

RESULTS

Of the 240 people with confirmed epilepsy, 167 (70%) were adults, of whom, 116 (70%) eventually participated in the study. The NDDI-E with a cut-off of 15 identified depression in 14 (12%) of 116 people after one year of follow-up and 17 (15%) at two years. The GAD-7 using a cut-off of 6 identified 22 (19%) at one year and 32 (28%) with anxiety at two years. The area under the curves for NDDI-E was estimated as 0.62 (_95%CI, 0.51-0.73; SE: 0.06; p = 0.04) and for GAD-7 as 0.62 (_95%CI, 0.46-0.78; SE: 0.08; p = 0.12). Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale identified 63 (54%) people with psychiatric symptoms, for whom, a psychiatric diagnosis was confirmed in 60 (52%). A psychiatric diagnosis was associated with education below high school [Odds Ratio (OR): 2.59, _95%CI, 1.12-5.1; p = 0.03], later age of seizure onset (OR, 1.05, _95%CI: 1.0-1.10; p = 0.04), seizure frequency of at least one/year at enrolment (OR, 2.36, _95%CI: 1.0-5.58; p = 0.05) and the use of clobazam (OR, 5.09, _95%CI, 1.40-18.42; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Depression and anxiety are common in people with epilepsy. Our findings underscore the low yields of screening instruments, NDDI-E and GAD-7, and comparatively better professionally-administered diagnostic assessments in resource-limited settings in LMICs. Moreover, previously established cut-offs do not apply to the community studied.