Long-term outcome of schizoaffective disorder. Are there any differences with respect to schizophrenia?

Functioning in community-dwelling patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders in rural Greece

BACKGROUND

There is a dearth of studies on functioning in patients with psychotic disorders in rural areas.

AIM

The objective of this study was to assess functioning in a population-based sample of patients with psychotic disorders who live in rural, remote and deprived areas in Greece, and to explore the differences in functioning across ages.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 61 patients with psychotic disorders that were engaged to treatment with a community mental health service. The mean age of patients was 54.2 years, and the mean illness duration was 26.5 years.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients (37.7%) had score in the Global Assessment of Functioning scale >60, and were rated as adequately functioning, and 18 patients (29.5%) had score in Clinical Global Impression scale-Schizophrenia ⩽3 and could be rated as mildly or minimally ill. Functioning was found to be inversely related to the patients' symptomatology. No correlation with age was found.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that a large proportion of patients with psychotic disorders in rural Greece may achieve a satisfactory level of functioning in the long-term, across the whole age range despite the not completely remitted symptomatology. More research is needed to clarify the factors associated with rural residency that may account for patients' functioning.

The continuing story of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: One condition or two?

Although schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder remain separable in diagnostic systems, the validity of the distinction is uncertain. This study asked whether schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder are distinguishable on selected cognitive, social cognitive and structural social brain measures. Outpatients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (n = 44) or schizoaffective disorder (n = 29) and non-psychiatric control participants (n = 62) were studied. Patients were assessed clinically (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) and all participants were administered a battery of cognitive (MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery; Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Wide Range Achievement Reading) and social cognitive (Reading the Mind in the Eyes, Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test; MSCEIT) tasks. In addition, participants underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to yield cortical thickness data for 42 regions associated with the social brain network. Results showed no significant differences between patient groups on 17/18 cognitive/social cognitive and social brain cortical thickness measures. In contrast, schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder patients differed from controls on 16/18 and 11/18 measures respectively. Schizoaffective disorder patients outperformed schizophrenia patients on an emotion regulation task (MSCEIT). Schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder are largely indistinguishable on key cognitive, social cognitive and neural measures. The continuing separation of these syndromes in diagnostic systems and disease models requires is questionable and requires further attention.

Characteristics and Service Use of Older Adults with Schizoaffective Disorder Versus Older Adults with Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine if schizoaffective disorder in older adults is differentiated from schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with respect to community functioning, cognitive functioning, psychiatric symptoms, and service use.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of baseline data collected from the Helping Older People Experience Success psychosocial skills training and health management study.

SETTING

Three community mental health centers in New Hampshire and Massachusetts.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults over the age of 50 (N = 139, mean age: 59.7 years, SD: 7.4 years) with persistent functional impairment and a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (N = 52), schizophrenia (N = 51), or bipolar disorder (N = 36).

MEASUREMENTS

Health status (36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36]), performance-based community living skills (UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment), neuropsychological functioning (Delis-Kaplan Executive Functioning subtests), psychiatric symptoms (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms), medical severity (Charlson comorbidity index), and acute service use.

RESULTS

Older adults with schizoaffective disorder had depressive symptoms of similar severity to bipolar disorder, and thought disorder symptoms of similar severity to schizophrenia. Schizoaffective disorder compared with schizophrenia was associated with better community functioning, but poorer subjective physical and mental health functioning as measured by the SF-36. Older adults with schizoaffective disorder had greater acute hospitalization compared with adults with schizophrenia, though their use of acute care services was comparable to individuals with bipolar disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study suggest that schizoaffective disorder in older adults occupies a distinct profile from either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder with respect to community functional status, symptom profile, and acute services utilization.

Comprehensive Psychopathological Assessment Based on the Association for Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry (AMDP) System: Development, Methodological Foundation, Application in Clinical Routine, and Research

The documentation of psychopathology is core to the clinical practice of the psychiatrist and clinical psychologist. However, both in initial as well as further training and specialization in their fields, this particular aspect of their work receives scanty attention only. Yet, for the past 50 years, the Association for Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry (AMDP) System has been in existence and available as a tool to serve precisely the purpose of offering a systematic introduction to the terminology and documentation of psychopathology. The motivation for its development was based on the need for an assessment procedure for the reliable documentation of the effectiveness of newly developed psychopharmacological substances. Subsequently, the AMDP-System began to be applied in the context of investigations into a number of methodological issues in psychiatry (e.g., the frequency and specificity of particular symptoms, the comparison of rating scales). The System then became increasingly important also in clinical practice and, today, represents the most used instrument for the documentation of psychopathology in the German-speaking countries of Europe. This paper intends to offer an overview of the AMDP-System, its origins, design, and functionality. After an initial account of the history and development of the AMDP-System, the discussion will in turn focus on the System's underlying methodological principles, the transfer of clinical skills and competencies in its practical application, and its use in research and clinical practice. Finally, potential future areas of development in relation to the AMDP-System are explored.