1
|
Khatkov IE, Alikhanov RB, Bedin VV, Breder VV, Britskaya NN, Voskanyan SE, Vishnevsky VA, Granov DA, Zhukova LG, Zagainov VE, Kovalenko DE, Koroleva AA, Kulezneva YV, Melekhina OV, Nazarenko AV, Odintsova MV, Petrov LO, Pogrebnyakov IV, Podluzhny DV, Polyakov AN, Porshennikov IA, Rutkin IO, Semenov NN, Sudakov MA, Tarakanov PV, Feoktistova PS, Tsvirkun VV, Zhao AV, Shabunin AV, Efanov MG. [The Russian consensus on the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2024:7-20. [PMID: 39422002 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia20241017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2024]
Abstract
The Russian consensus on the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was prepared by the group of experts consisting of surgeons, interventional radiologists, radiation therapists and oncologists. The purposes of this consensus are clarification and consolidation of opinions of multidisciplinary team on the following issues of management of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: indications for surgical treatment, features of therapeutic tactics for mechanical jaundice, technical aspects of liver resection, prevention of post-resection liver failure, indications for liver resection using transplantation technologies, laparoscopic and robot-assisted liver resection, perioperative systemic chemotherapy, local non-resection/non-radiotherapy methods of treatment, radiotherapy, follow-up and choice of treatment for recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I E Khatkov
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - R B Alikhanov
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - V V Bedin
- Burnazyan State Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - V V Breder
- Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia
| | - N N Britskaya
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - S E Voskanyan
- Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - V A Vishnevsky
- Vishnevsky National Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
| | - D A Granov
- Blokhin National Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - L G Zhukova
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - V E Zagainov
- National Medical Research Radiological Center, Obninsk, Russia
| | - D E Kovalenko
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - A A Koroleva
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Yu V Kulezneva
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - O V Melekhina
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - A V Nazarenko
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - M V Odintsova
- Blokhin National Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - L O Petrov
- Novosibirsk Regional State Hospital, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | | | - D V Podluzhny
- Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia
| | - A N Polyakov
- Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia
| | - I A Porshennikov
- Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - I O Rutkin
- Blokhin National Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - N N Semenov
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - P V Tarakanov
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - P S Feoktistova
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - V V Tsvirkun
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - A V Zhao
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - A V Shabunin
- Burnazyan State Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - M G Efanov
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alikhanov RB, Efanov MG, Subbotin VV, Novikova EV, Shchadrina KV, Buldakov MY. [Treatment of severe post-resection liver failure. Analysis of the specialized center]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2020:88-92. [PMID: 33301260 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202012188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Posthepatectomy liver failure is one of the most serious complications of large liver resections. OBJECTIVE The analyzes the management and results of treatment of patients with severe posthepatectomy liver failure (Grade C ISGLS) in a specialized hepatosurgical department. MATERIAL AND METHODS In the period from January to December 2019, 175 liver resections were performed in the Department of liver and pancreatic surgery at the A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center. Major-volume liver resections (hemihepatectomies and resections of more than three liver segments) were performed in 80 (45%) patients. In 125 (71%) cases liver resctions were performed for malignant liver and bile duct diseases. Laparoscopic liver resections were performed in 77 (44%) patients. RESULTS Postresection liver failure developed in 18 (10.2%) patients. Severe (class C according to ISGLS) developed in 6 (3.4%) patients. In the postoperative period (90-day mortality), 4 patients (2.3%) died, while in two patients, mortality was not associated with liver failure. Hyperbilirubinemia was observed for more than 5 days in 2 (33.3%), coagulopathy in 4 (66.6%), ascites in 5 (83.3%), encephalopathy in 5 (83.3%), hypoglycemia in 3 (50%), and uncontrolled sepsis in 2 (33.3%) patients, respectively. Correction of surgical complications was required in 100% of cases, which consisted in drainage of abscesses and abdominal bylomas, and the the bilio-digestive anastomosis fistulas. Inotropic support was required in all 6 (100%) patients, invasive ventilation in 4(66.6%), and extracorporeal detoxification in 5 (83.3%). CONCLUSIONS Posthepatectomy liver failure is a complex problem even in a specialized center. A comprehensive approach to treatment allows to achieve noticeable results and reduce mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R B Alikhanov
- Loginov Moscow clinical research center of the Moscow Department of health, Moscow, Russia
| | - M G Efanov
- Loginov Moscow clinical research center of the Moscow Department of health, Moscow, Russia
| | - V V Subbotin
- Loginov Moscow clinical research center of the Moscow Department of health, Moscow, Russia
| | - E V Novikova
- Loginov Moscow clinical research center of the Moscow Department of health, Moscow, Russia
| | - K V Shchadrina
- Loginov Moscow clinical research center of the Moscow Department of health, Moscow, Russia
| | - M Y Buldakov
- Loginov Moscow clinical research center of the Moscow Department of health, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Efanov MG, Alikhanov RB, Tsvirkun VV, Prostov MY, Kazakov IV, Vankovich AN, Kim PP, Grendal KD. [Early outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2018:24-30. [PMID: 30531749 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia201811124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
AIM To assess an experience of robot-assisted liver resection using CUSUM-test. MATERIAL AND METHODS The results of 46 robot-assisted liver resections were retrospectively analyzed by using of CUSUM-test. RESULTS There were 3 periods in development of the technology. The 1st period - procedures with the lowest index of difficulty (n=16), the 2nd period - expansion of the indications for difficult resections (n=18) and the 3rd period - stabilization of the results (n=12). The dynamics of difficulty index, intraoperative blood loss, duration of procedure and morbidity (Clavien-Dindo Grade II-V) were evaluated. Five liver resections were needed to decrease blood loss and duration of the procedure. Expansion of indications was feasible after 16 procedures. Stable results were obtained after 34 liver resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M G Efanov
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - R B Alikhanov
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - V V Tsvirkun
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - M Yu Prostov
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - I V Kazakov
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - A N Vankovich
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - P P Kim
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - K D Grendal
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|