[The possibility of using standardized self-report anxiety and depression scales in elderly patients: Depression scales/questionnaires in elderly]

Clinical effectiveness of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in routine secondary care: results of a randomized controlled trial

Introduction

Delivering cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia over the internet bears the advantage of accessibility and uptake to many patients suffering from chronic insomnia. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (iCBT-I) in routine care.

Materials and methods

We conducted a two-arm non-blinded randomized controlled trial with care as usual (CAU) as a control condition. Participants were recruited in a specialized outpatient sleep medicine department. Both arms had access to other healthcare resources, and the intervention group had access to the iCBT-I program for 2 months. The primary outcome was insomnia severity, measured by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Secondary outcomes were fatigue severity, daytime sleepiness, affective symptoms, dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep, sleep locus of control, sleep hygiene, sleep efficiency (SE), sleep onset latency, wake time after sleep onset (WASO), and total sleep time (TST). Linear mixed models for repeated measures were used to analyze the longitudinal data at baseline, post-treatment, and after 3 months of follow-up. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04300218 21.04.2020).

Results

The results showed a significant time*group interaction effect (p = 0.001) at post-treatment with between-group effect size (d = 0.51), indicating that the ISI decreased by a score of 3.8-fold in the iCBT-I group than in the CAU group. There was no significant difference in ISI between groups at follow-up. Regarding secondary outcomes, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, SE, and WASO decreased significantly during treatment in the intervention group with between-group effect sizes d = 0.35, d = -0.51, and d = 0.47, respectively. At the follow-up, between-group effects on DBAS and SE remained significant: d = 0.36 and d = -0.63, respectively. For TST, we observed a significant time*group effect of d = -0.38 only after follow-up.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that iCBT-I has a significant effect on insomnia severity at post-treatment compared to CAU. iCBT-I further improved dysfunctional beliefs about sleep and improved subjective sleep characteristics, such as SE, WASO, and TST during 3 months after treatment.

Clinical trial registration

www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier (NCT04300218).

[The effectiveness of short and prolonged course treatment of anxiety with Anvifen]

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of the treatment of anxiety disorder with Anvifen (aminophenylbutyric acid) in a short (21 days) and prolonged (60 days) course of treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients were randomly divided into two groups: a short course (21 days) of treatment with Anvifen (group 1) and a prolonged course (60 days) of treatment with Avifen (group 2). In each group, patients were divided into age subgroups: 20-40 years old (1a - n=30, mean age 32 [21; 39], 2a - n=30, mean age 33 [23; 38] years) and 41-70 years (1b - n=30, mean age 62 [51; 67] years; 2b - n=30, mean age 60 [51; 68] years). Evaluated by: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); fatigue according to the Russian version of the fatigue assessment scale (The Fatigue Assessment Scale - FAS); sleep assessment according to the questionnaire for scoring the subjective characteristics of sleep (sleep assessment - OS); mean frequency per month of attacks meeting the criteria for a panic attack (PA) in the previous 6 months; a comprehensive assessment of the severity of all subjective symptoms on a 10-point numerical rank scale (NRS), where «0» corresponded to the complete absence of any significant subjective symptoms, «10» - the maximum degree of bodily and mental discomfort presented by the patient. Anvifen patients took at a dose of 500 mg three times a day. The evaluation of the studied parameters was carried out at the point «1» (before the start of treatment), at point «2» at the end of the course of treatment (for group 1 - on the 21st day of treatment, for group 2 - on the 60th day of treatment), at point «3» (30 days after the end of treatment for patients in both groups).

RESULTS

The indicators of subgroups 1a and 1b at point 2 had a significant positive trend (p<0.05) compared with the indicators at point 1, but at point 3 these indicators did not differ significantly (p>0.05). The indicators of subgroups 2a and 2b at point 2 had a significant positive trend (p<0.05) compared with the indicators at point 1, and these differences persisted at point 3 (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Anvifen effectively eliminates anxiety symptoms, but the effect of a short course lasts less than 1 month, the effect of prolonged treatment lasts more than 1 month. The authors recommend prolonged treatment of anxiety with Anvifen for at least 2 months.

Social and physical factors related to depression in the older population of Siberia, Russia: a cross-sectional study

Background

Depression and suicide rates are relatively high in the colder regions of Russia. Older individuals in these regions are especially susceptible to these issues and are understudied in this regard. This study aims to better understand the current depression prevalence, and the factors related to depression, among the older individuals in these colder regions of Russia by studying a population in Novosibirsk oblast.

Methods

A questionnaire survey was administered to 422 older individuals, assessing basic attributes and health status, and employing the following standardized scales: 8-item Short-Form Health Survey, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Participants were divided in two groups (GDS ≤ 6, GDS > 6) and compared, using Student’s t test, χ2 test, and logistic regression analysis.

Results

Young old (YO) adults showed significant correlation of depression with asthma (P = 0.005, OR = 6.40, 95%CI: 1.74–23.5), having a spouse (P = 0.016, OR = 1.99, 95%CI: 1.14–3.48), and daily communication with others (P < 0.001, OR = 0.336, 95%CI: 0.197–0.572). Among old old (OO) adults, significant correlation with depression was found for the variables work status (P = 0.047, OR = 0.115, 95%CI: 0.014–0.974), and weekly walking (P = 0.014, OR = 0.288, 95%CI: 0.106–0.778).

Conclusions

Twenty eight percent of the participants have depression. In YO adults, frequent communication and social ties with individuals outside of the family can mitigate depression prevalence. As for OO adults, the factors that have the highest impact on mitigating depression are related to daily activity, including both frequent walking and working or self-employment. Asthma patients are one of the more sensitive groups towards depression, but further research on this topic is needed.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02225-7.

Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Clinical Settings

BACKGROUND

Internet-delivered cognitive-behavior treatment for insomnia (iCBT-I) has the potential to fill the gap created by the discrepancy between insomnia cases and number of trained professionals. Although the effectiveness of this method was proven in multiple studies conducted in research settings, its feasibility in routine care is still unclear. Predictors, mediators, and moderators of treatment effect remain uncertain since previous studies often give contradictory results. The present study aims to investigate clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an internet-based CBT-I program Sleepsy in comparison with care as usual (CAU) among patients with CI recruited from clinical settings. Baseline data will be further analyzed to find predictors of treatment outcome.

METHODS/DESIGN

The proposed study is a parallel-group randomized controlled trial comparing CAU plus iCBT-I with CAU in a clinical setting. One hundred ten participants will be referred from the medical doctors in Moscow. Both groups will have access to CAU, which corresponds to the treatment prescribed by the referring doctor. Patients of the first group will additionally get access to the iCBT-I program with the opportunity to contact a specialist (guidance on request) in a secured environment. The primary outcome is insomnia severity change from pre- to post-treatment. Secondary outcomes include change of subjective sleep characteristics, life quality, fatigue, daytime sleepiness, comorbid affective disorders, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, sleep hygiene, healthcare consumption, productivity losses, and longer term outcomes at 3 months follow-up. Predictor analysis will include baseline scores of the aforementioned outcomes along with treatment expectancies and personality traits.

DISCUSSION

The proposed study is one of the first studies evaluating whether iCBT-I also works in routine care. We expect that recruitment of the participants let us determine the target group more precisely and exclude health problems interfering with treatment. Using CAU as control condition may result in a loss of power to detect a meaningful difference. Nevertheless, this approach is reasonable since it reconstructs the clinical situation faced by practicing doctors.