[Early postoperative results of surgical treatment of patients with anterior clinoidal meningiomas]

Improvement in visual outcomes of patients with base of skull meningioma as a result of evolution in the treatment techniques in the last three decades: a systematic review

PURPOSE

We systematically reviewed visual outcomes over the last three decades in patients undergoing treatment for base of skull (BOS) meningiomas and provide recommendations to preserve vision.

METHODS

In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, a search was conducted from 6/1/2022-9/1/2022 using PubMed and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria included (1) patients treated for BOS meningiomas (2) treatment modality specified (3) specifics of surgical techniques and/or dose/fractions of radiotherapy (4) individual patient outcomes of treatment. Each study was assessed for bias based on study design and heterogeneity of results.

RESULTS

A total of 50 studies were included (N = 2911). When comparing improved vision versus unchanged or worsened vision, studies investigating surgery alone published from 2006 and onward had significantly better visual outcomes compared to pre-2006 studies (p = 0.02). When comparing improved vision versus unchanged or worsened vision, studies investigating combined therapy with surgery and radiation published from 2008 and onward had significantly better visual outcomes compared to pre-2008 studies (p < 0.01). Combined modality therapy was less likely to worsen vision compared to either surgery or radiation monotherapy (p < 0.01). However, surgery and radiation monotherapy were more likely to actually improve outcomes compared to combination therapy (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

For over a decade we have observed improvement in visual outcomes in patients managed for meningioma of BOS, likely attributing the innovation in microsurgical and more targeted and conformal radiation techniques. Combination therapy may be the safest option for preventing worsening of vision, but the highest rates of improving visual function are achieved through monotherapy when indicated.

Prognostic Factors in the Surgery of Clinoidal Meningiomas

INTRODUCTION

Clinoidal meningiomas are currently among the intracranial meningiomas with the greatest neurosurgical complexity, morbidity, and mortality associated with their resection. The worldwide literature has described tumor size (>4 cm³), patient age (>60 years), and invasion of the cavernous sinus as factors associated with a worse clinical outcome following surgery.

METHODS

We describe the series of cases of patients with clinoidal meningiomas who underwent microsurgical resection at our institution between January 2014 and March 2019. The intention was to analyze the multiple preoperative variables, such as the patient's demographic, tumor, and surgical characteristics, such as the Al-Mefty Classification to find a relationship with the patient's clinical outcome during their postoperative follow-up.  Results: Death occurred in 4.8% of the cases. Postoperative morbidity was documented in 42.9%, the most frequent being ophthalmoparesis, followed by worsening of visual acuity, and new onset motor deficits. Radiological characteristics were assessed based on preoperative MRI. The maximum diameter, midline shift, invasion of the cavernous sinus, arterial encasement, and peritumoral edema were evaluated. Average intraoperative bleeding was 1.3 L. The most frequent histological grade was World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1 in 85.6% of the cases. Complete resection was obtained in 52.4% of the cases; 42.8% received fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy after surgery for disease control, and one received radiosurgery. Recurrence occurred in 33.3%. The average follow-up in months was 23.8.  Conclusions: Demographic factors and tumor characteristics in clinoidal meningioma surgery are related to the subtype of meningioma according to the Al-Mefty Classification and impact directly the degree of resection, progression of the disease, and degree of postoperative complications. To achieve maximal resection while minimizing morbidity and mortality, these factors must be considered to decide on an appropriate approach and specific plan for each case.

Surgical management of anterior clinoidal meningiomas: consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of clinoidal meningiomas (CMs) continues to be debated.

METHODS

We constituted a task force comprising the members of the EANS skull base committee along with international experts to derive recommendations for the management of these tumors. The data from the literature along with contemporary practice patterns were discussed within the task force to generate consensual recommendations.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

This article represents the consensus opinion of the task force regarding pre-operative evaluations, patient's counselling, surgical classification, and optimal surgical strategy. Although this analysis yielded only Class B evidence and expert opinions, it should guide practitioners in the management of patients with clinoidal meningiomas and might form the basis for future clinical trials.

Extradural anterior clinoidectomy in surgical management of clinoidal meningiomas

Background

Despite the recent advances in skull base surgery, microsurgical techniques, and neuroimaging, yet surgical resection of clinoidal meningiomas is still a major challenge. In this study, we present our institution experience in the surgical treatment of anterior clinoidal meningiomas highlighting the role of extradural anterior clinoidectomy in improving the visual outcome and the extent of tumor resection. This is a prospective observational study conducted on 33 consecutive patients with clinoidal meningiomas. The surgical approach utilized consisted of extradural anterior clinoidectomy, optic canal deroofing with falciform ligament opening in all patients. The primary outcome assessment was visual improvement and secondary outcomes were extent of tumor resection, recurrence, and postoperative complications.

Results

The study included 5 males and 28 females with mean age 49.48 ± 11.41 years. Preoperative visual deficit was present in 30 (90.9%) patients. Optic canal involvement was present in 24 (72.7%) patients, ICA encasement was in 16 (48.5%), and cavernous sinus invasion in 8 (24.2%). Vision improved in 21 patients (70%), while 6 patients (20%) had stationary course and 1 patient (3%) suffered postoperative new visual deterioration. Gross total resection was achieved in 24 patients (72.7%). The main factors precluding total removal were cavernous sinus involvement and ICA encasement. Mortality rate was 6.1%; mean follow-up period was 27 ± 13 months.

Conclusions

In this series, the use of extradural anterior clinoidectomy provided a favorable visual outcome and improved the extent of resection in clinoidal meningioma patients.

Anterior Clinoid Metastasis Removed Extradurally: First Case Report

Background  We report a case of isolated metastasis on the anterior clinoid process (ACP) mimicking meningioma.

Clinical Presentation  A 58-year-old male presented with headaches, right-sided visual disturbances, and blurred and double vision. The cause of double vision was partial weakness of the right III nerve, resulting from compression of the nerve by “hypertrophied” tumor-involved right anterior clinoid. Medical history revealed two primary malignant tumors—male breast cancer and prostate cancer (diagnosed 6 and 18 months prior, respectively). The patient was treated with chemotherapy and showed no signs of active disease, recurrence, or metastasis. Postcontrast head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed extra-axial well-bordered enhancing mass measuring 1.6 × 1.1 × 1 × 1 cm (anteroposterior, transverse, and craniocaudal dimensions) on the ACP, resembling a clinoidal meningioma. Extradural clinoidectomy with tumor resection was performed via right orbitozygomatic pretemporal skull base approach. Visual symptoms improved. Follow-up MRI showed no signs of tumor residual or recurrence.

Conclusion  This is the first case report of a metastasis of any kind on ACP. Metastasis should be included as a part of the differential diagnosis of lesions of the anterior clinoid. Extradural clinoidectomy is a safe and effective method in the treatment of these tumors.