Evaluating the relationship of blood pressure, plasma angiotensin peptides and aldosterone with cognitive functions in patients with hypertension

Aldosterone in the brain and cognition: knowns and unknowns

Mineralocorticoid receptors are expressed in several structures of the central nervous system, and aldosterone levels can be measured in the brain, although in smaller amounts than in plasma. Nevertheless, these amounts appear to be sufficient to elicit substantial clinical effects. Primary aldosteronism, characterized by high levels of plasma aldosterone, is one of the most common causes of secondary hypertension. In this context, high aldosterone levels may have both indirect and direct effects on the brain with a negative impact on several cerebral functions. Thus, chronic aldosterone excess has been associated with symptoms of anxiety and depression - two clinical entities themselves associated with cognitive deficits. Today, there is an increasing number of reports on the influence of aldosterone on the brain, but there is also a significant amount of uncertainty, such as the role of high aldosterone levels on cognitive functions and decline independently of blood pressure. In this mini review, we discuss the known and unknowns of the impact of aldosterone on the brain putting emphasis on cognitive functions.

The new mechanism of cognitive decline induced by hypertension: High homocysteine-mediated aberrant DNA methylation

The prevalence and severity of hypertension-induced cognitive impairment increase with the prolonging of hypertension. The mechanisms of cognitive impairment induced by hypertension primarily include cerebral blood flow perfusion imbalance, white and gray matter injury with blood-brain barrier disruption, neuroinflammation and amyloid-beta deposition, genetic polymorphisms and variants, and instability of blood pressure. High homocysteine (HHcy) is an independent risk factor for hypertension that also increases the risk of developing early cognitive impairment. Homocysteine (Hcy) levels increase in patients with cognitive impairment induced by hypertension. This review summarizes a new mechanism whereby HHcy-mediated aberrant DNA methylation and exacerbate hypertension. It involves changes in Hcy-dependent DNA methylation products, such as methionine adenosyltransferase, DNA methyltransferases, S-adenosylmethionine, S-adenosylhomocysteine, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR). The mechanism also involves DNA methylation changes in the genes of hypertension patients, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor, apolipoprotein E4, and estrogen receptor alpha, which contribute to learning, memory, and attention deficits. Studies have shown that methionine (Met) induces hypertension in mice. Moreover, DNA hypermethylation leads to cognitive behavioral changes alongside oligodendroglial and/or myelin deficits in Met-induced mice. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that DNA methylation regulates cognitive dysfunction in patients with hypertension. A better understanding of the function and mechanism underlying the effect of Hcy-dependent DNA methylation on hypertension-induced cognitive impairment will be valuable for early diagnosis, interventions, and prevention of further cognitive defects induced by hypertension.

Comparing the Neuroprotective Effects of Telmisartan, Perindopril, and Nebivolol Against Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Injury in Neuron-Like Cells

The effect of antihypertensive drugs, especially drugs modulating the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS), on neurodegenerative diseases still needs to be investigated. This study aimed to compare the effects of three different antihypertensive drugs (telmisartan, perindopril, and nebivolol) on neuroprotection and acetylcholine (ACh) levels against lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced injury in a differentiated SH-SY5Y cell line. Cells were treated with retinoic acid for differentiation to a neuronal phenotype. LPS 20 (μg/mL) was applied to the cells for one hour. Then, the cells were treated with 1, 5, and 10 µg/mL concentrations of telmisartan, perindopril, and nebivolol separately for 24 hours, except for the control and LPS alone groups. Cell viability was evaluated using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. ACh levels were analyzed using an enzyme immunosorbent assay in the culture medium. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β), and nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFκB) expressions were evaluated using western blot analysis. Telmisartan demonstrated the highest cell viability against LPS-induced injury, whereas the protective effect of perindopril was moderate. Nebivolol showed no neuroprotective effect. The protective effect of 10-µg/mL telmisartan was superior to 10 µg/mL perindopril (p=0.006), 5 µg/mL perindopril (p=0.001), 1 µg/mL perindopril (p=0.001), and 1, 5, and 10 µg/mL nebivolol (p<0.001). Among all the study drugs, only telmisartan provided a statistically significant increase in ACh levels after LPS-induced injury. Additionally, the administration of telmisartan provided a concentration-dependent reduction in TNF-α, IL-1β, and NFκB expression against LPS-induced neuroinflammation. These findings suggest that telmisartan has a superior neuroprotective effect against LPS-induced injury in neuron-like cells compared with both perindopril and nebivolol.

Renin-Angiotensin System and Alzheimer's Disease Pathophysiology: From the Potential Interactions to Therapeutic Perspectives

New roles of the Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS), apart from fluid homeostasis and Blood Pressure (BP) regulation, are being progressively unveiled, since the discoveries of RAS alternative axes and local RAS in different tissues, including the brain. Brain RAS is reported to interact with pathophysiological mechanisms of many neurological and psychiatric diseases, including Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Even though AD is the most common cause of dementia worldwide, its pathophysiology is far from elucidated. Currently, no treatment can halt the disease course. Successive failures of amyloid-targeting drugs have challenged the amyloid hypothesis and increased the interest in the inflammatory and vascular aspects of AD. RAS compounds, both centrally and peripherally, potentially interact with neuroinflammation and cerebrovascular regulation. This narrative review discusses the AD pathophysiology and its possible interaction with RAS, looking forward to potential therapeutic approaches. RAS molecules affect BP, cerebral blood flow, neuroinflammation, and oxidative stress. Angiotensin (Ang) II, via angiotensin type 1 receptors may promote brain tissue damage, while Ang-(1-7) seems to elicit neuroprotection. Several studies dosed RAS molecules in AD patients' biological material, with heterogeneous results. The link between AD and clinical conditions related to classical RAS axis overactivation (hypertension, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease) supports the hypothesized role of this system in AD. Additionally, RAStargeting drugs as Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs) seem to exert beneficial effects on AD. Results of randomized controlled trials testing ACEi or ARBs in AD are awaited to elucidate whether AD-RAS interaction has implications on AD therapeutics.