Effect of the new needle-free injection system on pain perception and dental anxiety during anesthesia: randomized controlled split-mouth study

Devices to overcome the buccal mucosal barrier to administer therapeutic peptides

Peptide therapeutics are important in healthcare owing to their high target specificity, therapeutic efficacy, and relatively low side effect profile. Injections of these agents have improved thetreatment of chronic diseases including autoimmune, metabolic disorders, and cancer. However, their administration via injections can prove a barrier to patient acceptability of treatments. While oral delivery of these molecules is preferable, oral peptide formulations are associated with limited bioavailability due to degradation in the intestine and low epithelial permeability. Buccal administration of peptides is a potential alternative to injections and oral formulations. Similar to the oral route, the buccal route can promote better patient adherence to dosing regimens, along with the added advantages of not requiring restriction on food or drink consumption before and after administration, as well as avoidance of the liver first-pass metabolism. However, like oral, effective buccal absorption of peptides is still challenging due to the high epithelial permeability barrier. We present a multidisciplinary approach to understanding the buccal physiological barrier to macromolecule permeation and discuss how engineered devices may overcome it. Selected examples of buccal devices can facilitate fast and efficient macromolecule absorption through multiple mechanisms including physical disruption of epithelia, convection-based mass transfer, and a combination of physicochemical strategies. Importantly, minimally invasive devices can be self-applied and are associated with the maintenance of the barrier after exposure. We analysed the critical attributes that are required forthe clinical translation of buccal peptide administration devices. These include performance-driven device development, manufacturing features, patient acceptability, and commercial viability.

Articaine Needle - Free Anesthesia Vs Conventional Anesthesia in Root Canal Treatment of Irreversible Pulpitis in Permanent Teeth: A Prospective Study on Anesthetic Efficacy and Effects on Pain

Objective

This study aimed to compare the anesthetic efficacy of articaine needle-free anesthesia with conventional lidocaine nerve block anesthesia for root canal treatment in permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis.

Methods

In this prospective clinical trial, 94 patients were randomly allocated to receive either articaine needle-free anesthesia (n=47) or lidocaine nerve block anesthesia (n=47). Anesthetic effectiveness was evaluated through onset time, success rate, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores during crown opening and pulp removal procedures. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic stability (heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) and incidence of adverse reactions.

Results

The articaine group exhibited significantly faster anesthesia onset (7.62±1.28 minutes vs 9.35±2.04 minutes, p<0.05) and higher success rate (93.62% vs 80.85%, p<0.05). Patients receiving articaine reported significantly lower pain scores during crown opening (4.31±1.13 vs 5.48±1.06) and pulp removal (3.18±1.07 vs 4.26±1.12) (both p<0.05). Both groups maintained comparable hemodynamic stability throughout the procedure (p>0.05), with no significant difference in adverse reaction rates (11.49% vs 10.64%, p>0.05).

Conclusion

Articaine needle-free anesthesia demonstrates superior clinical performance compared to conventional lidocaine nerve block, offering faster onset, improved success rate, and enhanced pain control during root canal treatment of irreversible pulpitis, while maintaining equivalent safety parameters. These findings support its adoption as an effective alternative for dental anesthesia in endodontic procedures.

Effect of intraoral photobiomodulation therapy on pain perception associated with local anaesthesia infiltration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Local anaesthetic injections, commonly used in dentistry and oral surgery, often cause discomfort. This review aimed to examine the impact of intraoral photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) on pain associated with local anaesthesia. Up to March 2024, two independent reviewers searched four databases, ultimately screening 17 randomized controlled trials for meta-analysis using Stata 17.0. The results indicate that intraoral PBMT application significantly reduces the perception of pain associated with local anaesthetic injections (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.27 to -0.52; P < 0.001). This analgesic effect remained consistent irrespective of concurrent topical anaesthetics, and PBMT was efficacious in paediatric (SMD -0.53, 95% CI -0.89 to -0.17; P = 0.004) and adult (SMD -1.46, 95% CI -2.32 to -0.61; P = 0.001) populations. Subgroup analysis provided very low to low-quality evidence that using a wavelength between 900 nm and 980 nm (SMD -0.87, 95% CI -1.36 to -0.39; P < 0.001) and an irradiation time of 13-40 s (SMD -0.94, 95% CI -1.35 to -0.53; P < 0.001) are associated with significant pain reduction. The use of PBMT could aid in reducing pain perception for patients during dental injections, encouraging earlier presentation for dental consultations.

Efficacy of articaine anesthesia with needle-free/Comfort-in method and conventional needle injection in dental patients with irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the anesthetic efficacy of articaine with the needle-free/Comfort-in™ method compared to the conventional needle method. To assess pain during anesthesia application, onset of anesthesia and patient`s self-reported quality of life-related to oral health after the dental emergency appointment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This parallel, randomized clinical trial was conducted by a single operator/dentist in the state of Maranhao, northeast of Brazil. Included participants were adult dental patients with one molar (maxillary) or premolar (maxillary or mandibular) tooth diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. The primary outcome was the anesthetic efficacy, measured using a combination of electrical and cold pulp tests (cold + EPT) and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes were pain during anesthesia application, onset of anesthesia, and patient`s quality-of-life (measured with the OHIP-14).

RESULTS

62 patients were randomized in the anesthesia needle-free group and Comfort-in group (34.26 ± 10.786 × 33.29 ± 8.399 years old, respectively). The group of patients in the Comfort-in group had 71.0% success. Patients from the Comfort-in group reported statistically lower pain during the anesthesia application than patients from the conventional group (2.13 ± 2.172 × 6.03 ± 3.146 NRS scores, respectively) as well as immediately after the anesthetic procedure. Patients self-reported negative impact in quality of life was similar between groups before (p > 0.05) and after (p > 0.05) the dental emergency.

CONCLUSIONS

Comfort-in™ had similar efficacy to the conventional needle method.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This trial showed that it is possible to anesthetize patients with tooth pulpits without using needles to provide comfort mainly to anxious patients.

Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Needle-Free Anesthesia and Conventional Anesthesia in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Introduction Pain is the primary reason for which most of the patients seek endodontic treatment. Local anesthesia is considered to be the most important step in the procedure to reduce the pain. However, the majority of the patients do not cooperate due to the fear of syringe anesthesia. The aim of this clinical trial was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of needle-free anesthesia and conventional anesthesia in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis undergoing root canal therapy. Materials and methods A total of 54 patients were enrolled in the study, and the treatment was administered by a single operator. The initial assessment of vitality included cold testing, heat testing, and electric pulp testing. Preoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before the administration of anesthesia. Local anesthesia was administered according to the group assigned: Group 1 (conventional anesthesia) and Group 2 (needle-free anesthesia). The pain was assessed during the administration of anesthesia. Following the administration of anesthesia, the vitality of the tooth was evaluated using cold testing, heat testing, and electric pulp testing. Subsequently, the tooth was isolated with a rubber dam, and the access cavity was prepared. The pain was assessed during access cavity preparation and during the first file insertion. Working length was determined using an apex locator (Root ZX Mini, J Morita, Saitama, Japan) and was confirmed using intraoral periapical radiographs. Later on, further treatment was carried out. Results A total of 54 participants were included in this clinical trial. There was no significant difference in mean age distribution between the two groups (p=0.852). Considering the frequency distribution of gender, there was no significant difference; however, Group 1 had more female participants (59.3%) compared to Group 2 (33.3%). There was a significant reduction in the mean pain score in Group 2 compared to Group 1 during the delivery of anesthetic agents (p=0.000). Conclusion Needle-free anesthesia proves to be equally effective as the conventional syringe system in patients experiencing symptomatic irreversible pulpitis undergoing root canal treatment. However, it is noteworthy that patients exhibited greater comfort levels with needle-free anesthesia systems specifically during the administration of the anesthetic solution.

Evaluation of Child Preference for Dentist Attire and Usage of a Camouflage Syringe in Reduction of Anxiety

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of child-friendly dentist attire and camouflage syringes on reducing dental anxiety in children.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 120 pediatric patients aged 6 to 12 years. Participants were assigned to one of three groups: group A (child-friendly dentist attire), group B (camouflage syringe), or group C (control group). Child preference for dentist attire was assessed using a visual analog scale, while dental anxiety was measured using the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale and the Facial Image Scale.

RESULTS

The results showed a significant decrease in dental anxiety scores in both group 2 and group 3 compared to group 1 (P < 0.001). Children in group A exhibited a higher preference for child-friendly dentist attire [mean score: 8.7, standard deviation (SD): 1.2] compared to group 1 (mean score: 3.2, SD: 1.5) (P < 0.001). Similarly, children in group 2 showed a higher preference for a camouflage syringe (mean score: 8.5, SD: 1.3) compared to group 1 (mean score: 3.4, SD: 1.6) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Child-friendly dentist attire and camouflage syringes were found to be effective in reducing dental anxiety among pediatric patients. These interventions were well received by children and their parents, highlighting the importance of considering child preferences in dental settings.