CURRENT PROGRESS IN TRANS- AND CISGENIC APPLE AND STRAWBERRY BREEDING

Challenges for the Post-Market Environmental Monitoring in the European Union Imposed by Novel Applications of Genetically Modified and Genome-Edited Organisms

Information on the state of the environment is important to achieve the objectives of the European Green Deal, including the EU's Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. The existing regulatory provisions for genetically modified organisms (GMOs) foresee an obligatory post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) of potential adverse effects upon release into the environment. So far, GMO monitoring activities have focused on genetically modified crops. With the advent of new genomic techniques (NGT), novel GMO applications are being developed and may be released into a range of different, non-agricultural environments with potential implications for ecosystems and biodiversity. This challenges the current monitoring concepts and requires adaptation of existing monitoring programs to meet monitoring requirements. While the incorporation of existing biodiversity monitoring programs into GMO monitoring at the national level is important, additional monitoring activities will also be required. Using case examples, we highlight that monitoring requirements for novel GMO applications differ from those of GM crop plants previously authorized for commercial use in the European Union.

Identification and Characterization of Two Putative Citrus Phosphomannose Isomerase (CsPMI) Genes as Selectable Markers for Mature Citrus Transformation

Two Citrus sinensis (L.) phosphomannose isomerase (PMI) genes, CsPMI1 and CsPMI2, were evaluated as novel selectable markers in mature citrus transformation. Transgenic shoots produced after transformation of Kuharske rootstock with each PMI construct were selected on six treatments of mannose and sucrose. For CsPMI1, there were no significant differences among the various mannose and sucrose treatments for the mean number of positive shoots (PS), the mean transformation efficiency based on the number of shoots (TES), or the mean transformation efficiency based on the number of explants (TEE). However, for the CsPMI2 gene, the number of transgenics produced in two treatments (7.5 g L−1 mannose + 22.5 g L−1 sucrose and 15 g L−1 mannose + 15 g L−1 sucrose) was significantly greater than the sucrose control for TES at 4.2% and 3.7%, respectively. Moreover, TEE at 4.2% in the 15 g L−1 mannose + 15 g L−1 sucrose treatment, supported the TES value. Most of the transgenic lines demonstrated higher in vivo and in vitro enzyme assays compared with the wild-type control. CsPMI2 provided acceptable selection in mature citrus, and it will be applied in future intragenic research.

Intragenesis and cisgenesis as alternatives to transgenic crop development

One of the major concerns of the general public about transgenic crops relates to the mixing of genetic materials between species that cannot hybridize by natural means. To meet this concern, the two transformation concepts cisgenesis and intragenesis were developed as alternatives to transgenesis. Both concepts imply that plants must only be transformed with genetic material derived from the species itself or from closely related species capable of sexual hybridization. Furthermore, foreign sequences such as selection genes and vector-backbone sequences should be absent. Intragenesis differs from cisgenesis by allowing use of new gene combinations created by in vitro rearrangements of functional genetic elements. Several surveys show higher public acceptance of intragenic/cisgenic crops compared to transgenic crops. Thus, although the intragenic and cisgenic concepts were introduced internationally only 9 and 7 years ago, several different traits in a variety of crops have currently been modified according to these concepts. Five of these crops are now in field trials and two have pending applications for deregulation. Currently, intragenic/cisgenic plants are regulated as transgenic plants worldwide. However, as the gene pool exploited by intragenesis and cisgenesis are identical to the gene pool available for conventional breeding, less comprehensive regulatory measures are expected. The regulation of intragenic/cisgenic crops is presently under evaluation in the EU and in the US regulators are considering if a subgroup of these crops should be exempted from regulation. It is accordingly possible that the intragenic/cisgenic route will be of major significance for future plant breeding.