Side Branch is the Main Determinant Factor of Bifurcation Lesion Complexity: Critical Review with a Proposal Based on Single-centre Experience

Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Treatment of Left Main True Bifurcation Lesion

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data regarding drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment in the context of left main (LM) true bifurcation lesions.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DCB-based treatment for unprotected LM true bifurcation lesions.

METHODS

A total of 39 patients with LM true bifurcation lesion (Medina: 1,1,1/0,1,1/1,0,1) who were successfully treated with DCB alone or in combination with drug-eluting stent (DES) were retrospectively enrolled into the DCB-based group. They were compared with 39 propensity-matched patients who were treated with second-generation DES from the COBIS III registry (n = 2648). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent or target lesion thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization at the 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the groups, except for the prevalence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions (41.0% in DCB-based group vs. 17.9% in DES-only group, p = 0.047). In the DCB-based group, 59.0% of the patients (n = 23) underwent DCB-only treatment. There were no cases of abrupt vessel closure requiring treatment following DCB application. The MACE were comparable between both groups (12.8% in DCB-based group vs. 17.9% in DES-only group, p = 0.861) after 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with unprotected LM true bifurcation lesions, DCB-based treatment demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes at the 2-year follow-up when compared to DES-only treatment. DCB-based treatment could be considered a safe and effective alternative to DES for carefully selected patients who have achieved satisfactory predilation results (Impact of DCB Treatment in De Novo Coronary Lesion; NCT04619277).

Evaluation of Small Vessel Bifurcation Stenting Using the Double-Kissing Culotte and Culotte Technique in Acute Coronary Syndrome: 12-Month Clinical Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Patients with small vessels who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with subsequent multiple implantation of drug-eluting stents remain at a higher risk of unfavorable outcomes. In complex cases where maintaining flow to all side branches is part of contemporary practice, using two-stent techniques may be appropriate. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of double-kissing (DK) culotte technique in comparison to culotte technique in the context of small-vessel therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

This substudy of the Lower Silesia culotte Bifurcation Registry retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent ACS-PCI using DK culotte or culotte technique for bifurcation lesions in small vessels, defined as having at least one branch with a diameter of 2.75 mm or less. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1-year follow-up. The secondary endpoint included major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

RESULTS

The DK culotte group (n = 49) and the culotte group (n = 52) were compared, with 12-month follow-up showing lower TLF in the DK culotte group (8.2% vs. 19.2%, p = 0.082). Similar results were observed for TLR (6.1% vs. 13.5%; p = 0.161), stent restenosis (4.1% vs. 9.6%; p = 0.203), and MACE (18.4% vs. 25%; p = 0.344).

CONCLUSION

For bifurcation lesions with a small-diameter artery, the DK culotte technique may reduce TLF and MACE compared to the culotte technique. However, given the limited sample size and the absence of statistical significance, these findings remain preliminary and require further investigation.

Comparison of angiographic change in side-branch ostium after drug-coated balloon vs. drug-eluting stent vs. medication for the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions

OBJECTIVES

Data on side-branch (SB) ostial effect after drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment in the context of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions are limited. We aimed to investigate the angiographic outcomes of SB ostium after DCB treatment compared with drug-eluting stents (DESs) implantation in the main vessel (MV) or optimal medical therapy (OMT) for the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions.

METHODS

Serial angiographic changes in the SB ostium were compared between DCB, DES, and medication alone for MV treatment. Δ value was calculated by subtracting the follow-up value from the pre-procedure value.

RESULTS

A total of 132 bifurcation lesions were included for analysis (44 lesions in DCB group; 38 lesions in DES group; 50 lesions in OMT group). The minimal lumen diameter (MLD) of SB ostium showed an increase at follow-up in the DCB group, whereas a decrease was observed in both the DES and OMT groups (ΔMLD: -0.16 ± 0.45 mm for DCB group vs. 0.50 ± 0.52 mm for DES group vs. 0.08 ± 0.38 mm for OMT group, p < 0.001). The diameter stenosis (DS) of SB ostium showed a marked decrease at follow-up in the DCB group, in contrast to an increase observed in both the DES and OMT groups (ΔDS: 8.01 ± 18.96% for DCB group vs. -18.68 ± 18.60% for DES group vs. -2.05 ± 14.58% for OMT group, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In de novo coronary bifurcation lesions, DCB treatment on the MV demonstrated favorable angiographic outcomes in the SB ostium at 6-9 month follow-up compared to DES implantation or OMT.

Acute and long-term results of percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions with the dedicated Bioss Lim C stent: the Italian BIfurcation Observational Spontaneous Study (IBIOSS)

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions still represents a clinical challenge. The Bioss Lim C is a dedicated device for bifurcation lesions, features a tapered shape and large cells, and thus appears as a promising adjunct to the current interventional cardiologists' armamentarium. We aimed at conducting a prospective multicenter study focusing on early and long-term results after Bioss Lim C implantation for true coronary bifurcation lesions.

METHODS

Patients with true bifurcation lesions in whom Bioss Lim C implantation was attempted were enrolled in four Italian centers. An explicit bifurcation management approach was recommended, leaving however the choice between one- vs. two-stent strategies at operator's discretion. Acute and long-term results were systematically appraised, focusing on an acute composite of complex side branch (SB) rewiring, SB pinching, or SB occlusion (primary efficacy endpoint), as well as major adverse events (MACE, i.e. death, myocardial infarction [MI], or target vessel revascularization [TVR]), individual components of MACE, and stent thrombosis.

RESULTS

A total of 207 patients were included, with age of 67.3±10.8 years, and 40 (19.3%) women. The target lesion was located in the left main in 48 (23.2%) patients, whereas proximal reference vessel diameter was 3.69±0.48 mm, and lesion length 20.3±3.4 mm. According to the Medina classification, most patients (60 [30.9%]) had 1-1-1 lesions. Drug-eluting stent implantation in the SB was carried out in 19 (9.3%) subjects, and kissing balloon inflation was used in 67 (32.5%). The primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 27 (13.0%), with side branch (SB) occlusion in two (1.0%), SB pinching in 23 (11.1%), and complex SB rewiring in six (2.9%), and was most frequent in patients with lower body mass index or dyslipidemia. After 24.1±19.5 months, MACE were adjudicated in 23 (11.1%) subjects, with death in 10 (4.8%), MI in six (2.9%), and TVR in seven (3.4%), as well as stent thrombosis in one (0.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports a wider adoption of the Bioss Lim C dedicated bifurcation device, thanks to the favorable acute results as well as long-term clinical outcomes, as well as its versatility for the stenting strategy provisionally or eventually adopted by operators.

Standardized angiographic projections allow evaluation of coronary artery side branches with quantitative flow ratio (QFR)

Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel, software-based noninvasive method for the quantitative evaluation of coronary physiology. QFR results correlate with invasive FFR measurements in the three main epicardial coronary arteries. However, QFR data for the evaluation of coronary side branches (SB) are scarce. The evaluation of QFR-performance of SB was retrospective and prospective. Eighty-seven patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome, who received angiography using routine core lab projections, were retrospectively analyzed. On the second part 37 patients, who received angiography using recommended standardized coronary angiography projections, were prospectively analyzed. Quantitative analysis was performed for SB with a maximum lumen diameter proximal of ≥2 mm based on quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) by two certified experts with the software QAngio XA 3D 3.2. Using routine projections, QFR computation in 55 % of the SB were obtained (123 out of 224). Using standardized projections, 85 % of SB were computed by QFR (64 out of 75; p < 0.001 vs routine projections). The fluoroscopy time for recommended projections was not significantly different as opposed to routine projections (3.75 ± 2.2 vs. 4.58 ± 3.00 min, p = 2.6986). Using the standardized projections was associated with a higher amount of contrast medium (53.44 ± 24.23 vs. 87.95 ± 43.73 ml, p < 0.01), longer overall procedure time (23.23 ± 16.35 vs. 36.14 ± 17.21 min, p < 0.01) and a higher dose area product (1152.28 ± 576.70 vs. 2540.68 ± 1774.07 cGycm2, p < 0.01). Our study shows that the blood flow of the vast majority of coronary SB can be determined non-invasively by QFR in addition to the main epicardial coronary arteries when standardized projections are used.

Outcomes of Provisional Stenting With Versus Without Side Branch Intervention in Patients With Bifurcation Lesion-Related ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

To date, the best approach to coronary bifurcation lesion remains unsettled, and the parameters to guide side branch ballooning or stenting are not yet defined. This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes after provisional stenting with versus without side branch intervention. A cohort was conducted on 132 patients who underwent coronary angiography at Toulouse University Hospital for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with large culprit nonleft main coronary bifurcation lesion. Study participants were divided into 2 groups depending on the performance or not of a side branch intervention. We observed the living status at 1-year after hospital discharge. Side branch intervention by balloon inflation or final balloon kissing technique was performed in 34.1% of study participants. At 1-year follow-up, the incidence of all-cause mortality was 7.8 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1 to 15), and although it seemed higher in the side branch intervention group (10 per 100 person-years [95% CI 3.8 to 26.7] vs 6.6 per 100 persons-years [95% CI 2.8 to 15.9]), the survival analyses showed no differences in survival outcomes (hazard ratio side branch intervention 1.55 [0.42 to 5.78], p = 0.513). In conclusion, in the setting of a coronary bifurcation causing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, simple provisional stenting without side branch intervention showed a low mortality rate and no differences in the 1-year survival outcomes.