The possibilities of using beta-blocker bisoprolol in patients with stable angina with concomitant bronchial asthma

The Influence of Recreational Hiking on the Prevalence of Cardiovascular and Psychiatric Diseases Among Population of Republic of Serbia

Background: Hiking is a physical activity recommended for people of all ages. In an era of increased incidence of cardiovascular and psychiatric diseases, directing individuals to hiking can be very important from both public health and socioeconomic perspectives. Since the health status of recreational hikers and the general population in the Republic of Serbia has not been compared yet, our objectives are to compare the health-related characteristics of those two groups, including the prevalence of comorbidities, pharmacotherapy, and drug consumption. Methods: A descriptive epidemiological study was conducted. Research questions were asked via two specially prepared questionnaires distributed through the Google Forms platform. The means of the two groups were tested by a two-sample Student t-test for independent variables. Results: The sample consisted of 259 hikers and 292 people from the general population. A total of 199 hikers (76.8%) and 218 people from the general population group (74.7%) were declared as healthy. The statistically significant differences between the groups included age, sex, education level, and body mass index. In both groups, the majority of those with pre-existing medical conditions had at least one cardiovascular disease (23.5% of the hikers and 19.5% of the individuals in the general group). Pre-existing psychiatric diseases were noted in 6% of the hikers and in 12% of those in the general group. The average durations of the disease in the hiker and general population were 11.9 and 8.4 years, respectively (p < 0.05), whereas, there were no differences in drug consumption. Conclusions: This pilot study represents the comparison of the cardiovascular and mental health among hikers and the general population in the Republic of Serbia. Although psychiatric diseases were clearly less prevalent among hikers, the prevalence and burden of cardiovascular diseases must be interpreted with caution, due to big age difference between the respondents from both groups. However, our future studies will employ objective measurements and clinical parameters rather than self-reported surveys, so that the health benefits of hiking appear more clearly.

β-Blockers and Asthma: Surprising findings from the FAERS database

INTRODUCTION

β-Blockers are essential for cardiovascular disease management but can induce respiratory issues, particularly with non-selective β-blockers. Their safety in asthmatic patients is debated.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the link between different classes of β-blockers and the risk of asthma and asthma-like adverse events (AEs) using data from the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHODS

β-Blockers were first reviewed according to European Society of Cardiology classification and then using the Vashistha and Kumar classification. The risk associated with different β-blocker classes was evaluated through disproportionality analysis using the reporting odds ratio (ROR).

RESULTS

Among 251,145 AEs reported for β-blockers, 4104 were asthma-related. Selective β1-blockers had a higher asthma risk signal (ROR: 1.15) compared to non-selective β-blockers (ROR: 0.90). α- and β-Blockers showed the lowest risk (ROR: 0.51). The Vashistha and Kumar classification detailed risk profiles for various β-blockers, highlighting differences even within the same class. Dual α- and β-blockers, hydrophilic, and lipophilic β-blockers posed lower asthma risks, while selective β1-blockers had higher risks regardless of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity.

CONCLUSION

Although the signals detected by disproportionality analysis are only candidate risks, the risk stratification resulting from our analysis highlights the need for cautious β-blocker selection in asthmatic patients or those predisposed to asthma. Furthermore, despite the limitations associated with the FAERS data, the study reveals significant variability in risk among different β-blocker classes, crucial for clinical decisions and patient management. Drugs like esmolol, metoprolol, nebivolol, and nadolol may be safer for asthmatic patients, whereas betaxolol, bisoprolol, timolol, and propranolol should be avoided.

Safety and tolerability of β-blockers: importance of cardioselectivity

Cardioselective β-blockade is generally well tolerated in practice and contraindications to this therapy are uncommon. β-blockers are a diverse therapeutic class, and their individual tolerability profiles are influenced strongly by their pharmacodynamic effects across different adrenergic receptors. Bisoprolol, probably the β-blocker with the highest selectivity for blockade of β1- vs. β2-adrenoceptors, does not block β2-adrenoceptors to an appreciable extent at doses in therapeutic use. Side-effects often attributed to β-blockers, such as erectile dysfunction and adverse metabolic effects are uncommon with bisoprolol and other β-blockers used at doses which only block β1-adrenoceptors. Cautious use of a cardioselective β-blocker is not contraindicated in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma and the outcomes benefits of β-blockers in patients with coronary heart disease or heart failure are also apparent in patients with concurrent COPD. Starting with a low dose and titrating upwards carefully is important for optimising the tolerability of a β-blocker. Most people with hypertension will receive combination antihypertensive therapy in practice, and the low-dose combination therapy approach provides a useful strategy for optimising the efficacy and tolerability of a regimen that includes a β-blocker, compared with up-titrating an existing monotherapy.

The clinical value of β-blockers in patients with stable angina

Stable angina, one manifestation of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), is characterised by intermittent episodes of insufficient blood supply to the myocardium, provoking symptoms of myocardial ischaemia, particularly chest pain. These attacks usually occur during exercise or stress. Anti-ischaemic drugs are the mainstay of pharmacologic management of CCS with symptoms of angina. β-blockers reduce heart rate and myocardial contractility, thus reducing myocardial oxygen consumption. These drugs have been shown to ameliorate the frequency of anginal attacks and to improve exercise capacity in these patients. Current management guidelines include β-blockers as a first-line management option for most patients with CCS and symptoms of myocardial ischaemia, alongside dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCB). The presence of comorbid angina and heart failure is a strong indication for starting with a β-blocker. β-blockers are also useful in the management of angina symptoms accompanied by a high heart rate, hypertension (with or without a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system [RAS] blocker or CCB), or microvascular angina (with a RAS blocker and a statin). A β-blocker is not suitable for a patient with low heart rate (<50 bpm), although use of a β-blocker may be supported by a pacemaker if the β-blocker is strongly indicated) and should be used at a low dose only in patients with low blood pressure.