Clinical significance of serial biomarkers activity determination after acute heart failure decompensation: sST2 NT-proBNP role during long-term follow-up

The Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Under the Control of the Soluble ST2 Receptor Concentration in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction After Acute Decompensation of Heart Failure

Aim    To study the effectiveness of a treatment based on monitoring the soluble ST2 receptor (sST2) concentration in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF).Material and methods    The study included 37 patients hospitalized for ADHF with LVEF ≤40% and sST2 concentration ≥37.8 ng/ml at the time of discharge from the hospital. Patients were randomized into two groups: a sST2 monitoring (sST2M) group (19 patients) and a standard therapy (ST) group (18 patients). The follow-up period was 12 months. At baseline, the groups practically did not differ by clinical, functional, laboratory, and instrumental characteristics. For the sST2M group, the goal was reducing the sST2 concentration by >30% of baseline or to <30 ng/ml.Results    Therapy in both groups was comparable both in doses and in frequency of administration of basic drugs. However, the diuretic therapy was more frequently adjusted in the sST2M group (3.0 [1.0; 4.0] vs. 1.0 [0; 3.0] adjustments per patient, p = 0.047), which required more visits to the clinic (7.0 [6.0; 9.0] vs. 6.0 [6.0; 6.0] visits per patient, p=0.024). In the sST2M group at 6 months, the sST2 concentration was decreased by 43.3% (p=0.001), and 13 patients (72.2%) achieved the goal. In the ST group, the sST2 concentration was decreased by 38.5% (p=0.001), and 11 patients (68.8%) reached the target values. After 12 months, the downward trend continued in both groups. In both groups, the NT-proBNP concentration decreased: in the sST2M group by 27.7% (p=0.014), and in the ST group by 31.9% (p = 0.006). By the 12th month, the decrease remained only in the sST2M group. Only the sST2M group had an increase in LVEF (+28.5%, p=0.003), a decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) (-12.0%, p=0.017), and a decrease in left atrial volume (-13.4%, p=0.045); at 12 months, LVEF remained increased (26%, p=0.006), and LA volume remained decreased (-14.3%, p=0.028). Quality of life and results of 6-minute walk test (6MWT) improved in both groups. For 6 months of treatment, the sST2M group had a significantly lower incidence of composite endpoints (CEP, cardiovascular death and decompensation/hospitalization due to HF), 26.3% (5 events) of the sST2M group compared to the ST group, 83.3% (15 events) (p=0.029), primarily due to a lower incidence of decompensated HF. For 12 months of follow-up, the incidence of CEP in the ST group was 122.2% (22 events), and 47.4% (9 events) in the sST2M group (p=0.035).Conclusions    The tactics of sST2 monitoring used in the treatment of "high-risk" HFrEF patients (with high sST2 concentrations) is associated with increased LVEF, improved functional status of patients, a beneficial effect on LV remodeling, and decreased incidence of CEP.

[Expert opinion. Spironolactone: a new twist on an old story]

The article presents recent data on possibilities of a broader use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for existing indications and of expanding indications for the use of this pharmaceutical group in the context of the novel coronavirus infection COVID-19. The authors discussed prospects for expanded detection of aldosteronism using a new diagnostic approach, including an additional evaluation of blood pressure response to spironolactone.

[Biomarkers in Heart Failure: Current and Future]

Heart failure (HF) is the ending of practically all cardiovascular diseases and the reason for hospitalization of 49% of patients in a cardiological hospital. Available instrumental diagnostic methods and biomarkers not always allow verification of HF, particularly in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Prediction of chronic HF in patients with risk factors faces great difficulties. Currently, natriuretic peptides (NUP) are widely used for the diagnosis, prognosis and management of patients with HF and are included in clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of HF. Following multiple studies, the understanding of NUP significance has changed. This resulted in a need for new biomarkers to improve the insight into the process of HF and to personalize the treatment by better individual phenotyping. In addition, current technologies, such as transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic analyses, provide identification of new biomarkers and better understanding of features of the HF pathogenesis. The aim of this study was to discuss recent reports on NUP and novel, most promising biomarkers in respect of their possible use in clinical practice.

[Soluble ST2 - as a biomarker, a tool for risk stratification and therapeutic target in patients with chronic heart failure]

This review focuses on possibilities of using soluble ST2 as a HF marker for diagnostics, stratification of risk of adverse events, and for evaluation of prognosis and treatment effectiveness in patients with CHF. Circulating biomarkers are an essential element of algorithms for diagnostics, stratification of risk, and evaluation of prognosis in patients with HF. The recognized "gold standard", natriuretic peptides, has several well-known limitations, and multiple new candidate biomarkers have appeared in recent years. Soluble ST2, a marker of "mechanical myocardial stress", is considered as one of the most promising new biomarkers. This review discusses possibilities of using it in clinical practice in CHF patients.

[Soluble ST2 - biomarker for prognosis and monitoring in decompensated heart failure]

The review aims to appraise the value of determining the concentrations of the new biomarker sST2 for assessing prognosis and monitoring treatment effectiveness of patients with decompensated heart failure during an episode of decompensation and during long-term follow-up after discharge from the hospital. The article analyses in detail the expedience of sST2 measurement in a patient with ADHF on admission and discharge from the hospital and the changes in the biomarker level during the period of active treatment for risk-stratification in patients, presents the optimal threshold values of sST2, which should be oriented when selecting patients with high and very high risk. The importance of subsequent monitoring of the marker concentration during long-term observation in emphasized to predict the risk of death, HF re-decompensation / HF rehospitalization. The potential benefits of choosing sST2 as the optimal marker for serial measurement during long-term follow-up, as well as evaluating the treatment effectiveness in patients with HF, compared to the "classical" variant - natriuretic peptides are shown.