Treatment of upper and lower lacrimal punctal occlusion using retrograde canaliculotomy and punctoplasty

A major review on punctal stenosis: Part II: Updated therapeutic interventions, complications, and outcomes

We continue our review of on punctal stenosis by providing a detailed discussion of management modalities, their complications, and outcomes. There is a significant change in the understanding of punctal and peripunctal anatomy, puncto-canalicular junction, and the lacrimal pump mechanisms. While the snip punctoplasty procedures are still practiced, there is an increasing trend toward nonincisional procedures. The nonincisional procedures in select cases appear to be equally effective as the incisional ones. Although simple to use, punctal plugs never became the mainstay of treatment because of design issues and the inability to address the coexisting canalicular stenosis. Placing stents only in the lower punctum in cases of upper and lower punctal stenosis should be discouraged, and management needs to address punctal stenosis and not which punctum is involved. Several types of stents are used in the management of punctal stenosis, mostly based on surgeon's preference. The benefits of adjuvant mitomycin C are uncertain. In view of literature on how stent biofilms can themselves cause chronic inflammation, placing them for prolonged periods should be reviewed and debated. Enhanced understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of punctal stenosis and addressing the current controversies in management would help standardize the therapeutic interventions available in the lacrimal armamentarium.

A major review of punctal stenosis: Updated anatomy, epidemiology, etiology, and clinical presentation

We aim to provide a detailed and updated literature review on the epidemiology, etiology, clinical presentations, histopathology, and ultrastructural features of punctal stenosis. There are inconsistencies in the definition and staging of punctal stenosis. While advanced optical coherence tomography imaging techniques have revolutionized the way the punctum and vertical canaliculi are assessed or monitored following treatment, the planes of measurement to characterize punctum anatomy need to evolve further. The current criteria for diagnosing and grading punctal stenosis are inadequate and based on empirical clinical findings. There is increasing evidence of the role of lymphocytes and myofibroblasts in the pathogenesis of punctal stenosis. There is a need for a uniform assessment of punctal stenosis and a uniform reporting of severity that would help standardize the several management options available in the lacrimal armamentarium.

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Postoperative Hyphema After 23-Gauge Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Purpose

We aim to investigate the incidence, clinical course, and risk factors for developing postoperative hyphema after 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) without neovascularization of the iris or angles and neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

Methods

This retrospective study included 155 consecutive eyes from 124 patients with at least three-month follow-up who underwent PPV for PDR without neovascularization of the iris or angles and NVG. Demographic data, surgery notes, postoperative hyphema assessment, intraocular pressure (IOP), and the surgical outcome were recorded.

Results

Postoperative hyphema occurred in 18 of 155 eyes (11.6%), with 14 of those having hyphema on day 1, and 4 having hyphema on days 7–20. Of the 18 eyes, only 3 (16.7%) had normal IOP, and immediate intraocular hypertension was observed in 15 (83.3%). Seven eyes required anterior chamber paracentesis and five needed anterior chamber irrigation. The average time for absorption of the hyphema was 13.1 days, and IOP was controlled in all cases. There was a significant correlation between membrane removal and the development of hyphema (OR = 5.65 and 95% CI: 1.190–25.203; p = 0.013). No recurrence of hyphema was observed. In patients with hyphema, the final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.75 ± 0.84 logMAR, which improved significantly compared to the initial BCVA of 2.20 ± 0.65 logMAR (t = 3.893; p = 0.001), and the final anatomic success rate was 100%.

Conclusion

The development of hyphema is not uncommon after PPV for patients with PDR without neovascularization of the iris or angles and NVG, and membrane removal is a risk factor for postoperative hyphema. The timely management of hyphema ensures that hyphema does not affect the visual recovery or the final anatomical success.

[Conjunctival dacryocystorhinostomy in the treatment of proximal lacrimal drainage obstruction]

The problem of reconstruction of the lacrimal drainage system in cases of obliteration of both lacrimal points and/or both lacrimal canaliculi remains one of the most difficult in dacryology. The most common and effective operation for this pathology is Conjunctival dacryocystorhinostomy using tubes developed by L. Jones in 1962. However, wearing the tube for a long time and the complications associated with it can cause dissatisfaction with the treatment, even if the surgery was successful. The surgery technique and the tubes design have undergone numerous modifications to increase the amount of positive outcomes and reduce the number of complications. The results of original studies on this problem were analyzed revealing a lack of knowledge about the optimal design and material of the implant. There are few studies aimed at developing methods that ensure persistent preservation of the anastomosis after tube removal.