Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: evaluation of a minimally restricted face-down positioning after pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade

Updates on Treatment Modalities for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, a severe eye condition, presents anatomic separation of the neurosensory retina from its outermost layer-the retinal pigment epithelium. Early recognition of this relatively common finding and proper referral of patients to the retinal surgery department is essential in order to minimize its consequent possible severe reduction in vision. Several major surgical methods for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment have been in use over the last several decades, and they all aim to find and close the break in the retina that has caused the detachment. Surgery can be performed as pneumatic retinopexy, pars plana vitrectomy, and/or episcleral surgery (buckling). General surgical trends for reattaching the retina include moving from extraocular to intraocular surgery and from bigger gauge to smaller gauge via minimal invasive vitrectomy surgery (MIVS), with implementing shorter-lasting intraocular tamponades. Surgical options for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treatment nowadays emphasize gaining retinal reattachment, preferably with one surgery and with minimum damage to the eye. The procedure should not bring secondary eye conditions and complications with severe impairment of visual acuity, and it should be performed on as much as a smaller budget, with possibly peribulbar anesthesia, enabling the patient the quickest possible recovery. It should be adjusted to the patient's condition, not to the surgeon's skills or preferences.

EVALUATION OF PRONE VERSUS SUPINE POSITIONING IN FRESH RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT TREATED WITH PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY AND GAS

PURPOSE

To compare Supine versus Prone positioning in fresh rhegmatogenous retinal detachments treated with vitrectomy and gas tamponade.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized controlled trial of 72 eyes with fresh rhegmatogenous retinal detachment that underwent 25-gauge vitrectomy: 37 eyes were allotted supine position and 35 were allotted prone position. Cases were evaluated for single-surgery reattachment rates, best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, cataract formation, and any complications. The patients were followed up for a period of 3 months.

RESULTS

Both groups had similar demographics, and no significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of extent of retinal detachment, position, and number of breaks. The anatomical success after single surgery was 97.3% in the Supine group and 94.3% in the Prone group ( P = 0.609). The best-corrected visual acuity at the end of 3 months was 0.44 ± 0.27 in the Supine group and 0.35 ± 0.27 in the Prone group ( P = 0.119) with a significant increase in best-corrected visual acuity preoperatively from 0.11 ± 0.22 and 0.13 ± 0.22 in Supine and Prone groups, respectively ( P = <0.001). The intraocular pressure in the two groups was comparable at each follow-up. The rates of cataract formation were also similar in the two groups-60% and 53.8% in Supine and Prone groups, respectively ( P = 1.00). Complications such as spikes in intraocular pressure, epiretinal membrane formation, and cystoid macular edema were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Rates of retinal reattachment were comparable in both groups showing that supine position is equally safe and effective for adequate tamponade.

Outcomes of Primary Vitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment With No Postoperative Positioning

Purpose: To evaluate the anatomic and visual outcomes of primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair using no amount of postoperative prone positioning to clarify the role of face-down posturing for RRD reattachment. Methods: This retrospective consecutive interventional case series comprised patients who had primary vitrectomy for RRD repair. The surgical outcomes, single-surgery anatomic success rate, and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were assessed. The primary objective was to evaluate the anatomic and visual outcomes of vitrectomy RRD reattachment using no postoperative prone positioning. Results: This study comprised 116 eyes of 116 patients. Single-surgery anatomic success was achieved in 112 (96.5%) of 116 eyes. The single-surgery anatomic success rate was 100% in phakic patients (n = 56) and 93% in pseudophakic patients (n = 60), with both groups having an improvement in the mean BCVA. Conclusions: Primary vitrectomy with no postoperative prone positioning is a successful surgical intervention for RRD repair. The anatomic closure rate in this study is one of the highest reported in the literature and involved a large number of macula-off RRDs, with minimal complications and a significant improvement in BCVA, primarily using 14% perfluoropropane for gas tamponade.

Quantifying Head Position Following Vitrectomy Using a 3-Dimensional Position Sensor Embedded in a Novel Ophthalmic Shield: A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

To assess head position following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) using a novel low-energy, non-intrusive 3-D position sensor platform.

METHODS

In this prospective non-randomized interventional case series, a low-energy Bluetooth smart sensor housed within a novel eye shield recorded 3-D positional data every five minutes. The device was placed on the patient immediately after PPV and data was retrieved at the postoperative day 1 visit. Readings were processed by vector analysis into 4 groups, stratified by the angle of deviation away from a completely prone head position. The primary outcome was the angle between vectors.

RESULTS

Ten patients were enrolled in this pilot study. The mean (SD) age was 57.5 (17.4). A total of 2318 readings with a mean (SD) of 231.8 (26.8) readings per patient were obtained. The mean (SD) number of readings were 132.9 (34.7) while awake and 98.9 (27.9) during sleep. Of total readings, only 11.7% fell into group 1 while a majority of readings fell in group 2 (52.4%), and group 3 (32.4%), and only 3.5% fell into group 4. Positional deviation increased during sleep hours, with about 46.8% of readings at a reclined angle (group 3) and 4.9% supine, which was 21.6% and 2.5% respectively during the wake time (p<0.001, p=0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, a non-intrusive wireless 3-D position sensor-shield platform was tolerated well and capable of capturing positional data. Adherence to face-down positioning was low and positional deviation increased significantly while sleeping.

Expression levels of ROS and Atg proteins in the vitreous in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

AIM

To detect the concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS), transient receptor potential mucin-1 (TRPML1), and autophagy-related (Atg) proteins (LC3-I, LC3-II, and Beclin1) in vitreous humor of patients with simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

METHODS

RRD patients enrolled as the RRD group, and patients with idiopathic macular hole (IMH) and idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane (IMEM) were enrolled as control group. The levels of ROS, TRPML1, LC3-I, LC3-II, and Beclin1 in vitreous humor of patients in the RRD and control groups were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

The RRD group included 28 eyes 28 patients and had a higher concentration of ROS in vitreous humor (631.86±18.05 vs 436.34±108.22 IU/mL, P<0.05). The ROS level in patients with a wide retinal detachment (RD) extent (RD range ≥1/2) was higher than that with a narrow RD extent (RD range<1/2, P<0.05). ROS concentration was negatively correlated with RD time (r=-0.46, P=0.01). The expression levels of LC3-I and Beclin1 significantly decreased in RRD (P<0.05), but there were no correlations with the RD time, RD extent, or macular involvement.

CONCLUSION

In eyes with RRD, the concentration of ROS in vitreous humor increases and the expression levels of Atg proteins decrease, reflecting possibly that autophagy is inhibited.