Midwifery-led care can lower caesarean section rates according to the Robson ten group classification system

Examining Cesarean Among Individuals of Advanced Maternal Age in Nurse-Midwifery Care

INTRODUCTION

Cesarean rates are rising, especially for individuals of advanced maternal age (AMA), defined as aged 35 or older. The Robson 10-Group Classification System (TGCS) facilitates assessment and comparison of cesarean rates among individuals in different settings. In midwifery-led care, in which pregnant people are typically healthier and seek a vaginal birth, it is unknown whether individuals of AMA have different antecedents leading to cesarean compared with younger counterparts. This study aimed to examine antecedents contributing to cesarean using Robson TGCS for individuals across age groups in midwifery care.

METHODS

This study was a secondary analysis of 2 cohort data sets from Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) and University of Michigan Health Systems (UMHS) hospitals. The samples were individuals in midwifery-led care birthing at either OHSU from 2012 to 2019 or UMHS from 2007 to 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 11,951 individuals were studied. Overall cesarean rates were low; however, the rate for individuals of AMA was higher than the rate of their younger counterparts (18.30% vs 15.10%). The Robson groups were similar; however, the primary contributor among AMA individuals was group 5 (multiparous with previous cesarean), followed by group 2 [nulliparous with labor induced or prelabor cesarean], and group 1 [nulliparous with spontaneous labor]. In contrast, the primary contributors for younger individuals were groups 1, 2, and 5, respectively. In addition, prelabor cesarean and induced labor partly mediated the relationship between AMA and cesarean among nulliparous individuals, whereas prelabor cesarean was the key contributor to cesarean among multiparous people.

DISCUSSION

The cesarean rate in midwifery-led care was low. Using Robson TGCS provided additional insight into the antecedents to cesarean, rather than viewing cesarean as a single outcome. Future studies should continue to use Robson TGCS and investigate antecedents to cesarean, including factors influencing successful vaginal birth after cesarean in individuals of AMA.

Predictors and trends of Caesarean section and breastfeeding in the Eastern Mediterranean region: Data from the cross-sectional Cyprus Women's Health Research (COHERE) Initiative

INTRODUCTION

Caesarean section (C-section) is a life-saving procedure when medically indicated but unmet need and overuse can add to avoidable morbidity and mortality. It is not clear whether C-section has a negative impact on breastfeeding and there is limited data available on rates of C-section or breastfeeding from Northern Cyprus, an emerging region in Europe. This study aimed to investigate prevalence, trends and associations of C-section and breastfeeding in this population.

METHODS

Using self-reported data from the representative Cyprus Women's Health Research (COHERE) Initiative, we used 2,836 first pregnancies to describe trends in C-section and breastfeeding between 1981 and 2017. Using modified Poisson regression, we examined the relationship between year of pregnancy and C-section and breastfeeding, as well as the association between C-section and breastfeeding prevalence and duration.

RESULTS

C-section prevalence in first pregnancies increased from 11.1% in 1981 to 72.5% in 2017 with a relative risk of 2.60 (95%CI; 2.14-2.15) of babies being delivered by C-section after 2005 compared to before 1995, after full adjustment for demographic and maternal medical and pregnancy related factors. Prevalence of ever breastfeeding remained steady throughout the years at 88.7% and there was no significant association between breastfeeding initiation and the year of pregnancy, or demographic and maternal medical and pregnancy related variables. After full adjustment, women who gave birth after 2005 were 1.24 (95%CI; 1.06-1.45) times more likely to breastfeed for >12 weeks compared to women who gave birth before 1995. There was no association between C-section and breastfeeding prevalence or length.

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of C-section in this population is much higher than WHO recommendations. Public awareness campaigns surrounding choice during pregnancy and change in legal framework to allow for midwife-led continuity models of birthing care should be implemented. Further research is required to understand the reasons and drivers behind this high rate.

‘Labour Hopscotch’: Women’s evaluation of using the steps during labor

INTRODUCTION

METHODS

RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of the Implementation of Informed Consent COVID-19 Vaccination in the Semarang City Region

Background : In the data analysis report it was found that in more than 80 countries the number of deaths due to COVID-19. The vaccine in Semarang City has been carried out, the Semarang City Health Service noted, there are 1,216,650 people who have received the first and second doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. The use of informed consent in the COVID-19 vaccine is still very low. It was found that 80% of COVID-19 vaccines used incomplete informed consent in every medical action. The purpose of this study was to determine the implementation of informed consent for COVID-19 vaccination in the Semarang City Region. Materials and Methods: The carried out by means of a sampling non-probability sampling technique wasusing purposive sampling, namely a sampling technique with certain considerations made by the researchers themselves, based on characteristics, namely that they had already done a second dose of vaccine and also with the characteristics of the population that had been previously known. The sample is 100 people. Results: Informed consent was explained to the patient, not all were informed, because there were still things that had not been explained, such as procedures for action, previous medical history. Informed consent of the COVID-19 vaccine was not given in the first and second doses. However, the majority are given in the first dose. The information provided by health workers at the time of vaccinating COVID-19 did not provide a complete explanation. The explanation to the patient is enough to explain what is important and more orally. Conclusion: The implementation of COVID-19 vaccination can be carried out on men and women aged 18-60 years, the implementation of informed consent for COVID-19 vaccination is not in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations, namely the place is not in the right place. give informed consent for the COVID-19 vaccination, the information in the informed consent is still incomplete, so it has not been fully informed to patients. It is recommended to evaluate the implementation of informed consent to see the suitability of its implementation with the laws and regulations.

Do obstetrics trainees working hours affect caesarean section rates in normal risk women?

OBJECTIVES

The rate of caesarean section (CS) is increasing globally. The nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex presentation, spontaneously labouring woman (Robson Group 1/RG1) is considered low risk for CS. It has been hypothesized that more CS occur at nighttime or at weekends due to doctor fatigue. The European Working Time Directive (EWTD) was implemented in our institution in 2013 to limit doctor working hours, which aimed at reducing fatigue but arguably fractures continuity of care. This study aimed to determine the effect of nocturnal hours and weekend on-call as well as the implementation of EWTD on our RG1 CS rates.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a population-based study in a tertiary referral centre from 2008-2017. The inclusion criteria for our study were limited to RG1. Data were analysed from an established clinical database, including mode and time of delivery. Descriptive statistics are presented as number and percent for categorical variables. Relative frequencies were tested using chi-squared test. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Version 26. Statistical significance was defined as p < .05.

RESULTS

There were 86,473 deliveries over the 10-year study period. There were 18,761 women in RG1. Overall the RG1 CS rate was 12.9 % (n = 2415). Rates of CS in the RG1 were not statistically different between those delivering on weekdays (12.9 %, n = 1726/13,430) and weekends (12.9 %, n = 689/5,331, OR 0.99, 95 % CI = 0.90-1.09, p = .89). During daytime hours the CS rate was 12.1 % (n = 777/6411) and at nighttime was 13.3 % (n = 1638/12,350, OR 1.10, 95 % CI = 1.01-1.21, p = .03). Comparing the time periods pre and post EWTD implementation, there was a significant increase in CS rates (12.1 % n = 1319/10,873 V 13.9 % n = 1096/7,888, OR 1.17, 95 % CI = 1.07-1.27 p < .001). With respect to other modes of delivery in RG1 pre and post EWTD, there was a statistically significant decrease in operative vaginal delivery (OVD) rates (40.1%, n=4,360 V 37.7%, n=2,973, OR 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85-0.95, p = .001) CONCLUSION: This study shows an association between obstetric trainee working practices, RG1 CS and OVD rates; this is most pronounced at night and after the introduction of the EWTD. It is unlikely that obstetric trainee working practices are the only factor related to the increasing CS rate and reduced OVD rate. Consideration should be giving to addressing the needs of obstetric trainees in relation to achieving their competencies with now reduced labour ward exposure. Further study is required to see if alternate arrangements in relation to simulation training could increase the OVD rate and reduce the CS rate.