Influence on effectiveness of early treatment with anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

Synovial inflammation analyzed by 3-T magnetic resonance imaging in etanercept-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis indicates persistent disease activity despite of clinical remission: A pilot study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate joint inflammation using 3-T MRI in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) as compared to inhibitors for tumor necrosis factor α (TNFi) over 12 months.

METHODS

Prospective epidemiologic clinical pilot study using the RA MRI system (RAMRIS), the visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100) and the Disease Activity Score 28-joint count (DAS28) at baseline, 4, and 12 months after initiation of etanercept (ETA). Ten patients with inadequate response to two cDMARDs were treated with ETA and compared to 10 patients responding to cDMARDs.

RESULTS

In cDMARD patients, parameters at baseline and 12 months did not change: VAS: 21.0 ± 11.3 and 20.2 ± 24.6; DAS28: 2.1 ± 0.6 and 2.9 ± 1.0; and RAMRIS: 11.0 ± 2.3 and 11.8 ± 2.8, respectively. In contrast, in the ETA-patients the same parameters were as follows at baseline, 4, and 12 months: VAS: 46.3 ± 7.9, 23.9 ± 7.1, and 24.0 ± 6.3 (each p = .04); DAS28: 3.8 ± 0.4, 2.8 ± 0.3 (ns), and 2.5 ± 0.3 (p = .01); and RAMRIS: 28.9 ± 5.0, 25.8 ± 4.7 (ns), and 24.6 ± 4.5 (ns). Comparing ETA and cDMARD patients, RAMRIS was significantly different.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that synovial inflammation and DAS28 remission are separate entities in RA. MRI scoring before starting a treatment may therefore indicate the requirement for TNFi.

Efficacy and effectiveness of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in randomized controlled trials and routine clinical practice

Objective

Efficacy of TNF inhibitors in the treatment of RA assessed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may not be fully comparable to routine care owing to the stringent inclusion criteria. The objective of this study was to observe the effectiveness of TNF inhibitors in real-world patients and assess the patients' potential eligibility for the RCTs.

Methods

RA patients starting a TNF-inhibitor treatment between 2004 and 2014 were identified from the National Register for Biologic Treatment in Finland, which is a longitudinal observational cohort study. Effectiveness was measured using the ACR and EULAR response criteria and by studying the proportion of patients reaching DAS28 remission. The patients' baseline characteristics were compared against the inclusion criteria of 27 RCTs.

Results

EULAR moderate and good treatment responses at 6 months were achieved by 69 and 40% of the users of the first TNF inhibitor, respectively. ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 responses were reached by 48, 27 and 13%, respectively. DAS28 remission was reached by 47%. Only 7.6-44% of the patients would have been potentially eligible for the RCTs. The eligible patients had better treatment responses compared with the non-eligible patients. Different TNF inhibitors were mostly equipotent, but the usage of MTX co-therapy had a major influence on treatment response.

Conclusion

Only a small proportion of patients would have been eligible for RCTs, and the efficacy of TNF inhibitors assessed in them cannot be generalized directly into Finnish routine health care.

Association of a multibiomarker disease activity score at multiple time-points with radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the SWEFOT trial

OBJECTIVES

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), predictive biomarkers for subsequent radiographic progression (RP) could improve therapeutic choices for individual patients. We previously showed that the multibiomarker disease activity (MBDA) score in patients with newly diagnosed RA identified patients at risk for RP. We evaluated the MBDA score at multiple time-points as a predictor of RP during 2 years of follow-up.

METHODS

A subset of patients with RA (N=220) from the Swedish Farmacotherapy (SWEFOT) trial were analysed for MBDA score, disease activity score of 28 joints (DAS28), C reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at baseline (BL), month 3 and year 1, for predicting RP based on modified Sharp/van der Heijde scores at BL, year 1 and year 2.

RESULTS

Patients with persistently low MBDA (<30) scores or those with a decrease from moderate (30-44) to low MBDA scores, did not develop RP during 2 years of follow-up. The highest risk for RP during 2 years of follow-up (42%) was observed among patients with persistently high (>44) MBDA scores. Among methotrexate non-responders with a high MBDA score at BL or month 3, significantly more of those who received triple therapy had RP at year 2 compared with those who received antitumour necrosis factor therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring the MBDA score both before and during treatment in RA was useful for the assessment of individual patient risk for RP during 2 years of follow-up. In comparison with low CRP, ESR or DAS28, a low MBDA score at any time-point was associated with numerically lower proportions of RP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00764725.

Economic evaluation of anti-TNF agents for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Greece

Objectives

We aimed to estimate the total mean annual treatment cost of different therapy options for patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Greece.

Methods

A cost-minimization approach was adopted. An economic model was developed to estimate the direct costs of the three widely used treatments within a 1-year time horizon, from a health care payer perspective, either for new or for existing patients. Data on resource use, dose escalation, and frequency of therapy were based on a nationwide field survey of rheumatologists. Other analyses were also undertaken based on evidence from the literature. Total cost comprised the cost of drugs, administration, and hospital day care visits. Unit cost data were obtained from the price bulletin and the government gazettes issued by the Ministry of Health. Due to the short time horizon of the study, the cost was not discounted.

Results

The mean annual total cost per new (or per existing) responder patient on etanercept was estimated at €9,845 (€9,840), and the total cost on etanercept/methotrexate (MTX) was estimated at €9,857 (€9,852). Therapy with etanercept had lower annual cost relative to adalimumab and infliximab. On an annual basis, it was estimated that the difference between etanercept monotherapy and adalimumab monotherapy was €544 (€1,323). Similarly, the difference between etanercept/MTX and infliximab/MTX was €1,871 (€1,490) and €543 (€1,323), respectively, relative to adalimumab/MTX. Results remained constant under other scenario analyses undertaken.

Conclusion

In the real-life practice setting in Greece, where dose intensity and frequency differences occur, etanercept alone or in combination with MTX, if prescribed as per label, represents the option with lower annual cost per patient when compared with adalimumab or infliximab in patients with RA. These results hold true as long as the assumptions and data used in the analysis remain stable and may alter if any of the underlying parameters, such as drug price, change.

Spanish Rheumatology Society and Hospital Pharmacy Society Consensus on recommendations for biologics optimization in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to establish guidelines for the optimization of biologic therapies for health professionals involved in the management of patients with RA, AS and PsA.

METHODS

Recommendations were established via consensus by a panel of experts in rheumatology and hospital pharmacy, based on analysis of available scientific evidence obtained from four systematic reviews and on the clinical experience of panellists. The Delphi method was used to evaluate these recommendations, both between panellists and among a wider group of rheumatologists.

RESULTS

Previous concepts concerning better management of RA, AS and PsA were reviewed and, more specifically, guidelines for the optimization of biologic therapies used to treat these diseases were formulated. Recommendations were made with the aim of establishing a plan for when and how to taper biologic treatment in patients with these diseases.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations established herein aim not only to provide advice on how to improve the risk:benefit ratio and efficiency of such treatments, but also to reduce variability in daily clinical practice in the use of biologic therapies for rheumatic diseases.