The Economic Burden of ACPA-Positive Status Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Trends and frontiers of research on pharmacoeconomics from 2012-2021: a scientometric analysis

Background

Research on pharmacoeconomics (PE) promotes the rational allocation of medical resources, which has received attention in the last decade. We conducted a scientometric analysis of PE to determine the current status and frontiers, and promote cooperation and development.

Methods

The Web of Science Core Collection-Science Citation Index Expanded was adopted to retrieve publications associated with PE from 2012–2021. After screening publications, CiteSpace 3.8.R3 was used to conduct a scientometric analysis. We analyzed terms, including publications and citations, countries/regions, institutions, journals, authors, keywords, and references.

Results

In total, 4,715 documents published from 2012–2021 were included in this study, of which 3,829 were articles and 886 were reviews. The documents were cited 54,596 times, at an average of 11.58 times per document. 121 countries/regions and 410 institutions were involved. The top 3 countries/regions by the number of publications were the United States of America (n=1,790), England (n=601), and China (n=403), while the institution with the most publications was Pfizer. Pharmacoeconomics was the main journal of PE, with 310 publications in all, and the top 3 cited journals were New England Journal of Medicine (citation times =1,620), Value in Health (citation times =1,306), and Lancet (citation times =1,255). Bin Wu was the most productive author (n=16), while World Health Organization was the most influential author (citation times =387). 524 keywords altogether were found, and the top 3 keywords by frequency were therapy (frequency =318), impact (frequency =305), and cost-effectiveness (frequency =296). The keyword “modifying antirheumatic drug” associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has continued bursting from 2016–2021. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013 by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, was the most frequently cited publication on PE (citation times =65). Cluster 0 labeled as “cost-effectiveness analysis” (CEA) was the largest and latest cluster, and its citing articles focused on the CEA of first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Conclusions

The economic analysis of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs related to RA was a popular topic in the last 6 years, and CEA of NSCLC first-line treatment was at the frontier of PE.

Comparison of healthcare resource utilization and medical costs between patients with seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives:

To compare healthcare utilization and medical costs between patients with seronegative (SN) and seropositive (SP) rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods:

We conducted a nationwide population study using the Korean health insurance claims database in 2016. We divided patients with RA into SN and SP groups and compared healthcare utilization including medications, medical utilization, and direct medical costs for 1 year between the groups in a cross-sectional analysis. Differences in costs between patients with SPRA and SNRA were assessed using the quantile regression model. We performed longitudinal analysis using data from 2012 and 2016 to examine changes over time.

Results:

A total of 103,815 SPRA and 75,809 SNRA patients were included in the analyses. The SPRA group used significantly more methotrexate (73.2% versus 30.3%) and biologic agents (7.9% versus 2.9%) than the SNRA group. The number of RA-related outpatient visits [6.0 ± 3.7 versus 4.4 ± 4.0 times/year, standardized difference (SD) = 0.41] and annual medical costs per patient ($1027 versus $450/year, SD = 0.25) were higher in the SPRA group than the SNRA group. Quantile regression results indicated that the incremental cost of seropositivity on total medical costs of RA patients gradually increased as medical costs approached the upper quantile. The annual direct medical costs for each patient between 2012 and 2016 increased in both groups: by 25.1% in the SPRA group and 37.6% in the SNRA group.

Conclusion:

Annual RA-related direct medical costs and RA-related healthcare utilization per patient are higher in patients with SPRA than those with SNRA.

Persistence with Early-Line Abatacept versus Tumor Necrosis Factor-Inhibitors for Rheumatoid Arthritis Complicated by Poor Prognostic Factors

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by joint swelling and destruction that leads to severe disability. There are no clear guidelines regarding the order of therapies. Gathering data on treatment patterns outside of a clinical trial setting can provide useful context for clinicians. Objectives: To assess real-world treatment persistence in early-line abatacept versus tumor necrosis factor-inhibitors (TNFi) treated patients with RA complicated by poor prognostic factors (including anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies [ACPA] and rheumatoid factor [RF] seropositivity). Methods: We performed a multi-center retrospective medical record review. Adult patients with RA complicated by poor prognostic factors were treated with either abatacept or TNFis as the first biologic treatment at the clinic. Poor prognostic factors included ACPA+, RF+, increased C-reactive protein levels, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate levels, or presence of joint erosions. We report 12-month treatment persistence, time to discontinuation, reasons for discontinuation, and risk of discontinuation between patients on abatacept versus TNFi. Select results among the subgroup of ACPA+ and/or RF+ patients are presented. Results: Data on 265 patients (100 abatacept, 165 TNFis) were collected. At 12 months, 83% of abatacept patients were persistent versus 66.1% of TNFi patients (P=0.003). Median time to discontinuation was 1423 days for abatacept versus 690 days for TNFis (P=0.014). In adjusted analyses, abatacept patients had a lower risk of discontinuing index treatment due to disease progression (0.3 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1-0.6], P=0.001). Among the subgroup of ACPA+ and/or RF+ patients (55 abatacept, 108 TNFis), unadjusted 12-month treatment persistence was greater (83.6% versus 64.8%, P=0.012) and median time to discontinuation was longer (961 days versus 581 days, P=0.048) in abatacept versus TNFi patients. Discussion: Patients with RA complicated by poor prognostic factors taking abatacept, including the subgroup of patients with ACPA and RF seropositivity, had statistically significantly higher 12-month treatment persistence and a longer time to discontinuation than patients on TNFis. Conclusions: In a real-world setting, RA patients treated with abatacept were more likely to stay on treatment longer and had a lower risk of discontinuation than patients treated with TNFis.

Presence of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and costs and disease activity in early rheumatoid arthritis - a 3-year follow-up

Objective: To analyse healthcare utilization, loss of productivity, and disease activity in relation to presence of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs). Method: In total, 447 ACPA-positive and 224 ACPA-negative patients from two early rheumatoid arthritis cohorts, recruited 1996-1998 (cohort 1) and 2006-2009 (cohort 2), were followed during 3 years. Data on disease activity were collected, and patients reported healthcare utilization and days lost from work. Disease activity, healthcare costs, and loss of productivity were compared between ACPA groups. Linear regression was performed, controlling for confounders. Results: Healthcare costs did not differ significantly by ACPA status (EUR 3214 for vs EUR 2174 for ACPA-positive vs ACPA-negative patients in cohort 1, ns; EUR 4150 vs EUR 3820 in cohort 2, ns). Corresponding values for loss of productivity were EUR 9148 vs EUR 7916 (ns) and EUR 5857 vs EUR 5995 (ns). Total prescription of traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs was higher in cohort 2 than in cohort 1. Methotrexate prescription was higher in ACPA-positive patients, but biologics did not differ significantly between ACPA groups. Disease activity was significantly more improved in cohort 2, but there was no difference in achieving remission in relation to ACPA status. In cohort 1, 25% of ACPA-positive patients were in remission vs 31% of ACPA-negative (ns) and in cohort 2, 55% vs 60% (ns). Conclusions: With increasing drug treatment for both ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative patients, outcome in ACPA-positive was no more severe than in ACPA-negative patients. Healthcare costs and loss of productivity were similar in the two groups.

A budget impact analysis for making treatment decisions based on anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) testing in rheumatoid arthritis

Aim: Given that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with high anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) titer values respond well to abatacept, the aim of this study was to estimate the annual budget impact of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) testing and treatment selection based on anti-CCP test results.Materials and methods: Budget impact analysis was conducted for patients with moderate-to-severe RA on biologic or Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) treatment from a hypothetical US commercial payer perspective. The following market scenarios were compared: (1) 90% of target patients receive anti-CCP testing and the results of anti-CCP testing do not impact the treatment selection; (2) 100% of target patients receive anti-CCP testing and the results of anti-CCP testing have an impact on treatment selection such that an increased proportion of patients with high titer of ACPA receive abatacept. A hypothetical assumption was made that the use of abatacept would be increased by 2% in Scenario 2 versus 1. Scenario analyses were conducted by varying the target population and rebate rates.Results: In a hypothetical health plan with one million insured adults, 2,181 patients would be on a biologic or JAKi treatment for moderate-to-severe RA. In Scenario 1, the anti-CCP test cost was $186,155 and annual treatment cost was $101,854,295, totaling to $102,040,450. In Scenario 2, the anti-CCP test cost increased by $20,684 and treatment cost increased by $160,467, totaling an overall budget increase of $181,151. This was equivalent to a per member per month (PMPM) increase of $0.015. The budget impact results were consistently negligible across the scenario analyses.Limitations: The analysis only considered testing and medication costs. Some parameters used in the analysis, such as the rebate rates, are not generalizable and health plan-specific.Conclusions: Testing RA patients to learn their ACPA status and increasing use of abatacept among high-titer ACPA patients result in a small increase in the total budget (<2 cents PMPM).

Economic Evaluation of Anticyclic Citrullinated Peptide Positivity in Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Anticyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) positivity may be a strong predictor of joint erosion and a potential biomarker for guiding treatment decisions for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, limited studies are currently available on the effect of anti-CCP positivity on health care utilization and/or medical costs of RA patients.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate short-term and long-term direct health care expenditures associated with anti-CCP positivity in newly diagnosed RA patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in adult RA patients within a U.S. integrated health care delivery system (January 1, 2007-June 30, 2015). Patients were required to have 2 RA diagnoses and treatment with a conventional or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) within 12 months. The first RA diagnosis date was labeled as the index date, and patients were followed until they left the health plan, died, or reached the end of the study period. Patient demographics, anti-CCP results, comorbid conditions, and health care resource utilization during baseline (12 months before the index date) and follow-up periods were collected. Nationally recognized direct medical costs were assigned to health care utilization to calculate health care costs in 2015 U.S. dollars. The baseline differences between anti-CCP positivity and negativity and differences in censoring during follow-up were addressed using propensity scores. The mean differences in costs were estimated using recycled prediction methods.

RESULTS

2,448 newly diagnosed RA patients were identified and followed for a median of 3.7 years (range = 1-8 years). At baseline, 65.8% of patients were anti-CCP positive. Anti-CCP-positive patients had fewer comorbid conditions at baseline. During the first 12 months of follow-up, median (interquartile range) total health care expenditures for anti-CCP-positive and anti-CCP-negative patients were $6,200 ($3,563-$13,260) and $7,022 ($3,885-$12,995), respectively. After adjusting for baseline differences, total incremental mean cost associated with anti-CCP positivity during the first 12 months was estimated to be $2,163 per patient (P = 0.001). The annual incremental costs in anti-CCP-positive patients became progressively larger over time, from $2,163 during the first year to $5,062 during the fourth year. Anti-CCP positivity was associated with higher prescription, laboratory testing, and rheumatologist utilization. A higher percentage of anti-CCP-positive patients received 1 or more biologic DMARDs (11.6% for anti-CCP-positive vs. 5.7% for anti-CCP negative; P < 0.001) compared with anti-CCP-negative patients during the 12-month follow-up, which resulted in $2,499 in incremental prescription costs (P < 0.001). Total additional burden associated with anti-CCP positivity during the first 4 years was estimated to be $14,089 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

In newly diagnosed RA patients, higher economic burden associated with anti-CCP positivity was mainly driven by prescription costs.

DISCLOSURES

This research and manuscript were funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS). Alemao and Connolly are employees and shareholders of BMS and participated in the design of the study, interpretation of the data, review/revision of the manuscript, and approval of the final version of the manuscript. An and Cheetham received a grant from BMS for this research. At the time of this study, An was employed by Western University of Health Sciences, and Cheetham was employed by Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Bider-Canfield, Kang, and Lin have nothing to disclose. Some study results were presented as a poster at the American College of Rheumatology Annual Meeting; November 5, 2017; San Diego, CA, and at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Meeting; May 19, 2018; Baltimore, MD.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol outcomes post-non-PCSK9i lipid-lowering therapies in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and probable heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients

Background

This study evaluated the proportion of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and probable heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) achieving ≥50% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) or reaching the LDL-C ≤70 mg/dL threshold, after initiating or modifying statin, and/or ezetimibe therapy.

Materials and methods

Adult ASCVD patients with baseline LDL-C >70 mg/dL (index) and a subset of patients with probable HeFH (proxied by LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL) were identified between January 1, 2012, and August 31, 2014, from the IQVIA electronic medical record database. Patients were followed for 12 months pre-index to examine baseline lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) use, and 12 months post index to evaluate treatment modifications and post-treatment LDL-C levels, stratified by type of treatment received and LDL-C levels at baseline.

Results

Of the sample of ASCVD patients who initiated treatment post-index (n=111,147), only 7.6% patients achieved a ≥50% reduction from baseline LDL-C and 19.1% of patients reached the LDL-C ≤70 mg/dL threshold. Among treated ASCVD patients who modified therapy post-index (n=75,523), 5.6% achieved a ≥50% reduction in LDL-C, and proportion of patients achieving LDL-C ≤70 mg/dL ranged from 6.9% to 26.7%, depending on the baseline LDL-C levels. Approximately 50% of the untreated probable HeFH patients (n=3,064) initiated LLT; however, the mean (SD) post-treatment LDL-C remained high (136.2 [47.8] mg/dL), with only 4.4% reaching LDL-C ≤70 mg/dL. Of the treated probable HeFH patients (n=1,073), 41.5% modified treatment; 22.1% achieved a ≥50% reduction in LDL-C and 1.1% reached LDL-C ≤70 mg/dL.

Conclusion

This study found that most patients had suboptimal LDL-C responses after initiating or modifying standard LLT (statin and/or ezetimibe). More frequent and aggressive lipid management, including increasing statin intensity and alternative therapies, may be needed in patients with ASCVD and probable HeFH to reduce their cardiovascular risk.

Case series: rheumatological manifestations attributed to exposure to Libby Asbestiform Amphiboles

An increased risk for Systemic Autoimmune Diseases (SAID) has been reported in Libby, Montana, where extensive exposures to fibrous amphiboles occurred due to mining and use of asbestos-laden vermiculite. In addition, positive antinuclear autoantibody tests are associated with exposure to Libby Asbestiform Amphiboles (LAA) in both humans and mice. Among 6603 subjects who underwent health screening at the Center for Asbestos Related Diseases (CARD, Libby MT), 13.8% were diagnosed with an autoimmune disease, with prevalence values for the most common SAID being significantly higher than expected in the United States. Among the CARD screening population, serological and clinical profiles are diverse, representing symptoms and autoantibodies reflective of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), scleroderma, rheumatoid arthritis, and other rheumatic syndromes, including undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD). Based upon screening of medical records by physicians with rheumatology expertise, the evolving nature of rheumatological disease in these patients is often atypical, with mixed diagnostic criteria and with a 1:1 male-to-female ratio. Through the Libby Epidemiology Research Program, cases were identified that illustrate clinical autoimmune outcomes with LAA exposure. Our goal was to better characterize SAID in Libby, MT in order to improve recognition of autoimmune outcomes associated with this exposure. In view of recent discoveries of widespread exposure to fibrous minerals in several areas of the U.S. and globally, it is critical to evaluate rheumatologic manifestations in other cohorts so that screening, surveillance, and diagnostic procedures are able to detect and recognize potential autoimmune outcomes of asbestos exposure.

ABBREVIATIONS

ANA, antinuclear autoantibody; ARD, Asbestos-Related Diseases; ATSDR, Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry; CARD, Center for Asbestos Related Diseases; CCP, Cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody; CREST, limited cutaneous form of scleroderma; CT, computed tomography; DIP, Distal Interphalangeal Joint; DLCO, Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for CO₂; DMARD, Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs; ENA, Extractable Nuclear Antigen antibodies; FVC, Forced Vital Capacity; LAA, Libby Asbestiform Amphiboles; LERP, Libby Epidemiology Research Program; MCP, Metacarpal Phalangeal Joint; PIP, Proximal Interphalangeal Joint; PIP, rheumatoid arthritis; RV, Residual Volume; SAID, Systemic autoimmune diseases; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SSc, Systemic Sclerosis; TLC, Total Lung Capacity.