Prostacyclin Use Among Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the United States: A Retrospective Analysis of a Large Health Care Claims Database

Exploring the Economic Burden of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Its Relation to Disease Severity and Treatment Escalation: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a highly progressive disease characterized by luminal narrowing of the pulmonary arteries, leading to progressive dyspnoea and restricted functional capacity, which can ultimately result in right ventricular failure and death. Treatment goals include improving functional class and walk distance, recovering right ventricular function, halting disease progression, and improving survival. PAH carries a high mortality rate, and treatment escalation is a common feature of disease management. Due to the substantial impact of PAH, a high economic burden has been observed. A systematic literature review (SLR) was carried out to assess the contemporary economic burden of PAH, including the impact of disease severity and treatment escalation.

METHODS

An electronic database search was conducted and supplemented with a hand search of health technology assessments and conference materials. Studies were included from 2012 to 2024, with no restrictions on geographical location. The inclusion criteria specified that adult patients with PAH (≥ 18 years) and only English language studies were captured.

RESULTS

The review included 148 studies and evaluations, 110 of which were observational studies, 14 were economic evaluations, and 24 were health technology assessments. The studies identified reported on several healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) outcomes including hospitalization, PAH-related hospitalization, inpatient visits, emergency department (ED) visits, intensive care unit (ICU) visits, and outpatient visits. Cost data were also reported, including total costs and costs for each of the above-mentioned types of HCRU, as well as specific costs such as pharmacy and drug costs. The results provide an overview of the high economic burden caused by PAH, indicating that the economic burden increases with increasing severity; reported mean monthly costs were as high as US $14,614 (cost converted to USD 2024) for the highest severity group. These data also demonstrated the impact of PAH-specific therapies in reducing HCRU, with efficacious treatment shifting management from an inpatient to outpatient setting (i.e., reduced inpatient admissions and length of stay). Further, while treatment escalation resulted in increased pharmacy costs, this was offset by a reduction in HCRU, including hospitalizations and ED visits. Timely diagnosis was also associated with reduced economic burden, as patients with a longer delay prior to diagnosis reported a higher mean number of monthly hospitalizations, ICU stays, and ED visits. Functional limitation is a common feature of PAH disease progression and can severely impact a patient's ability to work. This SLR identified few studies that investigated such outcomes as well as broader indirect costs, such as out-of-pocket costs and productivity loss.

DISCUSSION

This study highlights the considerable economic burden associated with PAH, which is particularly evident for HCRU, and the importance of effective disease management in reducing this burden. Additionally, these findings demonstrate the economic value of treatment escalation and suggest higher drug costs can potentially be offset through improved patient outcomes and associated reductions in HCRU.

Parenteral prostacyclin utilization in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the intermediate-risk strata: a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Current clinical guidelines support use of parenteral prostacyclin therapy for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at intermediate risk. The objective of this study was to assess parenteral prostacyclin therapy use among patients at intermediate risk according to the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) 2.0 four-strata risk assessment model.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional online survey of healthcare professionals (HCPs). Included patients were classified as intermediate-low or intermediate-high risk per COMPERA 2.0 between 2016 and 2020 (index visit), initiated on a parenteral prostacyclin any time following intermediate risk assessment, and had World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class (FC), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and B-type natriuretic peptide/N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP/NT-proBNP) assessments at index and first comprehensive follow-up visits (follow-up).

RESULTS

A total of 139 HCPs (53% community-based, 47% Pulmonary Hypertension Care Center-based) participated in the survey and provided 350 patient records; among these, mean age (SD) was 54.1 (15.3) years and 52% were female. Median (IQR) time from parenteral prostacyclin initiation to follow-up was 3.0 months (2.0, 7.0). At parenteral prostacyclin initiation for the 280 patient records with available COMPERA 2.0 assessments, 62% of patients were intermediate-high risk, 33% were intermediate-low risk and 3% were low risk, improving to 38%, 53%, and 8%, respectively, at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvements were seen for the individual COMPERA 2.0 risk calculator parameters and for several other clinical parameters. Findings from this study substantiate recent guidelines suggesting earlier use of this treatment in intermediate-risk patients with PAH.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Congruency between clinician-assessed risk and calculated risk of 1-year mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: A retrospective chart review

The objective of this analysis was to compare clinician-based and formally calculated risk assessments by REVEAL Lite 2 and COMPERA 2.0 and to characterize parenteral prostacyclin utilization within 90 days of baseline in high-risk patients. A multisite, double-blind, retrospective chart review of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was conducted with an index period of January 2014-March 2017. Patients were categorized into the "any PAH medication" or "prostacyclin-enriched" cohort based on latest PAH medication initiated within the index period. Clinicians classified the patient's 1-year mortality risk as "low," "intermediate," or "high" based on their clinical assessment. REVEAL Lite 2 and COMPERA 2.0 scores were independently calculated. Risk assessment congruency was evaluated. Parenteral prostacyclin use was evaluated within 90 days of baseline. Thirty-two clinicians participated and abstracted data for 299 patients with PAH. At baseline, mean patient age was 52 years, 6-min walk distance was 226 m, and most patients were WHO functional class II or III. Half of the patients (53%) were classified by clinician assessment as intermediate risk, while most were classified as high risk by REVEAL Lite 2 (59%) and intermediate-high risk by COMPERA 2.0 (52%). Parenteral prostascyclins were underutilized in high-risk patients, and not initiated in a timely fashion. Clinician-assessed risk category was incongruent with tool-based risk assessments in 40%-54% of patients with PAH, suggesting an underestimation of the patient's risk category by clinician gestalt. Additionally, there was a lack of timely prostacyclin initiation for patients with PAH stratified as high-risk by either tool.

2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association (AHA), in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, nutrition, sleep, and obesity) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, glucose control, and metabolic syndrome) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The AHA Heart Disease and Stroke Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, brain health, complications of pregnancy, kidney disease, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, sudden cardiac arrest, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, valvular disease, venous thromboembolism, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs).

METHODS

The AHA, through its Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States and globally to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update with review of published literature through the year before writing. The 2024 AHA Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort in 2023 by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and AHA staff members. The AHA strives to further understand and help heal health problems inflicted by structural racism, a public health crisis that can significantly damage physical and mental health and perpetuate disparities in access to health care, education, income, housing, and several other factors vital to healthy lives. This year's edition includes additional global data, as well as data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, with an enhanced focus on health equity across several key domains.

RESULTS

Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.

Strategies for optimizing intravenous prostacyclin-analog therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous prostacyclin-analogs (PCA, e.g. epoprostenol, treprostinil, iloprost) have become an essential part in the therapy of patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), mainly pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). They show considerable differences in pharmacology. A combination therapy including intravenous drugs is regarded as the 'gold standard' in most of PAH patients.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses and summarizes the studies and concepts on which this therapy is based. To date, intravenous prostacyclin-analogs are mainly administered when standard therapy fails to improve patients to low-risk status. However, preliminary data from uncontrolled studies suggest that an 'upfront triple' therapy including intravenous or subcutaneous prostacyclin-analogs could be preferable in selected patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Various IV PCA have been evaluated in the treatment of patients with PAH. Today, combination therapy is the 'gold standard' for the majority of patients. Intravenous PCA is recommended from functional class III onwards. Timing of its initiation is still a point of discussion. An escalation of therapy to IV or SC PCA is always necessary if a low-risk status cannot be achieved with other targeted therapies. Preliminary data suggest that selected patients could benefit from an 'upfront triple' therapy. Controlled studies on which such recommendation could be based are lacking.

Monotherapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension at four German PH centres

BACKGROUND

Although combination therapy is the gold standard for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), some of these patients are still being treated with monotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis at four German PH centres to describe the prevalence and characteristics of patients receiving monotherapy.

RESULTS

We identified 131 incident PAH patients, with a mean age of 64 ± 13.8 years and a varying prevalence of comorbidities, cardiovascular risk factors and targeted therapy. As in other studies, the extent of prescribed PAH therapy varied with age and coexisting diseases, and younger, so-called "typical" PAH patients were more commonly treated early with combination therapy (48% at 4-8 months). In contrast, patients with multiple comorbidities or cardiovascular risk factors were more often treated with monotherapy (69% at 4-8 months). Survival at 12 months was not significantly associated with the number of PAH drugs used (single, dual, triple therapy) and was not different between "atypical" and "typical" PAH patients (89% vs. 85%).

CONCLUSION

Although "atypical" PAH patients with comorbidities or a more advanced age are less aggressively treated with respect to combination therapy, the outcome of monotherapy in these patients appears to be comparable to that of dual or triple therapy in "typical" PAH patients.

Evaluation of code-based algorithms to identify pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension patients in large administrative databases

Large administrative healthcare (including insurance claims) databases are used for various retrospective real-world evidence studies. However, in pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, identifying patients retrospectively based on administrative codes remains challenging, as it relies on code combinations (algorithms) and the accuracy for patient identification of most of them is unknown. This study aimed to assess the performance of various algorithms in correctly identifying patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in administrative databases. A systematic literature review was performed to find publications detailing code-based algorithms used to identify pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension patients. PheValuator, a diagnostic predictive modelling tool, was applied to three US claims databases, yielding models that estimated the probability of a patient having the disease. These models were used to evaluate the performance characteristics of selected pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension algorithms. With increasing algorithm complexity, average positive predictive value increased (pulmonary arterial hypertension: 13.4–66.0%; chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: 10.3–75.1%) and average sensitivity decreased (pulmonary arterial hypertension: 61.5–2.7%; chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: 20.7–0.2%). Specificities and negative predictive values were high (≥97.5%) for all algorithms. Several of the algorithms performed well overall when considering all of these four performance parameters, and all algorithms performed with similar accuracy across the three claims databases studied, even though most were designed for patient identification in a specific database. Therefore, it is the objective of a study that will determine which algorithm may be most suitable; one- or two-component algorithms are most inclusive and three- or four-component algorithms identify most precise pulmonary arterial hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension populations, respectively.

Medication Adherence and Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treated with Oral Prostacyclins: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Given the improved convenience of oral prostacyclins, there is a shift toward their use in treating pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to compare patient characteristics, medication adherence, healthcare resource use (HCRU), and costs among patients receiving oral treprostinil or selexipag.

METHODS

We used Truven Health MarketScan Commercial and Medicare databases to identify patients with PAH with a diagnosis code for pulmonary hypertension (PH) plus a prescription for oral treprostinil or selexipag from July 2013 to September 2017. Medication adherence, persistence, and all-cause and PAH-related HCRU and costs were compared between cohorts during the 6-month follow-up. Adjusted healthcare costs were obtained using recycled predictions and bootstrapped samples.

RESULTS

A total of 256 (130 oral treprostinil, 126 selexipag) patients fulfilled the study criteria. The oral treprostinil cohort was more likely to be male, to have previously used parenteral prostacyclins, and to have higher outpatient costs at baseline than the selexipag cohort. During follow-up, both cohorts had similar proportions of patients who were adherent to and persistent with their respective therapies. All-cause and PAH-related medical utilization was generally similar between cohorts. The oral treprostinil cohort had 66.9% lower total PAH-related healthcare costs (mean difference - $75,183; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 102,584 to - 49,771) and 70.6% lower PAH-related pharmacy costs (mean difference - $76,439; 95% CI - 104,512 to - 51,458) than the selexipag cohort, with similar differences in all-cause healthcare and pharmacy costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower all-cause and PAH-related total healthcare and pharmacy costs were observed in patients receiving oral treprostinil compared with those receiving selexipag. It will be important to study longer-term costs and clinical outcomes.

Identifying Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Using Administrative Claims Algorithms

Retrospective administrative claims database studies provide real-world evidence about treatment patterns, healthcare resource use, and costs for patients and are increasingly used to inform policy-making, drug formulary, and regulatory decisions. However, there is no standard methodology to identify patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) from administrative claims data. Given the number of approved drugs now available for patients with PAH, the cost of PAH treatments, and the significant healthcare resource use associated with the care of patients with PAH, there is a considerable need to develop an evidence-based and systematic approach to accurately identify these patients in claims databases. A panel of pulmonary hypertension clinical experts and researchers experienced in retrospective claims database studies convened to review relevant literature and recommend best practices for developing algorithms to identify patients with PAH in administrative claims databases specific to a particular research hypothesis.

The economic burden of systemic sclerosis related pulmonary arterial hypertension in Australia

Background

To quantify the financial cost of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Methods

Healthcare use was captured through data linkage, wherein clinical data for SSc patients enrolled in the Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study were linked with hospital, emergency department (ED) and ambulatory care databases (MBS) for the period 2008–2015. PAH was diagnosed on right heart catheter according to international criteria. Determinants of healthcare cost were estimated using logistic regression.

Results

Total median (25th–75th) healthcare cost per patient (including hospital, ED and MBS cost but excluding medication cost) for our cohort during 2008–2015 was AUD$37,685 (18,144-78,811) with an annual per patient healthcare cost of AUD$7506 (5273-10,654). Total healthcare cost was higher for SSc-PAH patients compared with those without PAH with a total cost per patient of AUD$70,034 (37,222-110,814) vs AUD$34,325 (16,093 – 69,957), p < 0.001 respectively with an annual excess healthcare cost per PAH patient of AUD$2463 (1973-1885), p < 0.001. The cost of SSc-PAH occurs early post PAH diagnosis with 89.4% utilizing a healthcare service within the first 12 months post PAH diagnosis with an associated cost per patient of AUD$4125 (0–15,666). PAH severity was the main significant determinant of increased healthcare cost (OR 2.5, p = 0.03) in our PAH cohort.

Conclusions

Despite SSc-PAH being a low prevalence disease, it is associated with significant healthcare resource utilization and associated economic burden, predominantly driven by the severity of PAH.

Treatment Discontinuation or Interruption in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease, which can be potentially fatal. The management of a complex disease like PAH requires a multidisciplinary approach from a team consisting of physicians, nurses, social workers, and pharmacists. Adherence to PAH-specific therapy is one of the key factors in the management of this disease. Poor adherence to treatment is a common problem in PAH as it is in many chronic diseases. Management of medication interruptions is a challenge in patients with PAH that can lead to negative consequences. However, for most PAH-specific drugs, there are no clear guidelines on how to manage temporary or abrupt medication discontinuations. In this review, we summarized the available literature and provide suggestions on how to manage interruptions of PAH-specific therapies.

Combination Therapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Gleaning a Practical Approach from the Randomized Trials

In the past decade, combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has evolved from something PAH practitioners felt almost compelled to do, notwithstanding the absence of data, to a strategy proven by well-conducted randomized clinical trials. Whereas in the past, PAH treatment was limited to parenteral epoprostenol; today multiple drugs administrable either parenterally, inhaled, or orally have expanded the options for treating PAH patients. The SERIPHIN, AMBITION, and GRIPHON trials and emerging findings in FREEDOM-EV confirm the validity of a combined-therapy approach. Data from these trials in which either combined therapy was planned or an agent was added to background therapy have demonstrated significant reduction in the progression of disease and are on the cusp of demonstrating survival benefit. Combination therapy may be started simultaneously in some cases, but in many cases a stepped approach to initiating a second, or third, agent is better tolerated. Trials of all the specific combinations of drugs may not be possible, but a continuing trend toward treating PAH with multiple agents is likely. Currently, Food and Drug Administration-approved agents are predominantly pulmonary vasodilators acting through different pathways, with minimal impact on progression of the proliferative pulmonary arteriopathy that is the key pathologic finding in PAH. It is to be hoped that treatment strategies that result in halting progression and substantial reversal of pulmonary arteriolar obstruction will soon be discovered and available.

Accuracy of Algorithms to Identify Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Administrative Data: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is challenging, and there is significant overlap with the more heterogenous diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Clinical and research efforts that rely on administrative data are limited by current coding systems that do not adequately reflect the clinical classification scheme. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate current algorithms to detect PAH using administrative data and to appraise the diagnostic accuracy of these algorithms against a reference standard.

METHODS

We conducted comprehensive searches of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science from their inception. We included English-language articles that applied an algorithm to an administrative or electronic health record database to identify PAH in adults.

RESULTS

Of 2,669 unique citations identified, 32 studies met all inclusion criteria. Only four of these studies validated their algorithm against a reference standard. Algorithms varied widely, ranging from single International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes to combinations of visit, procedure, and pharmacy codes. ICD codes alone performed poorly, with positive predictive values ranging from 3.3% to 66.7%. The addition of PAH-specific therapy and diagnostic procedures to the algorithm improved the diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Algorithms to identify PAH in administrative databases vary widely, and few are validated. The sole use of ICD codes performs poorly, potentially leading to biased results. ICD codes should be revised to better discriminate between PH groups, and universally accepted algorithms need to be developed and validated to capture PAH in administrative data, better informing research and clinical efforts.

Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and healthcare costs among patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in a real-world US database

Several new medications for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have recently been introduced; however, current real-world data regarding US patients with PAH are limited. We conducted a retrospective administrative claims study to examine PAH treatment patterns and summarize healthcare utilization and costs among patients with newly diagnosed PAH treated in US clinical practice. Patients newly treated for PAH from 1 January 2010 to 31 March 2015 were followed for ≥12 months. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were described. Adherence (proportion of days covered), persistence (months until therapy discontinuation/modification), and the probability of continuing the index regimen were analyzed by index regimen cohort (monotherapy versus combination therapy). Of 1637 eligible patients, 93.8% initiated treatment with monotherapy and 6.2% with combination therapy. The most common index regimen was phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE-5I) monotherapy (70.0% of patients). A total of 581 patients (35.5%) modified their index regimen during the study. Most patients (55.4%) who began combination therapy did so on or within six months of the index date. Endothelin receptor agonists (ERAs) and combination therapies were associated with higher adherence than PDE-5Is and monotherapies, respectively. Healthcare utilization was substantial across the study population, with costs in the combination therapy cohort more than doubling from baseline to follow-up. The majority of patients were treated with monotherapies (most often, PDE-5Is), despite combination therapies and ERAs being associated with higher medication adherence. Index regimen adjustments occurred early and in a substantial proportion of patients, suggesting that inadequate clinical response to monotherapies may not be uncommon.

Tolerability and clinical efficacy of inhaled treprostinil in patients with group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension

Background

Treprostinil is a prostacyclin analogue that directly vasodilates pulmonary and systemic arterial vascular beds. The United States Food and Drug Administration approved inhaled treprostinil in July 2009 for the treatment of group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension. Inhaled treprostinil avoids issues with continuous infusion prostanoids. This study describes a single institutional experience with inhaled treprostinil.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension patients receiving inhaled treprostinil from July 2009 through September 2015. Patient demographics, vital signs, prognostic indicators, pulmonary arterial hypertension assessments, treprostinil dosing, pulmonary arterial hypertension medications, and physician assessment were collected. Prognostic indicators and the physician assessment were used to assess treatment response. A modified Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL) risk score was calculated prior to and after initiation of inhaled treprostinil.

Results

The mean time on inhaled treprostinil for the 16 patients was 21 ± 17 months. A total of 31% discontinued treatment. The New York Heart Association Functional Class, right ventricular size, and right ventricular function improved after inhaled treprostinil. Directional improvement in B-type natriuretic peptide, 6-minute walk distance, right arterial pressure and mean pulmonary artery pressure were also observed. The mean modified REVEAL risk score (RRS) was 7 ± 3 at baseline. The RRS decreased in 7 of the 11 patients that improved and remained stable in 2 patients.

Conclusion

The majority of patients in this consecutive series receiving inhaled treprostinil tolerated treatment. Most patients remained on therapy for over 12 months. Clinical assessments of disease severity all changed directionally toward improvement and the overall risk assessment was improved or stable in 56% by the RRS.