Costs associated with the administration of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for the treatment of anemia in patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease: a US societal perspective

Remote management of anaemia in patients with end-stage kidney disease using a wearable, non-invasive sensor

Anaemia is a prevalent complication in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing haemodialysis. This study evaluates the accuracy of the Alio SmartPatch™, a non-invasive remote monitoring device, in measuring haemoglobin (Hb) and haematocrit (Hct) levels in haemodialysis patients by comparing its results with standard blood-based laboratory methods. The results from 116 patients across multiple sites in the USA and the Kingdom of Jordan show that SmartPatch measurements align closely with standard blood-based laboratory methods, meeting clinically acceptable limits of agreement. The current standard methods of Hb and Hct measurements are invasive and require visits to clinical sites, whereas the FDA-cleared SmartPatch offers non-invasive measurement of these parameters up to 240 times per month, thereby enhancing personalized care and patient engagement. This study demonstrates the potential of remote monitoring technologies, such as the SmartPatch, to improve the management of ESKD-associated anaemia. Further research is warranted to evaluate the device's long-term outcomes and its impact across diverse patient populations.

Development of a health economic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of roxadustat in treating anemia associated with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Treatment for anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) largely consists of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) with iron supplementation. Although ESAs are well-established and efficacious, their use has been associated with considerable economic and humanistic burdens. Roxadustat, an oral medication, is a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that targets multiple causes of CKD and has a similar efficacy and safety profile to ESAs. The cost-effectiveness of this treatment, however, has yet to be investigated.

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to develop a health economic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of roxadustat compared with ESAs for treating anemia of non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) CKD.

METHODS

A cohort-based model was developed for a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients with anemia of NDD CKD, incorporating eight health states, representing the hemoglobin level of each patient. The model was informed by individual patient-level data from the roxadustat global phase 3 clinical trial program. Total and incremental costs as well as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with roxadustat versus ESAs were estimated from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the model. Analyses exploring alternative scenarios were also conducted.

RESULTS

On a per-person basis, over 1,000 simulations, roxadustat was found to be on average less costly (-£32) and more effective (+0.01 QALYs) than ESAs, with a dominant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. The probability of cost-effectiveness at a £20,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold from the UK perspective was 67%.

CONCLUSION

The model developed may be a useful instrument that, alongside expert clinical opinion, can inform clinical and policy decision-making regarding treatment of anemia of NDD CKD. The model highlights the cost-effectiveness of roxadustat, as well as its potential to have a meaningful impact in reducing the burden of anemia of NDD CKD.