Underprescribing vs underfilling to oral anticoagulation: An analysis of linked medical record and claims data for a nationwide sample of patients with atrial fibrillation

Factor XI/XIa inhibitors: a potential solution to anticoagulation dilemmas

INTRODUCTION

Antithrombotic therapy is the cornerstone of stroke prevention, but standard of care therapies are underutilized and use is limited by bleeding rates, drug interactions, and renal elimination. Factor XI/XIa (FXI/XIa) inhibitors are a novel anticoagulation class that purportedly target thrombosis more than hemostasis, thereby raising the hope of reducing bleeding consequences while maintaining efficacy.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the mechanistic rationale for FXI/XIa inhibitors, describes the various molecule sub-classes, addresses barriers to current anticoagulation use, and reviews clinical trial data to date for this novel class of anticoagulants.

EXPERT OPINION

FXI/XIa inhibitors offer several advantages over DOACs in stroke prevention such as reduced bleeding, fewer drug interactions, and less renal elimination. However, clinical trials must demonstrate non-inferior efficacy and improved safety compared to DOACs. Additional barriers to use will include cost, inadequacy of antidotes, and overall anticoagulant underutilization. The potential for a small molecule or monoclonal antibody to reach the clinic is very high.

Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Primary Adherence of Oral Anticoagulants Among Patients with Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Oral anticoagulants (OAC) reduce the risk of stroke among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, adherence remains suboptimal. We focused on primary nonadherence to OAC and its associations with patient characteristics-specifically social determinants of health collected in electronic health records (EHR).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used EHR data linked to prescription fill data from a large, integrated Midwestern community healthcare system. Adult patients with an incident AF diagnosis from 2020 to 2021 and a first OAC prescription (index visit) were included. Primary nonadherence was defined as failure to fill an initial OAC prescription within 30 days. Outcomes included 1-year all-cause mortality, first stroke, and first bleed after first OAC prescription. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the likelihood of primary nonadherence, and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models evaluated the association between primary nonadherence with outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 8679 patients, 46% were female, 82% were non-Hispanic white, and the mean age was 71.3 ± 12.1 years. Twenty-one percent were primary nonadherent. The odds of primary nonadherence were greater among patients who were non-Hispanic Black, older (≥ 75 years), male, lacking commercial insurance, not employed/retired, and referred to social work; similar results were observed for secondary nonadherence. Primary nonadherence was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-2.01).

CONCLUSION

These results reveal disparities in primary nonadherence among patients with a new AF diagnosis. There is a need to develop and test interventions for primary nonadherence that are implemented in disadvantaged patients, among whom nonadherence is highest.

COVID-19 pandemic and trends in clinical outcomes and medication use for patients with established atrial fibrillation: A nationwide analysis of claims data

Study objective

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted multiple aspects of the health care system, including the diagnosis and control of chronic conditions. This study aimed to quantify pandemic-related changes in the rates of clinical events among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Design/setting/participants

In this retrospective cohort study, we identified individuals with established AF at any time before 2019 using de-identified Optum's Clinformatics® Data Mart, and followed them from 3/18/2019 to death, or disenrollment, or the end of the study (09/30/2021).

Main outcome

Rates of clinical event, including all-cause hospitalization, ischemic stroke, and bleeding. We constructed interrupted time series to test changes in outcomes after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (3/11/2020, date of pandemic declaration). We then identified the first month after the start of the pandemic in which outcomes returned to pre-pandemic levels.

Results

A total of 561,758 patients, with a mean age of 77 ± 9.9 years, were included in the study. The monthly incidence rate of all-cause hospitalization decreased from 2.8 % in the period immediately before the pandemic declaration to 1.7 % in the period immediately after, with p-value for level change<0.001. The rate of new ischemic stroke diagnoses decreased from 0.28 % in the period immediately before pandemic declaration to 0.20 % in the period immediately after, and the rate of major bleeding diagnoses from 0.81 % to 0.59 %, both p-values for level change<0.01. The incidence rate of ischemic stroke and bleeding events returned to pre-pandemic levels in October and November 2020, respectively.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a decrease in health care visits for ischemic stroke and bleeding in a nationwide cohort of patients with established AF.

COVID-19 pandemic and initiation of treatment for atrial fibrillation: a nationwide analysis of claims data

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly disrupted the delivery of medical care. It remains unclear whether individuals diagnosed with new onset disease during the pandemic were less likely to initiate treatments after diagnosis. We sought to evaluate changes in the treatment initiation of patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we identified individuals with incident AF from 01/01/2016-09/30/2021 using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. The primary outcome was initiation of oral anticoagulation (OAC) within 30 days of AF diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included initiation of OAC within 180 days of diagnosis, initiation of warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), rhythm control medications and electrical cardioversion within 30 days of diagnosis. We constructed interrupted time series analyses to examine changes in the outcomes following the onset of the pandemic.

RESULTS

A total of 573,524 patients (age 73.0 ± 10.9 years) were included in the study. There were no significant changes in the initiation of OAC, DOAC, and rhythm control medications associated with the onset of the pandemic. There was a significant decrease in initiation of electrical cardioversion associated with the onset of the pandemic. The rate of electronic cardioversion within 30 days of diagnosis decreased by 4.9% per 1,000 patients after the onset of the pandemic and decreased by about 35% in April 2020, compared to April 2019, from 5.53% to 3.58%.

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic did not affect the OAC initiation within 30 days of AF diagnosis but was associated with a decline in the provision of procedures for patients newly diagnosed with AF.