[The First Results of the Russian Register of Chronic Heart Failure]

[Creation of registers as one of the mechanisms for improving medical care for patients with chronic heart failure. Problem state]

The annual mortality of patients with clinically pronounced symptoms of chronic heart failure in the Russian Federation reaches 26-29%, i.e., from 880 to 986 thousand patients with heart failure die in the country in one year, which is comparable to the population of a large city. Providing care for patients with heart failure places a heavy burden on the country's health care system, making a significant contribution to mortality rates, hospitalization rates, including readmissions, which in turn requires considerable costs. The article presents an overview of registry studies that are devoted to assessing the effectiveness of diagnostics, the completeness of examinations, as well as the adequacy of ongoing drug treatment.

[Рossibility of using European (HFA-PEFF) and American (H2FPEF) algorithms for diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in Russian clinical practice]

This article focuses on the significance of a unified approach to diagnosing heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF). The key hemodynamic index of HFpEF is increased left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) and its noninvasive marker, the E / e' value obtained by tissue Doppler echocardiography (EchoCG). The modern verified algorithms for HFpEF diagnosis, HFA-PEFF and Н2FPEF, mandatorily take into account the E / e' value. However, the routing use of these algorithms in the Russian practice may be complicated since even among "advanced" specialists who are interested in heart failure, 38% of the interviewed do not use or do not know how to use tissue Doppler EchoCG or the algorithm for diagnosing HFpEF with E / e'. In addition to the obvious way of overcoming this problem by equipping respective medical facilities with ultrasonic apparatuses with tissue Doppler EchoCG software and educating physicians, a possibility of using simplified HFA algorithm without the E / e' value is being considered. However, such approach will inevitably lead to erroneous estimation of the probability of HFpEF and, at the best, to underestimation of this probability with ensuing mistakes in diagnosis and treatment. Simplifying the HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF algorithms by omitting one or more parameters is possible but this requires a special investigation to develop a new rating scale and actually a new algorithm, which, in turn, will require a new validation.

Left Atrial Strain as a Predictor of Diastolic Stress Test Results in Patients With Arterial Hypertension

Aim      To study a possibility of using the left atrial strain (LAS) for predicting results of the noninvasive diastolic stress test (DST) in patients with arterial hypertension (AH).

Material and methods  The study included 98 patients previously diagnosed with AH. As a part of evaluation for complaints of dyspnea, palpitation or pain in the area of the heart, DST and transthoracic echocardiography were performed. Echocardiography included measurements of LAS in the reservoir phase, left atrial volume index (LAVI), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), and ratio of early filling transmitral flow velocity to mitral annular velocity (Е / е’).

Results The DST was negative in 52 patients (group 1) and positive in 46 patients (group 2). Group 2 had greater values of mean Е / е’ (11.0 [9.4; 12.6] vs 9.0 [7.9; 11.1], р=0.0003); LAVI (33.8 [29.0; 40.0] ml /m2 vs 28.0 ml /m2 [25.0; 32.9], р=0.0001); and PASP (29.0 mm Hg [28.0; 30.0] vs 26.0 mm Hg [25.0; 28.0], р<0.0001 were greater, but LAS values were lower (19.0 % [18.0; 21.0] vs 24.0 % [22.0; 28.0], р<0.0001. The predictive capability of LAS with respect of heart failure was higher than of other echocardiographic parameters. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the reservoir strain was 0.922 (95 % confidence interval, CI, 0.851–0.967), which was significantly greater than for Е / е’: 0.713 (0.613–0.800); the LAVI was 0.724 (0.624–0.809); and the PASP was 0.764 (0.668–0.844). A LAS value in the reservoir phase less than 22 % predicts a positive result of DST with a probability of 88.9 % (76.5–95.2 %). Higher values of the strain allow expecting a negative DST result with a probability of 88.7 % (77.4–94.7 %).

Conclusion      If the DST cannot be performed for a noninvasive diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, a positive result of this test can be predicted by a decrease of LAS in the reservoir phase to 21 % or lower. The diagnostic accuracy of this criterion is 88.8 % (81.0–93.6 %).

[Three ages of spironolactone. Evolution of views on spironolactone capabilities in the treatment of patients with heart failure.]

The article describes the history of the discovery of aldosterone and the creation of its antagonist, spironolactone. The effects of aldosterone associated with the stimulation of two types of receptors.  Long-term effect (nuclear or genomic) and fast - term (membrane). They are manifested not only by the influence on the water-salt metabolism and the volume of extracellular fluid, but also in the regulation of vascular tone and elasticity of the vascular wall and, most interestingly, the effect on cardiac remodeling. Early after its development  Spironolactone was considered as a medicine for water-salt metabolism regulation, diuresis and normalization of blood pressure. In the following period,  Spironolactone embraced a new area - systolic heart failure. The drug was considered not only to enhance safe diuresis, but also to eliminate the phenomenon of escape of the antialdosterone effect angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The change in the paradigm of heart failure towards the prevailing changes in her diastolic phenotype, which is based on excessive diffuse myocardial fibrosis, changed role of spironolactone in the treatment of heart failure. Currently, it is considered as an independent drug, due to its powerful antifibrotic effect, blocking which controls the whole complex of endo- and paracrine effects of aldosterone.

Levels of angiogenesis markers in patients with different heart failure phenotypes

Aim. To assess the relationship between the levels of angiogenesis markers and various heart failure (HF) phenotypes in patients with class II-IV HF of ischemic origin.

Material and methods. This cross-sectional cohort study was based on the clinical departments of the National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine. The study involved 180 patients aged 30-85 years with class II-IV HF of ischemic origin as follows with (n=90) and without (n=90) metabolic syndrome (MS). All patients included in the study signed an informed consent to personal data processing, participation in a clinical trial and consent to blood biobanking. All patients were divided into three groups: HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)  — left ventricular (LV) EF <40%, HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF) — LVEF from 40 to 49%, HF with preserved EF (HFpEF)  — LVEF >49%. In addition to the standard paraclinical investigations, angiogenesis markers were analyzed with the determination of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), pentraxin-3 (PTX-3). Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Office Excel, STATISTICA 10.0 software packages (Statsoft, USA).

Results. Transthoracic echocardiography determined that 74 (41,1%) patients had LVEF <50%, while 71 (39,4%)  — <40%. For the group of patients with HFpEF, there was an association with an increase in TGF-β ≥7,2 ng/ml (p=0,011). The threshold level of PTX-3 ≥55 ng/ml is associated with the development of HFpEF (p=0,001). For the HFmrEF phenotype, the threshold values of VEGF-A, TGF-β and PTX-3 were determined, which did not reach the significance level. However, an upward trend in VEGF-A >200 ng/ml was noted (p=0,052). In HFrEF patients, a threshold value of VEGF-A >195 ng/ml (p=0,001) associated with reduced LVEF was determined.

Conclusion. Thus, the present work showed the relevance of using PTX-3, VEGF-A and TGF-β as additional markers for assessing the HF course. So, patients with HFpEF had increased levels of PTX-3 and TGF-β, while patients with HFmrEF and HFrEF  — increased VEGF-A values. Determination of the level of these angiogenesis markers should be used to improve the efficiency of diagnosis and treatment of patients with various class II-IV HF phenotypes.

Empagliflozin and heart failure: position paper of the experts on the results of the online meeting and discussion of the EMPEROR-Preserved Trial

At an international online expert meeting held on September 16, 2021, the results of the empagliflozin research program EMPA-REG Outcome, EMPEROR-Reduced and EMPEROR-Preserved were reviewed. We analyzed cardiovascular and renal outcomes during the treatment with empagliflozin in patients with chronic heart failure, regardless of the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The positive results of the EMPEROR-Preserved study are updated and their significance for clinical practice is discussed. Several proposals have been adopted that will accelerate the introduction of empagliflozin therapy into practice in patients with heart failure and overcome clinical inertia.

Patients with a Combination of Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Heart Failure in Clinical Practice: Comorbidities, Drug Treatment and Outcomes

Aim. To assess in clinical practice the structure of multimorbidity, cardiovascular pharmacotherapy and outcomes in patients with a combination of atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic heart failure (CHF) based on prospective registries of patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD).

Materials and Methods. The data of 3795 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were analyzed within the registries RECVASA (Ryazan), RECVASA FP (Moscow, Kursk, Tula, Yaroslavl), REGION-PO and REGION-LD (Ryazan), REGION-Moscow, REGATA (Ryazan). The comparison groups consisted of 3016 (79.5%) patients with AF in combination with CHF and 779 (29.5%) patients with AF without CHF. The duration of prospective observation is from 2 to 6 years.

Results. Patients with a combination of AF and CHF (n=3016, age was 72.0±10.3 years; 41.8% of men) compared with patients with AF without CHF (n=779, age was 70.3±12.0 years; 43.5% of men) had a higher risk of thromboembolic complications (CHA2DS2-VASc – 4.68±1.59 and 3.10±1.50; p<0.001) and hemorrhagic complications (HAS-BLED – 1.59±0.77 and 1.33±0.76; p<0.05). Patients with a combination of AF and CHF significantly more often (p<0.001) than in the absence of CHF were diagnosed with arterial hypertension (93.9% and 83.8%), coronary heart disease (87.9% and 53,5%), myocardial infarction (28.4% and 14.0%), diabetes mellitus (22.4% and 7.7%), chronic kidney disease (24.8% and 16.2%), as well as respiratory diseases (20.1% and 15.3%; p=0.002). Patients with AF in the presence of CHF, compared with patients without CHF, were more often diagnosed with a permanent form of arrhythmia (49.3% and 32.9%; p<0.001) and less often paroxysmal (22.5% and 46.2%; p<0.001) form  of  arrhythmia.  Ejection  fraction  ≤40%  (9.3%  and  1.2%;  p<0.001),  heart  rate  ≥90/min  (23.7% and 19.3%; p=0.008) and blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg (59.9% and 52.2%; p<0.001) were recorded with AF in the presence of CHF more often than in the absence of CHF. The frequency of proper cardiovascular pharmacotherapy was higher, albeit insufficient, in the presence of CHF (64.9%) than in the absence of it (56.1%), but anticoagulants were prescribed less frequently when AF and CHF were combined (38.8% and  49, 0%; p<0.001). The frequency of unreasonable prescription of antiplatelet agents instead of anticoagulants was 52.5% and 33.3% (p<0.001) in the combination of AF, CHF and coronary heart disease, as well as in the combination of AF with coronary heart disease but without CHF. Patients with AF and CHF during the observation period compared with those without CHF had higher mortality from all causes (37.6% and 30.3%; p=0.001), the frequency of non-fatal cerebral stroke (8.2% and 5.4%; p=0.032) and myocardial infarction (4.7% and 2.5%; p=0.036), hospitalizations for CVD (22.8% and 15.5%; p<0.001).

Conclusion. Patients with a combination of AF and CHF, compared with the group of patients with AF without CHF, were older, had a higher risk of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, they were more often diagnosed with other concomitant cardiovascular and chronic noncardiac diseases, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, tachysystole, failure to achieve the target blood pressure level in the presence of arterial hypertension. The frequency of prescribing proper cardiovascular pharmacotherapy was higher, albeit insufficient, in the presence of CHF, while the frequency of prescribing anticoagulants was less. The  incidence of mortality from all causes, the development of non-fatal myocardial infarction   and cerebral stroke, as well as the incidence of hospitalizations for CVDs were higher in AF associated with CHF.

[Ivabradine for Treatment of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction]

Aim      To evaluate the effect of combination ivabradine-containing therapy for chronic heart failure (CHF) with preserved ejection fraction on quality of life (QoL) and the primary composite endpoint during a one-year follow-up.Material and methods  This study included 160 patients aged 45 to 65 years with NYHA functional class (FC) II-III CHF with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (CHF-PEF) and grade I and II diastolic dysfunction associated with FC III stable angina with sinus rhythm and a heart rate (HR) higher than 70 bpm. Presence of CHF-PEF was confirmed by results of echocardiography and myocardial tissue Doppler imaging. During one year of prospective observation, effects of bisoprolol and ivabradine as a part of the combination therapy on the primary composite endpoint, including death from cardiovascular complications (CVC) and hospitalizations for myocardial infarction (MI) or CHF, were evaluated in patients with CHF-PEF. Patients were randomized to three groups: A, bisoprolol with dose titration from 2.5 to 10 mg; В, combination of bisoprolol 2.5-10 mg and ivabradine 10-15 mg/day; and С, ivabradine 10-15 mg/day. All patients were on a chronic background therapy, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (lisinopril) or, if not tolerated, angiotensin II receptor blockers (valsartan), antiaggregants, statins (atorvastatin, rosuvastatin), and short-acting nitrates as required. If edema developed diuretics were added. The follow-up duration was one year.Results After 12 weeks of follow-up, the achievement of goal HR in group A was associated with a tendency to increased distance in the 6-min walk test from 279±19 to 341±21 m (р&gt;0,05); in group B the distance increased from 243±25 to 319±29 m (р&lt;0.05); and in group C the distance increased from 268±21 to 323±22 m (р&lt;0.05). In the combination ivabradine and bisoprolol treatment group, results of the 24-h electrocardiogram monitoring showed a more pronounced anti-ischemic effect associated with a decrease in the number of myocardial ischemic episodes (p&lt;0.05). QoL was evaluated with the Minnesota questionnaire against the background of treatment. At 12 weeks of observation, the total score decreased from 44.5±2.6 to 38.4±2.1 in group A; from 45±2.9 to 38±2.2 in group B; and from 50.9±3.2 to 42.7±2.8 in group C (р&lt;0.05). The risk of acute MI and repeated hospitalization for CHF during the year of observation, as evaluated according to the Kaplan-Meier method, decreased in both bisoprolol and ivabradine combination treatment groups.Conclusion      The inclusion of bisoprolol and ivabradine into the background therapy of CHF-PEF patients with stable IHD provided an improvement of QoL and a decrease in the risk of hospitalization for acute MI and CHF during the year of observation.

[Clinical characteristics and quality assessment of the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure with diabetes mellitus]

AIM

A study of the clinical and instrumental characteristics and quality of treatment of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) with diabetes mellitus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted by using the CHF register method, which is a computer program with remote access, which allows on-line data collection on patients who have been examined and treated in primary care and in hospitals. The study included 8272 patients with CHF IIIV FC (functional class) (New York Heart Association NYHA); among them 62% of patients were treated in hospital.

RESULTS

The study showed that the frequency of diabetes was 21%. The main causes of CHF in diabetic patients are coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction (in anamnesis) and hypertension. These patients are more often diagnosed with III and IV CHF FC according to (NYHA) and retained LV (left ventricular) ejection fraction. The reduced ejection fraction was observed in 6.8% of cases, and the frequency of the intermediate LV was significantly higher than among patients with CHF and with diabetes and accounted for 18.9%. At patients with CHF with diabetes in comparison with patients with CHF without diabetes, atherosclerosis of the peripheral arteries, stroke (in anamnesis) and chronic kidney disease of stage III and IV were significantly more common.

CONCLUSION

Under the treatment, patients with CHF with diabetes have higher levels of SBP (systolic blood pressure), lipids and glucose in the blood plasma, indicating a lack of quality of treatment and, accordingly, the doctors are not optimally performing the clinical guidelines on treating this category of patients.

[Difficulties in diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in clinical practice: dissonance between echocardiography, NTproBNP and H2HFPEF score]

This pilot study was aimed to assess the percentage of patients admitted to a Russian hospital and diagnosed with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) maintaining this diagnosis when evaluated against the ESC 2016 and Russian 2017 heart failure guidelines. In addition, we reviewed the probability of an HFpEF diagnosis when patients were assessed against the H2FPEF score. Forty-two patients (mean age 68 ±7,5) diagnosed with HFpEF on their discharge record, admitted between March 2018 and May 2018, were included. Twenty percent of patients did not meet Russian guideline criteria for HFpEF due to either the absence of symptoms and/or echocardiographic evidence of structural/functional abnormalities. Using the ESC 2016 guidelines (which required an elevation in NT Pro BNP) the diagnosis was confirmed in only 37% of patients, mostly due to the normal level of NTproBNP in 54.8% of those investigated. The probability of HFpEF by H2FPEF score in patients with dyspnea and HFpEF by ESC 2016 criteria was 93% and without HFpEF by ESC 2016 criteria 68% (p = 0.054). In contrast, the probability of HFpEF by H2FPEF score in patients with dyspnea and HFpEF by Russian criteria was 84.4%.