Pregnancy after transverse plication lipoabdominoplasty, undermining halted at umbilicus, liposuction without restrictions, umbilicoplasty with a skin graft, and low transverse scar localization (TULUA). Literature review and case report

Pregnancy After Panniculectomy Postbariatric Surgery: A Case Report

Panniculectomy and abdominoplasty are two forms of abdominal body contouring commonly performed. There are literature reports of healthcare providers citing abdominoplasty as a contraindication to future pregnancy due to potential risks to the patient and fetus. Panniculectomy, outside of the reduced risks from the lack of rectus muscle plication, would have similar effects on the patient and fetus in future pregnancies. Yet, abdominal contouring surgery is being performed in women of childbearing age with increasing frequency, meriting further research to explore the true safety profile of pregnancy after body contouring surgeries. Here, we present a case report of a woman who underwent two full-term vaginal deliveries after undergoing a panniculectomy due to massive weight loss from prior gastric bypass. While she had high utilization of healthcare services throughout her pregnancies, she experienced no significant adverse pregnancy outcomes. Our report is consistent with current literature, suggesting that prior panniculectomy should not be a contraindication to pregnancy.

Pregnancy one month post abdominoplasty: a case report and review of literature

Pregnancy post abdominoplasty may ruin the aesthetic result of the operation and may harm both mother and child. This report is about a 39-year-old lady who got pregnant a month after her abdominoplasty. Her pregnancy was uneventful, and she delivered a healthy baby at the gestational age of 38 weeks.

TULUA: Effects of Flap Undermining and Type of Wall Plicature in a Rat Model Abdominoplasty

BACKGROUND

TULUA, a transverse plication lipoabdominoplasty, which excludes elevation of the supraumbilical flap and includes a skin graft neoumbilicoplasty, claims greater safety and better results. An animal study was designed to compare it, with two current techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three matched groups of 12 rats had combined liposuction and abdominoplasty. Liposuction was extensive and unrestricted. Groups 1 and 2 had vertical plication and transposition umbilicoplasty, and group 3 had transverse plication and neoumbilicoplasty. Flap elevation in the epigastrium was wide to costal margins in group 1, limited to a tunnel in group 2, and no dissection in group 3. The animals were observed for 21 days and then euthanized. Intraoperative, postoperative, and postmortem variables and findings were measured and analyzed to find differences between groups.

RESULTS

Transverse lipoabdominoplasty demonstrated a wider wall plication area, as well as a decrease in tension to close the wound, causing the horizontal scar to remain in a low position. In vertical plication lipoabdominoplasty groups, flap necrosis and seromas were more frequent, and the umbilical position descended due to secondary healing and scar contraction. The scar's scores were better in the transverse group and were confirmed when evaluated by external observers.In postmortem examination, horizontal plication presented less widening; perforator vessels were preserved when surgical undermining of the upper abdomen was not performed, and there were fewer seromas.

CONCLUSION

In a rat model, TULUA demonstrates superior results and a decrease in complications when compared to lipoabdominoplasties with vertical plication and wide or tunneled dissection in the upper abdomen.

NO LEVEL ASSIGNED

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .