Cracking the riddle of dedifferentiated liposarcoma: is EV-MDM2 a key?

Comparison of three-dimensional cell culture techniques of dedifferentiated liposarcoma and their integration with future research

Background: Dedifferentiated liposarcoma is a formidable sarcoma subtype due to its high local recurrence rate and resistance to medical treatment. While 2D cell cultures are still commonly used, 3D cell culture systems have emerged as a promising alternative, particularly scaffold-based techniques that enable the creation of 3D models with more accurate cell-stroma interactions. Objective: To investigate how 3D structures with or without the scaffold existence would affect liposarcoma cell lines growth morphologically and biologically. Methods: Lipo246 and Lipo863 cell lines were cultured in 3D using four different methods; Matrigel® ECM scaffold method, Collagen ECM scaffold method, ULA plate method and Hanging drop method, in addition to conventional 2D cell culture methods. All samples were processed for histopathological analysis (HE, IHC and DNAscope™), Western blot, and qPCR; moreover, 3D collagen-based models were treated with different doses of SAR405838, a well-known inhibitor of MDM2, and cell viability was assessed in comparison to 2D model drug response. Results: Regarding morphology, cell lines behaved differently comparing the scaffold-based and scaffold-free methods. Lipo863 formed spheroids in Matrigel® but not in collagen, while Lipo246 did not form spheroids in either collagen or Matrigel®. On the other hand, both cell lines formed spheroids using scaffold-free methods. All samples retained liposarcoma characteristic, such as high level of MDM2 protein expression and MDM2 DNA amplification after being cultivated in 3D. 3D collagen samples showed higher cell viability after SAR40538 treatment than 2D models, while cells sensitive to the drug died by apoptosis or necrosis. Conclusion: Our results prompt us to extend our investigation by applying our 3D models to further oncological relevant applications, which may help address unresolved questions about dedifferentiated liposarcoma biology.

Cross-flow microfiltration for isolation, selective capture and release of liposarcoma extracellular vesicles

We present a resource‐efficient approach to fabricate and operate a micro‐nanofluidic device that uses cross‐flow filtration to isolate and capture liposarcoma derived extracellular vesicles (EVs). The isolated extracellular vesicles were captured using EV‐specific protein markers to obtain vesicle enriched media, which was then eluted for further analysis. Therefore, the micro‐nanofluidic device integrates the unit operations of size‐based separation with CD63 antibody immunoaffinity‐based capture of extracellular vesicles in the same device to evaluate EV‐cargo content for liposarcoma. The eluted media collected showed ∼76% extracellular vesicle recovery from the liposarcoma cell conditioned media and ∼32% extracellular vesicle recovery from dedifferentiated liposarcoma patient serum when compared against state‐of‐art extracellular vesicle isolation and subsequent quantification by ultracentrifugation. The results reported here also show a five‐fold increase in amount of critical liposarcoma‐relevant extracellular vesicle cargo obtained in 30 min presenting a significant advance over existing state‐of‐art.