1
|
Kim JS, Chung MJ, Lee DY, Lee SH, Jeong SK, Yoo BE, Chung CS, Chung WK. Clinicopathological Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Undergoing Preoperative Short- Versus Long-course Chemoradiotherapy With Delayed Surgery. In Vivo 2023; 37:2768-2775. [PMID: 37905618 PMCID: PMC10621450 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM We aimed to compare the clinicopathological outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after short- or long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by delayed surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS The records of 94 patients with cT3-4N0-2M0 rectal cancer who received CCRT between 2010 and 2017 were reviewed. Short-course radiotherapy (RT) was delivered with a median total dose of 25 Gy in five fractions (n=27), and long-course RT was delivered with a median total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions (n=67). The following concurrent chemotherapy regimens were administered: 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in 58 and capecitabine in 24; in 12 cases agents were unknown. The median interval between CCRT and surgery was 8 weeks. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered after surgery in 80 patients (5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin, n=54; capecitabine, n=9; other, n=14; and unknown, n=3). Propensity-score matching analysis was conducted. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 4.3 years. There were no statistically significant differences between the short- and long-course RT groups in sphincter preservation (85.2% vs. 92.5%, p=0.478), pathological complete remission (18.5% vs. 14.9%, p=0.905), downstaging (44.4% vs. 26.9%, p=0.159), and negative circumferential resection margin (92.6% vs. 89.6%, p=0.947) rates. No differences were found in survival outcomes between the short- and long-course groups at 3 years (overall survival: 91.8% vs. 88.1%, p=0.790; disease-free survival, 75.2% vs. 72.5%, p=0.420; locoregional relapse-free survival, 90.5% vs. 98.4%, p=0.180; and distant metastasis-free survival, 79.6% vs. 73.5%, p=0.490). Similar results were observed after PSM. CONCLUSION Clinically, short-course CCRT may be a feasible alternative to long-course CCRT in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Sik Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi Joo Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanyang University Changwon Hanmaeum Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Doo Yeul Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Suk Hwan Lee
- Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Kyu Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Yang Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung Eun Yoo
- Department of Surgery, Yang Hospital, Namyangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Choon Sik Chung
- Department of Surgery, Hansol Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Weon Kuu Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu Q, Zhou J, Huang J, Deng X, Li C, Meng W, He Y, Wang Z. Total neoadjuvant therapy versus chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Bayesian network meta-analysis. Br J Surg 2023; 110:784-796. [PMID: 37191308 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total neoadjuvant therapy is a promising treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, utilizing either short-course radiotherapy or long-course chemoradiotherapy, but their relative efficacy remains unclear. The aim of this Bayesian network meta-analysis was to investigate clinical outcomes amongst patients receiving total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy or long-course chemoradiotherapy, and those receiving long-course chemoradiotherapy alone. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed. All studies that compared at least two of these three treatments for locally advanced rectal cancer were included. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response rate, and survival outcomes were adopted as secondary outcomes. RESULTS Thirty cohorts were included. Compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy, both total neoadjuvant therapy with long-course chemoradiotherapy (OR 1.78, 95 per cent c.i. 1.43 to 2.26) and total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy (OR 1.75, 95 per cent c.i. 1.23 to 2.50) improved the pathological complete response rate. Similar benefits were observed in the sensitivity and subgroup analyses, except for short-course radiotherapy with one to two cycles of chemotherapy. No significant differences in survival outcomes were found amongst the three treatments. Long-course chemoradiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy (HR 0.44, 95 per cent c.i. 0.20 to 0.99) exhibited higher disease-free survival than long-course chemoradiotherapy alone. CONCLUSION Compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy, both short-course radiotherapy with greater than or equal to three cycles of chemotherapy and total neoadjuvant therapy with long-course chemoradiotherapy can improve the pathological complete response rate, and long-course chemoradiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy may lead to a marginal benefit in disease-free survival. The pathological complete response rate and survival outcomes are similar for total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy or long-course chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingbin Wu
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiahao Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jun Huang
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiangbing Deng
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Changtao Li
- Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wenjian Meng
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yazhou He
- Department of Oncology, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ziqiang Wang
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cho MS, Bae HW, Chang JS, Yang SY, Kim TH, Koom WS, Shin SJ, Choi GS, Kim NK. Short-Term Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness between Long-Course Chemoradiation and Short-Course Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Yonsei Med J 2023; 64:395-403. [PMID: 37226566 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) has been widely recommended in a majority of rectal cancer patients. Recently, encouraging data on short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) for rectal cancer has emerged. In this study, we aimed to compare these two methods in terms of short-term outcomes and cost analysis under the Korean medical insurance system. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty-two patients with high-risk rectal cancer, who underwent either SCRT or LCRT followed by total mesorectal excision (TME), were classified into two groups. Twenty-seven patients received 5 Gy×5 with two cycles of XELOX (capecitabine 1000 mg/m² and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² every 3 weeks) followed by TME (SCRT group). Thirty-five patients received capecitabine-based LCRT followed by TME (LCRT group). Short-term outcomes and cost estimation were assessed between the two groups. RESULTS Pathological complete response was achieved in 18.5% and 5.7% of patients in the SCRT and LCRT groups, respectively (p=0.223). The 2-year recurrence-free survival rate did not show significant difference between the two groups (SCRT vs. LCRT: 91.9% vs. 76.2%, p=0.394). The average total cost per patient for SCRT was 18% lower for inpatient treatment (SCRT vs. LCRT: $18787 vs. $22203, p<0.001) and 40% lower for outpatient treatment (SCRT vs. LCRT: $11955 vs. $19641, p<0.001) compared to LCRT. SCRT was shown to be the dominant treatment option with fewer recurrences and fewer complications at a lower cost. CONCLUSION SCRT was well-tolerated and achieved favorable short-term outcomes. In addition, SCRT showed significant reduction in the total cost of care and distinguished cost-effectiveness compared to LCRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Soo Cho
- The Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeon Woo Bae
- The Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jee Suk Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Yoon Yang
- The Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woong Sub Koom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Joon Shin
- The Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gyu-Seog Choi
- The Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea
| | - Nam Kyu Kim
- The Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liao CK, Kuo YT, Lin YC, Chern YJ, Hsu YJ, Yu YL, Chiang JM, Hsieh PS, Yeh CY, You JF. Neoadjuvant Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy before Surgery for Treating Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:3708-3727. [PMID: 35621687 PMCID: PMC9139840 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29050297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant short course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) is an alternative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the tumor response and oncological outcomes of this new approach compared to conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT). An online search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed. This review included 7507 patients from 14 different cohorts. The pCR rate was higher with SCRT + CCT than that with CRT (RR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.35−1.91; p < 0.01). SCRT + CCT provided a higher ypN0 response (RR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01−1.12; p = 0.02). There were no differences in R0 resection and positive CRM rates; however, more sphincter-preservation surgeries were performed in the SCRT + CCT arm (RR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01−1.11; p = 0.02). There was no difference in the OS and DFS between the SCRT + CCT and the CRT arms (OS: HR: 0.85, p = 0.07; DFS: HR: 0.88, p = 0.08). The compliance and toxicity were comparable between the SCRT and CRT groups. In the subgroup analysis, patients who underwent four or more cycles of CCT had better pCR and DFS events. Therefore, SCRT followed by consolidation chemotherapy might be an effective alternative treatment for LARC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Kai Liao
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 333423, Taiwan; (C.-K.L.); (Y.-T.K.); (Y.-C.L.); (Y.-J.C.); (Y.-J.H.); (J.-M.C.); (P.-S.H.); (C.-Y.Y.)
| | - Ya-Ting Kuo
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 333423, Taiwan; (C.-K.L.); (Y.-T.K.); (Y.-C.L.); (Y.-J.C.); (Y.-J.H.); (J.-M.C.); (P.-S.H.); (C.-Y.Y.)
| | - Yueh-Chen Lin
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 333423, Taiwan; (C.-K.L.); (Y.-T.K.); (Y.-C.L.); (Y.-J.C.); (Y.-J.H.); (J.-M.C.); (P.-S.H.); (C.-Y.Y.)
| | - Yih-Jong Chern
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 333423, Taiwan; (C.-K.L.); (Y.-T.K.); (Y.-C.L.); (Y.-J.C.); (Y.-J.H.); (J.-M.C.); (P.-S.H.); (C.-Y.Y.)
| | - Yu-Jen Hsu
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 333423, Taiwan; (C.-K.L.); (Y.-T.K.); (Y.-C.L.); (Y.-J.C.); (Y.-J.H.); (J.-M.C.); (P.-S.H.); (C.-Y.Y.)
| | - Yen-Lin Yu
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung Branch, No. 222, Maijin Rd., Anle Dist., Keelung City 204201, Taiwan;
| | - Jy-Ming Chiang
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 333423, Taiwan; (C.-K.L.); (Y.-T.K.); (Y.-C.L.); (Y.-J.C.); (Y.-J.H.); (J.-M.C.); (P.-S.H.); (C.-Y.Y.)
- School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Road, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 333323, Taiwan
| | - Pao-Shiu Hsieh
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 333423, Taiwan; (C.-K.L.); (Y.-T.K.); (Y.-C.L.); (Y.-J.C.); (Y.-J.H.); (J.-M.C.); (P.-S.H.); (C.-Y.Y.)
- School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Road, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 333323, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Yuh Yeh
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 333423, Taiwan; (C.-K.L.); (Y.-T.K.); (Y.-C.L.); (Y.-J.C.); (Y.-J.H.); (J.-M.C.); (P.-S.H.); (C.-Y.Y.)
- School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Road, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 333323, Taiwan
| | - Jeng-Fu You
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 333423, Taiwan; (C.-K.L.); (Y.-T.K.); (Y.-C.L.); (Y.-J.C.); (Y.-J.H.); (J.-M.C.); (P.-S.H.); (C.-Y.Y.)
- School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Road, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 333323, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-975-365-617
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu H, Fan C, Fang C, Huang L, Li Y, Zhou Z. Preoperative short-course radiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy for treatment with locally advanced rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:14. [PMID: 35073940 PMCID: PMC8785003 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01974-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The addition of consolidation chemotherapy to preoperative short-course radiotherapy during the prolonged interval between the completion of radiation and surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) could enhance pathologic response and might act on potential micrometastasis. We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate whether short-course radiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy (SCRT/CCT) could be a neoadjuvant treatment option compared with conventional long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT).
Methods
We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases. The primary endpoints were pathological outcomes, and the secondary endpoints included survival rate, sphincter preservation rate, R0 resection rate and toxicity. RevMan 5.3 was used to calculate pooled risk ratio (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
A total of seven eligible studies and 1865 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the LCCRT, SCRT/CCT increased pathologic complete response (pCR) rate [RR = 1.74, 95% CI (1.41, 2.15), P < 0.01] and led to a lower proportion of patients with adjuvant pathologic tumor stage 3–4 (ypT3-4) disease [RR = 0.88, 95% CI (0.80, 0.97), P = 0.01] or lymph node positive (ypN +) disease [RR = 0.83, 95% CI (0.71, 0.98), P = 0.02]. In addition, the disease-free survival (DFS) was better in SCRT/CCT group [RR = 1.10, 95% CI (1.02, 1.18), P = 0.01], while overall survival rate and toxicity and surgical procedures were similar between two groups.
Conclusion
Based on better pathological outcomes and DFS in SCRT/CCT group, we recommended preoperative short-course radiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy as the optional neoadjuvant treatment for LARC.
Collapse
|
6
|
Socha J, Kairevice L, Kępka L, Michalski W, Spałek M, Paciorek K, Bujko K. Should Short-Course Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy Be Applied for Low-Lying Rectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:1257-1264. [PMID: 32634546 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend either long-course chemoradiation (LC) or short-course radiation (SC, 5 × 5 Gy) for rectal cancer before total mesorectal excision. However, they do not recommend SC for low-lying tumors. As early toxicity of SC is lower than that of LC, and postoperative complications as well as late toxicity are similar, the probable reason is a notion that for low-lying tumors LC may be more effective than SC in assuring local control. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized trials comparing SC with LC was performed to test the hypothesis that for low-lying tumors, LC is superior to SC in reducing the risk of local failure. RESULTS The systematic search identified 4 trials including, in total, 421 patients with tumors <5 cm from the anal verge; 221 were randomized to SC and 200 to LC. The meta-analysis showed that the difference in local failure rate between SC and LC was insignificant; the pooled odds ratio was 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.53 to 1.44, P = .59. Heterogeneity between trials was insignificant; I2 = 0.0%, P = .47. CONCLUSIONS Our meta-analysis does not support the notion that LC given before total mesorectal excision is superior to SC in reducing the risk of local failure in low-lying tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Socha
- Department of Radiotherapy, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Radiotherapy, Regional Oncology Centre, Czestochowa, Poland.
| | - Laura Kairevice
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Lucyna Kępka
- Department of Radiotherapy, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Wojciech Michalski
- Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Unit, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Mateusz Spałek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Karol Paciorek
- Department of Radiotherapy I, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Bujko
- Department of Radiotherapy I, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ciseł B, Pietrzak L, Michalski W, Wyrwicz L, Rutkowski A, Kosakowska E, Cencelewicz A, Spałek M, Polkowski W, Jankiewicz M, Styliński R, Bębenek M, Kapturkiewicz B, Maciejczyk A, Sadowski J, Zygulska J, Zegarski W, Jankowski M, Las-Jankowska M, Toczko Z, Żelazowska-Omiotek U, Kępka L, Socha J, Wasilewska-Tesluk E, Markiewicz W, Kładny J, Majewski A, Kapuściński W, Suwiński R, Bujko K. Long-course preoperative chemoradiation versus 5 × 5 Gy and consolidation chemotherapy for clinical T4 and fixed clinical T3 rectal cancer: long-term results of the randomized Polish II study. Ann Oncol 2020; 30:1298-1303. [PMID: 31192355 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This trial evaluated whether preoperative short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) were superior to chemoradiation in rectal cancers with clinical (c)T4 or fixed cT3. Previously, we reported early results showing no differences in the radical surgery rate (primary end point). In the short-course/CCT group, we observed lower acute toxicity of preoperative treatment and better overall survival (OS). We updated results to determine whether the benefit in OS was sustained and to evaluate late complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with cT4 or fixed cT3 rectal cancer were randomized either to preoperative 5 × 5 Gy and three cycles of FOLFOX4 or to chemoradiation (50.4 Gy with bolus 5-Fu, leucovorin and oxaliplatin). RESULTS Patients (N = 515) were eligible for analysis, 261 in the short-course/CCT group and 254 in the chemoradiation group. The median follow-up was 7.0 years. The difference in OS was insignificant [hazard ratio (HR) 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-1.15; P = 0.38). However, the difference in early OS favouring short-course/CCT previously reported was observed again, being 9% at 3 years (95% CI 0.5% to 17%). This difference disappeared later; at 8 years OS was 49% in both groups. There was no difference in disease-free survival (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.75-1.19; P = 0.65) at 8 years 43% versus 41% in the short-course/CCT group versus the chemoradiation group, respectively. The corresponding values for cumulative incidences of local failure and distant metastases did not differ and were HR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.70-1.23, P = 0.60, 35% versus 32% and HR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.68-1.23, P = 0.54, 36% versus 34%, respectively. The rate of late complications was similar (P = 0.66), grade 3+ being 11% versus 9% in the short-course/CCT group versus the chemoradiation group, respectively. CONCLUSION The superiority of preoperative short-course/CCT over chemoradiation was not demonstrated. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER The trial is registered as ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00833131.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Ciseł
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin
| | | | | | | | - A Rutkowski
- Gastroenterological Oncology, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Warsaw
| | - E Kosakowska
- Gastroenterological Oncology, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Warsaw
| | - A Cencelewicz
- Gastroenterological Oncology, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Warsaw
| | | | - W Polkowski
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin
| | - M Jankiewicz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin; Department of Radiotherapy, St. John's Cancer Center, Lublin
| | - R Styliński
- 1st Department of General Surgery, Transplantology and Nutritional Therapy Medical University of Lublin
| | | | | | - A Maciejczyk
- Radiotherapy, Silesian Oncological Centre, Wrocław
| | - J Sadowski
- Department of Radiotherapy, Regional Oncological Centre, Kielce
| | - J Zygulska
- Department of Radiotherapy, Beskid Centre of Oncology, Bielsko-Biala
| | | | | | - M Las-Jankowska
- Clinical Oncology, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University and Oncology Centre, Bydgoszcz
| | - Z Toczko
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital, Elblag
| | | | - L Kępka
- Department of Radiotherapy, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw
| | - J Socha
- Department of Radiotherapy, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw; Department of Radiotherapy, Regional Oncology Center, Czestochowa
| | - E Wasilewska-Tesluk
- Radiotherapy Department, Public Health Care Facility of the Ministry of the Interior and Warmian-Masurian Oncology Centre, Olsztyn; Department of Oncology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn
| | - W Markiewicz
- Department of Surgery, Regional Cancer Centre, Białystok
| | - J Kładny
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology First Clinical Hospital of Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin
| | - A Majewski
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital, Wałbrzych
| | - W Kapuściński
- Department of Radiotherapy, Regional Cancer Centre, Copernicus Memorial Hospital of Łódź, Łódź
| | - R Suwiński
- Department of Radiotherapy, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Gliwice, Poland
| | - K Bujko
- II Department of Radiotherapy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aghili M, Khalili N, Khalili N, Babaei M, Farhan F, Haddad P, Salarvand S, Keshvari A, Fazeli MS, Mohammadi N, Ghalehtaki R. Short-course versus long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Radiat Oncol J 2020; 38:119-128. [PMID: 33012155 PMCID: PMC7533412 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2020.00115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Colorectal cancer is becoming an increasing concern in the middle-aged population of Iran. This study aimed to compare the preliminary results of short-course and long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy treatment for rectal cancer patients. Materials and Methods In this clinical trial we recruited patients with rectal adenocarcinoma located from 5 cm to 15 cm above the anal verge. Patients in group I (short-course) received three-dimensional conformational radiotherapy with a dose of 25 Gy/5 fractions in 1 week plus concurrent XELOX regimen (capecitabine 625 mg/m2 from day 1–5 twice daily and oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 once daily). Patients in group II (long-course) received a total dose of 50–50.4 Gy/25–28 fractions for 5 to 5.5 weeks plus capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily. Both groups underwent consolidation chemotherapy followed by delayed surgery at least 8 weeks after radiotherapy completion. The pathological response was assessed with tumor regression grade. Results In this preliminary report on complications and pathological response, 66 patients were randomized into two study groups. Mean duration of radiotherapy in groups I and II was 5 ± 1 days (range, 5 to 8 days) and 38 ± 6 days (range, 30 to 58 days). The median follow-up was 18 months. Pathological complete response was achieved in 32.3% and 23.1% of patients in the short-course and long-course groups, respectively (p = 0.558). Overall, acute grade 3 or higher treatment-related toxicities occurred in 24.2% and 22.2% of patients in group I and II, respectively (p = 0.551). No acute grade 4 or 5 adverse events were observed in either group except one grade 4 hematologic toxicity that was seen in group II. Within one month of surgery, no significant difference was seen regarding grade ≥3 postoperative complications (p = 0.333). Conclusion For patients with rectal cancer located at least 5 cm above the anal verge, short-course radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation chemotherapy and delayed surgery is not different in terms of acute toxicity, postoperative morbidity, complete resection, and pathological response compared to long-course chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahdi Aghili
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nastaran Khalili
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Neda Khalili
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Babaei
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farshid Farhan
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Peiman Haddad
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Samaneh Salarvand
- Department of Anatomical and Clinical Pathology, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amir Keshvari
- Colorectal Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli
- Colorectal Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Negin Mohammadi
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Ghalehtaki
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yoon SM, Lee P, Raldow A. The Evolving Landscape of Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-020-00451-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
10
|
Hoendervangers S, Sparreboom CL, Intven MPW, Lange JF, Verkooijen HM, Doornebosch PG, van Grevenstein WMU. The effect of neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and delayed surgery versus chemoradiation on postoperative outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer patients - A propensity score matched nationwide audit-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:1605-1612. [PMID: 32192792 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate differences in postoperative outcomes between short-course radiotherapy and delayed surgery (SCRT-delay) and chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). BACKGROUND Previous trials suggest that SCRT-delay could serve as an adequate neoadjuvant treatment for LARC. Therefore, in frail LARC patients SCRT-delay is recommended as an alternative to CRT. However, data on postoperative outcomes after SCRT-delay in comparison to CRT is scarce. METHODS This was an observational study with data from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit (DCRA). LARC patients who underwent surgery (2014-2017) after an interval of ≥6 weeks were included. Missing values were replaced by multiple imputation. Propensity score matching (PSM), using age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, cT-stage and surgical procedure, was applied to create comparable groups. Differences in postoperative outcomes were analyzed using Chi-square test for categorical variables, independent sample t-test for continuous variables and Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric data. RESULTS 2926 patients were included. In total, 288 patients received SCRT-delay and 2638 patients underwent CRT. Patients in the SCRT-delay group were older and had more comorbidities. Also, ICU-admissions and permanent colostomies were more common, as well as pulmonic, cardiologic, infectious and neurologic complications. After PSM, both groups comprised 246 patients with equivalent age, comorbidities and tumor stage. There were no differences in postoperative complications. CONCLUSION Postoperative complications were not increased in LARC patients undergoing SCRT-delay as neoadjuvant treatment. Regarding treatment-related complications, SCRT-delay is a safe alternative neoadjuvant treatment option for frail LARC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hoendervangers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - C L Sparreboom
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J F Lange
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle a/d Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - P G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle a/d Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kane C, Glynne-Jones R. Should we favour the use of 5 × 5 preoperative radiation in rectal cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2019; 81:101908. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.101908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
12
|
Phase 1 Study of Neoadjuvant Short-Course Radiation Therapy Concurrent With Infusional 5-Fluorouracil for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol 2019; 4:605-612. [PMID: 31673654 PMCID: PMC6817539 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Revised: 04/19/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant short-course radiation therapy (RT) concurrent with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods and Materials Patients with cT3-4 or N + rectal adenocarcinoma based on ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging were prospectively enrolled in this study. Study treatment consisted of continuous infusion 5-FU combined with short-course RT (5 Gy x 5 fractions) followed by 4 cycles of mFOLFOX, total mesorectal excision (TME), and 6 cycles of adjuvant mFOLFOX. To mitigate the potential added toxicity from concurrent 5-FU, intensity modulated RT was used. Using the continual reassessment method, the dose of 5-FU was escalated from 100 to a maximum-tolerated dose of 200 mg/m2/d. Results Fourteen patients were accrued. All patients completed continuous infusion 5-FU and short-course RT and the 5-FU dose was safely escalated to 200 mg/m2/d with no dose-limiting toxicity. Thirteen patients received the neoadjuvant mFOLFOX, and only 1 patient went straight to surgery after chemoradiation. Clinical response was 21% complete, 63% partial, 14% stable disease, and no patients had progression. Three patients with cCR had negative biopsies and did not have TME. Pathologic response was 64% partial response and 14% stable disease. No patients had pathologic progression. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were cytopenias. The most common grade 1 and 2 toxicities were cytopenia, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea. Conclusions Our findings suggest that concurrent chemotherapy with neoadjuvant short-course RT is feasible and can be safely given with concurrent continuous infusion 5-FU. This works adds to the growing evidence that short-course RT is not only equivalent to long-course RT, but also may provide additional benefits, such as allowing for a transition to full dose systemic therapy in the neoadjuvant setting, selective organ preservation in complete responders, and providing a more convenient and cost-effective way of delivering pelvic RT.
Collapse
|
13
|
Comparison of pathological complete response rates after neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy or chemoradiation followed by delayed surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44:1013-1017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
|
14
|
Aghili M, Sotoudeh S, Ghalehtaki R, Babaei M, Farazmand B, Fazeli MS, Keshvari A, Haddad P, Farhan F. Preoperative short course radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation chemotherapies followed by delayed surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer: preliminary results. Radiat Oncol J 2018; 36:17-24. [PMID: 29621870 PMCID: PMC5903358 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2017.00185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2017] [Revised: 10/15/2017] [Accepted: 10/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess complications and outcomes of a new approach, that is, combining short course radiotherapy (SRT), concurrent and consolidative chemotherapies, and delayed surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this single arm phase II prospective clinical trial, patients with T3-4 or N+ M0 rectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Patients who received induction chemotherapy or previous pelvic radiotherapy were excluded. Study protocol consisted of three-dimensional conformal SRT (25 Gy in 5 fractions in 1 week) with concurrent and consolidation chemotherapies including capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Total mesorectal excision was done at least 8 weeks after the last fraction of radiotherapy. Primary outcome was complete pathologic response and secondary outcomes were treatment related complications. RESULTS Thirty-three patients completed the planned preoperative chemoradiation and 26 of them underwent surgery (24 low anterior resection and 2 abdominoperineal resection). Acute proctitis grades 2 and 3 were seen in 11 (33.3%) and 7 (21.2%) patients, respectively. There were no grades 3 and 4 subacute hematologic and non-hematologic (genitourinary and peripheral neuropathy) toxicities and perioperative morbidities such as anastomose leakage. Grade 2 or higher late toxicities were observed among 29.6% of the patients. Complete pathologic response was achieved in 8 (30.8%) patients who underwent surgery. The 3-year overall survival and local control rates were 65% and 94%, respectively. CONCLUSION This study showed that SRT combined with concurrent and consolidation chemotherapies followed by delayed surgery is not only feasible and tolerable without significant toxicity but also, associated with promising complete pathologic response rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahdi Aghili
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sarvazad Sotoudeh
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Ghalehtaki
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Babaei
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Borna Farazmand
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad-Sadegh Fazeli
- Colorectal Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amir Keshvari
- Colorectal Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Peiman Haddad
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farshid Farhan
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee SW, Lee JH, Lee IK, Oh ST, Kim DY, Kim TH, Oh JH, Baek JY, Chang HJ, Park HC, Kim HC, Chie EK, Nam TK, Jang HS. The Impact of Surgical Timing on Pathologic Tumor Response after Short Course and Long Course Preoperative Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res Treat 2017; 50:1039-1050. [PMID: 29161802 PMCID: PMC6056970 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2017.252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose A pooled analysis of multi-institutional trials was performed to analyze the effect of surgical timing on tumor response by comparing short course concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with long course CCRT followed by delayed surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer. Materials and Methods Three hundred patients with cT3-4N0-2 rectal adenocarcinoma were included. Long course patients from KROG 14-12 (n=150) were matched 1:1 to 150 short course patients from KROG 10-01 (NCT01129700) and KROG 11-02 (NCT01431599) according to stage, age, and other risk factors. The primary endpoint was to determine the interval between surgery and the last day of neoadjuvant CCRT which yields the best tumor response after the short course and long course CCRT. Downstaging was defined as ypT0-2N0M0 and pathologic complete response (ypCR) was defined as ypT0N0M0, respectively. Results Both the long and short course groups achieved lowest downstaging rates at < 6 weeks (long 20% vs. short 8%) and highest downstaging rates at 6-7 weeks (long 44% vs. short 40%). The ypCR rates were lowest at < 6 weeks (both long and short 0%) and highest at 6-7 weeks (long 21% vs. short 11%) in both the short and long course arms. The downstaging and ypCR rates of long course group gradually declined after the peak at 6-7 weeks and those of the short course group trend to constantly increase afterwards. Conclusion It is optimal to perform surgery at least 6 weeks after both the short course and long course CCRT to obtain maximal tumor regression in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sea-Won Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Hoon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Kyu Lee
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Taek Oh
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dae Yong Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jae Hwan Oh
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Ji Yeon Baek
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Hee Jin Chang
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Cheol Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eui Kyu Chie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Taek-Keun Nam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Hong Seok Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|