Targeting binding partners of the CBFβ-SMMHC fusion protein for the treatment of inversion 16 acute myeloid leukemia

Cbfβ: A key regulator in skeletal stem cell differentiation, bone development, and disease

The skeletal system comprises closely related yet functionally distinct bone and cartilage tissues, regulated by a complex network of transcriptional factors and signaling molecules. Among these, core-binding factor subunit beta (Cbfβ) emerges as a critical co-transcriptional factor that stabilizes Runx proteins, playing indispensable roles in skeletal development and homeostasis. Emerging evidence from genetic mouse models has highlighted the essential role of Cbfβ in directing the lineage commitment of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their differentiation into osteoblasts and chondrocytes. Notably, Cbfβ deficiency is strongly associated with severe skeletal dysplasia, affecting both endochondral and intramembranous ossification during embryonic and postnatal development. In this review, we synthesize recent advancements in understanding the structural and molecular functions of Cbfβ, with a particular focus on its interactions with key signaling pathways, including BMP/TGF-β, Wnt/β-catenin, Hippo/YAP, and IHH/PTHrP. These pathways converge on the Cbfβ/RUNX2 complex, which orchestrates a gene expression program essential for osteogenesis, bone formation, and cartilage development. The integration of these signaling networks ensures the precise regulation of skeletal development, remodeling, and repair. Furthermore, the successful local delivery of Cbfβ to address bone abnormalities underscores its potential as a novel therapeutic target for skeletal disorders such as cleidocranial dysplasia, osteoarthritis, and bone metastases. By elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying Cbfβ function and its interactions with key signaling pathways, these insights not only advance our understanding of skeletal biology but also offer promising avenues for clinical intervention, ultimately improving outcomes for patients with skeletal disorders.

Histone deacetylase inhibitors: targeting epigenetic regulation in the treatment of acute leukemia

Acute leukemia (AL) is a rare yet perilous malignancy. Currently, the primary treatment for AL involves combination chemotherapy as the cornerstone of comprehensive measures, alongside hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as a radical approach. However, despite these interventions, mortality rates remain high, particularly among refractory/recurrent patients or elderly individuals with a poor prognosis. Acetylation, a form of epigenetic regulation, has emerged as a promising therapeutic avenue for treating AL. Recent studies have highlighted the potential of acetylation regulation as a novel treatment pathway. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) play a pivotal role in modulating the differentiation and development of tumor cells through diverse pathways, simultaneously impacting the maturation and function of lymphocytes. HDACis demonstrate promise in enhancing survival rates and achieving a complete response in both acute myeloid leukemia and acute T-lymphoblastic leukemia patients. This article provides a comprehensive review of the advancements in HDACi therapy for AL, shedding light on its potential implications for clinical practice.

Are inhibitors of histone deacetylase 8 (HDAC8) effective in hematological cancers especially acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)?

Histone deacetylase 8 (HDAC8) aberrantly deacetylates histone and non-histone proteins. These include structural maintenance of chromosome 3 (SMC3) cohesin protein, retinoic acid induced 1 (RAI1), p53, etc and thus, regulating diverse processes such as leukemic stem cell (LSC) transformation and maintenance. HDAC8, one of the crucial HDACs, affects the gene silencing process in solid and hematological cancer progressions especially on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A specific HDAC8 inhibitor PCI-34051 showed promising results against both T-cell lymphoma and AML. Here, we summarize the role of HDAC8 in hematological malignancies, especially in AML and ALL. This article also introduces the structure/function of HDAC8 and a special attention has been paid to address the HDAC8 enzyme selectivity issue in hematological cancer especially against AML and ALL.

Epigenetic Modifications in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Prognosis, Treatment, and Heterogeneity

Leukemia, specifically acute myeloid leukemia (AML), is a common malignancy that can be differentiated into multiple subtypes based on leukemogenic history and etiology. Although genetic aberrations, particularly cytogenetic abnormalities and mutations in known oncogenes, play an integral role in AML development, epigenetic processes have been shown as a significant and sometimes independent dynamic in AML pathophysiology. Here, we summarize how tumors evolve and describe AML through an epigenetic lens, including discussions on recent discoveries that include prognostics from epialleles, changes in RNA function for hematopoietic stem cells and the epitranscriptome, and novel epigenetic treatment options. We further describe the limitations of treatment in the context of the high degree of heterogeneity that characterizes acute myeloid leukemia.

Preleukemia and Leukemia-Initiating Cell Activity in inv(16) Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a collection of hematologic malignancies with specific driver mutations that direct the pathology of the disease. The understanding of the origin and function of these mutations at early stages of transformation is critical to understand the etiology of the disease and for the design of effective therapies. The chromosome inversion inv(16) is thought to arise as a founding mutation in a hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) to produce preleukemic HSCs (preL-HSCs) with myeloid bias and differentiation block, and predisposed to AML. Studies in mice and human AML cells have established that inv(16) AML follows a clonal evolution model, in which preL-HSCs expressing the fusion protein CBFβ–SMMHC persist asymptomatic in the bone marrow. The emerging leukemia-initiating cells (LICs) are composed by the inv(16) and a heterogeneous set of mutations. In this review, we will discuss the current understanding of inv(16) preleukemia development, and the function of CBFβ–SMMHC related to preleukemia progression and LIC activity. We also discuss important open mechanistic questions in the etiology of inv(16) AML.

Myeloid neoplasms with concurrent BCR-ABL1 and CBFB rearrangements: A series of 10 cases of a clinically aggressive neoplasm

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is defined by the presence of t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)/BCR-ABL1. Additional chromosomal abnormalities confer an adverse prognosis and are particularly common in the blast phase of CML (CML-BP). CBFB rearrangement, particularly CBFB-MYH11 fusion resulting from inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22), is an acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-defining alteration that is associated with a favorable outcome. The co-occurrence of BCR-ABL1 and CBFB rearrangement is extremely rare, and the significance of this finding remains unclear. We identified 10 patients with myeloid neoplasms harboring BCR-ABL1 and CBFB rearrangement. The study group included six men and four women with a median age of 51 years (range, 20-71 years). The sequence of molecular alterations could be determined in nine cases: BCR-ABL1 preceded CBFB rearrangement in seven, CBFB rearrangement preceded BCR-ABL1 in one, and both alterations were discovered simultaneously in one patient. BCR-ABL1 encoded for p210 kD in all cases in which BCR-ABL1 preceded CBFB rearrangement; a p190 kD was identified in the other three cases. Two patients were treated with the FLAG-IDA regimen (fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin, and G-CSF) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI); seven with other cytarabine-based regimens and TKIs, and one with ponatinib alone. At last follow up (median, 16 months; range 2-85), 7 of 10 patients had died. The co-existence of BCR-ABL1 and CBFB rearrangement is associated with poor outcome and a clinical course similar to that of CML-BP, and unlike de novo AML with CBFB rearrangement, suggesting that high-intensity chemotherapy with TKI should be considered in these patients.